Lei Yan1,2, Heng Luo3, Xingsheng Li4, Yongyong Li4. 1. Clinical Experimental Centre, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 2. Xi'an Engineering Technology Research Center for Cardiovascular Active Peptides, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 3. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 4. Department of Gerontology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong, Chongqing, China.
Abstract
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major unavoidable clinical problem often accompanying various liver surgery and transplantation. d-Pinitol, a cyclic polyol, exhibits hepatoprotective efficacy. The objective of this study is to determine the possible mechanism of action of pinitol against endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress regulation-mediated hepatic IRI and compare its effects with thymoquinone (TQ) in experimental rats. Male Sprague Dawley rats were pre-treated orally with either vehicle (DMSO) or d-Pinitol (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) or TQ (30 mg/kg) for 21 days and subjected to 60 min of partial hepatic ischemia followed by 24 h of reperfusion. Pre-treatment with pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) effectively (P < 0.05) protected against IRI-induced hepatic damage reflected by attenuation of elevated oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, western blot and ELISA analyses suggested that pinitol significantly (P < 0.05) down-regulated expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress apoptotic markers, namely glucose-regulated protein (GRP)-78, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), activating transcription factor (AFT)-4 and -6α, X-box binding protein-1, and caspase-3, 9, and 12. Additionally, pinitol pre-treatment effectively (P < 0.05) improved mitochondrial function and phosphorylation of Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1/2 and p38. Pinitol markedly (P < 0.05) protected hepatic apoptosis determined by flow cytometry. Further, pinitol provided effective (P < 0.05) protection against hepatic histological and ultrastructural aberrations induced by IRI. TQ showed more pronounced protective effect against attenuation of IRI-induced hepatic injury as compared to d-Pinitol. Pinitol offered protection against endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38, thereby inhibiting AFT4-CHOP/GRP78 signaling response and caspase-3 induced hepatocellular apoptosis during hepatic ischemia-reperfusion insults. Thus, Pinitol can be considered as a viable option for the management of hepatic IRI.
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major unavoidable clinical problem often accompanying various liver surgery and transplantation. d-Pinitol, a cyclic polyol, exhibits hepatoprotective efficacy. The objective of this study is to determine the possible mechanism of action of pinitol against endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress regulation-mediated hepatic IRI and compare its effects with thymoquinone (TQ) in experimental rats. Male Sprague Dawley rats were pre-treated orally with either vehicle (DMSO) or d-Pinitol (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) or TQ (30 mg/kg) for 21 days and subjected to 60 min of partial hepatic ischemia followed by 24 h of reperfusion. Pre-treatment with pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) effectively (P < 0.05) protected against IRI-induced hepatic damage reflected by attenuation of elevated oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, western blot and ELISA analyses suggested that pinitol significantly (P < 0.05) down-regulated expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress apoptotic markers, namely glucose-regulated protein (GRP)-78, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), activating transcription factor (AFT)-4 and -6α, X-box binding protein-1, and caspase-3, 9, and 12. Additionally, pinitol pre-treatment effectively (P < 0.05) improved mitochondrial function and phosphorylation of Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1/2 and p38. Pinitol markedly (P < 0.05) protected hepatic apoptosis determined by flow cytometry. Further, pinitol provided effective (P < 0.05) protection against hepatic histological and ultrastructural aberrations induced by IRI. TQ showed more pronounced protective effect against attenuation of IRI-induced hepatic injury as compared to d-Pinitol. Pinitol offered protection against endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38, thereby inhibiting AFT4-CHOP/GRP78 signaling response and caspase-3 induced hepatocellular apoptosis during hepatic ischemia-reperfusion insults. Thus, Pinitol can be considered as a viable option for the management of hepatic IRI.
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major pathophysiological phenomenon
that commonly occurs in an array of clinical conditions such as trauma, circulatory
shock, liver transplantation, and resection surgery leading to liver dysfunction,
even failure.
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion is an inevitable process during liver surgery or
transplantation; thus, numerous advanced techniques such as hepatic pedicle clamping
(Pringle’s maneuver) and hemihepatic vascular occlusion (HHO) have been introduced
to control the hepatic arterial and portal venous flow.
Despite implementing such techniques, hepatic ischemia-reperfusion is
considered one of the most challenging elements during hepatic surgery and is
associated with a significant number of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
A mild hepatic IRI often causes multiple organ dysfunction, including lungs,
heart, and kidneys, secondary to liver damage.Despite significant pharmaceutical industry development, safe and effective treatment
options for clinical management of hepatic IRI remain challenging. Moreover, various
surgical techniques have been evaluated during hepatic reperfusion however, none
could prevent mortality associated with IRI.
Thus, there is a need for alternative options to prevent mortality and
improve patient survival during hepatic IR insult. Several researchers have used a
preconditioning strategy by implementing various moieties such as lipoic acid and
isoflurane to protect against hepatic IRI.[4,5] These agents have been shown to
inhibit elevated postsurgical levels of aspartate transferase and alanine
transferase, thus improving the condition of patients with hepatic IR. Furthermore,
intravenous administration of N-acetylcysteine in patients
undergoing liver transplantation showed improved liver function.[6,7] However, the mechanism of this
protective effect is not yet fully elucidated, and clinical outcomes about the
effect of these treatment options against hepatic warm IRI are still ambivalent.
