Xiaohong Liu1,2, Mohammad-Amin Moradi2, Tom Bus1,2, Johan P A Heuts2,3, Michael G Debije1, Albert P H J Schenning1,2. 1. Stimuli-responsive Functional Materials and Devices, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 2. Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 3. Supramolecular Polymer Chemistry Group, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Monodisperse, micrometer-sized liquid crystalline (LC) shells are prepared by seeded dispersion polymerization. After polymerizing LC monomer mixtures in the presence of non-crosslinked polymer seeds, hollow LC polymer shells with programmable alignment and shape are prepared by removing the seeds. The LC alignment in the LC polymer shells can be easily manipulated by the polymer seeds, as a radial alignment is observed with amorphous poly(phenyl methacrylate) seeds and a bipolar alignment is observed with bipolar LC polymer seeds. After removal of the seeds, the radially aligned samples give radially aligned shells with small dimples. The resulting bipolar LC polymer shells collapse into a biconcave shape. Polarized optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy indicate that the collapse occurs at the defect points in the shell. In the case of a lower crosslink density, LC polymer hollow shells with larger dimples are obtained, resulting in cup-shaped polymer particles. Biconcave LC polymer shells based on other LC mixtures have also been prepared, showing the versatility of the seeded dispersion polymerization method.
Monodisperse, micrometer-sized liquid crystalline (LC) shells are prepared by seeded dispersion polymerization. After polymerizing LC monomer mixtures in the presence of non-crosslinked polymer seeds, hollow LC polymer shells with programmable alignment and shape are prepared by removing the seeds. The LC alignment in the LC polymer shells can be easily manipulated by the polymer seeds, as a radial alignment is observed with amorphous poly(phenyl methacrylate) seeds and a bipolar alignment is observed with bipolar LC polymer seeds. After removal of the seeds, the radially aligned samples give radially aligned shells with small dimples. The resulting bipolar LC polymer shells collapse into a biconcave shape. Polarized optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy indicate that the collapse occurs at the defect points in the shell. In the case of a lower crosslink density, LC polymer hollow shells with larger dimples are obtained, resulting in cup-shaped polymer particles. Biconcave LC polymer shells based on other LC mixtures have also been prepared, showing the versatility of the seeded dispersion polymerization method.
Polymer
shells are of interest for use in drug delivery,[1−3] in separation
of chiral mixtures,[4−7] and as a host for catalysts.[8−10] Among hollow particles, liquid
crystalline (LC) polymer shells are
particularly interesting, as the alignment of LC molecules gives rise
to novel anisotropic functional properties.[11−14] Monodisperse LC polymer shells
have been prepared using microfluidics;[11−14] however, preparing well-defined
LC polymer shells with tunable alignment with dimensions smaller than
10 μm remains a challenge.Requiring only temperature
control and mild agitation, dispersion
and precipitation polymerizations have emerged as promising alternatives
for preparing monodisperse LC polymer particles with average diameters
ranging from a few micrometers to less than 1 μm.[15−17] Based on these polymerization methods, seeded dispersion polymerization
has been developed for amorphous polymers.[18,19] In this process, polymerization commences in the presence of preexisting
seeds with the newly-formed polymer chains adsorbing onto the surface
of the seeds, resulting in a distinctive core–shell structure.
The technique offers great versatility in chemical composition, and
by selectively removing the inner core, hollow polymer particles can
be prepared. This method has been widely used to prepare amorphous
particles, but to the best of our knowledge, ordered LC polymer shells
prepared by seeded dispersion polymerization have never been reported.Herein, we report the facile preparation of monodisperse micrometer-sized
LC polymer shells with programmed alignment and shape via seeded dispersion
polymerization. Since the outer surface of the seed functions as an
alignment layer for the LC molecules making up the shell, we expected
differing alignments in the shell dependent on whether amorphous poly(phenyl
methacrylate) (PPhMA) or LC bipolarpolymer particles were used as
seeds. In what follows, we show that the nature of the seed indeed
determines the alignment and shape of the monodisperse, micrometer-sized
shell, which consists of a combination of the acrylic LC monomers
as shown in Figure .
