Literature DB >> 34272981

Multi-parametric Z-spectral MRI may have a good performance for glioma stratification in clinical patients.

Changliang Su1, Shijie Xu2, Danlin Lin1, Haoqiang He1, Zhenghe Chen2, Frederick C Damen3, Chao Ke4, Xiaofei Lv5, Kejia Cai3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively and noninvasively risk-stratify glioma grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genotype, and 1p/19q codeletion status using multi-contrast Z-spectral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients with glioma were retrospectively included. Multiple contrasts contributing to Z-spectra, including direct saturation of water (DSW), semi-solid magnetization transfer contrast (MTC), amide proton transfer (APT) effect, aliphatic nuclear Overhauser effect, and the 2-ppm chemical exchange saturation transfer peak (CEST@2ppm), were fitted with five individual Lorentzian functions. Z-spectral contrasts were compared according to the three most important risk stratifications: tumor grade, IDH genotype, and 1p/19q codeletion status. We further investigated the differentiation of 1p/19q codeletion status within IDH mutant gliomas. The stratification performance of individual Z-spectral contrasts and their combination was quantified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.
RESULTS: DSW was significantly different within grade, IDH genotypes, and 1p/19q codeletion status. APT was significantly different with grade and IDH mutation, but not with 1p/19q subtypes. CEST@2ppm was only significantly different with 1p/19q codeletion subtypes. DSW and CEST@2ppm were the two Z-spectral contrasts able to differentiate 1p/19q codeletion subtypes within IDH mutant gliomas. For differentiating glioma grades using ROC analyses, DSW achieved the largest AUC. For differentiating IDH genotypes, DSW and APT achieved comparable AUCs. DSW was the best metric for differentiating 1p/19q codeletion status within all patients and within the IDH mutant patients. Combining all Z-spectral contrasts improved sensitivity and specificity for all risk stratifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Multi-parametric Z-spectral MRI serves as a useful, comprehensive, and noninvasive imaging technique for glioma stratification in clinical patients. KEY POINTS: • Multiple contrasts contributing to Z-spectra were separately fitted with Lorentzian functions. • Z-spectral contrasts were compared within the three most important and common tumor risk stratifications for gliomas: tumor grade, IDH genotype, and 1p/19q codeletion status. • The stratification performance of individual Z-spectral contrasts and their combination was quantified using receiver operating characteristic analyses, which found Z-spectral MRI to be a useful and comprehensive imaging biomarker for glioma stratification.
© 2021. European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genotype; Glioma; Magnetic resonance imaging; ROC curve; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34272981     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08175-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  1 in total

1.  CEST signal at 2ppm (CEST@2ppm) from Z-spectral fitting correlates with creatine distribution in brain tumor.

Authors:  Kejia Cai; Anup Singh; Harish Poptani; Weiguo Li; Shaolin Yang; Yang Lu; Hari Hariharan; Xiaohong J Zhou; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.044

  1 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  Jianpan Huang; Zilin Chen; Se-Weon Park; Joseph H C Lai; Kannie W Y Chan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 2.  Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.

Authors:  Jinyuan Zhou; Moritz Zaiss; Linda Knutsson; Phillip Zhe Sun; Sung Soo Ahn; Silvio Aime; Peter Bachert; Jaishri O Blakeley; Kejia Cai; Michael A Chappell; Min Chen; Daniel F Gochberg; Steffen Goerke; Hye-Young Heo; Shanshan Jiang; Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim; John Laterra; Daniel Paech; Mark D Pagel; Ji Eun Park; Ravinder Reddy; Akihiko Sakata; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; A Dean Sherry; Seth A Smith; Greg J Stanisz; Pia C Sundgren; Osamu Togao; Moriel Vandsburger; Zhibo Wen; Yin Wu; Yi Zhang; Wenzhen Zhu; Zhongliang Zu; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.737

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.