Giorgos Boras1, Xuezhe Yu1, H Aruni Fonseka2, George Davis3, Anton V Velichko3, James A Gott2, Haotian Zeng1, Shiyao Wu4, Patrick Parkinson5, Xiulai Xu4, David Mowbray3, Ana M Sanchez2, Huiyun Liu1. 1. Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom. 4. Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China. 5. Department of Physics and Astronomy and the Photon Science Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Self-catalyzed AlGaAs nanowires (NWs) and NWs with a GaAs quantum dot (QD) were monolithically grown on Si(111) substrates via solid-source molecular beam epitaxy. This growth technique is advantageous in comparison to the previously employed Au-catalyzed approach, as it removes Au contamination issues and renders the structures compatible with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology applications. Structural studies reveal the self-formation of an Al-rich AlGaAs shell, thicker at the NW base and thinning towards the tip, with the opposite behavior observed for the NW core. Wide alloy fluctuations in the shell region are also noticed. AlGaAs NW structures with nominal Al contents of 10, 20, and 30% have strong room temperature photoluminescence, with emission in the range of 1.50-1.72 eV. Individual NWs with an embedded 4.9 nm-thick GaAs region exhibit clear QD behavior, with spatially localized emission, both exciton and biexciton recombination lines, and an exciton line width of 490 μeV at low temperature. Our results demonstrate the properties and behavior of the AlGaAs NWs and AlGaAs/GaAs NWQDs grown via the self-catalyzed approach for the first time and exhibit their potential for a range of novel applications, including nanolasers and single-photon sources.
Self-catalyzed AlGaAs nanowires (NWs) and NWs with a GaAs quantum dot (QD) were monolithically grown on Si(111) substrates via solid-source molecular beam epitaxy. This growth technique is advantageous in comparison to the previously employed Au-catalyzed approach, as it removes Au contamination issues and renders the structures compatible with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology applications. Structural studies reveal the self-formation of an Al-rich AlGaAs shell, thicker at the NW base and thinning towards the tip, with the opposite behavior observed for the NW core. Wide alloy fluctuations in the shell region are also noticed. AlGaAs NW structures with nominal Al contents of 10, 20, and 30% have strong room temperature photoluminescence, with emission in the range of 1.50-1.72 eV. Individual NWs with an embedded 4.9 nm-thick GaAs region exhibit clear QD behavior, with spatially localized emission, both exciton and biexciton recombination lines, and an exciton line width of 490 μeV at low temperature. Our results demonstrate the properties and behavior of the AlGaAs NWs and AlGaAs/GaAs NWQDs grown via the self-catalyzed approach for the first time and exhibit their potential for a range of novel applications, including nanolasers and single-photon sources.
Semiconductor nanowires
(NWs) are promising building blocks for
next-generation electronic and optoelectronic applications.[1] In particular, III–V compound NWs have
gained increasing interest due to their efficient light generation
and guiding.[2,3] Consequently, significant advances
have been made in this field, with a number of direct band-gap III–V
semiconductor-based NWs studied and, in several cases, directly grown
on Si substrates.[4−7]An essential step to expand the functionality range of NWs
is the
synthesis of ternary III–V alloys, allowing tunability of the
band gap via the elemental composition. This provides an additional
and controllable degree of freedom in the band-gap engineering[8] and has been widely employed in conventional
thin-film growth. Nevertheless, the successful growth of high-quality
ternary NWs remains challenging, due to the sensitivity of the growth
parameters and potential issues associated with inhomogeneous elemental
distribution in the alloy.[8] Despite these
challenges, a variety of III–V ternary alloys have been realized.[9−16] Among the various III–V material platforms available, AlGaAs
combined with GaAs has the significant advantage of nearly identical
lattice constants and a broad range of band-gap tunability, varying
between 1.42 eV (GaAs) and 2.16 eV (AlAs) at room temperature (RT).[17] The band gap is direct up to 1.98 eV, which
corresponds to an Al content of ∼45%.[17] Therefore, the planar GaAs/AlGaAs material system has led to a wide
range of applications over the past few decades, including high-electron-mobility
transistors,[18] quantum well (QW) infrared
detectors,[19] and near-infrared laser diodes.[20]AlGaAs has been successfully incorporated
in GaAs NWs for a range
of structures, using different growth techniques. Several groups have
implemented the GaAs/AlGaAs material system in NWs for applications
including lasers,[21,22] quantum emitters,[23,24] light-emitting diodes,[25] and detectors.[26] The majority of these results are limited to
a GaAs core/AlGaAs shell architecture. However, the less-investigated,
pure AlGaAs ternary NWs are also of great interest. For example, AlGaAs
NWs could be exploited as efficient light sources on a Si chip, with
a tunable emission wavelength. Furthermore, AlGaAs NWs can also act
as hosts for GaAs nanostructures. For instance, radial QWs incorporated
in pure AlGaAs NWs can enhance the lasing performance compared to
their GaAs/AlGaAs core/shell NW counterparts,[27−30] where the GaAs core forms a low-band-gap