Figure 1
(a) Monomers employed to prepare the LC polymer shells. (b) Schematic
representation of the synthesis of LC shells with radial alignment
using amorphous PPhMA seeds. (c) Schematic representation of the synthesis
of LC shells with bipolar alignment using bipolar LC seeds.
(a) Monomers employed to prepare the LC polymer shells. (b) Schematic
representation of the synthesis of LC shells with radial alignment
using amorphous PPhMA seeds. (c) Schematic representation of the synthesis
of LC shells with bipolar alignment using bipolar LC seeds.
Experimental
Section
Materials
4-Methoxyphenyl 4-((6-(acryloyloxy)hexyl)oxy)benzoate
(1), 2-methyl-1,4-phenylene bis(4-((6-(acryloyloxy)hexyl)oxy)benzoate)
(2), 4,4’-bis(6-acryloyloxyhexyloxy) azobenzene
(3), and 4-(6-acryloxyhexyl-1-oxy)benzoic acid (4) (see Figure ) were purchased from Synthon Chemicals, Germany. Phenyl methacrylate
(PhMA, 97%) was purchased from TCI Europe. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP
K30) and 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN, 98%) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All solvents were purchased from Biosolve.
Preparation of LC Shells via Seeded Dispersion
Polymerization
Synthesis of Core–Shell
LC Particles
with Amorphous PPhMA Seeds
Poly(phenyl methacrylate) (PPhMA)
seeds were prepared by dispersion polymerization. To this end,100
mg of PVP and 10 mg of AIBN were added to a 50 mL round-bottom flask,
which was then evacuated and backfilled with nitrogen 3 times. Subsequently,
1 mL of PhMA dissolved in 9 mL of ethanol was added to the flask,
after which the flask was put into an oil bath preheated to 70 °C
and stirred at 200 rpm under N2 overnight. After the polymerization,
the PPhMA particles were centrifuged and washed with ethanol three
times. Yield = 77%.The PPhMA seed particles were then used
to prepare core–shell LC particles. To a 50 mL round-bottom
flask, 90 mg of monomer 1, 5 mg of monomer 2, 5 mg of monomer 3, 20 mg of PVP, and 2 mg of AIBN
were added, after which the round-bottom flask was then pumped and
backfilled with nitrogen 3 times. Subsequently, 5 mL of ethanol was
added and the round-bottom flask was put into an oil bath preheated
to 70 °C. Upon complete dissolution of the monomers, 100 mg of
PPhMA particles was dispersed in 5 mL of ethanol and added. The polymerization
was carried out at 70 °C and stirred at 200 rpm under N2 overnight. After polymerization, the dispersion was centrifuged
and washed with ethanol to obtain the particles. The particles were
stored in 5 mL of ethanol prior to use, and the solid content was
accurately measured by drying 50 μL of suspension in a DSC pan.
Yield = 88%, where yield is defined as the weight of the core–shell
LC particles after seeded dispersion polymerization divided by the
total weight of LC monomers and PPhMA seeds.
Synthesis
of Core–Shell LC Particles
with LC Seeds
First, the LC seed particles were synthesized
via dispersion polymerization. To a 50 mL round-bottom flask, 100
mg of monomer 1, 10 mg of PVP, and 2 mg of AIBN were
added, after which the flask was pumped and backfilled with nitrogen
3 times. Subsequently, 5 mL of ethanol was added to the flask, which
was then put into an oil bath preheated to 70 °C and stirred
at 200 rpm under N2 for 2 h. Without isolating the seed
particles, 60 mg of monomer 1, 5 mg of monomer 2, 5 mg of monomer 3, and 10 mg of PVP were dissolved
in 5 mL of hot ethanol and added to the reaction mixture in the flask.