Thus, an effective treatment strategy for clinical management of hepatic IRI
is urgently needed. Researchers have used various experimental models to evaluate
the potential number of therapeutic moieties against hepatic IRI.[9,10] However, partial warm hepatic
ischemia induced by occlusion of the hepatic artery and the portal vein is well
established and widely used in animal models which mimic most of the clinical
features of human hepatic IRI.[9,11] In the present investigation,
we have also implemented animal model to evaluate the potential of
d-Pinitol against hepatic IRI.Pinitol (3-O-methyl-chiro-inositol) is a cyclic
polyol that has shown its clinical potential in patients with non-alcoholic fatty
liver disorder (NAFLD) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.[12,13] In 12 weeks randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study, administration of pinitol (500 mg/d) in
subjects with NAFLD showed inhibition of elevated AST (aspartate transaminase), ALT
(alanine aminotransferase), and oxidative stress levels as a testimony to its
hepatoprotective potential.
The antidiabetic effect of pinitol was mediated by a significant diminution
in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus
patients during a 12-week, double-blind, randomized trial.
Its wide range of pharmacological activities include antihyperlipidemic,
hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant,
and anticancer.[14,15] Inhibitory potentials of pinitol against various
pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), and ILs
(interleukins) has been significantly implemented for its antiarthritic potential.
Furthermore, pinitol exerts its antiapoptotic potential via modulation of
expression of Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma-2) and Bcl-xL (B-cell lymphoma-extra-large) in-vitro.
The hepatoprotective effect of pinitol against d-galactosamine induced,
high-fat diet-induced,
and streptozotocin-induced
hepatotoxicities have been well established. However, the potential of
pinitol against IRI remains largely unknown. Thus, the present investigation was
undertaken to determine the possible mechanism of action of pinitol and to compare
its effects with thymoquinone against the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
stress during hepatic IRI in experimental rats.
Materials and methods
Drugs and chemicals
d-Pinitol (purity 95%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis,
MO, USA). Rats-specific TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) Kit were obtained from Bethyl Laboratories Inc. (Montgomery, TX, USA).
The primary antibodies of caspase-3, caspase-9, caspase-12, AFT4 (Activating
transcription factor-4), AFT6α (Activating transcription factor-6α), XBP-1
(X-box binding protein 1), ERK-1/2 (Extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2),
and p38 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA).
Animals
Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (180–200 g) were purchased from Second Affiliated
Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Animal House, China, and kept in
quarantine for 1-week in-house at the institute animal house under standard
laboratory conditions, that is, a temperature of 24°C ± 1°C, relative humidity
of 45–55% and 12 h light/dark cycle. Animals had free access to standard chow
pelleted food and water. The experimental protocol was approved by the
Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing
Medical University (CQMU-efy-2020021), China, and performed in accordance with
the guidelines of the National Institute of Health Guide for Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals.
Selection of sample size
The sample size calculation was based on the resource equation approach.
The acceptable range of degrees of freedom (DF) for the error term in an
analysis of variance (ANOVA) is between a minimum and a maximum number of
animals per group. To determine the sample sizes per group, the present study
considered the glucose-regulated protein (GRP)-78 as the primary outcome to
compared between various treatment groups.
Induction of hepatic IRI
The rats were made to fast for 12 h prior to the experiment but were provided
with tap water ad libitum. Rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal (i.p.)
injection of pentobarbital (5%), a mid-line abdominal incision was performed
vertically at a length of 3.5–4 cm. The liver was then separated from its
surrounding ligaments to expose the hilar, and then they subjected to surgery as
described previously.[10,11] Briefly, a partial warm hepatic ischemia model (70% of
liver mass) was induced by occlusion of the hepatic artery with a microvascular
clamp for 60 min. This selective interruption of the blood supply avoided
accompanying gastrointestinal congestion and hemodynamic instability. After
removal of the clamps, reperfusion was initiated for the next 24 h. During the
reperfusion, warm saline was injected into the abdomen, and the abdomen was
closed temporarily with a continuous 4-0 silk suture. All rats were placed in a
designed warm container (HTP-1500 Heat Therapy Pump, Adroit Medical Systems,
USA) to maintain their temperature at 29°C.