carrier reservoir and can also absorb lasing photons emitted by the
GaAs QWs. Pure AlGaAs NWs have been exploited as hosts for quantum
dots (QDs) embedded in their axis, allowing the integration of the
QDs with the photonic cavity formed by the NW morphology. Specifically,
AlGaAs/GaAs nanowire-quantum dots (NWQDs) with light emission in the
spectral range of 600–800 nm have been reported.[31−33]To date, published reports on AlGaAs NWs[34−38] and AlGaAs/GaAs NWQD[31−33] systems have used the
Au-catalyzed growth technique. This significantly hinders their potential,
as fast solid diffusion of Au atoms renders them incompatible with
existing technology.[39] Furthermore, it
has been shown that the optoelectronic properties and material quality
of self-catalyzed GaAs/AlGaAs core/shell NWs are considerably improved
in comparison to their Au-catalyzed counterparts and can match the
performance of planar structures.[40] Hence,
utilizing the self-catalyzed method to grow NWs on Si substrates via
molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is a critical step required for incorporating
AlGaAs NWs in Si-based photonics.[41−43] The MBE technique allows
precise control of material deposition,[44] thus enabling the realization of highly complex structures. It is
noted that the focus regarding self-catalyzed ternary NWs has been
mainly III–V–V alloys, including GaAsP,[9,10] GaAsSb,[11,12] GaNP,[13,14] and InAsSb,[15] in terms of growth and device application. Even
though progress has been witnessed regarding the catalyst-free development
of InGaAs NWs,[16] the overall inspection
of III–III–V ternary nanowires is limited compared with
III–V–V nanowires, possibly due to the relatively high
solubility of group III elements in the droplet, which leads to the
chemical consistency of the droplet seed changing even under small
alterations in the balance between group III elements, rendering the
growth particularly sensitive.[8]In
this work, self-catalyzed AlGaAs NW growth on Si(111) substrates
using solid-source MBE is reported. A systematic study of the morphological,
structural, and optical properties of the AlGaAs NWs is presented.
Initially, the impact of Al incorporation into the NWs is investigated,
in terms of morphology, structure, and compositional distribution.
It is shown that the NWs adopt a core/shell structure by the spontaneous
formation of an AlGaAs shell, with a much higher Al concentration
than the core. In addition, the shell exhibits complex alloy fluctuations.
The AlGaAs NWs display strong photoluminescence (PL) emission and
demonstrate band-gap tunability as a function of the Al content. Furthermore,
AlGaAs NWs containing a single GaAs QD are fabricated, which exhibit
spatially localized emission lines corresponding to exciton and biexciton
recombination, with a low-temperature excitonic line width of 490
μeV, clearly demonstrating light emission by the quantum-confined
states within the QD segment.
Methods
AlGaAs NW samples were grown
by MBE using solid Al and Ga sources
and As4 cracker cells, on commercially available p-type
Si(111) substrates. Before growth, the substrates were subjected to
annealing at 660 °C for 10 min in the growth chamber to remove
surface contamination. The growth was initiated by the formation of
Ga-catalyzed GaAs stems, approximately 600 nm long, grown for 10 min.
Next, the Al flux was introduced in order to form Ga-catalyzed AlGaAs
NWs, with the nominal composition varying between 10 and 40%. The
NW length ranged between 4 and 8 μm, depending on the Al composition;
hence, the GaAs stems represent a very small fraction of the entire
structure. The NW growth took ∼100 min, and the Ga and Al fluxes
used were those needed to produce AlxGa1-xAs thin films of the same composition on GaAs(001) substrates. The
Ga flux was adjusted to give a thin-film growth rate of 0.6 ML/s,
as previously determined by GaAs film calibrations on GaAs(100) substrates.
Unless stated otherwise, a stable As4 flux of 2.75 ×
10–6 Torr was maintained, giving an As/Ga ratio
of 15. Based on the information provided above, the V/III beam flux
ratio of As/(Ga + Al) for the samples with 10, 20, 30, and 40% nominal
Al contents is 14.053, 13.119, 12.134, and 11.075, respectively. The
NWQD samples were grown under similar conditions, except that the
Al supply was interrupted for seven seconds. This allowed for the
deposition of Ga and As only, which led to the formation of a GaAs
segment of narrower band gap in the NW axis that inherently acts as
a QD. Following this stage, Al flux was resumed in order for the top
part of the NW to grow. Hence, the GaAs QD was fully embedded in the
nanostructures.Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements
were conducted
in a JEOL JSM IT-100, with the accelerating voltage set at 20 kV and
at a tilt angle of 30° from the top view. Scanning transmission
electron microscopy (STEM) imaging and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDX) analysis were performed using a doubly corrected ARM200F microscope,
operating at 200 kV. The NWs were mechanically transferred to holey
carbon grids for side-view analysis and the microtome sliced for the
cross-section STEM analysis. Finally, PL measurements on ensembles
of NWs were carried out at RT using a Nanometrics RPM2000 system with
an excitation wavelength of 635 nm and a power density of approximately
500 W/cm2. Low-temperature (6 K) micro-PL (μPL) measurements
were performed on single NWs transferred to a SiO2/Si substrate
with a focused laser spot size of about 1 μm and excitation
wavelength of 515 nm.