The polymerization was carried out overnight. After polymerization,
the dispersion was centrifuged and washed with ethanol to obtain the
particles. The particles were stored in 5 mL of ethanol prior to use,
and the solid content was accurately measured by drying 50 μL
of suspension in a DSC pan. Yield = 73%, where yield is defined as
the weight of the core–shell particles after seeded dispersion
polymerization divided by the total weight of LC monomers.
Synthesis of Carboxylic Acid-Functionalized
Core–Shell LC Particles with LC Seeds
Carboxylic acid-functionalized
core–shell LC particles were prepared in a similar manner as
described in 2.2.2. First, the LC seed was prepared by adding 100
mg of monomer 1, 10 mg of PVP, and 2 mg of AIBN to a
50 mL round-bottom flask, pumping and backfilling the flask with nitrogen
3 times, adding 5 mL of ethanol to the flask and reacting it for 2
h under N2, and continuous stirring at 200 rpm at 70 °C
in an oil bath. Again, without isolating the seeds, 35 mg of monomer 1, 15 mg of monomer 2, 20 mg of carboxylic acid
monomer 4, and 40 mg of PVP were dissolved in 5 mL of
hot ethanol and added to the flask. The polymerization was carried
out for another 4 h. After polymerization, the dispersion was centrifuged
and washed with ethanol to obtain the particles. The core–shell
particles were stored in 5 mL of ethanol prior to use, and the solid
content was accurately measured by drying 50 μL of suspension
in a DSC pan. Yield = 61%, where yield is defined as the weight of
the core–shell particles after seeded dispersion polymerization
divided by the total weight of LC monomers.
Removal
of the Seeds
The particle
suspension (1 mL) of predetermined solid content was added to 9 mL
of tetrahydrofuran (THF), and the particles were allowed to sediment.
The solvent was then poured out, and fresh THF was added. This process
was repeated 3 times in total. Then, 10 mL of ethanol was added dropwise
with agitation and the particles were allowed to sediment. The solvent
was poured out, and 10 mL of fresh ethanol was added dropwise with
agitation. This process was repeated 3 times in total. The LC polymer
shells were stored in 5 mL of ethanol prior to use, and the solid
content was accurately measured by drying 50 μL of suspension
in a DSC pan. Weight loss = 52% (entry 1), 63% (entry 3), and 36%
(entry 5), where weight loss = 1 – (weight of THF-treated particles/weight
of initial particles); the weights were calculated from the solid
content and the volume of the corresponding suspensions.
Photoresponsiveness of the Bipolar LC Polymer
Shell
LC polymer shells in chlorobenzene (0.3 mg/mL) were
added in a quartz cuvette. The suspension was immediately subjected
to UV–vis measurement, denoted as “measurement 0.”
Then, the suspension was irradiated with 365 nm light for 1 min, and
the suspension was subjected to another UV–vis measurement,
denoted as “measurement 1.” The suspension was irradiated
with 455 nm light for 1 min, and the suspension was subjected to another
UV–vis measurement, denoted as “measurement 2.”
Five cycles of alternative irradiation were performed, and the UV–vis
spectra were measured.
Characterization
Polarized optical
microscopy (POM) images were taken with a Leica CTR6000 polarized
optical microscope and a Leica DFC 420C camera. POM images were taken
by drying the particle suspensions on clean glass slides unless otherwise
stated. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz Bruker
Avance III HD spectrometer in deuterated chloroform with tetramethyl
silane used as an internal standard. Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) images were taken with a JEOL TM 220 A. The average size and
coefficient of variation of the particle size distribution () were measured using ImageJ. The polymer
particles and their cross sections were investigated via transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) using a Tecnai 20 (type Sphera) by FEI operating
with a LaB 6 filament at 200 kV under slight under-focus conditions.