Experimental groups
Animals were divided randomly into various groups (n = 12–16) as
follows:Group 1: Sham group: Rats were subjected to the surgical
procedure but without the occlusion of the hepatic pedicle. They
received pre-treatment of a vehicle (10 g/kg of 1% aqueous DMSO
(Dimethyl sulfoxide) solution, p.o.) for 21 days.Group 2: IRI control group: Rats were subjected to 60 min of
partial ischemia (70%) followed by 24 h reperfusion. They received
pre-treatment of a vehicle (10 g/kg of 1% aqueous DMSO solution, p.o.)
for 21 days.Group 3: Thymoquinone (30 mg/kg) treated group: Rats were
subjected to 60 min of partial ischemia (70%) followed by 24 h
reperfusion. They received pre-treatment of thymoquinone (30 mg/kg,
p.o.) for 21 days.Rats
were subjected to 60 min of partial ischemia (70%) followed by 24 h
reperfusion. They received pre-treatment of d-Pinitol (5 mg/kg,
p.o.) for 21 days.Rats
were subjected to 60 min of partial ischemia (70%) followed by 24 h
reperfusion. They received pre-treatment of d-Pinitol
(10 mg/kg, p.o.) for 21 days.Rats
were subjected to 60 min of partial ischemia (70%) followed by 24 h
reperfusion. They received pre-treatment of d-Pinitol
(20 mg/kg, p.o.) for 21 days.Previous reports were used to determine the treatment doses of pinitol (5, 10,
20 mg/kg).[15,16]
Serum biochemistry
On day 21, at the end of the reperfusion period (24 h), blood was withdrawn by a
retro-orbital plexus, and serum was obtained by centrifugation at
8350g for 10 min, at 4°C. The serum AST and ALT levels were
measured using reagent assay kits (Accurex Biomedical Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India)
with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (JASCO-V-530, JASCO Corp., Tokyo,
Japan).
Biochemical estimation
Tissue homogenate preparation, estimation of oxidative stress, and
pro-inflammatory markers
All animals were sacrificed at the end of the study, that is, on the 21st
day, the liver was immediately isolated. Tissue homogenates were prepared
with 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), and supernatant of homogenates were
employed to estimate superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced glutathione (GSH),
lipid peroxidation (MDA, i.e. Malondialdehyde content), and nitric oxide
(NO) content as described previously.
Another portion of aliquot was used for estimation of hepatic
pro-inflammatory markers using rats-specific TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6,
glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
homologous protein (CHOP) ELISA Kit (Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery,
TX, USA).
Mitochondrial enzymes estimation
Liver mitochondrial isolation was performed according to a previously described method.
Mitochondrial complex-I activity was measured spectrophotometrically
according to a previously described method.
Mitochondrial Complex-II activity Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) was
measured spectrophotometrically according to an already described method.
Mitochondrial redox activity (Complex-III), that is, the MTT reduction
rate, was used to assess the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain in
isolated mitochondria. It was determined according to an already established method.
Mitochondrial complex-IV (Cytochrome oxidase assay) activity was assayed
in liver mitochondria according to a previously described method.
Reverse transcriptase PCR
The mRNA expressions of GRP78 (Forward: 5′-CTGAGGCGTATTTGGGAAAG-3′, Reverse:
5′-TCATGACATTCAGTCCAGCAA-3′), CHOP (Forward: 5′-CTTGAGCCTAACACGTCGATT-3′,
Reverse: 5′-TGCACTTCCTTCTGGAACACT-3′), and β-actin (Forward:
5′-GTCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCT-3′, Reverse: 5′-ACAGAGTACTTGCGCTCAGGAG-3′) were
analyzed in liver tissue using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction (qRT–PCR) according to a method described elsewhere.
PCR was performed using 1 X forward and reverse primers and 2.5 U Taq
polymerase (MP Biomedicals India Private Limited, India). Amplification of
β-actin served as a control for sample loading and integrity.
Western blot procedure
The protein expressions of caspase-3, caspase-9, caspase-12, AFT4, AFT6α, XBP-1,
ERK-1/2, p38, and GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) were
estimated in liver tissue according to a method described elsewhere.
Briefly, liver tissue was dissected and sonicated in Tissue Protein
Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., India). The lysates were
centrifuged at 10,000g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein
concentrations were determined using a Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay kit
(Beyotime Shanghai, China) on ice for 30 min. An equal amount of extracted
protein samples (50 μg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) and transferred onto polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk at
37°C for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4°C with the respective primary
antibodies that recognized caspase-3, caspase-9, caspase-12, AFT4, AFT6α, XBP-1,
ERK-1/2, p38, and GAPDH. Anti-rabbit horseradish-linked IgG was used as the
secondary antibody, incubated for 37°C for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized
using the Chemiluminescent kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). GAPDH served as the
loading control.
Preparation of single-cell (SC) suspensions and flow cytometry
analysis
Preparation of single-cell (SC) suspensions and determination of apoptotic cell
populations were carried out as previously described.
At the end of treatment, the liver of rats was collected and mixed with
0.4% collagenase and 0.25% Trypsin at 37°C for 30 min and dissociated, ground
and obtained homogenate was passed through a 70 μm nylon mesh. Single-cell (SC)
suspension was washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). In order
to determine SC apoptosis, the isolated SCs were incubated with rabbit anti-cow
S-100 antibody, followed by staining with APC-goat anti-rabbit IgG (both from
BD) with FITC-Annexin V and PI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The
percentages of expression of Fas and Annexin-V on gated S-100 positive SC were
analyzed by a FACS Calibur cytometer using CELL Quest software (Becton &
Dickinson, San Diego, USA).