Results and Discussion
Initially,
the morphology of NWs with a nominal Al content varying
between 10 and 40% was investigated via SEM images. For the lowest
Al concentration, the majority of the NWs adopted a vertically aligned,
one-dimensional morphology (Figure a). However, as the Al content increases this simple
morphology changes, and at 40% Al very few NWs grew perpendicular
to the substrate [Figure S1a,c in the Supporting
Information (SI)]. Two main morphologies of the vertical NWs are found
(Figure b,c). The
first is kinked NWs (Figure b), originating from the introduction of Al into the Ga droplet,
which influences the preferred nucleation by changing the particle
supersaturation and initiates growth along directions other than [1̅1̅1̅].[45] The other form is branched NW growth on the
AlGaAs NW side facets (Figure c). It is believed that the origin of this type of structure
is Ga accumulation at the NW sidewalls, which causes the formation
of branches via the vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) growth
mode (Figure S1d in the SI). It is interesting
to mention that, whilst the appearance of kinked structures is occasional,
the frequency of the branched NW formation is proportional to the
Al composition. Specifically, at low Al contents of 10–30%,
the percentage of branched structures is low and does not exceed 15%.
On the contrary, with increasing Al content (at 40%), the percentage
of NWs that develop branches reaches 60%.[46] Notably, the diameter of the NWs was also observed to increase with
elevating Al content, due to the trend of this element to adhere to
the sidewall facets and incorporate in the lateral shell growth. More
details on this phenomenon and the analysis of these unique structures
have been described in a previous report by our group.[46] Additionally, the influence of the V/III ratio
was examined, as this parameter is crucial for NW growth. Consequently,
the As flux was modified in order to give V/III ratios of 15, 20,
and 35. The growth is found to be very sensitive to this value, as
its increase above 20 causes premature solidification of the droplets,
leading to short structures with morphological deviations (Figure S1e in the SI). In what follows, we focus
on fully grown NWs with the optimum morphological configuration, achieved
with V/III ratios lower than 15, with the exact values that were mentioned
earlier. Structural analysis and characterization were conducted for
all of the acquired samples. Nevertheless, the NWs with 20% Al content
were chosen as the most representative examples.
Figure 1
(a) SEM image with a
30° tilt angle from the top view of the
AlGaAs NWs with 10% nominal Al content. (b) Kinked and (c) branched
NWs are the two typical morphological variations regularly observed
in these samples.
(a) SEM image with a
30° tilt angle from the top view of the
AlGaAs NWs with 10% nominal Al content. (b) Kinked and (c) branched
NWs are the two typical morphological variations regularly observed
in these samples.Structural and compositional
properties of the AlGaAs NWs were
studied by STEM. NWs with the Ga droplet still present, and with no
kinking or branching, were selected for these measurements. Elemental-distribution
EDX maps close to the tip of an AlGaAs NW with a nominal 20% Al content
are shown in Figure a. The droplet is formed of an Al/Ga alloy, with As not observable
due to its low solubility in Ga. This confirms that Al is incorporated
into the Ga droplets and that AlGaAs NW formation results from the
VLS growth mechanism. Nevertheless, Al is not observable in some NW
droplets. A possible explanation is that Al leaves the droplet before
Ga, after the termination of the group III supply.[38]Figure b corresponds to a different NW with the same nominal Al composition.
The black arrow in the annular dark field (ADF) upper image indicates
the direction of the EDX line. The elemental distribution along the
nanowires, shown in the bottom image of Figure b, demonstrates that only Ga is found in
the droplet. The elemental distribution along the NW is also found
to be inhomogeneous, with Ga increasing (Al decreasing) noticeably
from the base to the NW tip. The radial distribution was also addressed.
The ADF upper image of Figure c presents the radial direction of the same AlGaAs NW. The
elemental distribution is illustrated in the bottom image of Figure c, where distinct
peaks in Al and dips in Ga are demonstrated in the external regions
of the AlGaAs NW. This feature is suggestive of the core/shell configuration
based on the tendency of Al to be adhered to the sidewall facets of
the NWs, which will be conclusively established further on in the
current report.