For the cross section, particles were embedded in an EPOFIX epoxy
medium. Cross sections were cut at room temperature using an ultra-microtome
(Reichert-Jung Ultracut E) with a setting thickness of 60 nm. The
obtained cross sections were transferred to a carbon film-covered
grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, CF200-CU). UV–vis spectra
were measured with a Shimadzu UV-3102 PC. Thorlabs light emitting
diode lamps with collimation adapters were used to provide 365 and
455 nm lights. The distance between the lamps and the cuvette was
about 30 cm. The light intensities were about 120 mW/cm2 (365 nm) and 45 mW/cm2 (455 nm).
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of LC Shells
via Seeded Dispersion
Polymerization with PPhMA Seeds
Monodisperse PPhMA particle
seeds were first prepared by dispersion polymerization at 70 °C
in ethanol, with PVP as the stabilizer and AIBN as the thermal initiator.
SEM images revealed an average diameter of 1.50 μm and a coefficient
of variation of 3.7% (Figure a). The PPhMA particle seeds were redispersed in ethanol and
then added to an ethanol solution containing LC monoacrylate 1, LC diacrylate 2, and azobenzene diacrylate 3 (Table ,
entry 1, Figure b),
PVP, and AIBN. The suspension was heated to 70 °C and polymerized
overnight, yielding spherical core–shell particles with an
average diameter of 1.69 μm and a coefficient of variation of
3.8% (Figure b). This
indicates a thickness of approximately 100 nm for the cross-linked
shell. To remove the PPhMA core (which consists of linear PPhMA chains),
the particles were treated with THF repeatedly, prior to transferring
and storing in ethanol. The treatment with THF resulted in a weight
reduction of 52%, which suggests a near complete removal of the PPhMA
core; the original composition of the core–shell particles
was 56 wt % core and 44 wt % shell. SEM images of the LC shells (Figure c) show dimpled particles
with an average diameter of about 1.46 μm. The Hansen solubility
parameter of the LC polymer shells was estimated with a group contribution
method,[20] and the solubility distance (Ra) to ethanol and THF was calculated (Tables S1 to S3). The lower number of Ra to THF suggests that THF has a higher compatibility
than ethanol with the LC, and hence, it is conceivable that THF diffusion
out of the shell is faster than ethanol diffusion into the shells,
resulting in an osmotic pressure that could locally compress the shell.
The TEM images of a cross section of the shells (Figure d) confirm a thickness of about
100 nm for the LC shells, which can be seen as the dark rings with
dimples; this result is consistent with the increase of the particle
diameter after the seeded dispersion polymerization (Figure a,b).
Figure 2
SEM images of (a) PPhMA
seeds, (b) core–shell particles
after seeded dispersion polymerization, and (c) LC shells after THF
treatment (scale bar (a–c) = 2 μm); (d) TEM images of
the cross section of the LC shells (scale bar = 0.5 μm).
Table 1
LC Polymer Core–Shell Particles
and Hollow Shells Prepared by Seeded Dispersion Polymerization
entry
monomer mixture
type/diameter of the seeds
diameter of the core–shell particles
diameter/shape of the LC shells
alignment of the LC shells
1
1, 2, 3
PPhMA/1.50
μm
1.69 μm
1.46 μm/spheres
with small dimples
radial
2
1, 3
PPhMA/1.50 μm
1.86 μm
N.A.b/cup-shape
radial
3
1, 2,
3
bipolar LC polymer seedsa
1.63 μm
1.59 μm × 0.61
μm/biconcave
bipolar
4
1, 3
bipolar LC polymer
seedsa
1.82 μm
N.A.b/cup-shape
radial
5
1, 2, 4
bipolar LC polymer seedsa
1.38
μm
1.32 μm × 0.68 μm/biconcave
bipolar
No diameters were measured because
the seeds were not isolated.
The diameter of the LC shells cannot
be measured accurately due to the extensive deformations.