Histological and electron microscopic analysis
Histopathological analysis of liver tissue was carried out using hematoxylin and
eosin (H&E) stain under a light microscope (Nikon E200, Japan) whereas, the
liver ultrastructural studies were performed under a transmission electron
microscope (H-7000 Hitachi) according to a method described previously.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) was used to perform data
analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error mean (SEM) and analyzed
using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range post hoc analysis (for
parametric tests) as well as Kruskal-Wallis test for post hoc analysis
(non-parametric tests). A value of P < 0.05
was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in body weight, liver index, and hepatic
function tests in rats
Induction of IRI was associated with significant
(P < 0.05) reduction in body weight and
increased liver index in the IRI control group compared to the sham group. When
compared with the IRI control group, administration of TQ and pinitol (10 and
20 mg/kg) showed a significant (P < 0.05)
attenuation of IRI-induced alterations in body weight and liver index. However,
pinitol (20 mg/kg) showed more significant
(P < 0.05) attenuation in the
prevention of IRI-induced increased liver index as compared to the TQ group
(Table 1).
Table 1.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in body weight,
liver index, AST, ALT, and hepatic oxidative stress in rats.
Parameters
Treatment
Sham
IRI control
TQ (30)
P (5)
P (10)
P (20)
Body weight (g)
234.00 ± 3.73
220.70 ± 2.36#
233.70 ± 3.73*,$
211.80 ± 1.96
220.80 ± 3.26*,$
229.50 ± 3.71*,$
Liver index
0.0223 ± 0.0013
0.0329 ± 0.0015#
0.0272 ± 0.0013*,$
0.033 ± 0.0017
0.0303 ± 0.0008*,$
0.0253 ± 0.0014*,$
AST (IU/L)
81.86 ± 12.71
300.00 ± 14.57#
118.90 ± 13.59*,$
306.40 ± 12.66
231.30 ± 9.091*,$
160.30 ± 12.63*,$
ALT (IU/L)
33.47 ± 5.28
146.90 ± 3.80#
49.23 ± 4.48*,$
142.10 ± 6.14
94.77 ± 7.06*,$
62.50 ± 6.11*,$
SOD (U/mg of protein)
6.72 ± 0.47
2.14 ± 0.32#
5.44 ± 0.41*,$
2.80 ± 0.33
3.93 ± 0.49*,$
5.83 ± 0.47*,$
GSH (μg/mg of protein)
14.43 ± 0.83
5.63 ± 0.79#
14.08 ± 0.66*,$
6.55 ± 0.46
10.75 ± 0.68*,$
12.09 ± 0.59*,$
MDA (nM/mg of protein)
0.20 ± 0.03
0.80 ± 0.03#
0.36 ± 0.04*,$
0.71 ± 0.03
0.55 ± 0.03*,$
0.39 ± 0.04*,$
NO (μg/mg of protein)
0.18 ± 0.03
0.88 ± 0.04#
0.23 ± 0.03*,$
0.73 ± 0.07
0.42 ± 0.04*,$
0.25 ± 0.02*,$
Data were represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data
were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple range
test. Figures in parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in body weight,
liver index, AST, ALT, and hepatic oxidative stress in rats.Data were represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data
were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple range
test. Figures in parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.IRI: ischemia-reperfusion Injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol
(10 mg/kg) treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats; AST:
aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; SOD:
superoxide dismutase; GSH: glutathione; MDA: malondialdehyde; NO:
nitric oxide.P < 0.05 as compared with sham
group.P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.There was marked elevation (P < 0.05) in the
hepatic function test (AST and ALT) in the IRI control group as compared to the
sham group. These elevations of AST and ALT levels were significantly prevented
by TQ and pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) treatment compared with the IRI control
group. However, prevention in elevation of AST and ALT levels were more
noticeably (P < 0.05) inhibited by the TQ
group compared to the pinitol group (Table 1).
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic oxidative stress in rats
The hepatic SOD and GSH levels decreased significantly
(P < 0.05), whereas hepatic MDA and NO
levels elevated prominently (P < 0.05) in
the IRI control group when compared to the sham group. Pre-treatment with TQ
significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited
IRI-induced elevated hepatic oxidative stress compared to the IRI control group.
Pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) treatment also markedly improved
(P < 0.05) hepatic SOD and GSH levels,
whereas hepatic MDA and NO levels decreased significantly
(P < 0.05) as compared to the IRI
control group. The inhibition of IRI-induced hepatic oxidative stress was more
significant (P < 0.05) in the TQ group as
compared to the pinitol treated group (Table 1).
