| Literature DB >> 34273996 |
Xue Cao1, Zhe Tang2, Jie Zhang1,3, Haibin Li1,3, Manjot Singh4, Fei Sun2, Xiaochun Li1,3, Changwei Li5,6, Youxin Wang1,3, Xiuhua Guo1,3, Deqiang Zheng7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some previous studies on different populations have yielded inconsistent findings with respect to the relationship between levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and future type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence. This study was designed to gain further insight into this relationship through a cohort study with a 25-year follow-up duration.Entities:
Keywords: Cox proportional-hazards model; Hazard ratio; High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Time-dependent variable; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34273996 PMCID: PMC8286580 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-021-01499-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Flowchart demonstrating the participant selection process and survival curves corresponding to the four HDL-C quartiles. (A). Study participant selection flowchart. (B). Kaplan–Meier curve. (C). Adjusted Cox regression survival curves used in Model IV
Baseline features of research participants
| Variables | High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1.15 | 1.15–1.39 | 1.40–1.69 | ≥ 1.70 | ||
| Age, year | 68.15 ± 8.29 | 69.21 ± 8.18 | 69.26 ± 8.89 | 68.6 ± 8.54 | 0.279 |
| Male, n (%) | 207 (56.71) | 178 (49.31) | 176 (47.31) | 172 (47.25) | 0.032 |
| Residence, n (%) | 0.022 | ||||
| Urban | 201 (55.07) | 206 (57.06) | 193 (51.88) | 229 (62.91) | |
| Rural | 164 (45.93) | 155 (42.94) | 179 (48.12) | 135 (37.09) | |
| Educational level, n (%) | 0.081 | ||||
| Secondary or higher | 86 (23.56) | 81 (22.44) | 61 (16.40) | 74 (20.33) | |
| Primary or lower | 279 (76.44) | 280 (77.56) | 311 (83.60) | 290 (79.67) | |
| Job types, n (%) | 0.078 | ||||
| Mental activity | 73 (20.0) | 72 (19.9) | 59 (15.9) | 67 (18.4) | |
| Light physical activity | 93 (25.5) | 98 (27.1) | 116 (31.2) | 127 (34.9) | |
| Heavy physical activity | 199 (54.5) | 191 (52.9) | 197 (53.0) | 170 (46.7) | |
| Alcohol intake, n (%) | 0.040 | ||||
| Mild | 39 (10.68) | 42 (11.63) | 46 (12.37) | 60 (16.48) | |
| Moderate | 326 (89.32) | 319 (88.37) | 326 (87.63) | 304 (83.52) | |
| Heavy | 39 (10.7) | 42 (11.6) | 46 (12.4) | 60 (16.5) | |
| Smoking status, n (%) | 0.3810 | ||||
| Non-smoker | 190 (52.1) | 197 (54.6) | 205 (55.1) | 182 (50.0) | |
| Ex-smokers | 50 (13.7) | 63 (17.5) | 59 (15.9) | 64 (17.6) | |
| Current smokers | 125 (34.2) | 101 (28.0) | 108 (29.0) | 118 (32.4) | |
| Staple food, g/day, n (%) | 0.119 | ||||
| ≤ 300 | 131 (35.9) | 150 (41.6) | 144 (38.7) | 163 (44.8) | |
| 350–450 | 131 (35.9) | 125 (34.6) | 129 (34.7) | 129 (35.4) | |
| ≥ 500 g | 103 (28.2) | 86 (23.8) | 99 (26.6) | 72 (19.8) | |
| Egg consumption, a day, n (%) | 0.026 | ||||
| 0 | 59 (16.2) | 67 (18.6) | 52 (14.0) | 48 (13.2) | |
| 1 | 200 (54.8) | 205 (56.8) | 212 (57.0) | 184 (50.5) | |
| > 1 | 106 (29.0) | 89 (24.7) | 108 (29.0) | 132 (36.3) | |
| Regular exercise, hours/week, n (%) | 0.572 | ||||
| < 3 | 145 (39.73) | 146 (40.44) | 157 (42.2) | 145 (39.84) | |
| 3–10 | 151 (41.37) | 151 (41.83) | 141 (37.90) | 163 (44.78) | |
| > 10 | 69 (18.90) | 64 (17.73) | 74 (19.89) | 56 (15.38) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.9 ± 3.78 | 23.64 ± 3.84 | 22.75 ± 3.76 | 22.27 ± 3.85 | < 0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.74 ± 0.92 | 1.55 ± 0.72 | 1.29 ± 0.57 | 1.28 ± 0.65 | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.00 ± 0.95 | 3.17 ± 0.97 | 2.88 ± 0.99 | 2.89 ± 0.99 | < 0.001 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.06 ± 1.01 | 5.10 ± 1.01 | 5.19 ± 1.01 | 5.33 ± 0.84 | 0.003 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 233 (63.8) | 226 (62.6) | 31 (62.1) | 223 (61.3) | 0.910 |
