| Literature DB >> 34276780 |
Lifen Chen1, Junqi Wang1, Wenli Lu1, Yuan Xiao1, Jihong Ni1, Wei Wang1, Xiaoyu Ma1, Zhiya Dong1.
Abstract
It is estimated that around 10-20% of hypospadias are caused by genetic abnormalities worldwide although the spectrum of associated genes does vary across different ethnicities. The prevalence of hypospadias among the Chinese population has been increasing the last couple of decades. However, the pathogenesis underlying the disease and its associated genetic abnormality remains unclear. Here we performed a genetic analysis of 81 children with karyotype 46, XY and the hypospadias phenotype in order to characterize the genetic components that contribute to the development of hypospadias in Chinese patients. 15 candidate genes, including sex determination genes-SOX9, SRY, NR0B1 (DAX1), NR5A1 (SF1), DHH, sex differentiation genes-AR, SRD5A2, MAMLD1, INSL3, and hypospadias-associated genes-FGF8, FGF10, BMP4, BMP7, ATF3, and MID1 were screened by using next generation sequencing. A total of 18 patients were found to have mutations identified by PCR and sequencing, including 11 cases of SRD5A2 genes, 6 cases of AR genes, and 1 case of MID1 gene, respectively. One novel missense mutation p.I817N was discovered in AR gene. Further molecular analysis found that subcellular localization of the ARI 81 7N was the same as that of wild type ARWT in the absence or presence of hormone. But it led to 50% reduction in AR-induced transcriptional activity in the presence of either the synthetic androgen R1881 or the natural ligand dihydrotestosterone. Our results indicate that SRD5A2 and AR genes are two top candidate genes associated with 46, XY hypospadias in Chinese patients. Further epidemiological and genetic analysis are still needed to further clarify the pathogenesis of hypospadias in Han Chinese patients.Entities:
Keywords: AR; SRD5A2; gene function analysis; gene mutations; hypospadias
Year: 2021 PMID: 34276780 PMCID: PMC8278054 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.673732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Clinical characteristics of 81 patients diagnosed with hypospadias.
| Type of hypospadias | I | II | III | IV | Total |
| Number of cases (%) | 9 (11.1%) | 14 (17.3%) | 31 (38.3%) | 27 (33.3%) | 81 (100%) |
| EMS (mean) | 7.8 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.2 |
| Micropenis | 5 (55.5%) | 7 (50%) | 24 (77.4%) | 13 (48.1%) | 49 (60.5%) |
| Microtesticle | 2 (22.2%) | 1 (7.1%) | 12 (38.7%) | 13 (48.1%) | 28 (34.6%) |
| Cryptorchidism | 3 (33.3%) | 2 (14.3%) | 16 (51.6%) | 14 (51.9%) | 35 (43.2%) |
| Clubbed penis | 0 | 3 (21.4%) | 4 (12.9%) | 4 (14.8%) | 11 (13.6%) |
| Poor scrotum | 2 (22.2%) | 3 (21.4%) | 13 (41.9%) | 20 (74.1%) | 38 (46.9%) |
| Hydrocele | 0 | 0 | 3 (9.7%) | 3 (11.1%) | 6 (7.4%) |
| Testicular microlithiasis | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (7.1%) | 2 (6.5%) | 1 (3.7%) | 5 (6.2%) |
| Epididymal head cyst | 0 | 1 (7.1%) | 0 | 2 (7.4%) | 3 (3.7%) |
| Inguinal hernia | 0 | 1 (7.1%) | 2 (6.5%) | 3 (11.1%) | 6 (7.4%) |
| SGA | 1 (11.1%) | 2 (14.3%) | 2 (6.5%) | 4 (14.8%) | 8 (9.8%) |
| ASD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (18.5%) | 5 (6.2%) |
| Adolescent mammoplasia | 0 | 4 (28.6%) | 1 (3.2%) | 2 (7.4%) | 7 (8.6%) |
| Positive family history | 0 | 1 (7.1%) | 1 (3.2%) | 0 | 2 (24.5%) |
Genotype hypospadias patients with candidate gene abnormities.