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in a hepatic mitochondrial complex in
rats
IRI-induces a significant (P < 0.05)
reduction in hepatic mitochondrial complex (I–IV) levels in the IRI control
group as compared to the sham group. IRI-induced reduction in hepatic
mitochondrial complex (I–IV) levels was prominently
(P < 0.05) inhibited by TQ
pre-treatment as compared to the IRI control group. Pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg)
administration also showed significant
(P < 0.05) improvement in hepatic
mitochondrial complex (I–IV) levels compared to the IRI control group. However,
hepatic mitochondrial complex (I–IV) levels were more effectively
(P < 0.05) increased by the TQ group
compared to pinitol treatment (Table 2).
Table 2.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
mitochondrial complex, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in rats.
Parameters
Treatment
Sham
IRI control
TQ (30)
P (5)
P (10)
P (20)
Complex I (nmole of NADH oxidized/min/mg protein)
33.57 ± 3.49
6.86 ± 3.61#
30.59 ± 3.31*,$
10.01 ± 2.88
16.85 ± 2.75*,$
27.71 ± 3.10*,$
Complex II (mmole/mg protein)
14.62 ± 0.76
4.34 ± 0.76#
11.92 ± 0.83*,$
4.71 ± 0.68
9.03 ± 0.70*,$
11.30 ± 0.53*,$
MTT assay (OD at 540 nm)
0.45 ± 0.04
0.16 ± 0.02#
0.44 ± 0.02*,$
0.22 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.03*,$
0.39 ± 0.04*,$
Complex-IV (nmol cyto-C oxidized/min/mg protein)
6193.00 ± 329.9
880.50 ± 251.50#
5312.00 ± 339.10*,$
1561.00 ± 226.60
3183.00 ± 159.20*,$
4550.00 ± 286.40*,$
TNF-α (pg/mg of protein)
0.22 ± 0.01
1.56 ± 0.15#
0.34 ± 0.03[*,$]
1.21 ± 0.13
0.79 ± 0.06[*,$]
0.44 ± 0.03[*,$]
IL-1β (pg/mg of protein)
0.02 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.03#
0.05 ± 0.01[*,$]
0.22 ± 0.02
0.12 ± 0.01[*,$]
0.07 ± 0.01[*,$]
IL-6 (pg/mg of protein)
0.14 ± 0.01
0.56 ± 0.05#
0.18 ± 0.02[*,$]
0.49 ± 0.05
0.31 ± 0.02[*,$]
0.22 ± 0.01[*,$]
Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and
analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test.
Figures in parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
mitochondrial complex, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in rats.Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and
analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test.
Figures in parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; NADH: nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg) treated; P (5):
pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg) treated; P
(20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats; TNF-α: tumor necrosis
factor-alpha; ILs: interleukins.P < 0.05 as compared with sham
group.P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic pro-inflammatory cytokines
levels in rats
The levels of hepatic pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) were
significantly (P < 0.05) elevated in the
control group after hepatic IRI as compared to the sham group. Compared to the
IRI control group, TQ pre-treatment effectively
(P < 0.05) reduced hepatic TNF-α,
IL-1β, and IL-6 levels. Pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) administration also showed
significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of
hepatic IRI-induced elevated hepatic pro-inflammatory cytokines levels as
compared to the IRI control group. Elevated levels of hepatic pro-inflammatory
cytokines were more significantly
(P < 0.05) inhibited by TQ treatment
compared to pinitol treatment (Table 2).
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic apoptosis in rats
Induction of IRI resulted in significant
(P < 0.05) apoptosis reflected by
elevated caspase-3, -9, and -12 protein expressions and apoptotic cells in the
IRI control group compared to the sham group. Compared with the IRI control
group, TQ treatment showed a significant
(P < 0.05) reduction of caspase-3, -9,
and -12 protein expressions and apoptotic cells. Pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg)
treatment also significantly ameliorated IRI-induced apoptosis compared to the
IRI control group. However, the TQ group showed a more effective reduction in
IRI-induced apoptosis than pinitol treatment (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
caspase-3 (a), caspase-9 (b), caspase-12 (c) protein expression, and
apoptosis (d) in rats.
Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed
by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. Figures in
parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.
IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats.
#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.
*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.
$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
caspase-3 (a), caspase-9 (b), caspase-12 (c) protein expression, and
apoptosis (d) in rats.Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed
by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. Figures in
parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats.#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic GRP78 and CHOP protein, and mRNA
expressions in rats
The hepatic GRP78 and CHOP protein and mRNA expressions were up-regulated
significantly (P < 0.05) in the IRI control
group compared to the sham group. TQ administration significantly
(P < 0.05) inhibited IRI-induced
elevated hepatic GRP78 and CHOP protein and mRNA expressions compared to the IRI
control group. Administration of pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) also prominently
down-regulated hepatic GRP78 and CHOP protein and mRNA expressions compared to
the IRI control group. However, pinitol treatment showed less significant
(P < 0.05) amelioration in hepatic
GRP78 and CHOP protein and mRNA expressions compared to the TQ group (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic GRP78
(a) and CHOP (b) protein levels as well as GRP78 (c) and CHOP (d) mRNA
expressions in rats.
Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed
by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. Figures in
parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.
IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats; GRP78: ER chaperone
78-kDa glucose-regulated/binding immunoglobulin protein; CHOP:
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein.
