| Literature DB >> 34277155 |
Xue Chen1,2, Linling Jiang3, Yi Liu3, Hailiang Ran1, Runxu Yang3, Xiufeng Xu3, Jin Lu3, Yuanyuan Xiao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood maltreatment could increase the risk of suicidal ideation (SI) in adolescents. However, the mediation of resilience in this association remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Childhood maltreatment; Resilience; Suicidal ideation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34277155 PMCID: PMC8269734 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1The process for sampling and study participants selection.
Major characteristics of the study participants, Lincang, China, 2019.
| Features | SI | Non-SI | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender ( | 697 (63.89) | 1,012 (49.25) | 1,709 (54.32) |
| Age (Mean (SE)) | 13.74 (0.06) | 13.09 (0.05) | 13.31 (0.04) |
| Ethnicity ( | |||
| Han | 728 (66.73) | 1,384 (67.35) | 2,112 (67.13) |
| Yi | 127 (11.64) | 238 (11.58) | 365 (11.60) |
| Dai | 82 (7.52) | 128 (6.23) | 210 (6.68) |
| Other | 154 (14.12) | 305 (14.84) | 459 (14.59) |
| Residence ( | |||
| Township | 491 (45.00) | 1,026 (49.93) | 1,517 (48.22) |
| Village | 600 (55.00) | 1,029 (50.07) | 1,629 (51.78) |
| Grade ( | |||
| Primary school | 300 (27.50) | 832 (40.49) | 1,132 (35.98) |
| Junior high school | 378 (34.64) | 691 (33.63) | 1,069 (34.00) |
| Senior high school | 413 (37.86) | 532 (25.89) | 945 (30.04) |
| Study style ( | |||
| Day students | 368 (33.73) | 913 (44.43) | 1,281 (40.72) |
| Boarding students | 723 (66.27) | 1,142 (55.57) | 1,865 (59.28) |
| Father’s age (Mean (SE)) | 42.76 (0.18) | 42.02 (0.13) | 42.27 (0.10) |
| Mother’s age (Mean (SE)) | 39.94 (0.16) | 39.25 (0.11) | 39.49 (0.09) |
| Father’s education level ( | |||
| Elementary school and below | 343 (31.44) | 542 (26.37) | 885 (28.13) |
| Junior high school and above | 633 (58.02) | 1,299 (63.21) | 1,932 (61.41) |
| Mother’s education level ( | |||
| Elementary school and below | 401 (36.76) | 676 (32.90) | 1,077 (34.23) |
| Junior high school and above | 617 (56.55) | 1,199 (58.35) | 1,816 (57.72) |
| Marital status of the parents ( | |||
| Married | 909 (83.32) | 1,797 (87.45) | 2,706 (86.01) |
| Divorced | 87 (7.97) | 130 (6.33) | 217 (6.90) |
| Re-married | 62 (5.68) | 78 (3.80) | 140 (4.50) |
| Widowed | 33 (3.02) | 47 (2.29) | 80 (2.54) |
| Family income ( | |||
| Stable | 981 (89.92) | 1,926 (93.72) | 2,907 (92.40) |
| Unstable | 108 (9.90) | 128 (6.23) | 236 (7.50) |
| Childhood maltreatment (CTQ sores, Mean (SE)) | |||
| Emotional abuse | 8.66 (0.11) | 6.33 (0.04) | 7.13 (0.05) |
| Physical abuse | 6.59 (0.08) | 5.82 (0.04) | 6.09 (0.04) |
| Sexual abuse | 5.54 (0.05) | 5.22 (0.02) | 5.33 (0.02) |
| Emotional neglect | 11.75 (0.15) | 9.43 (0.09) | 10.23 (0.08) |
| Physical neglect | 8.03 (0.09) | 6.83 (0.05) | 7.25 (0.05) |
| Resilience (RSCA scores, Mean (SE)) | |||
| Combined score | 84.29 (0.46) | 98.96 (0.34) | 93.87 (0.30) |
| Goal concentration (Dimension 1) | 15.48 (0.14) | 18.12 (0.11) | 17.21 (0.09) |
| Emotional regulation (Dimension 2) | 17.58 (0.16) | 23.02 (0.11) | 21.14 (0.10) |
| Positive perception (Dimension 3) | 13.20 (0.11) | 13.78 (0.09) | 13.58 (0.07) |
| Family support (Dimension 4) | 19.67 (0.11) | 21.36 (0.08) | 20.78 (0.06) |
| Interpersonal assistance (Dimension 5) | 18.36 (0.17) | 22.67 (0.11) | 21.18 (0.10) |
Notes.
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
Suicidal ideation
the combined score of Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents
Results of multivariate regression models for associated factors of SI.
| Covariates | Multivariate 1 | Multivariate 2 | Multivariate 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Age (+1 year) | 1.12 (1.04, 1.20) | 1.12 (1.04, 1.21) | 1.11 (1.02, 1.21) |
| Father’s age (+5 years) | 1.00 (0.85, 1.19) | 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) | 1.02 (0.85, 1.23) |
| Mother’s age (+5 years) | 1.08 (0.93, 1.25) | 1.06 (0.93, 1.21) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.26) |
| Gender (Ref: Boys) | |||
| Girls | 2.09 (1.76, 2.47) | 1.96 (1.67, 2.31) | 2.07 (1.78, 2.42) |
| Grade (Ref: Primary school) | |||
| Junior high school and above | 2.15 (1.37, 3.36) | 1.70 (1.12, 2.58) | 1.91 (1.16, 3.15) |
| Study style (Ref: Day students) | |||
| Boarding students | 0.56 (0.47, 0.67) | 0.65 (0.53, 0.80) | 0.63 (0.51, 0.78) |
| Father’s education level (Ref: Elementary and below) | |||
| Junior high school and above | 0.96 (0.79, 1.16) | 1.07 (0.90, 1.27) | 1.10 (0.93, 1.29) |
| Marital status of the parents (Ref: Married) | |||
| Other | 1.48 (1.09, 2.02) | 1.62 (1.08, 2.43) | 1.52 (1.02, 2.27) |
| Childhood maltreatment (Ref: No) | |||
| Yes | 3.00 (2.45, 3.69) | 1.91 (1.51, 2.41) | |
| Resilience (Ref: RSCA scores <94) | |||
| RSCA scores ≥ 94 | 0.17 (0.14, 0.22) | 0.20 (0.16, 0.26) |
Notes.
the combined score of Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents
Figure 2Adjusted ORs with 95% CIs of SI (suicidal ideation) for types of childhood maltreatment. Adjusted for age, gender, study style, marital status of the parents, father’s education level.
Figure 3The hypothetical path model of five types of childhood maltreatment, resilience and SI.
Figure 4Proportion of mediating effect in association of EA, PA, PN and SI by different dimensions of resilience.
EA, Emotional abuse; PA, Physical abuse. PN: Physical neglect.