Glenn M Chertow1, Priya Vart2, Niels Jongs2, Robert D Toto3, Jose Luis Gorriz4, Fan Fan Hou5, John J V McMurray6, Ricardo Correa-Rotter7, Peter Rossing8,9, C David Sjöström10, Bergur V Stefánsson10, Anna Maria Langkilde10, David C Wheeler11,12, Hiddo J L Heerspink2. 1. Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California gchertow@stanford.edu. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 4. Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 5. Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, China. 6. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 7. National Medical Science and Nutrition Institute Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico. 8. Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark. 9. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 10. Late-Stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal, and Metabolism, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden. 11. Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, United Kingdom. 12. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin significantly reduced risk of kidney failure and prolonged survival in patients with CKD with or without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Adults with eGFR of 25-75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 200-5000 mg/g had been randomized to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg/d or placebo. Here, we conducted a prespecified analysis of dapagliflozin's effects in patients with stage 4 CKD (eGFR,30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) at baseline. The primary end point was a composite of time to ≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESKD, or kidney or cardiovascular death. Secondary end points were a kidney composite (same as the primary end point but without cardiovascular death), a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 293 participants with stage 4 CKD received dapagliflozin and 331 received placebo. Patients with stage 4 CKD randomized to dapagliflozin experienced a 27% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -2 to 47%) reduction in the primary composite endpoint, and 29% (-2 to 51%), 17% (-53 to 55%), and 32% (-21 to 61%) reductions in the kidney, cardiovascular and mortality endpoints, respectively, relative to placebo. Interaction P-values were 0.22, 0.13, 0.63, and 0.95, respectively, comparing CKD stages 4 versus 2/3. The eGFR slope declined by 2.15 and 3.38 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year in the dapagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.005). Patients treated with dapagliflozin or placebo had similar rates of serious adverse events and adverse events of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage 4 CKD and albuminuria, the effects of dapagliflozin were consistent with those observed in the DAPA-CKD trial overall, with no evidence of increased risks.
BACKGROUND: In the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin significantly reduced risk of kidney failure and prolonged survival in patients with CKD with or without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Adults with eGFR of 25-75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 200-5000 mg/g had been randomized to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg/d or placebo. Here, we conducted a prespecified analysis of dapagliflozin's effects in patients with stage 4 CKD (eGFR,30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) at baseline. The primary end point was a composite of time to ≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESKD, or kidney or cardiovascular death. Secondary end points were a kidney composite (same as the primary end point but without cardiovascular death), a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 293 participants with stage 4 CKD received dapagliflozin and 331 received placebo. Patients with stage 4 CKD randomized to dapagliflozin experienced a 27% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -2 to 47%) reduction in the primary composite endpoint, and 29% (-2 to 51%), 17% (-53 to 55%), and 32% (-21 to 61%) reductions in the kidney, cardiovascular and mortality endpoints, respectively, relative to placebo. Interaction P-values were 0.22, 0.13, 0.63, and 0.95, respectively, comparing CKD stages 4 versus 2/3. The eGFR slope declined by 2.15 and 3.38 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year in the dapagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.005). Patients treated with dapagliflozin or placebo had similar rates of serious adverse events and adverse events of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage 4 CKD and albuminuria, the effects of dapagliflozin were consistent with those observed in the DAPA-CKD trial overall, with no evidence of increased risks.
Authors: John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon; Silvio E Inzucchi; Lars Køber; Mikhail N Kosiborod; Felipe A Martinez; Piotr Ponikowski; Marc S Sabatine; Inder S Anand; Jan Bělohlávek; Michael Böhm; Chern-En Chiang; Vijay K Chopra; Rudolf A de Boer; Akshay S Desai; Mirta Diez; Jaroslaw Drozdz; Andrej Dukát; Junbo Ge; Jonathan G Howlett; Tzvetana Katova; Masafumi Kitakaze; Charlotta E A Ljungman; Béla Merkely; Jose C Nicolau; Eileen O'Meara; Mark C Petrie; Pham N Vinh; Morten Schou; Sergey Tereshchenko; Subodh Verma; Claes Held; David L DeMets; Kieran F Docherty; Pardeep S Jhund; Olof Bengtsson; Mikaela Sjöstrand; Anna-Maria Langkilde Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Ruggenenti; A Perna; G Gherardi; G Garini; C Zoccali; M Salvadori; F Scolari; F P Schena; G Remuzzi Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-07-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David C Wheeler; Bergur V Stefánsson; Niels Jongs; Glenn M Chertow; Tom Greene; Fan Fan Hou; John J V McMurray; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Peter Rossing; Robert D Toto; C David Sjöström; Anna Maria Langkilde; Hiddo J L Heerspink Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Fan Fan Hou; Xun Zhang; Guo Hua Zhang; Di Xie; Ping Yan Chen; Wei Ru Zhang; Jian Ping Jiang; Min Liang; Guo Bao Wang; Zheng Rong Liu; Ren Wen Geng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G Maschio; D Alberti; G Janin; F Locatelli; J F Mann; M Motolese; C Ponticelli; E Ritz; P Zucchelli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David C Wheeler; Bergur V Stefansson; Mikhail Batiushin; Oleksandr Bilchenko; David Z I Cherney; Glenn M Chertow; Walter Douthat; Jamie P Dwyer; Elizabeth Escudero; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Hans Furuland; José Luis Górriz; Tom Greene; Hermann Haller; Fan Fan Hou; Shin-Wook Kang; Rey Isidto; Dinesh Khullar; Patrick B Mark; John J V McMurray; Naoki Kashihara; Michal Nowicki; Frederik Persson; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Peter Rossing; Robert D Toto; Kausik Umanath; Pham Van Bui; István Wittmann; Magnus Lindberg; C David Sjöström; Anna Maria Langkilde; Hiddo J L Heerspink Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: David Z I Cherney; Bernard Charbonnel; Francesco Cosentino; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Darren K McGuire; Richard Pratley; Weichung J Shih; Robert Frederich; Mario Maldonado; Annpey Pong; Christopher P Cannon Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 10.122