| Literature DB >> 34277702 |
Xianqiang Li1, Yue Wu1, Rui Zhang1, Wei Bai1, Tiantian Ye1, Shujun Wang1.
Abstract
Over the past five years, oxygen-based nanocarriers (NCs) to boost anti-tumor therapy attracted tremendous attention from basic research and clinical practice. Indeed, tumor hypoxia, caused by elevated proliferative activity and dysfunctional vasculature, is directly responsible for the less effectiveness or ineffective of many conventional therapeutic modalities. Undeniably, oxygen-generating NCs and oxygen-carrying NCs can increase oxygen concentration in the hypoxic area of tumors and have also been shown to have the ability to decrease the expression of drug efflux pumps (e.g., P-gp); to increase uptake by tumor cells; to facilitate the generation of cytotoxic reactive oxide species (ROS); and to evoke systematic anti-tumor immune responses. However, there are still many challenges and limitations that need to be further improved. In this review, we first discussed the mechanisms of tumor hypoxia and how it severely restricts the therapeutic efficacy of clinical treatments. Then an up-to-date account of recent progress in the fabrications of oxygen-generating NCs and oxygen-carrying NCs are systematically introduced. The improved physicochemical and surface properties of hypoxia alleviating NCs for increasing the targeting ability to hypoxic cells are also elaborated with special attention to the latest nano-technologies. Finally, the future directions of these NCs, especially towards clinical translation, are proposed. Therefore, we expect to provide some valued enlightenments and proposals in engineering more effective oxygen-based NCs in this promising field in this comprehensive overview.Entities:
Keywords: nanocarriers; nanoenzyme; oxygen; tumor hypoxia; tumor therapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34277702 PMCID: PMC8281198 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.683519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of chronic and acute hypoxia of tumors. (A): Regions of chronic hypoxia and necrosis are usually 100∼150 and ∼180 μm away from blood vessels. (B): Areas of acute hypoxia can develop as a result of the temporary blockade or reduced flow in certain vessels.
Typical pO2 of major tumors and respective normal tissue/organ.
| Tissue/Organ | Tumor pO2 (mmHg) | Normal pO2 (mmHg) | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gliocyte | 2.9∼4.9 | ND |
|
| Lung | 7.5 | 38.5 |
|
| Pancreas | 2.7 | 51.6 |
|
| Prostate | 2.4 | 30.0 |
|
| Skin | 11.6 | 40.5 |
|
| Brain | 13 | 35 |
|
| Breast | 10∼12 | 50∼65 |
|
| Head and neck | 12.2∼14.7 | 40.0∼51.2 |
|
| Cervix | 3.0∼5.0 | 51.0 |
|
| Vulva | 10∼13 | ND |
|
| Kidney | 5.02 ± 1.12 | 35.08 ± 2.41 |
|
| Liver | 0.8 | 4.0∼7.3 |
|
| Recta | 19 | 52 |
|
Note: Median tumor pO2
Mean tumor pO2
ND: Not determined.
FIGURE 2Schematic diagram of oxygen-generating strategies and oxygen-carrying strategies for tumor hypoxia relief: varieties, advantages, and disadvantages.
FIGURE 3Tumor hypoxia-related publications over the 4 decades from the core collection of Web of Science. The blue line, yellow line, and red line represent data using the keywords of “tumor” and “oxygen”, “tumor” and “hypoxia”, and “tumor” and “oxygen”, and “nano”, respectively (update to Dec 31, 2020).
Hypoxic TME regulates miRNAs expression to induce CMT resistance.
| miRNA | Regulation | Biological actions | Drugs | Tumors | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-488 | Up | Direct targeted bim | DOX | Osteosarcoma |
|
| miR-301b | Up | Suppressed bim expression | DOX | Lung cancer |
|
| miR-497 | Up | Targeted PDCD4 | TMZ | Glioma |
|
| miR-424 | UP | Suppressed PDCD4 protein | DOX, EP | Colon cancer, melanoma |
|
| miR-421 | Up | Targeted E-cadherin and caspase-3 | CDDP | Gastric cancer |
|
| miR-26a | Up | Protected response to mitochondrion | TMZ | Glioblastoma multiforme |
|
| miR-301a | Up | Reduced TAp63 and PTEN level | GEM | Pancreatic cancer |
|
| miR-338–3p | Down | Regulated HIF-1α | SOR | Hepatocarcinoma |
|
| miR-338–5p | Down | Regulated feedback circuit | OX | Colorectal cancer |
|
| miR-224–3p | Down | Regulated hypoxia induced autophagy | TMZ | Glioblastoma, astrocytoma |
|
Oxygen generating NCs to modulate tumor hypoxia for enhanced anti-tumor therapy.