#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.
*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.
$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic GRP78
(a) and CHOP (b) protein levels as well as GRP78 (c) and CHOP (d) mRNA
expressions in rats.Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed
by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. Figures in
parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats; GRP78: ER chaperone
78-kDa glucose-regulated/binding immunoglobulin protein; CHOP:
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein.#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic AFT4, AFT6α, XBP-1, ERK-1/2, and
p38 protein expressions in rats
There was a significant (P < 0.05) increase
in the hepatic AFT4, AFT6α, and XBP-1 protein expressions, whereas hepatic
ERK-1/2 and p38 protein expressions markedly
(P < 0.05) decreased in the IRI control
group as compared to the sham group. Administration of pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg)
efficiently attenuated these IRI-induced modifications in hepatic AFT4, AFT6α,
XBP-1, ERK-1/2, and p38 protein expressions compared to the IRI control group.
TQ treatment also significantly (P < 0.05)
decreased hepatic AFT4, AFT6α, and XBP-1 protein expressions and prominently
(P < 0.05) increased hepatic ERK-1/2
and p38 protein expressions as compared to the IRI control group. Inhibition in
IRI-induced modifications in hepatic AFT4, AFT6α, XBP-1, ERK-1/2, and p38
protein expressions was more significant
(P < 0.05) in the TQ group as compared
to pinitol treatment (Figure
3).
Figure 3.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
morphology (a), AFT4 (b), AFT6α (c), XBP-1 (d), ERK-1/2 (e), and p38 (f)
protein expressions in rats. Photographs of liver tissue from sham (i),
Ischemia-reperfusion Injury control (ii), Thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated (iii) and Pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated (iv) rats.
Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed
by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. Figures in
parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
morphology (a), AFT4 (b), AFT6α (c), XBP-1 (d), ERK-1/2 (e), and p38 (f)
protein expressions in rats. Photographs of liver tissue from sham (i),
Ischemia-reperfusion Injury control (ii), Thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated (iii) and Pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated (iv) rats.Data were represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed
by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test. Figures in
parentheses indicate oral dose in mg/kg.IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats; AFT4: activating
transcription factor 4; AFT6α: activating transcription factor 6 alpha;
XBP-1: X-box binding protein 1; ERK-1/2: Extracellular signal-regulated
kinase-1/2.#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic histopathology of rats
IRI induces histological aberration in hepatic tissue of the IRI control group,
evident by a significant (P < 0.05)
increase in Suzuki score (Figure 4a) as compared to a sham group (Figure 4b). When compared with the IRI
control group, TQ administration showed a significant
(P < 0.05) reduction in Suzuki score
(Figure 4c).
Pinitol (10 and 20 mg/kg) treatment also markedly
(P < 0.05) inhibited IRI-induced
histological aberration reflected by reduced Suzuki score (Figure 4d and e) as compared to the IRI control group
(Figure 4f).
Figure 4.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
histopathology in rats. Photomicrograph of sections of hepatic tissue
from sham (a), IRI control (b), Thymoquinone (30 mg/kg) treated (c),
Pinitol (10 mg/kg) treated (d), and Pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated (e) rats
(H&E stain). Quantitative representation of Suzuki score (f).
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3), and one-way
ANOVA followed by the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied for post hoc
analysis.
IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats.
#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.
*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.
$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
histopathology in rats. Photomicrograph of sections of hepatic tissue
from sham (a), IRI control (b), Thymoquinone (30 mg/kg) treated (c),
Pinitol (10 mg/kg) treated (d), and Pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated (e) rats
(H&E stain). Quantitative representation of Suzuki score (f).Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3), and one-way
ANOVA followed by the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied for post hoc
analysis.IRI: ischemia-reperfusion injury; TQ (30): thymoquinone (30 mg/kg)
treated; P (5): pinitol (5 mg/kg) treated; P (10): pinitol (10 mg/kg)
treated; P (20): pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated rats.#P < 0.05 as compared
with sham group.*P < 0.05 as compared with IRI
control group.$P < 0.05 as compared
thymoquinone with pinitol.
Effect of IRI-induced alterations in hepatic ultrastructure of rats
Transmission electron microscopy of liver tissue from the sham group showed the
presence of normal vesicular cytoplasm, nuclear membrane, and mitochondria
within the endoplasmic reticulum (Figure 5a). However, liver tissue from
the IRI control group showed distorted vesicular cytoplasm, thickened nuclear
membrane, electron-dense mitochondria, accumulation of autophagosomes, and rough
endoplasmic reticulum (Figure
5b). However, administration of TQ and Pinitol showed marked
attenuation of IRI-induced ultrastructural alterations in hepatic tissue (Figure 5c and d).
Figure 5.
Effect pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
ultrastructure in rats. Photomicrographs of sections of hepatic tissue
from sham (11580 X) (a), IRI control (19300 X) (b), Thymoquinone
(30 mg/kg) treated (11580 X) (c), and Pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated (5790
X) (d) rats.
