| Literature DB >> 34277366 |
Daniela Zuzolo1, Rosaria Sciarrillo1, Alessia Postiglione1, Carmine Guarino1.
Abstract
A full-scale mesocosm study was conducted to depict how integrated biological systems interact to adapt to contaminant stress and improve remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)contaminated soils. The combination of Verbascum sinuatum L. and microbial consortium (fungi and bacteria) was employed along with three differently contaminated soils. After 240 days the highest PAHs removal (up to 68 %) and 6-rings compounds decrease was found in soil with lower pollution and cation exchange capacity. V. sinuatum showed a significant adaptability over time in terms of redox biology. Soil enzyme activities and microscopic evidences proved a rising plant-microorganisms association and a successful mycorrhization, arising from the inoculation of our consortia. In addition, an enhanced richness of PAHs degrading genes was achieved. Microbial co-metabolism, helped by the establishment of complex relationships with hosting plant, demonstrated to be suitable for the degradation of high molecular weight PAHs and represents a biotechnology with great prospects.Entities:
Keywords: Bioremediation; Mesocosm experiment; Microbial consortium treatment; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Verbascum sinuatum L.
Year: 2021 PMID: 34277366 PMCID: PMC8264111 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Fig. 1Comparison of PAHs pattern of A3 soil: (A) concentration levels at the beginning (T0) and at the end (TF) and removal performance of the phytoremediation system; (B) congener's profiles of PAHs at the beginning (T0) and at the end (TF).
Fig. 2Comparison of PAHs pattern of A4 soil: (A) concentration levels at the beginning (T0) and at the end (TF) and removal performance of the phytoremediation system; (B) congener's profiles of PAHs at the beginning (T0) and at the end (TF).
Fig. 3Comparison of PAHs pattern of A6 soil: (A) concentration levels at the beginning (T0) and at the end (TF) and removal performance of the phytoremediation system; (B) congener's profiles of PAHs at the beginning (T0) and at the end (TF).
Fig. 4Mycorrhization of Verbascum sinuatum L. grown in mesocosm experiment (sampled at TF). Roots are detected by Trypan Blue staining and light microscopy (using Vohník et al., 2016 protocol). (A) Intracellular vescicles (v)and extracellular spores (s); (B) external hypae (eh) and extraradical spores (s); (C) external hypae forming an extraradical mycelium (em); (D) external hypae (eh), entry point with appressorium (ap) formation, coiled hypae (ch); (E) intraradical hypae running through, parallel to the root axis and spreading forming an intraradical mycelium (im); (F) vesicles (v) and internal hypae (ih); (G) roots completely filled up with vesicles (v); (H)vescicles and intraradical mycelium (im); (I–L) Arbuscular mycorrhiza (ar) in root fragments often completely filling the root cells; central cilinder (cc).
Enzymatic activities (DHO, PPO, ALP, URE and CAT) in mesocosm soil of three subareas (A3, A4 and A6) at different times: T0, 60 days (T1), 120 days (T2) and 240 days (TF). Mean (3 replicates) ± ES is shown. Different letters indicate significant difference between experimental times at the level of P < 0.05.