SEM images of (a) PPhMA
seeds, (b) core–shell particles
after seeded dispersion polymerization, and (c) LC shells after THF
treatment (scale bar (a–c) = 2 μm); (d) TEM images of
the cross section of the LC shells (scale bar = 0.5 μm).No diameters were measured because
the seeds were not isolated.The diameter of the LC shells cannot
be measured accurately due to the extensive deformations.To study the LC alignment, the LC
shells were dispersed in ethanol
and dried on a glass slide for POM. The POM image in Figure a without crossed polarizers
shows monodisperse, micrometer-sized, almost spherical shells with
occasional dimples consistent with the SEM image in Figure c. The POM images obtained
with crossed polarizers are shown in Figure b,c. Maltese crosses were always observed
whose direction was always parallel to the orientation of one of the
crossed polarizers, indicating that the LC molecules in the polymer
shells aligned radially, that is, perpendicular to the shell surface,
as schematically shown in Figure d.
Figure 3
POM images of LC shells (a) without and (b, c) with crossed
polarizers
(scale bar = 10 μm) prepared by using PPhMA seeds. The orientation
of the crossed polarizers is indicated by the arrows. (d) Schematic
representation of the LC alignment in the LC shells using PPhMA seeds.
POM images of LC shells (a) without and (b, c) with crossed
polarizers
(scale bar = 10 μm) prepared by using PPhMA seeds. The orientation
of the crossed polarizers is indicated by the arrows. (d) Schematic
representation of the LC alignment in the LC shells using PPhMA seeds.Seeded dispersion polymerization of a LC monomer
mixture consisting
of monomers 1 and 3 was also performed (Table , entry 2, and Figure ). Since there are
relatively more monoacrylates in the forming shells than in entry
1, the final crosslink density in the polymerized shells is likely
lower, resulting in hollow shells capable of collapsing and forming
larger dimples and cup-shaped polymer particles. Maltese crosses were
observed in the POM images, again indicating radial alignment of the
LCs in the polymer shells.
Figure 4
SEM images of (a) core–shell particles and (b) LC shells
(scale bar = 2 μm). POM images of LC shells (c) without and
(d and e) with cross polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm). The orientation
of the cross polarizers is indicated by the arrows.
Synthesis of LC Shells
via Seeded Dispersion
Polymerization with Bipolar LC Seeds
To induce noncentral
symmetric alignment in the LC shells, dispersion polymerization of
LC monomer 1 developed by Zentel et al. was adopted[15,21] to produce noncrosslinked bipolar LC polymer seeds, which were then used as seeds. Upon forming
the bipolar LC polymer seeds, the monomer mixture for the LC polymer
shell was added to the dispersion without separation of the seeds,
and the polymerization was continued to form the core–shell
particles. LC monomer 1, PVP, and AIBN were dissolved
in ethanol and polymerized at 70 °C for 2 h to form the noncrosslinked
bipolar LC seeds in situ (Figure a). A small volume of suspension was withdrawn from
the mixture and subjected to POM and 1H NMR to determine
the alignment of these LC particles and the conversion, respectively.
The LC particle seeds showed bright spots under crossed polarizers,
indicating that the LC molecules in the particles aligned in a bipolar
manner, similar to that reported before.[15] The integration of remaining acrylate peaks at 5.5 to 6.5 ppm in
the 1H NMR spectrum indicated that around 30% of monomer 1 remained unreacted at this point (Figure S1). Therefore, the amount of monomer 1 added
in the second stage was correspondingly reduced to maintain the composition
of the shells identical to the shells made using the PPhMA seeds;
the LC monomer mixture was added in the flask without separation and
purification of the LC seeds. Seeded dispersion polymerization was
continued overnight, yielding core–shell particles with an
average diameter of 1.63 μm and a coefficient of variation of
4.3% (Table , entry
3, and Figure b). The noncrosslinked LC seeds were removed
by THF, similar to the removal of the PPhMA seeds. The weight of the
LC shells was reduced by 63%, suggesting successful seed removal,
as the core and shell initially made up 57 and 43% of the core–shell
particle. SEM images revealed that the remaining hollow shells collapsed
into a biconcave shape with two dimples distributed symmetrically
at opposite faces of the hollow shells (Figure c). While the average diameter of the shells
remained almost unchanged as 1.59 μm, the height of the shell
decreased significantly to 0.61 μm. TEM images further confirmed
the size and shape of the LC shells, and the symmetrically distributed
dimples were observed as a relatively brighter center upon tilting
the sample (Figure d to f).
