| Literature DB >> 34277917 |
Alexander N Rose1, Emrullah Yilmaz2, John R Durkin3.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; cemiplimab; immunotherapy; intravascular; skin cancer; squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 34277917 PMCID: PMC8267435 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.06.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAAD Case Rep ISSN: 2352-5126
Fig 1A, An ill-defined, purple, bruise-like plaque associated with some fullness was present on majority of the left cheek. B, Initial shave biopsy (hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification: ×20.)
Fig 2A, Hematoxylin-eosin–stained image (original magnification: ×4) from the punch biopsy shows the effacement of the rete ridges, marked solar elastosis, and some sparse perivascular and lymphohistiocytic infiltrate. There are some dilated dermal vessels containing some pink pleomorphic and hyperchromatic cells. The intravascular cells were positive for P40, P16, and CK5 and negative for Ber-EP4, TTF-1, CD45, Sox-10, and Erg. B, Immunohistochemical staining (original magnification: ×10) positive for p40, confined within the vessel. Ber-EP4, Epithelial cell adhesion molecule; CD45, cluster of differentiation 45; CK5, cytokeratin 5; ERG, ETS-related gene; TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor 1; Sox-10, SRY-related HMG-box 10.
Fig 3A, Positron emission tomography—computed tomography (PET/CT) scan fails to identify a primary lesion. B, Five months following the start of cemiplimab treatment.