Figure 2
(a) Elemental distribution in an AlGaAs NW droplet region
(with
nominal 20% Al content) showing an Ga/Al alloy in the droplet. (b)
Upper image: ADF-STEM image of a different AlGaAs NW to (a). Bottom
image: Elemental-distribution profile along the NW axial direction
(as indicated by the arrow in the upper image of b) showing Al and
Ga inhomogeneous distributions. The droplet contains only Ga, in contrast
to (a). The Ga content increases from the NW base to its tip. (c)
Upper image: ADF-STEM image of the same NW of b, c, in the radial
direction. Bottom image: Elemental-distribution profile in the radial
direction of the NW. Whilst peaks in Al and dips in Ga are observed
in the external regions, the center of the NW core exhibits a homogeneous
elemental distribution for Ga and Al in the radial direction.
(a) Elemental distribution in an AlGaAs NW droplet region
(with
nominal 20% Al content) showing an Ga/Al alloy in the droplet. (b)
Upper image: ADF-STEM image of a different AlGaAs NW to (a). Bottom
image: Elemental-distribution profile along the NW axial direction
(as indicated by the arrow in the upper image of b) showing Al and
Ga inhomogeneous distributions. The droplet contains only Ga, in contrast
to (a). The Ga content increases from the NW base to its tip. (c)
Upper image: ADF-STEM image of the same NW of b, c, in the radial
direction. Bottom image: Elemental-distribution profile in the radial
direction of the NW. Whilst peaks in Al and dips in Ga are observed
in the external regions, the center of the NW core exhibits a homogeneous
elemental distribution for Ga and Al in the radial direction.NWs were sectioned perpendicular to the growth
direction using
an ultramicrotome for further characterization. All sections analyzed
here correspond to regions above the GaAs stems formed at the initial
stages of the growth, i.e., approximately the first 600 nm of the
structures. It is important to mention that these GaAs areas are not
included in this study. ADF cross-sectional image, taken from the
bottom part of a NW, with 20% nominal Al composition (Figure a) corroborates the spontaneous
formation of an AlGaAs shell, with higher average Al content than
the core. This is indicated by the darker contrast of the layers (∼35
nm) surrounding the brighter NW core (∼70 nm) in Figure a. Here, brighter regions in
ADF images correspond to a higher concentration of heavier elements,
which in this case is Ga. As can be observed, the region surrounding
the core does not exhibit a uniform contrast, but a series of bands
that correspond to different compositions. To corroborate the different
Al compositions, EDX analysis was performed at four different radial
points, and at the edge of the core, as indicated in Figure b (a magnified image of the
region enclosed in the red square in Figure a). The measured Al values are included in
the image for each point, revealing shell compositions varying from
65 to 89%. This confirms the non-uniform Al distribution as well as
the higher Al content in the spontaneous shell than in the core. The
Al content in the shell reaches 89% (position 2), i.e., an Al/Ga ratio
of 8, much larger than values previously reported.[47] The higher Al composition in the shell is attributed to
the shorter diffusion length of Al, with a much higher activation
energy for surface diffusion compared to Ga.[38,48,49] Consequently, it is preferential for Al
to be incorporated at the side facets of the structure during simultaneous
vapor–solid growth, leading to the formation of the Al-rich
shell. It is interesting to note that alloy fluctuations in the shell,
similar to the ones observed in the current work, with alternating
regions of different composition, have been previously reported and
exploited for the realization of radial QWs.[27−30] Furthermore, such alloy fluctuations
have led to the self-formation of QD-like emitters and related nanostructures,
which provide a novel type of nonclassical light emitter.[50,51] Additional EDX mappings of the shell can validate the bright contrast
derived from higher Al content within the shell. These measurements,
along with the relevant discussion, are presented in Figure S2a–d in the SI. The origins of the observed
phase separation have not been conclusively identified. It has been
reported in previous works that such phenomena are attributed to the
kinetics of the adatoms and more specifically to the different diffusivities
of Al and Ga during the growth procedure.[47] This has also been indicated by the fact that similar phenomena
can be drastically reduced in core/shell NWs developed at lower temperatures.[47] The above observations are in good agreement
with predictions regarding the temperature-related modifications of
the adatom diffusion length.[52] However,
more work is required to fully interpret the interesting formation
of these alloy fluctuations.
Figure 3
(a) ADF-STEM image of a cross section from the
bottom region of
an AlGaAs NW with 20% nominal Al content. The diameters of the core
and shell are indicated by red and green arrows, respectively. (b)
A magnified STEM image of the area enclosed in the red square in (a).
The points 1–5 indicate the five positions where point-EDX
measurements were performed. The Al percentage at these different
positions is written below each circle. (c) Atomically resolved ADF-STEM
image from a representative AlGaAs NW. Twin defects (white dashed
line) and short wurtzite (WZ) insertions coexist with a predominantly
ZB structure. (d, e) Representative ADF-STEM images from the middle
and tip, respectively, of an AlGaAs NW with a nominal 20% composition,
showing the spontaneous formation of the shell and the inverse tapering
of the core NW structure. (f–h) Elemental mapping of a section
close to the AlGaAs NW tip for As, Ga, and Al, respectively.