| Sample | DHO (µgTPFg-1min-1) | PPO [m/(mg g-1soil 2h-1)] | ALP [m(phenol)/(mg g-1soil 24h-1)] | URE [mNH3-N)/(mg g-1soil 24h-1)] | CAT (ml 0.1 mol/l KMnO4/g/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A3_T0 | 9.1±0.05a | 0.18±0.01a | 0.023±0.001a | 0.33±0.02a | 0.89±0.05a |
| A3_T1 | 11.9±0.08b | 0.21±0.02ab | 0.026±0.001b | 0.39±0.01b | 1.1±0.07b |
| A3_T2 | 13.1±0.06b | 0.29±0.01b | 0.028±0.001bc | 0.41±0.02b | 2.41±0.06c |
| A3_Tf | 14.6±0.08b | 0.28±0.01b | 0.029±0.001c | 0.44±0.03b | 2.44±0.05c |
| A4_T0 | 7.5±0.05a | 0.22±0.02a | 0.021±0.001a | 0.28±0.01a | 0.78±0.01a |
| A4_T1 | 10.3±0.06b | 0.27±0.01ab | 0.026±0.001b | 0.32±0.02b | 1.32±0.04b |
| A4_T2 | 12.2±0.05b | 0.26±0.01b | 0.027±0.001bc | 0.37±0.05b | 2.37±0.03c |
| A4_Tf | 15±0.04b | 0.23±0.02b | 0.028±0.0001c | 0.4±0.05b | 3.4±0.01c |
| A6_T0 | 7.1±0.02a | 0.17±0.01a | 0.019±0.001a | 0.32±0.01a | 0.99±0.01a |
| A6_T1 | 9.2±0.04b | 0.18±0.01ab | 0.024±0.001b | 0.34±0.02b | 2.34±0.05b |
| A6_T2 | 10.4±0.05b | 0.21±0.05b | 0.026±0.001bc | 0.39±0.0b | 2.39±0.03c |
| A6_Tf | 12.7±0.08b | 0.28±0.01b | 0.026±0.001c | 0.41±0.01b | 2.41±0.02c |
Activity of SOD, CAT, GPX and APX, GST, PAL, Proline content and MDA in leaves of Verbascum sinuatum L. at different times: 60 days (T1), 120 days (T2) and 240 days (TF). Mean (3 replicates) ± ES is shown. Different letters indicate significant difference between experimental times at the level of P < 0.05.
| Sample | SOD (Umg/protein) | CAT (nmol H2O2 mg−1 protein min−1) | APX (nmol ascorbate mg−1 protein min−1) | GPX (nmol guaiacol mg−1 protein min−1) | GST (µM/min/µg protein) | PAL (µg t-cinnamic acid/h/µg protein) | PROLINE content (µmol g fw) | MDA (µmol/g fw) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A3_T1 | 88.45±2.50a | 141.12±9.0a | 258.48±15a | 81.19±2.90a | 101.87±3.5a | 89.88±2a | 258.98±2.5a | 106.46±5a |
| A3_T2 | 75.46±2.66 ab | 128.34±8ab | 236.51±7.0ab | 75±3.50ab | 93.28±1.50a | 81.35±1.90ab | 256.47±2.9a | 104.37±4ab |
| A3_TF | 61.11±3.01b* | 112.65±7.0b | 187.25±5.0b | 70±4.50b | 81.26±2.30b | 78.27±3.0b | 222.87±2.5b | 101.38±2.5b |
| A4_T1 | 44.23±1.51a | 106.14±10a | 210.16±10a | 79±6.50a | 116.34±2.0a | 33.56±1.78a | 233.45±11a | 81.23±2a |
| A4_T2 | 40.21±1.01ab | 98.65±5.6ab | 196.37±4.9ab | 75±4.0ab | 111.47±2.5a | 33.21±1.55ab | 221.47±9a | 79.27±2ab |
| A4_TF | 36.54±1.11b | 95.56±4.50b | 176.26±3.9b | 59±2.50b | 89.46±1.5b | 30.26±1.70b | 210.01±8b | 76.82±3b |
| A6_T1 | 64.14±1.90a | 123.14±10a | 219.38±10a | 65±2.50a | 101.35±10a | 28.45±1.90a | 248.56±11a | 86.45±4a |
| A6_T2 | 53.11±1.78ab | 112.5±11ab | 233.26±11ab | 56±2.0ab | 98.45±3.5a | 27.46±1.55ab | 244.59±9.5a | 82.48±3ab |
| A6_TF | 51.13±1.23b | 103.45±10b | 220.49±15b | 51±2.0b | 85.31±3.0b | 25.28±1.45b | 220.37±2.5b | 78.26±3.5b |
Fig. 5PAHs degrading genes from soil metagenomes. (A) Abundance of PAHs degrading genes before and after the experiment. (B) Relative increment of observed gene encoding for PAHs degradation.