Effect pinitol treatment on IRI-induced alterations in hepatic
ultrastructure in rats. Photomicrographs of sections of hepatic tissue
from sham (11580 X) (a), IRI control (19300 X) (b), Thymoquinone
(30 mg/kg) treated (11580 X) (c), and Pinitol (20 mg/kg) treated (5790
X) (d) rats.
Discussion
Hepatic IRI is a major clinical problem associated with patients who undergo liver
surgery, transplantation, and circulatory shock.[28,29] Studies demonstrate that
IRI-induced insult, which stimulates the generation of ROS, the release of
inflammatory cytokines, microvascular modification, and induction of apoptosis,
results in hepatocellular dysfunction.[29,30] Furthermore, treatment
options are very limited for the clinical management of hepatic IRI. Thus, many
researchers have investigated the antiapoptotic potential of various therapeutic
moieties for the treatment of hepatic IRI. Pinitol has been reported for its
anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic potential.[12,14,15] Thus, in the
current study, we have evaluated the potential of pinitol against ER stress-mediated
apoptosis during hepatic IRI. The results demonstrated that pre-treatment with
pinitol inhibited IRI-induced oxidative stress (SOD, GSH, MDA and NO),
pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and ILs), ER stress (GRP78, CHOP, AFT-4, and
AFT6α), mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis (Caspase-3, -9, and -12), thus improving
histological and ultrastructural derangements to ameliorate hepatic damage.Inflammation plays a central role in the induction and maintenance of ER stress
during the pathophysiology of hepatic IRI.[10,28] Reperfusion causes activation
of Kupffer cells (KCs) to release various pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α
and ILs.
These cytokines inaugurate inflammatory response, resulting in leukocytes
recruitment and its infiltration. Furthermore, TNF-α stimulates the release of
various apoptotic proteins and Cytochrome-C in cellular cytosol, which activates the
phase of apoptotic degradation. Whereas interleukins are thought to play a vital
role in elevated ROS production. Several studies have documented the direct relation
of the elevated inflammatory response of TNF-α and ILs with hepatic
damage.[31,32] The results of the present investigation support the findings
of previous investigators where hepatic IRI is associated with elevated
pro-inflammatory cytokines levels (TNF-α, IL-1β, and ILs). However, administration
of pinitol inhibited IRI-induced elevated inflammatory response via attenuation of
cytokine levels to reduce the hepatic damage. Zheng et al. (2017) also documented
the anti-inflammatory efficacy of pinitol via inhibition of TNF-α and ILs during
adjuvant-induced arthritis,
and the results of the present investigation corroborate the same.A researcher documented hepatocellular apoptosis as an important cause of
IRI.[1,33] During
hepatic I/R, apoptosis is induced in almost 40–60% of hepatocytes and 50–70% of
endothelial cells, and caspase-3 plays a vital role in the induction of this apoptosis.
ER stress-induced in mitochondria released cytochrome C to cell cytosol,
which further activated caspase-3 and caspase-9.[33,34] ER, stress-induced activation
of caspase-3 dissociates procaspase-12 from the ER membrane. Dissociation of
procaspase-12 resulted in its activation, which further initiated a downstream
pathway where TNF-α promoted the binding of caspase-3 and caspase-12, leading to apoptosis.
The induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis has been well supported by
previous researchers where caspase-12-deficient mice failed to induce ER
stress-related apoptosis.[9,33] In the present study, hepatic IRI also showed significant
induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis, further evident by flow cytometric
analysis where apoptotic cell populations were seen to be significantly increased.
Interestingly, the antiapoptotic potential of pinitol has been well studied by
various researchers.[14,35] The data of the present investigation also showed that pinitol
protected against ischemia-induced apoptosis in hepatocytes which are in line with
previous researchers.[14,35]It has been well documented that ER stress initiated unfolded protein response (UPR)
facilitates cell survival and apoptosis.
Thus, GRP78, a main molecular chaperone, plays a regulatory role in the
induction and maintenance of ER homeostasis.
Under normal physiological conditions, GRP78 remains in an inactive state via
the formation of its complex with inositol requiring 1 (IRE1) and protein kinase
RNA-like ER kinase (PERK).
However, under ER stressful conditions, phosphorylation of IRE1a and PERK
causes activation of GRP78 from its complex, which further combines with unfolded
proteins to initiate protein folding.
Furthermore, CHOP is another pro-apoptosis transcription factor for the
induction of ER stress through downstream targets of AFT-4, AFT6α, and XBP-1 pathway
in UPR.
CHOP has an ability to inhibit the activation of Bcl-2, which is an important
regulator of apoptosis.[10,38] Thus, studies have demonstrated that AFT4-CHOP mediated
activation of GRP78 is a vital apoptotic pathway for ER stress during hepatic
IRI.[10,36,37] In this study, up-regulated mRNA and protein analysis of GRP78,
and CHOP from IRI control group suggested activation of ER stress during hepatic
IRI. However, pinitol down-regulated expression of GRP78 and CHOP, suggesting its
antiapoptotic potential.Evidence suggests that unfolded protein response during ER stress is initiated to
maintain homeostasis mediated by various signaling proteins such as IRE1, PERK, and AFT6.