| Antihypertensive drug, n (%) | 58 (15.9) | 52 (14.4) | 52 (14.0) | 45 (12.4) | 0.595 |
| CVD medication, n (%) | 57 (15.6) | 61 (16.9) | 43 (11.6) | 46 (12.6) | 0.131 |
BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides
Adjusted hazard ratios for incidence of T2DM by the groups of HDL-C levels in the analyses of regression with time-dependent variables
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1.15 | 1.15–1.39 | 1.40–1.69 | ≥ 1.70 | ||
| No. of participants | 365 | 361 | 372 | 364 | |
| No. of diabetes cases | 46 | 35 | 20 | 19 | |
| Incidence/1000 person-years | 12.60 | 9.70 | 5.38 | 5.22 | |
| Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) | |||||
| Time-dependent Cox regression | |||||
| I | 1.00 | 0.96 (0.62–1.50) | 0.46 (0.26–0.78) | 0.37 (0.21–0.64) | < 0.001 |
| II | 1.00 | 1.00 (0.64–1.56) | 0.49 (0.28–0.85) | 0.45 (0.26–0.78) | 0.001 |
| III | 1.00 | 1.04 (0.66–1.64) | 0.54 (0.31–0.95) | 0.49 (0.28–0.88) | 0.006 |
| IV | 1.00 | 0.98 (0.62–1.55) | 0.48 (0.27–0.85) | 0.44 (0.25–0.80) | 0.002 |
| Time-dependent Fine-Gray model | |||||
| I | 1.00 | 0.97 (0.63–1.50) | 0.45 (0.26–0.76) | 0.39 (0.23–0.67) | < 0.001 |
| II | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.67–1.58) | 0.48 (0.28–0.83) | 0.48 (0.28–0.82) | 0.002 |
| III | 1.00 | 1.10 (0.70–1.73) | 0.56 (0.32–0.99) | 0.56 (0.32–0.97) | 0.014 |
| IV | 1.00 | 1.07 (0.68–1.67) | 0.52 (0.29–0.92) | 0.52 (0.30–0.91) | 0.008 |
BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides
I: Adjustments were made for gender, age, education, smoking status, alcohol intake, regular exercise, residence and job type
II: Model I along with hypertension, BMI, consumptions of staple foods and eggs
III: Model II along with LDL-C, TG, antihypertensive drug and cardiovascular medication use
IV: Model III along with FPG
Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of T2DM incidence conforming to baseline levels of HDL-C
| Model | HDL-C (mmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1.15 | 1.15–1.39 | 1.40–1.69 | ≥ 1.70 | ||
| Cox regression | |||||
| I | 1.00 | 0.76 (0.49–1.19) | 0.44 (0.26–0.76) | 0.39 (0.23–0.67) | < 0.001 |
| II | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.51–1.25) | 0.49 (0.29–0.84) | 0.44 (0.25–0.77) | 0.002 |
| III | 1.00 | 0.79 (0.51–1.25) | 0.54 (0.31–0.94) | 0.48 (0.27–0.84) | 0.008 |
| IV | 1.00 | 0.75 (0.48–1.18) | 0.49 (0.28–0.85) | 0.44 (0.25–0.77) | 0.004 |
| Fine-Gray model | |||||
| I | 1.00 | 0.77 (0.50–1.19) | 0.43 (0.26–0.72) | 0.39 (0.23–0.67) | < 0.001 |
| II | 1.00 | 0.82 (0.53–1.26) | 0.47 (0.28–0.80) | 0.45 (0.27–0.78) | 0.003 |
| III | 1.00 | 0.82 (0.53–1.27) | 0.53 (0.31–0.90) | 0.49 (0.29–0.85) | 0.009 |
| IV | 1.00 | 0.78 (0.50–1.22) | 0.48 (0.28–0.82) | 0.46 (0.27–0.79) | 0.005 |
BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides
I: Adjustments were made for gender, age, education, smoking status, alcohol intake, regular exercise, residence and job type
II: Model I along with hypertension, BMI, consumptions of staple foods and eggs
III: Model II along with LDL-C, TG, antihypertensive drug and cardiovascular medication
IV: Model III along with FPG
Fig. 2Sensitivity analyses of the association between HDL-C levels and T2DM risk. (A). Relationships between the levels of HDL-C and the risk of diabetes among individuals under the age of 75 (F-G: Fine-Gray model). (B). Associations between continuous levels of HDL-C and diabetes incidence in terms of dose-response, with 95% confidence intervals being indicated with dashed lines. (C). ROC curves based upon time-dependent Cox regression analyses used to predict 5-year risk. (D). ROC curves based upon time-dependent Cox regression analyses used to predict 10-year risk