Figure 5
(a) POM images of noncrosslinked LC seeds prepared with monomer 1 with polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm); SEM images of
(b) core–shell particles after seeded dispersion polymerization
and (c) hollow LC shells after removing the polymer seeds (scale bar
= 2 μm); (d) to (f) tilt series TEM image of LC shells from
different angles (scale bar = 1 μm).
SEM images of (a) core–shell particles and (b) LC shells
(scale bar = 2 μm). POM images of LC shells (c) without and
(d and e) with cross polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm). The orientation
of the cross polarizers is indicated by the arrows.(a) POM images of noncrosslinked LC seeds prepared with monomer 1 with polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm); SEM images of
(b) core–shell particles after seeded dispersion polymerization
and (c) hollow LC shells after removing the polymer seeds (scale bar
= 2 μm); (d) to (f) tilt series TEM image of LC shells from
different angles (scale bar = 1 μm).Maltese crosses were observed parallel to the directions of the
cross polarizers after drying the shells on a glass slide (Figure a to c). However, since the biconcave shells uniformly “lie
down” on the glass slide, meaning that the radii of the spheroids
are coplanar with the glass slide surface, in order to investigate
the birefringence from different angles, the shells were suspended
in glycerol and filled in a glass cell for POM (Figure d to f). Due to the flow of the solvent,
LC shells first rotated and flowed (see Movie S1), and as a result, the shape and birefringence pattern of
the LC shells continuously changed. Static POM images were taken when
the shells stopped moving, and some shells showed dark lines parallel
to the direction of the collapse rather than the Maltese cross. From
the POM images, it was concluded that the LC shells had a bipolar
alignment, and the collapse occurred at the defects, which is probably
because the unaligned defects have a lower modulus than the aligned
regions (Figure g).
Figure 6
POM images
of the LC shells (a) without and (b and c) with crossed
polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm) prepared by using bipolar LC
seeds. POM images of the LC shells suspended in glycerol (d) without
and (e and f) with crossed polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm). The
orientation of the crossed polarizers is indicated by the arrows.
(g) Schematic representation of the structure and LC alignment of
the LC shells.
POM images
of the LC shells (a) without and (b and c) with crossed
polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm) prepared by using bipolar LC
seeds. POM images of the LC shells suspended in glycerol (d) without
and (e and f) with crossed polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm). The
orientation of the crossed polarizers is indicated by the arrows.
(g) Schematic representation of the structure and LC alignment of
the LC shells.LC shells prepared with bipolar
LC seeds and a LC monomer mixture
with a lower crosslink density (Table , entry 4, Figure ) showed cup-shaped particles with large dimples, similar
to the shells prepared with PPhMA seeds using the same LC mixture
(Table , entry 2, Figure ). Moreover, Maltese
crosses were observed in POM images, indicating that the LC molecules
aligned radially in the shells, even with bipolar LC seeds. This result
suggests that an appropriate crosslink density is necessary to obtain
the bipolar alignment in the shells.
Figure 7
SEM images of (a) core–shell particles
and (b) LC shells
(scale bar = 2 μm). POM images of LC shells (c) without and
(d and e) with cross polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm). The orientation
of the cross polarizers is indicated by the arrows.
SEM images of (a) core–shell particles
and (b) LC shells
(scale bar = 2 μm). POM images of LC shells (c) without and
(d and e) with cross polarizers (scale bar = 10 μm). The orientation
of the cross polarizers is indicated by the arrows.
