Literature DB >> 34276325

Neurofeedback Learning Is Skill Acquisition but Does Not Guarantee Treatment Benefit: Continuous-Time Analysis of Learning-Curves From a Clinical Trial for ADHD.

Antti Veikko Petteri Veilahti1, Levas Kovarskis2, Benjamin Ultan Cowley3,4,5.   

Abstract

Neurofeedback for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has long been studied as an alternative to medication, promising non-invasive treatment with minimal side-effects and sustained outcome. However, debate continues over the efficacy of neurofeedback, partly because existing evidence for efficacy is mixed and often non-specific, with unclear relationships between prognostic variables, patient performance when learning to self-regulate, and treatment outcomes. We report an extensive analysis on the understudied area of neurofeedback learning. Our data comes from a randomised controlled clinical trial in adults with ADHD (registered trial ISRCTN13915109; N = 23; 13:10 female:male; age 25-57). Patients were treated with either theta-beta ratio or sensorimotor-rhythm regimes for 40 one-hour sessions. We classify 11 learners vs 12 non-learners by the significance of random slopes in a linear mixed growth-curve model. We then analyse the predictors, outcomes, and processes of learners vs non-learners, using these groups as mutual controls. Significant predictive relationships were found in anxiety disorder (GAD), dissociative experience (DES), and behavioural inhibition (BIS) scores obtained during screening. Low DES, but high GAD and BIS, predicted positive learning. Patterns of behavioural outcomes from Test Of Variables of Attention, and symptoms from adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, suggested that learning itself is not required for positive outcomes. Finally, the learning process was analysed using structural-equations modelling with continuous-time data, estimating the short-term and sustained impact of each session on learning. A key finding is that our results support the conceptualisation of neurofeedback learning as skill acquisition, and not merely operant conditioning as originally proposed in the literature.
Copyright © 2021 Veilahti, Kovarskis and Cowley.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADHD; EEG; adult ADHD; classification; clinical trial; continuous-time modelling; learning; neurofeedback

Year:  2021        PMID: 34276325      PMCID: PMC8277562          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.668780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  38 in total

1.  PROD-screen--a screen for prodromal symptoms of psychosis.

Authors:  M Heinimaa; R K R Salokangas; T Ristkari; M Plathin; J Huttunen; T Ilonen; T Suomela; J Korkeila; T H McGlashan
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Test-retest reliability and standard error of measurement for the test of variables of attention (T.O.V.A.) with healthy school-age children.

Authors:  Robert A Leark; Denise R Wallace; Robert Fitzgerald
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2004-12

3.  Confusion regarding operant conditioning of the EEG - Authors' reply.

Authors:  Michael Schönenberg; Eva Wiedemann; Alexander Schneidt; Jonathan Scheeff; Alexander Logemann; Philipp M Keune; Martin Hautzinger
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 4.  Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Samuele Cortese; Maite Ferrin; Daniel Brandeis; Martin Holtmann; Pascal Aggensteiner; David Daley; Paramala Santosh; Emily Simonoff; Jim Stevenson; Argyris Stringaris; Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Lenard Adler; Minnie Ames; Olga Demler; Steve Faraone; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; Kristina Secnik; Thomas Spencer; T Bedirhan Ustun; Ellen E Walters
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  What works for whom: Tailoring psychotherapy to the person.

Authors:  John C Norcross; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-02

7.  The effects of stimulant therapy, EEG biofeedback, and parenting style on the primary symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Vincent J Monastra; Donna M Monastra; Susan George
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2002-12

8.  ADHD and EEG-neurofeedback: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  M M Lansbergen; M van Dongen-Boomsma; J K Buitelaar; D Slaats-Willemse
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  'My Virtual Dream': Collective Neurofeedback in an Immersive Art Environment.

Authors:  Natasha Kovacevic; Petra Ritter; William Tays; Sylvain Moreno; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neurofeedback in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - different models, different ways of application.

Authors:  Holger Gevensleben; Gunther H Moll; Aribert Rothenberger; Hartmut Heinrich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Neurofeedback Learning in Patients with ADHD: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elizaveta Kuznetsova; Antti Veikko Petteri Veilahti; Ruhoollah Akhundzadeh; Stefan Radev; Lilian Konicar; Benjamin Ultan Cowley
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2022-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.