| Design | Size (nm) | Oxygenation efficacy | Therapies |
| Mechanisms | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT-based NCs | ||||||
| TaOx@CAT NPs functionalized with PEG | ∼119 | Hypoxia positive areas reduced from 65 to 15% | RT | >95% | Increased radiation-induced DNA damage |
|
| Liposomes containing CAT and cisplatin-prodrug | ∼100 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from76.9 to 11.45% | CMT-RT | ∼85% | Induced high level of DNA damage |
|
| Liposomes encapsulating CAT, MBDP and DOX | ∼122 | Hypoxia positive regions reduced from 20 to 12% | PDT-CMT | >95% | Facilitated 1O2 production, improved immune response |
|
| HSA-based NPs loaded CAT, PTX, and Ce6 | ∼100 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 32 to 7% | PDT-CMT | ∼80% | Increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| PLGA-based NPs loaded CAT, MB and BHQ-3 | ∼205 | The intracellular O2 levels increased gradually | PDT | ∼100% | Induced the formation of cytotoxic 1O2 |
|
| HA-based NPs loaded CAT and Ce6 | ∼233 | Retained more than 90% of CAT enzymatic activity | PDT | ∼85% | Enhanced the production of 1O2 |
|
| Cell membrane loaded ZIF-8, CAT and DOX | ∼130 | Mixing it with 10 × 106 M H2O2 can increase 15 mg/L O2 in 400 s | CMT-IMT | ∼100% | Reduced the expression of HIF-α and PD-L1 |
|
| MnO2-based NCs | ||||||
| MnO2 nanosheets anchored upconversion nanoprobes | 100∼200 | Enhanced tumor vascular saturated O2 about 6 times | PDT-RT | >95% | Boosted the kinetics of 1O2 generation |
|
| NPs composed of albumin and MnO2 | ∼50 | Tumor hypoxic area decreased by 24%, 45% within 30 min, 60 min | RT | ∼70% | Increased DNA double strand breaks |
|
| HA-coated MnO2 NPs loaded DOX | ∼203 | The percentage of hypoxia areas decreased by 64.5% | CMT-IMT | ∼50% | Primed TAMs toward m1-like phenotype |
|
| HA-modified NPs loaded MnO2 and ICG | ∼240 | Oxygen content in the tumor elevated about 2.25 times | PDT | ∼100% | Facilitated 1O2 production, reducing HIF-α expression |
|
| HSA-coated MnO2 NPs loaded Ce6 and Pt (IV) | ∼50 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 33 to 9% | PDT-CMT | ∼90% | Enhanced drug uptake and 1O2 production |
|
| PEGylated MnO2 NPs containing Ce6 | ∼100 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 36 to 12% within 12 h and to 4% within 24 h | PDT | ∼80% | Increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| MnO2 based NPs containing of WS2, Fe3O4, SiO2 and PEG | ∼182 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 43 to 10% within 12 h and to 3% within 24 h | PTT-RT | >90% | Generated a high level of DNA damage |
|
| BSA-Au-MnO2 composite NPs | ∼60 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 20 to 2% | RT | ∼90% | Improved the susceptibility of tumor cells to X-ray |
|
| PEGylated hollow MnO2 nanoshells containing Ce6 and DOX | ∼15 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 41 to 10% within 6 h and to 6% within 12 h | CMT-PDT | >80% | Reversed the immunosuppressive TME |
|
| Radionuclide131I labeled HSA-bound MnO2 NPs | ∼40 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from 35 to 10% | RT | ∼90% | Promoted DNA damages |
|
| RBC membrane composed MnO2, PB, and DOX | ∼67 | Relieved tumor hypoxia situation | PTT-CMT | ∼100% | Enhanced anti-tumor drug uptake |
|
| UCNPs@TiO2@MnO2 core/shell/sheet NCs | ∼80 | Increased the dissolved O2 about 30 mg/L within 20 min | PDT | ∼100% | Increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| MnO2-based hybrid semiconducting NPs | 40∼76 | Triggered about 2.5 mg/L O2 in the H2O2 solution within 10 min | PDT | >90% | Generated 2.68-fold more 1O2 at hypoxic TME |