(a) ADF-STEM image of a cross section from the
bottom region of
an AlGaAs NW with 20% nominal Al content. The diameters of the core
and shell are indicated by red and green arrows, respectively. (b)
A magnified STEM image of the area enclosed in the red square in (a).
The points 1–5 indicate the five positions where point-EDX
measurements were performed. The Al percentage at these different
positions is written below each circle. (c) Atomically resolved ADF-STEM
image from a representative AlGaAs NW. Twin defects (white dashed
line) and short wurtzite (WZ) insertions coexist with a predominantly
ZB structure. (d, e) Representative ADF-STEM images from the middle
and tip, respectively, of an AlGaAs NW with a nominal 20% composition,
showing the spontaneous formation of the shell and the inverse tapering
of the core NW structure. (f–h) Elemental mapping of a section
close to the AlGaAs NW tip for As, Ga, and Al, respectively.The crystal quality of the AlGaAs NWs was studied
by atomically
resolved ADF. Figure c corresponds to a representative ADF-STEM image of the nanowire
with 20% nominal Al composition along the <110> direction. Here,
twin defects and occasional thin wurtzite (WZ) insertions coexist
in the predominant zinc blende (ZB) crystal. An enlarged image can
be found in the Supporting Information (Figure S4). Figure d,e shows ADF images of representative cross sections acquired at
different positions along the NWs from the sample with a nominal Al
composition of 20%. In combination with Figure a, it is seen that the thickness of the self-formed
shell decreases towards the NW tip, being thickest (∼35 nm)
at the base (Figure a), thinning (18 nm) in the middle (Figure d), and eventually disappearing completely
in the vicinity of the tip, where only the core is present (Figure e). The opposite
behavior occurs for the core, where the diameter is small at the base
(∼70 nm) (Figure a) and the thickness increases towards the tip. Consequently, the
total diameter of the NW increases from the bottom to the top, being
roughly 105 nm at the base, 128 nm in the middle, and 220 nm at the
NW tip, giving an inversely tapered shape. The increasing diameter
of the NW core from the NW base to the tip is attributed to a reduction
of the effective V/III ratio after introducing Al into the reactor,
which contributes to the droplet volume expansion.[53] In contrast, the thinning of the shell is attributed to
the previously mentioned short diffusion length of Al, which results
in Al adatoms preferentially adhering to the bottom region of the
NW sidewalls, with less Al reaching the upper region of the NW. A
similar explanation was proposed for an analogous observation in InGaAs
NWs.[54] A schematic representation of this
mechanism is included in Section S3 of
the SI. Another reason for the thickness variations is that the top
part of the NW is formed at the later stages of the growth. Hence,
there is not sufficient time for the shell to be developed close to
the tip, as opposed to the base, where the material has been accumulating
for a longer time. Eventually, the elemental mappings of the cross
section close to the NW tip for As, Ga, and Al are presented in Figure f–h, respectively.
This conclusively confirms the existence of the three elements along
the radial direction of the AlGaAs NW.RT PL was recorded for
NW ensembles with 10–30% nominal
Al composition and with the NWs attached to the original Si substrate.
The spectra are presented in Figure a, where it is seen that increasing Al composition
causes a blueshift of the emission, due to the increasing band-gap
energy of AlGaAs. Strong RT emission is obtained for all of the three
samples. The average Al composition of the structures was estimated
by using the emission wavelengths of the NW ensembles and the empirical
equation Eg(x)= 1.422
+ 1.2475x, where x is the Al fraction
and Eg is the band-gap energy at RT.[55] For the samples with 10, 20, and 30% nominal
Al content, effective Al compositions are calculated to be 7 ±
2, 13 ± 3, and 22 ± 4%, respectively. The errors in these
values are obtained by attributing the line width of the emission
to the distribution of the Al content in the structures. The present
observation of strong RT emission that is tunable with Al content
demonstrates the potential of the AlGaAs NWs as wavelength-tunable
light sources on Si. No RT emission was measured from the sample with
a nominal 40% Al content, possibly due to the actual composition of
this structure being close to, or even above, the value at which the
band gap becomes indirect.
Figure 4
(a) RT PL spectra for AlGaAs NW ensembles with
different nominal
Al compositions. The blueshift of the emission confirms the tunability
of the emission with ternary alloy composition. (b) Representative
position-dependent μPL spectra recorded for the samples with
10% (red), 20% (blue), and 30% (black) nominal Al content, respectively.
The upper axis indicates the corresponding Al composition as obtained
from published values for the low-temperature band gap of zinc blende
AlGaAs. (c) Power-dependent μPL spectra from a sample with nominal
20% Al content. With increasing power, the sharp emission lines merge
into a broader peak, which allows the average Al composition of the
NW to be determined.