Seeded Dispersion Polymerization of Other
LC Mixtures
Seeded dispersion polymerization was also performed
using a nematic LC mixture containing monomers 1, 2, and 4 (weight ratio = 65/15/20, Table , entry 5). Monomer 4 (Figure a) is chosen
to investigate the versatility of this seeded dispersion polymerization
approach, since carboxylic acid-functionalized monomers have been
known to significantly undermine the colloidal stability and make
dispersion polymerization challenging.[22] The in situ preparation of the bipolar LC seeds of monomer 1 was performed as previously described, but since carboxylic
acid groups significantly undermine the colloidal stability and are
known to make dispersion polymerization challenging,[22] the second stage of the seeded dispersion polymerization
was modified, with the amount of PVP increased and the polymerization
time reduced to 4 h. SEM images showed that the average diameter of
the resulting core–shell particles was 1.38 μm and the
coefficient of variation was 8.1% (Figure a), indicating that stable dispersion and
particles with low polydispersity were obtained, even in the presence
of the carboxylic acid-functionalized LC monomers. The core–shell
particles were smaller than the previous core–shell particles
(Table , entry 3),
probably because the yield is lower as the polymerization time is
shortened. After THF treatment, a weight loss of 36% was observed,
while the core and shell initially made up 68 and 32% of the core–shell
particle. This indicates that the removal of the seeds is not complete,
probably because the diffusion of the polymer chains out of the particles
was slowed by the dense LC shell, and harsher conditions are needed
to remove the LC seeds more completely. Similar birefringence patterns
to those seen in the previous bipolar shells were observed with POM
(Figure c to h), confirming
bipolar alignment in these LC shells, and that effective control on
the LC alignment is feasible with the seeded dispersion polymerization
method even with more challenging LC monomers.
Figure 8
SEM images of the (a)
core–shell particles and the (b) shells
prepared from monomers 1, 2, and 4 (weight ratio = 20/65/15) (scale bar = 2 μm). POM images of
the shells (c) without and (d and e) with crossed polarizers (scale
bar = 10 μm); POM images of the shells suspended in glycerol
(f) without and (g and h) with crossed polarizers (scale bar = 10
μm). The orientation of the crossed polarizers is indicated
by the arrows.
SEM images of the (a)
core–shell particles and the (b) shells
prepared from monomers 1, 2, and 4 (weight ratio = 20/65/15) (scale bar = 2 μm). POM images of
the shells (c) without and (d and e) with crossed polarizers (scale
bar = 10 μm); POM images of the shells suspended in glycerol
(f) without and (g and h) with crossed polarizers (scale bar = 10
μm). The orientation of the crossed polarizers is indicated
by the arrows.
Conclusions
We report the successful preparation of monodisperse, micrometer-sized
LC polymer shells via seeded dispersion polymerization. Investigation
of the chemical structure of the seeds revealed that with non-LC (PPhMA)
seeds, the molecules in the LC polymer shells aligned radially, and
shells with small dimples are formed. By polymerizing a monomer mixture
with an appropriate crosslinking density in the presence of bipolar
LC seeds, hollow bipolar LC polymer shells can be prepared, which
collapsed in a biconcave shape. For lower crosslink density LC polymers,
cup-shaped polymer shells are formed. LC polymer shells with other
functional groups can also be prepared with this method, revealing
the versatility of the seeded dispersion polymerization method.Our findings disclose a new method to fabricate monodisperse LCpolymer shells with programmable alignments and shapes. Preliminary
results reveal that the azobenzene moieties in the shells can be photoswitched
by alternative irradiation of 365 and 455 nm light (Figure S2), which might be interesting for drug delivery and
soft actuator applications.
Authors: V S R Jampani; R H Volpe; K Reguengo de Sousa; J Ferreira Machado; C M Yakacki; J P F Lagerwall Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Xiaohong Liu; Yifei Xu; Johan P A Heuts; Michael G Debije; Albert P H J Schenning Journal: Macromolecules Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 5.985