Laura D Allen1, Idalina Z Odziemczyk2, Jolanta Perek-Białas3, Liat Ayalon1. 1. Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel. 2. Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland. 3. Institute of Sociology and Center of Evaluation and Public Policy Analysis, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the fall of 2020, it became clear that the initial doses of the COVID-19 vaccine would be limited, and a priority order would be necessary. This paper examines the perceptions of old age in the context of establishing a priority order for the COVID-19 vaccine from the perspective of online newspaper commenters. Two research questions are investigated: (1) how do commenters place older people in line for the COVID-19 vaccine? and (2) what frames and factors do commenters use as reasoning for their proposed position of older adults? RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: : This study involves a frame analysis of 440 online comments on an article published by The New York Times on December 1, 2020 about the U.S. recommendations for distributing the coronavirus vaccine. RESULTS: Older adults were referenced as belonging to one of three groups: older long-term care residents, older workers, and older adults retired and/or isolating at home. Two frames emerged from the data as criteria for prioritization: social contribution and vulnerability. Older commenters themselves frequently stated that they should be deprioritized so that others can be inoculated earlier. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings may be interpreted as demonstrative of pervasive ageism throughout the pandemic; older commenters' sacrificial remarks may reflect generativity, internalized ageism, social pressure from online forums, or some combination thereof.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the fall of 2020, it became clear that the initial doses of the COVID-19 vaccine would be limited, and a priority order would be necessary. This paper examines the perceptions of old age in the context of establishing a priority order for the COVID-19 vaccine from the perspective of online newspaper commenters. Two research questions are investigated: (1) how do commenters place older people in line for the COVID-19 vaccine? and (2) what frames and factors do commenters use as reasoning for their proposed position of older adults? RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: : This study involves a frame analysis of 440 online comments on an article published by The New York Times on December 1, 2020 about the U.S. recommendations for distributing the coronavirus vaccine. RESULTS: Older adults were referenced as belonging to one of three groups: older long-term care residents, older workers, and older adults retired and/or isolating at home. Two frames emerged from the data as criteria for prioritization: social contribution and vulnerability. Older commenters themselves frequently stated that they should be deprioritized so that others can be inoculated earlier. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings may be interpreted as demonstrative of pervasive ageism throughout the pandemic; older commenters' sacrificial remarks may reflect generativity, internalized ageism, social pressure from online forums, or some combination thereof.
Authors: Juanita-Dawne Bacsu; Sarah Fraser; Alison L Chasteen; Allison Cammer; Karl S Grewal; Lauren E Bechard; Jennifer Bethell; Shoshana Green; Katherine S McGilton; Debra Morgan; Hannah M O'Rourke; Lisa Poole; Raymond J Spiteri; Megan E O'Connell Journal: JMIR Aging Date: 2022-03-31