|
| MnO2 functionalized albumin bound PTX NPs | ∼140 | Tumor O2 concentration was 50 μM after intratumoral injection | CMT-RT | 96.57% | Stabilized DNA damages |
|
| MnO2 coated SiO2-MB nanocomposites | ∼300 | Elevation of O2 concentration in the H2O2 solution within 4 min | PDT | >90% | Promoted the kinetics of 1O2 generation |
|
| Core-shell gold nanocage coated with MnO2 | ∼91 | The percentage of hypoxia areas dramatically disappeared | PDT-IMT | ∼100% | Promoted 1O2 production, elicited immune cell death |
|
| DSPE-PEG 2000 modified MnO2 based NPs | ∼110 | Improved the dissolved O2 about 20 mg/L within 10 min | PDT | >95% | Increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| MnO2 based NPs loaded DOX, g-C3N4 and F127 | ∼78 | Triggered about 16 mg/L O2 in the H2O2 solution within 3 min | CMT-PDT | ∼100% | Increased 1O2 generation and allayed DOX resistance |
|
| MnO2-hollow mesoporous organsilica NPs | ∼90 | Improved the dissolved O2 about 7 mg/L within 1 min | SDT | ∼96% | Promoted 1O2 production, reduced HIF-α expression |
|
| MnO2-PEGylated black phosphorous nanosheet | ∼120 | The percentage of hypoxia areas were decreased | PDT | ∼100% | Enhanced 1O2 generation, reduced HIF-α expression |
|
| MnO2-loaded, BSA and PEG co-modified mesoporous CaSiO3 NPs | ∼110 | The O2 saturation inside tumors increased from 3 to 20% within 24 h | CMT | ∼95% | Increased chemodrug uptake by tumor cells |
|
| Pt based NCs | ||||||
| Pt based NCs containing of MPDA, BSA, Ce6 and DOX | ∼140 | The dissolved O2 increased more than 20 mg/L within 120 s | PDT-CMT | ∼100% | Increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| Pt based hybrid core-shell NCs | ∼200 | Enhanced the dissolved O2 about 50 mg/L within 25 min | PDT | >90% | Enhanced the production of the cytotoxic ROS |
|
| Pt and Pd nanoplates modified with PEG and conjugated with Ce6 | ∼30 | Effectively decomposed intracellular H2O2 into oxygen | PDT | ∼100% | Promoted the generation of the cytotoxic ROS |
|
| Pt NPs decorated MOFs | ∼90 | Promoted H2O2 to O2 conversion by the presence of Pt NPs | PDT | >90% | Increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| PEGylated porous Pt NPs | ∼116 | Well relieved the tumor cell hypoxia situation | RT | ∼90% | Decreased RT resistance by promoting O2 generation |
|
| Fe-based NCs | ||||||
| Fe-TBP nanorice co-assembly of MOFs | ∼100 | Effectively catalyzed H2O2 into oxygen | PDT-IMT | >90% | Improved a-PD-L1 therapy increased 1O2 generation |
|
| Mn-Fe NP anchored mesoporous silica NPs | ∼56 | Tumor O2 saturation increased from 1.5 ± 0.2% to 12.6 ± 1.9% | PDT | >90% | Improved ROS generation |
|
| PEG modified liposome loaded holo-Lf and DOX | ∼180 | Hypoxia positive regions decreased from 60.2 to 17.3% | RT-CMT | ∼100% | Strengthened the cell DNA damage |
|
| Ce-based NCs | ||||||
| Lanthanide ion-doped mesoporous hollow cerium oxide upconversion NPs | ∼160 | Tumor blood oxygen saturation increased from 6.9 to 19.2% in 100 min | PDT-CMT | ∼90% | Enhanced the drug uptake, potentiated ROS-mediated cytotoxicity |
|
| Ce-based NCs comprising of DOX | ∼48 | The quantity of oxygen produced reaches 2.06 mg/L and 1.32 mg/L in H2O2 solution within 30 min | PDT-CMT | ∼90% | Increased the DOX uptake, boosted ROS-mediated cytotoxicity |
|
Oxygen carrying NCs to modulate tumor hypoxia for enhanced anti-tumor therapy.