| Patient ID | Gene | cDNA | Protein | Exon | Rs number | Genotype | Origin | ACMG |
| 1 | G680 > A | R227Q | E4 | rs9332964 | CompoundHet | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| G737 > A | R246Q | E5 | rs9332967 | Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |||
| 2 | G680 > A | R227Q | E4 | rs9332964 | Hom | Mother/Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| 3 | G607 > A | G203S | E4 | rs9332961 | CompoundHet | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| G680 > A | R227Q | E4 | rs9332964 | Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |||
| 4 | G607 > A | G203S | E4 | rs9332961 | Hom | Mother/Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| 5 | C408 > A | Y136Ter | E2 | / | CompoundHet | P/PVS1 + PM2 + PM6 + PP3 | ||
| G680 > A | R227Q | E4 | rs9332964 | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |||
| 6 | A578 > G | N193S | E5 | rs763296857 | CompoundHet | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| G737 > A | R246Q | E5 | rs9332967 | Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |||
| 7 | G737 > A | R246Q | E5 | rs9332967 | Hom | Mother/Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| 8 | C59 > T | L20P | E1 | rs761824859 | CompoundHet | Mother | LP/PM1 + PM2 + PP3 + PP4 + PP5 | |
| G680 > A | R227Q | E4 | rs9332964 | Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |||
| 9 | C59 > T | L20P | E1 | rs761824859 | Hom | Mother/Father | LP/PM1 + PM2 + PP3 + PP4 + PP5 | |
| 10 | A578 > G | N193S | E5 | rs763296857 | CompoundHet | Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| 656delT | F219fs*60 | E5 | rs61748127 | Mother | P/PVS1 + PS3 + PM2 + PM3 | |||
| 11 | SRD5A2 | G607 > A | G203S | E4 | rs9332961 | CompoundHet | Father | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 |
| 656delT | F219fs*60 | E5 | rs61748127 | Mother | P/PVS1 + PS3 + PM2 + PM3 | |||
| 12 | C2338 > T | R780W | E6 | / | Hem | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| 13 | T2450 > A | I817N | E7 | / | Hem | LP/PS2 + PM1 + PP3 + PP4 | ||
| 14 | G2567 > A | R856H | E7 | rs9332971 | Hem | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM3 + PP4 | |
| 15 | C2612 > T | A871V | E8 | rs143040492 | Hem | Mother | P/PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PP4 + PP5 | |
| 16 | Exon 5-8 gross deletion, chX 67716101-67724136 | / | Hem | Mother | P/PVS1 + PM2 + PP3 + PP4 | |||
| 17 | Exon 2 gross deletion, chX 67643255-67643407 | / | Hem | Mother | P/PVS1 + PM2 + PP3 + PP4 | |||
| 18 | C2000 > T | P667L | E10 | rs147106995 | Hom | Mother/Father | LP/PM1 + PM2 + PP3 + PP4 | |
The clinical features of 11 patients carrying SRD5A2 mutations.
| No. | Age at diagnosis | Gender upon diagnosis | Type of hypospadias | Complications | EMS | LH/FSH (mIU/ml) | T/DHT (HCG stimulation before/after) | ||
| Microtesticle | Micropenis | Cryptorchidism | |||||||
| 1 | 0.6 | Male | III | Y | Y | Y | 2 | 0.48/3.94 | 10/10.5 |
| 2 | 2.7 | Male | III | Y | Y | N | 6 | 0.5/1.55 | – |
| 3 | 1.9 | Female | III | N | Y | Y | 1 | 2.9/7.76 | – |
| 4 | 12.6 | Male | IV | N | Y | N | 3 | 0.1/4.26 | 81.9/– |
| 5 | 22.2 | Male | II | N | N | N | 10 | 2.6/1.8 | – |
| 6 | 2.7 | Male | III | N | Y | N | 6 | 4.21/7.71 | – |
| 7 | 0.9 | Male | IV | N | Y | N | 6 | 3.3/2.6 | – |
| 8 | 0.3 | Female | IV | Y | Y | N | 3 | 2.19/4.06 | 25.1/30.5 |
| 9 | 10.9 | Female | III | Y | Y | Y | 5 | 0.4/0.35 | 39.7/64.4 |
| 10 | 5.6 | Male | III | N | Y | N | 6 | < 0.07/0.15 | 8.3/– |
| 11 | 5.4 | Male | III | N | Y | N | 6 | 0.08/0.54 | 10.9/10.4 |
The clinical features of 6 patients carrying AR mutations.
| No. | Age at diagnosis | Gender upon diagnosis | Type of hypospadias | Complications | EMS | LH/FSH (mIU/ml) | T/DHT (HCG stimulation before/after) | ||
| Microtesticle | Micropenis | Cryptorchidism | |||||||
| 12 | 1.6 | Female | IV | N | N | Y | 5 | 2.26/2.39 | – |
| 13 | 14.6 | Female | IV | N | Y | N | 3 | 27.7/6.7 | – |
| 14 | 14.3 | Female | II | N | Y | N | 6 | 18.5/8.6 | 19.6/21.46 |
| 15 | 0.3 | Male | II | N | Y | N | 4 | 1.2/0.83 | 5.83/– |
| 16 | 5.9 | Male | III | N | N | Y | 7 | 9.95/21.93 | 2.2/3.6 |
| 17 | 14.2 | Female | IV | Y | Y | Y | 1 | 0.82/4.63 | – |
FIGURE 1The protein expression of ARWT and ARI871N in transfected cells. (A) The expression levels of ARWT and ARI871N were analyzed in cells 24 h post-transfection in the presence of R1881 (1, 10, and 100 nM) or vehicle alone (0.1% DMSO). An amount of 10 ug lysate was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with AR monoclonal antibody. No significant differences of expression were found between ARWT and ARI871N. (B) Quantitation the protein expression levels of AR.
FIGURE 2Sub-cellular localization of ARWT and ARI871N. Confocal microscope images of CHO cells transfected with 1 ug of ARWT or ARI871N in the absence of ligand (A,B) or in the presence of 1 nM R1881 (C,D). The bars represent 10 μm. (E) Quantitation of the ratio of nuclear/cytoplasmic expression of AR. *P < 0.05 compared with wild type.
FIGURE 3Decreased transactivation activity of ARI871N mutation in reporter gene assay. CHO cells transfected with either ARWT or ARI871N, were exposed to DHT (A) or R1881 (B) at the different concentrations. In a competitive binding assay, where R1181 competed with the anti-androgen OHF for AR binding sites, the ARI871N mutation showed slightly weaker binding than the wild type (C). Lower activity of ARI871N was observed when it was compared to the wild-type receptor. The experiments were conducted in triplicate. *P < 0.05 compared with wild type.