(a) RT PL spectra for AlGaAs NW ensembles with
different nominal
Al compositions. The blueshift of the emission confirms the tunability
of the emission with ternary alloy composition. (b) Representative
position-dependent μPL spectra recorded for the samples with
10% (red), 20% (blue), and 30% (black) nominal Al content, respectively.
The upper axis indicates the corresponding Al composition as obtained
from published values for the low-temperature band gap of zinc blende
AlGaAs. (c) Power-dependent μPL spectra from a sample with nominal
20% Al content. With increasing power, the sharp emission lines merge
into a broader peak, which allows the average Al composition of the
NW to be determined.6 K μPL measurements
were performed at positions along the
axis of single NWs to probe the spatial variation of the Al composition. Figure b shows spectra from
NWs of the three nominal compositions 10, 20, and 30%. The NWs have
different lengths, as indicated in the figure. For each NW, spectra
were recorded at equidistant positions along the axis. The top horizontal
axis of Figure b is
calibrated to give the Al content of AlGaAs using the band gap vs
composition relationship at 6 K.[56] The
spectra exhibit a series of sharp emission lines, whose intensity
and wavelength vary along the NW axis. Due to the relatively low incident
laser power (6 μW) used to acquire these spectra, these lines
are attributed to recombination from a low density of localized states,
produced by fluctuations in the AlGaAs composition. The peaks are
relatively weak in the vicinity of the NW ends. Although it is not
possible to distinguish the base and tip in these measurements, the
weak emission at one end most likely results from the presence of
the GaAs stem at the NW base, used to initiate the NW growth. It is
interesting to observe that in the case of the AlGaAs NWs with 30%
nominal Al content, there are two emission bands being presented.
The band at 680 nm is suspected to originate from the alloy fluctuations
in the AlGaAs shell that were described earlier (Figure b) and have been reported to
form AlGaAs QWs[27−30] or QD-like emitters.[50,51] This is also indicated in a previous
work, where emission from the alloy fluctuations in the AlGaAs shell
of core/shell NWs was traced at roughly the same spectral region.[50] The band at 720 nm is derived from the AlGaAs
NW core emission. Figure c shows the typical power-dependent spectra for the 20% Al
sample. With increasing laser power, the multiple sharp emission lines
are replaced by a broader, continuous emission, more reflective of
the local average AlGaAs composition. Al compositions extracted from
high-power spectra for the samples with 10, 20, and 30% nominal Al
composition are 5 ± 1.2, 13 ± 2.2, and 22 ± 1.4%, respectively.
These values are consistent with those extracted from the RT ensemble
measurements discussed previously.The composition values determined
from EDX for the cores of the
three NW samples are higher than the corresponding values determined
by both the RT ensemble PL and the low-temperature μPL of single
NWs. Specifically, the latter gives an effective Al composition significantly
lower than the nominal value, whilst the former gives a higher Al
content. To explain this difference, we consider two possible factors.
First, polytypism may play a role. The polytypic nature of the crystal
structure has been previously established, with the observation of
thin WZ insertions of 4–6 monolayers within the dominant ZB-phase
NWs (Figure d). An
enlarged image of Figure d is presented in Section S4 of
the SI, in order to better demonstrate the aforementioned observations.
It has recently been reported that the WZ form of AlGaAs exhibits
a significantly lower direct band gap than the ZB form.[57] With both forms present in a nanostructure,
carriers may diffuse into the WZ segments prior to their recombination.
The resultant lower PL emission energy would hence lead to a lower
calculated effective Al composition, as the ZB band-gap values were
used in the calculation. Second, it is possible that PL measurements
are sensitive to lower-band-gap Al-deficient regions of the NWs due
to carrier diffusion and capture before recombination occurs. Structural
studies show the NWs to have a complex morphology (Figure b,c), with regions of different
Al content, and it is likely that regions with the lowest Al composition
dominate the PL. A quantified comparison and discussion of these two
factors are presented in Section S4 of
the SI.After having described the AlGaAs NW properties and
behavior, another
interesting topic of research is the suitability of NWs for hosting
GaAs dots. For this reason, AlGaAs/GaAs NWQDs were grown via MBE,
with a single GaAs QD incorporated in the center of AlGaAs NWs. The
QDs were deterministically embedded, axially in the AlGaAs NWs by
stopping the supply of Al for 7 s, in order for the GaAs layers to
be deposited. STEM analysis and structural studies of a NWQD with
20% nominal Al composition are shown in Figure . Figure a depicts an ADF image of the structures. The QD is
presented as a bright band, indicating a higher Ga content, near the
midpoint of the AlGaAs NW. A higher-magnification image is illustrated
in Figure b, which
reveals a QD thickness of roughly 4.9 nm and a diameter of 140 nm.
To further confirm the above, the intensity profile of the area enclosed
in the red box in Figure b is presented in Figure c, which indicates the QD formation at the position
of the intensity peak. EDX elemental profiles along the white arrow
of Figure b are shown
in Figure d. The dip
in the Al signal and corresponding distinct peak in Ga confirm the
anticipated presence of the QD. The Al signal does not reach the expected
zero value within the QD as a result of the AlGaAs shell, which is
spontaneously formed around the NW and is present in the middle section
of the structures (Figure e).