Stress-induced phosphorylation and dislocation of IRE1a from GRP78 results in
its activation, which further produces a potent transcription factor XBP-1.
The activation of XBP-1 induces upregulation of UPR via its direct binding to
their related promoters. Similarly, ER stress-induced phosphorylation and PERK
activation induce activation of AFT4, which regulates various UPR target genes
responsible for oxidative stress and regulation of CHOP expression.
Meanwhile, phosphorylation mediated release of GRP78 also initiates
translocation of AFT6α to the nucleus where its activated form further up-regulates
the expression of various chaperone genes such as GRP78 and CHOP.
Conversely, p38 is essential for the inherent cellular responses against
external stress, and a body of evidence reported that activation of p38 offers
protection against stress-induced apoptosis.
Our data revealed that the IRI control group was associated with elevated
AFT4, AFT6α, and XBP-1 expressions suggesting induction of ER stress after hepatic
reperfusion. Results are in line with previous research findings that highlighted ER
stress after hepatic IRI.[39,40] These molecular analyses are consistent with histopathological
and ultrastructural findings where induction of ER stress is reflected in the
presence of electron-dense mitochondria with the rough endoplasmic reticulum.
However, administration of pinitol protects ER from ischemic reperfusion damage via
its inhibition of ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation at GRP78, thus diminishing elevated
AFT4, AFT6α, and XBP-1 response.Pinitol is a cyclic polyol compound widely found in various food constituents,
including soy, alfalfa, and pinewood. Pinitol has a history of traditional medicinal
use across geographical barriers, including China, Sri Lanka, India, and European
countries, to manage an array of disorders.[13,41] Clinical findings suggested
that pinitol is a therapeutic moiety with potent antioxidant property and has proven
its efficacy against non-alcoholic fatty liver disorder and Type 2 diabetes
mellitus.[12,13] A large body of experimental studies supported its
hepatoprotective potential.[17
–19] Thus, based on the available
evidence and findings from the present investigation, pinitol can be considered as a
potential therapeutic moiety for further clinical development during the management
of hepatic IRI.Thymoquinone (2-isopropyl-5-methylbenzo-1, 4-quinone), a major phytoconstituents from
Nigella sativa seeds, has been well documented for its array of
pharmacological potential. A recent systematic review demonstrated its potential
against hepatic IRI via activation of P38 and ERK pathway as well as inhibition of
mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress, nitric oxide signaling, ER stress, and
apoptosis.[10,42
–45] Thus, in the present
investigation, thymoquinone serves as a positive control to determine and compare
the mechanism of action of d-Pinitol against hepatic IRI. The results of
the present investigation also in accordance with findings of previous researchers
where thymoquinone inhibited elevated oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines,
ER stress, mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis to ameliorate IRI-induced hepatic
damage.[10,42] Moreover, the protective effect of thymoquinone is more
pronounced against attenuation of IRI-induced hepatic injury as compared to
d-Pinitol. However, thymoquinone may interact with few medications such
as warfarin and beta-blockers (like metoprolol) processed through the cytochrome
P450 pathway.
Thus, future research can be considered where a reduced dose of thymoquinone
combined with d-Pinitol could target against hepatic IRI.However, the present investigation has several limitations that we need to consider.
First, the findings of the present study based on various pathological pathways in
the experimental animal model may not be completely applicable for clinical
pathways. Interestingly, a recent study established a similarity of major mRNA
involved in hepatic IRI during experimental and clinical settings.
Secondly, the ischemic preconditioning by using d-Pinitol cannot be
considered as a routine treatment option for the hepatic infraction as this event is
not preplanned thus, this preconditioning can utilize for controlled elective
situations. Thirdly, although the d-Pinitol showed promising potential
against warm IRI during hepatic transplant, these results cannot be extended to
prevent organ damage during cold storage. Nevertheless, there are only a fraction of
patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Fourthly, Doppler ultrasound
is an advanced technique that is generally recommended to determine the hepatic
ischemia. However, due to the limitation of the state of the art of the existing
facility, the present investigation could not determine the Doppler ultrasound.
Lastly, the effect of d-Pinitol alone on the various parameters has not
been evaluated in the separate group as its broad margin of safety has been well
established in experimental and clinical settings.
Conclusion
The findings of the present investigation sug-gested that pinitol attenuated
ischemia-reperfusion induced hepatic damage in experimental rats. Pinitol offered
protection against ER stress-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38, thereby
inhibiting AFT4-CHOP/GRP78 signaling response and inducing caspase-3 induced
hepatocellular apoptosis during hepatic ischemia-reperfusion insults.
Authors: Mohamed Abd-Elbaset; El-Shaimaa A Arafa; Gamal A El Sherbiny; Mohamed S Abdel-Bakky; Abdel Nasser A M Elgendy Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.000