| Design | Size (nm) | Oxygenation efficacy | Therapies |
| Mechanisms | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFCs-based NCs | ||||||
| PFC-loaded hollow Fe3O4 magnetic nanoplatform | ∼13 | Hypoxia positive areas decreased from ∼78 to ∼18% | CMT | ∼85% | Alleviated the hypoxia induced CMT resistance |
|
| PFTBA@HSA NPs | 150∼200 | Enhanced tumor relative oxygen pressure from 90 to 220% | CMT | >80% | Enhanced the hypoxia associated cytotoxic |
|
| Albumin-based NPs loaded PFC and HSA | ∼150 | Relieved short-term and long-term tumor hypoxia | RT | ∼90% | Promoted radiation-induced cell damage |
|
| PFP-based PLGA NPs loaded ICG and PTX | ∼186 | Relieved tumor cell hypoxia situation | PDT-SDT, CMT | ∼80% | Decreased the expression of MDR-1 |
|
| PFOB-based nanoemulsion | ∼197 | The oxygen level increased from 62.8 to 83.5% | CMT | ∼75% | Reduced hypoxia-induced CMT resistance |
|
| Hb-based NCs | ||||||
| Hb loaded nanoliposome loaded DOX | ∼151 | Effectively alleviated hypoxic state both | CMT | ∼70% | Enhanced ROS-mediated cytotoxicity |
|
| Hb and albumin NPs loaded DOX and Ce6 | ∼30 | Modulated tumor hypoxia by donating bound oxygen deep in the tumor | CMT-PDT | 89.5% | Decreased the expression of P-gp and MDR-1, increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| Hb connected with Ce6 NPs with SOR | ∼175 | Well relieved tumor hypoxia situation | PDT | >90% | Boosted ROS generation and enhanced the ferroptosis |
|
| ZnF16 Pc-loaded ferritin RBC | ∼7,000 | Provided O2 to enable sustained 1O2 production under hypoxia | PDT | 76.7% | Continuous increased the production of 1O2 |
|
| RBC microcarriers | ∼7,000 | The oxygenated Hb percentage | PDT | >90% | Effectively promoted the generation of 1O2 |
|
| MOFs-based NCs | ||||||
| UiO-66 MOF conjugated with ICG and coated with RBC membranes | ∼65 | Obviously elevated oxygen level in tumors | PDT | ∼100% | Enhanced the production of the cytotoxic ROS |
|
| Mesoporous silica coated ZIF-90 | ∼120 | Released a large amount of O2 in an acidic TME | PDT-CMT | ∼90% | Increased cytotoxic of DOX and 1O2 generation |
|
| Increasing intratumoral blood flow | ||||||
| MnSe@Bi2Se3 NPs | ∼140 | Reduced the hypoxic level in almost the whole tumor | RT | ∼90% | Improved blood flow into tumors |
|
| MoS2 based NPs | ∼21 | Relieved tumor hypoxia through hyperthermia | PTT-RT | ∼95% | Enhanced tumor blood flow under hyperthermia |
|
| Decreasing intratumoral oxygen consumption | ||||||
| Met-based PEGylated liposomes loaded Ce6 | ∼110 | Oxyhemoglobin saturation increased from 14.6 to 30.1% | PDT | >75% | Decreased oxygen consumption to promote 1O2 generation |
|
| Met and W18O49 NPs co-loaded into platelet membranes | ∼115 | Almost no detectable hypoxia signal in tumors | PDT-PTT | ∼90% | Decreased oxygen consumption to enhance ROS production |
|
FIGURE 4Oxygen-generating NCs to modulate tumor hypoxia and to endow magnetic resonance imaging. The specific mechanisms of oxygen generation are represented by chemical equations.
FIGURE 5Hypoxic tumor cells oxygen-based NCs delivery process, involving (A) Transport in circulation; (B) Penetrate into tumor tissue; and (C) Uptake of hypoxic tumor cell.
FIGURE 6Oxygen-based NCs boosted tumor therapies. (A) CMT: alleviated hypoxia decreased the expression of drug efflux pumps such as P-gp and increased drugs uptake by tumor cells. (B) RT: oxygen stabilized DNA damages and prevented DNA self-repair by cells. (C) PDT: oxygen enhanced the generation of ROS such as 1O2. (D) SDT: elevated ROS level enhanced DNA broken. (E) IMT: oxygen increased the number and activity of cytotoxic T cell, down-regulated the expression of important immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-L1, changed the immunosuppressive TME, tilted the polarization of TAM from the M2 phenotype to the tumor-inhibiting M1 phenotype.