Figure 5
(a) ADF image of the dot-in-wire structure, where the bright region
shown by the arrow corresponds to the GaAs QD. (b) Higher-magnification
ADF image of the QD region. (c) Intensity profile of the area in the
red box in b. The peak corresponds to the QD region, which is confirmed
to be approximately 4.9 nm thick. (d) Elemental profile along the
NW axis. The dip in the Al value and peak in the Ga value correspond
to the GaAs QD.
(a) ADF image of the dot-in-wire structure, where the bright region
shown by the arrow corresponds to the GaAs QD. (b) Higher-magnification
ADF image of the QD region. (c) Intensity profile of the area in the
red box in b. The peak corresponds to the QD region, which is confirmed
to be approximately 4.9 nm thick. (d) Elemental profile along the
NW axis. The dip in the Al value and peak in the Ga value correspond
to the GaAs QD.The optical analysis on NWQDs
that followed is presented in Figure . Specifically, Figure a shows low-power
μPL spectra recorded as a function of the laser spot position
along the axis of a NW. The lowest-energy emission at roughly 791
nm consists of a single peak, which has a relatively narrow line width
of 490 μeV at a temperature of 6 K and for a low laser power
of 10 nW. This emission is attributed to the GaAs dot, as it is highly
spatially localized and located centrally along the NW axis. Higher-energy
emission comprises two sets of peaks, grouped around 778 and 750 nm
(Figure a). Both groups
persist over a wide range of laser positions (>3–4 μm),
notably larger than the laser spot size, and are hence attributed
to the AlGaAs barriers. Although both groups of AlGaAs emission lines
are observed for excitation on either side of the QD, a different
set dominates for each side. This observation suggests that, for the
current NW, the introduction of the GaAs QD results in a change in
the structure of the core region of the AlGaAs NW. Further investigations
are planned to clarify this effect. Nextnano simulations conducted
to corroborate the experimental observations for the structure with
20% nominal Al composition[58] give a free-particle
ground-state transition energy of 1.59 eV, equivalent to 775 nm. When
corrected for an exciton binding energy of ∼25 meV, typical
for the GaAs–AlGaAs NWQD system,[59] an emission wavelength of 787 nm is obtained, consistent with the
experimentally observed emission peak at 791 nm. In addition, Figure b plots the intensity
of the QD emission against laser position, which exhibits a spatial
profile consistent with the size of the focused laser spot being much
larger than the height of the QD. It can be distinctly shown that
the PL intensity at 791 nm is stronger when the laser spot illuminates
the middle of the AlGaAs NW, where the dot is located. This is an
additional strong indication that the localized emission described
earlier at 791 nm derives from the QD insertion.
Figure 6
(a) Position-dependent
μPL spectra measured at a low power
of 50 nW. (b) QD μPL intensity vs laser position along the NW.
(c) Power-dependent μPL spectra with the laser spot positioned
to maximize the QD emission: exciton and biexciton peaks are indicated.
(d) Laser power dependence of the exciton and biexciton emission,
log–log plot. The gradients at low powers are indicated. (e)
Temperature-dependent μPL spectra measured for a laser power
of 1 μW; the measurement temperatures and scaling factors are
shown in the figure; the QD-related emission is highlighted in blue
and the main AlGaAs barrier emission in red. (f) Upper panel: Plots
of the temperature dependence of the integrated intensity of the QD
emission and its ratio to the barrier emission. Lower panel: Plot
of the temperature dependence of the QD single-exciton emission line
width.
(a) Position-dependent
μPL spectra measured at a low power
of 50 nW. (b) QD μPL intensity vs laser position along the NW.
(c) Power-dependent μPL spectra with the laser spot positioned
to maximize the QD emission: exciton and biexciton peaks are indicated.
(d) Laser power dependence of the exciton and biexciton emission,
log–log plot. The gradients at low powers are indicated. (e)
Temperature-dependent μPL spectra measured for a laser power
of 1 μW; the measurement temperatures and scaling factors are
shown in the figure; the QD-related emission is highlighted in blue
and the main AlGaAs barrier emission in red. (f) Upper panel: Plots
of the temperature dependence of the integrated intensity of the QD
emission and its ratio to the barrier emission. Lower panel: Plot
of the temperature dependence of the QD single-exciton emission line
width.Figure c shows
spectra recorded as a function of laser power for the laser positioned
at the maximum of the QD emission. At low power, the dot emission
comprises a single line, representing single-exciton recombination.
