Literature DB >> 34277001

Clinical evaluation of RB1 genetic testing reveals novel mutations in Vietnamese patients with retinoblastoma.

Chinh Quoc Hoang1,2,3, Hong-Quan Duong2,4, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen5, Sy Anh Hao Nguyen6, Cuong Nguyen1,7, Bo Duy Nguyen8, Lan Tuyet Phung8, Dung Thuy Nguyen8, Chau Thi Minh Pham9, Trang Le Doan9, Mai Hoang Tran2,5.   

Abstract

Clinical evaluation of the genetic testing strategy is essential for ensuring the correct determination of mutation carriers. The current study retrospectively analyzed genetic and clinicopathological data from 62 Vietnamese patients with retinoblastoma (RB) referred to the Vinmec Hi-Tech Center for RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1) genetic testing between 2017 and 2019. The present study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) method to identify novel RB1 mutations, and to consider using age at diagnosis as a risk factor. Genomic DNA was analyzed with custom panel based targeted NGS. NGS was performed on the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) sequencing platform, and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing, quantitative PCR (qPCR) or Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification assay (MLPA). Constitutional RB1 variants were identified in 100% (25/25) of the bilateral cases, while several common previously reported RB1 mutations were also recorded. In addition, in Vietnamese patients with RB, nine novel RB1 mutations were identified. Children aged between 0-36 months were more likely to be RB1 carriers compared with those aged >36 months. The current findings indicated that the NGS method implemented in the Vinmec Hi-Tech Center was highly accurate, and age at diagnosis may be used to assess the risk of hereditary RB. Furthermore, the newly identified RB1 mutations may provide additional data to improve the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying RB1 inactivation and the development of rapid assays for detecting RB1 mutations. Overall, the present study suggested that NGS may be applied for detecting germline RB1 mutations in routine clinical practice.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RB transcriptional corepressor 1; next generation sequencing; novel mutations; retinoblastoma; risk-stratified factors; sensitivity

Year:  2021        PMID: 34277001      PMCID: PMC8278403          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  63 in total

Review 1.  RB1 gene mutations in retinoblastoma.

Authors:  D R Lohmann
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Helen Dimaras; Kahaki Kimani; Elizabeth A O Dimba; Peggy Gronsdahl; Abby White; Helen S L Chan; Brenda L Gallie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Simultaneous identification of clinically relevant RB1 mutations and copy number alterations in aqueous humor of retinoblastoma eyes.

Authors:  Liya Xu; Lishuang Shen; Ashley Polski; Rishvanth K Prabakar; Rachana Shah; Rima Jubran; Jonathan W Kim; Jacklyn Biegel; Peter Kuhn; David Cobrinik; James Hicks; Xiaowu Gai; Jesse L Berry
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 1.803

4.  Mutations in the retinoblastoma gene and their expression in somatic and tumor cells of patients with hereditary retinoblastoma.

Authors:  M V Kato; K Ishizaki; J Toguchida; A Kaneko; J Takayama; H Tanooka; T Kato; T Shimizu; M S Sasaki
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Targeted next generation sequencing of RB1 gene for the molecular diagnosis of Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Bharanidharan Devarajan; Logambiga Prakash; Thirumalai Raj Kannan; Aloysius A Abraham; Usha Kim; Veerappan Muthukkaruppan; Ayyasamy Vanniarajan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Classification and staging of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Ido Didi Fabian; Ashwin Reddy; Mandeep S Sagoo
Journal:  Community Eye Health       Date:  2018

7.  ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype.

Authors:  Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; George R Riley; Wonhee Jang; Wendy S Rubinstein; Deanna M Church; Donna R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor.

Authors:  William McLaren; Laurent Gil; Sarah E Hunt; Harpreet Singh Riat; Graham R S Ritchie; Anja Thormann; Paul Flicek; Fiona Cunningham
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome.

Authors:  Philipp Rentzsch; Daniela Witten; Gregory M Cooper; Jay Shendure; Martin Kircher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Spectrum of RB1 Germline Mutations and Clinical Features in Unrelated Chinese Patients With Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Xiaoping Lan; Wuhen Xu; Xiaojun Tang; Haiyun Ye; Xiaozhen Song; Longlong Lin; Xiang Ren; Guangjun Yu; Hong Zhang; Shengnan Wu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  1 in total

1.  Germline RB1 Mutation in Retinoblastoma Patients: Detection Methods and Implication in Tumor Focality.

Authors:  Duangnate Rojanaporn; Sermsiri Chitphuk; Nareenart Iemwimangsa; Takol Chareonsirisuthigul; Duangporn Saengwimol; Rangsima Aroonroch; Usanarat Anurathathapan; Suradej Hongeng; Rossukon Kaewkhaw
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.048

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.