| Literature DB >> 34274026 |
Feixiang Chen1, Weihuang Liu1,2, Qiang Zhang1,3, Ping Wu1, Ao Xiao1, Yanan Zhao1, Ying Zhou1,2, Qiaona Wang1,2, Yun Chen4, Zan Tong5,6.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injury is a serious health problem and repairing long nerve deficits remains a clinical challenge nowadays. Nerve guidance conduit (NGC) serves as the most promising alternative therapy strategy to autografts but its repairing efficiency needs improvement. In this study, we investigated whether modulating the immune microenvironment by Interleukin-17F (IL-17F) could promote NGC mediated peripheral nerve repair. Chitosan conduits were used to bridge sciatic nerve defect in IL-17F knockout mice and wild-type mice with autografts as controls. Our data revealed that IL-17F knockout mice had improved functional recovery and axonal regeneration of sciatic nerve bridged by chitosan conduits comparing to the wild-type mice. Notably, IL-17F knockout mice had enhanced anti-inflammatory macrophages in the NGC repairing microenvironment. In vitro data revealed that IL-17F knockout peritoneal and bone marrow derived macrophages had increased anti-inflammatory markers after treatment with the extracts from chitosan conduits, while higher pro-inflammatory markers were detected in the Raw264.7 macrophage cell line, wild-type peritoneal and bone marrow derived macrophages after the same treatment. The biased anti-inflammatory phenotype of macrophages by IL-17F knockout probably contributed to the improved chitosan conduit guided sciatic nerve regeneration. Additionally, IL-17F could enhance pro-inflammatory factors production in Raw264.7 cells and wild-type peritoneal macrophages. Altogether, IL-17F may partially mediate chitosan conduit induced pro-inflammatory polarization of macrophages during nerve repair. These results not only revealed a role of IL-17F in macrophage function, but also provided a unique and promising target, IL-17F, to modulate the microenvironment and enhance the peripheral nerve regeneration.Entities:
Keywords: IL-17F; Immune microenvironment; Macrophage polarization; Nerve guidance conduit; Peripheral nerve regeneration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34274026 PMCID: PMC8285852 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-021-01227-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Fig. 1Chitosan conduit mediated sciatic nerve transection repair
Fig. 2KO mice had improved functional recovery of sciatic nerve comparing to WT mice. a Representative image of walking track. b SFI analysis. N = 10. c Representative CMAPs recorded on the regenerated nerve. d Analysis of peak amplitude and latency of CMAPs. N = 3. e Images of gastrocnemius muscle from both normal (left) and operative (right) sides. Bar = 1 cm. f Masson’s trichrome staining of gastrocnemius muscle sections. Bar = 100 μm. g The gastrocnemius weight recovery ratio. N = 10. h The ratio of collagen fiber area to muscle fiber area. N = 3. All values are expressed as Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3KO mice had improved axonal regeneration of sciatic nerve comparing to WT mice. a Toluidine blue staining of regenerated nerves. Bar = 20 μm. b Analysis of the myelinated nerve fibers based on toluidine blue staining. N = 3. c TEM images of regenerated nerves. Bar = 2 μm. d Analysis of the myelinated nerve fibers based on TEM images. N = 3. e Quantitative PCR analysis of regenerated nerves. N = 3. All values are expressed as Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Fig. 4KO mice had enhanced anti-inflammatory macrophages in chitosan conduit guided sciatic nerve repairing microenvironment. a Immunohistochemical staining of Arg1 and Nos2 in the regenerated nerves. Bar = 25 μm. N = 3. b Quantitative PCR analysis of the regenerated nerves. N = 3. All values are expressed as Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Fig. 5Chitosan conduits affected the growth and polarization of Raw264.7 macrophage cells. a Light microscope images of cells cultured on the plate and chitosan film. b Light microscope images of cells cultured in 25% different media for 24 h. c RTCA analysis of cells cultured in different media. N = 3. d Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry of cells cultured in different media for 24 h. N = 3. e Immunofluorescence images of cells cultured in 25% different media for 24 h. f Quantitative PCR analysis of cells cultured in 25% different media for 24 h. N = 5. g ELISA analysis of the supernatants from cells cultured in 25% different media for 24 h. N = 3. h, i Immunofluorescence images of cells cultured in 25% different media for 24 h. All values are expressed as Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; comparing to control medium with the same concentration
Fig. 6Peritoneal macrophages (PeM) and Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) from KO and WT mice polarized differently after chitosan conduits extracts treatment. a, c Quantitative PCR analysis of PeM cells treated with 25% different media for 24 h. N = 5. d, e Immunofluorescence images of cells treated with 25% different media for 24 h. f Quantitative PCR analysis of BMDM cells treated with 25% different media for 24 h. N = 3. All values are expressed as Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; comparing to control medium. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01
Fig. 7IL-17F induced pro-inflammatory factors production in Raw264.7 cells and peritoneal macrophages. a, b Quantitative PCR analysis of Raw264.7 cells treated with different concentration of IL-17F for 24 h. N = 3. c, d Quantitative PCR analysis of WT peritoneal macrophages treated with different concentration of IL-17F for 24 h. N = 3. All values are expressed as Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; comparing to 0 group