With increasing power, additional spectral lines appear, attributed
to multi-exciton recombination. In Figure d, the power dependence of the peak intensity
of the two most resolved lines is shown. The gradients of the two
lines (1.0 and 2.2, respectively) indicate exciton and biexciton recombination,
whilst their energy separation of 2 meV is consistent with the calculated
value of biexciton binding energy of 1.5 meV in GaAs/AlGaAs QDs.[59] Analytically, it can be seen that both resolved
lines exhibit an initial increase with power. The exciton line presents
a saturation and both lines decrease at higher powers. This is the
expected behavior of a zero-dimensional system with increasing average
carrier occupancy.Figure e shows
temperature-dependent μPL spectra, where the dot emission is
seen to quench rapidly with increasing temperature and is fully suppressed
above 60 K, indicating a low potential barrier for carrier escape
from the QD. The upper panel of Figure f plots the integrated intensity of the QD emission
and its ratio to the barrier emission. Presenting the results in terms
of the ratio corrects for any possible misalignment of the sample
as a result of the temperature increase. It is not possible to extract
a reliable value for the activation energy of the QD PL quenching,
but considering that the lowest-energy barrier emission, occurring
at 778 nm, is only 24 meV above the dot-related peak, a relatively
rapid decrease in the intensity of the QD emission is expected. Increasing
the Al content of the AlGaAs NW surrounding the dot should result
in a more stable emission. The lower panel of Figure f shows a plot of the temperature dependence
of the line width of the QD single-exciton emission. At low temperature,
the line width is much narrower, whilst it broadens with increasing
temperature. This broadening is described reasonably well by a model
in which carriers are scattered out of the ground state of the QD
by acoustic phonons.[60] The activation energy
associated with this model is the separation between the ground state
and the first excited state of the QD. The value that is extracted
from the fit to the experimental data is 3 meV. Nextnano simulations
give the calculated separations of the ground and first excited QD
states of 1 and 0.6 meV for electrons and holes, respectively, in
reasonable agreement with the extracted energy of 3 meV. It is noted
that the observed discrepancy between the experimentally extracted
value and the simulated values of the separation energies can be attributed
to crystal imperfections related to the GaAs QD and to the non-ideally
abrupt NW/QD interfaces. Details of the nextnano simulations are presented
in Section S5 of the SI.The current
optical spectroscopy results for the NWQD structure
show clear evidence for QD behavior at low temperatures. Emission
from a spatially localized region is observed, with different excitonic
recombination processes; these exhibit the expected saturation at
high pump powers consistent with fully quantized states. The temperature
dependence of the emission line width shows a behavior consistent
with that expected for a QD. The results reveal a relatively large
emission line width at low temperatures and a rapid quenching of the
emission intensity with increasing temperature. The former most likely
arises from fluctuating carrier occupancies in nearby defect states.
Consequently, improving the crystal purity of the structures would
minimize this effect and adding effective surface passivation layers
would reduce the effects of surface states. Additionally, improved
temperature stability would possibly result from the use of higher
Al compositions in the shell of the NWs, since it is anticipated to
lead to improvement of their emission properties.[61,62] However, further works are needed to unambiguously verify the aforementioned
phenomenon.
Conclusions
In summary, MBE growth of self-catalyzed
AlGaAs NWs, with and without
a GaAs QD, and of varying Al content, on Si substrates has been reported.
For low Al concentrations the NWs are vertically oriented, while increasing
Al composition leads to complex morphologies. The spontaneous formation
of an Al-rich AlGaAs shell is observed, with an inhomogeneous radial
distribution of Al. The shell is thicker at the bottom of the NW and
thins towards the NW tip; the opposite behavior is observed for the
core. A strong RT emission and band-gap tunability from 1.50 to 1.72
eV is achieved by varying the Al composition between 10 and 30%. A
GaAs/AlGaAs single dot-in-wire structure shows clear QD behavior,
exhibiting spatially localized emission and both exciton and biexciton
transitions. The exciton line width at 6 K is 490 μeV. These
results demonstrate the potential of self-catalyzed AlGaAs NWs as
the host for QD emitters for applications including single-photon
sources and lasers.
Authors: M Heiss; E Russo-Averchi; A Dalmau-Mallorquí; G Tütüncüoğlu; F Matteini; D Rüffer; S Conesa-Boj; O Demichel; E Alarcon-Lladó; A Fontcuberta i Morral Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Jeppe V Holm; Henrik I Jørgensen; Peter Krogstrup; Jesper Nygård; Huiyun Liu; Martin Aagesen Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Q D Zhuang; Ezekiel A Anyebe; R Chen; H Liu; Ana M Sanchez; Mohana K Rajpalke; Tim D Veal; Z M Wang; Y Z Huang; H D Sun Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Xuezhe Yu; Hailong Wang; Jun Lu; Jianhua Zhao; Jennifer Misuraca; Peng Xiong; Stephan von Molnár Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: L Leandro; R Reznik; J D Clement; J Repän; M Reynolds; E V Ubyivovk; I V Shtrom; G Cirlin; N Akopian Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 4.379