| Literature DB >> 34272286 |
Jay T Osvatic1, Laetitia G E Wilkins2,3, Lukas Leibrecht1, Matthieu Leray4, Sarah Zauner1, Julia Polzin1, Yolanda Camacho5, Olivier Gros6, Jan A van Gils7, Jonathan A Eisen2,8,9, Jillian M Petersen10, Benedict Yuen10.
Abstract
In the ocean, most hosts acquire their symbionts from the environment. Due to the immense spatial scales involved, our understanding of the biogeography of hosts and symbionts in marine systems is patchy, although this knowledge is essential for understanding fundamental aspects of symbiosis such as host-symbiont specificity and evolution. Lucinidae is the most species-rich and widely distributed family of marine bivalves hosting autotrophic bacterial endosymbionts. Previous molecular surveys identified location-specific symbiont types that "promiscuously" form associations with multiple divergent cooccurring host species. This flexibility of host-microbe pairings is thought to underpin their global success, as it allows hosts to form associations with locally adapted symbionts. We used metagenomics to investigate the biodiversity, functional variability, and genetic exchange among the endosymbionts of 12 lucinid host species from across the globe. We report a cosmopolitan symbiont species, Candidatus Thiodiazotropha taylori, associated with multiple lucinid host species. Ca. T. taylori has achieved more success at dispersal and establishing symbioses with lucinids than any other symbiont described thus far. This discovery challenges our understanding of symbiont dispersal and location-specific colonization and suggests both symbiont and host flexibility underpin the ecological and evolutionary success of the lucinid symbiosis.Entities:
Keywords: biogeography; recombination; symbiosis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34272286 PMCID: PMC8307296 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104378118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Geographic distribution and host specificity of lucinid symbiont species. (A) Global biogeography of symbiont species in the genus Ca. Thiodiazotropha reveals both localized (Mediterranean and Caribbean) and globally distributed symbiont groups. Shapes represent host species and colors represent symbiont species. Ca. T. taylori (pink) was found in association with eight lucinid species across the globe. Ca. T. sp. “RUGA” (teal) is the endosymbiont of a R. munda specimen from Tin Can Bay, Queensland, Australia. Ca. T. endolucinida (green) is distributed throughout the Caribbean and also associates with multiple host species. Ca. T. endoloripes, previously described as a single species by Petersen et al. (15), is in fact two closely related species (Ca. T. weberae in orange and Ca. T. lotti in purple), so far found exclusively within L. orbiculatus in the Mediterranean. (B) Phylogenetic relationships of lucinid endosymbionts. Shown is a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree reconstructed from 43 conserved marker genes. Circles indicate bootstrap support values above 95%. Colors indicate geographic origin of the sample.
Fig. 2.Phylogenetic relationships of Ca. Thiodiazotropha taylori MAGs and distribution across host species. (A) Phylogenetic relationship among Ca. T. taylori MAGs (high quality) and the individual host species where these MAGs were found in (b–h; a = outgroup symbiont found in the host Rugalucina munda colored in gray). The core gene alignment of Ca. T. taylori was constructed by aligning all shared genes in progressiveMauve and correcting for recombination in ClonalFrameML (). This corrected alignment [alignment available on Figshare (90)] was uploaded to the IQtree web interface to construct a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with 1,000 bootstraps. The best-fit substitution model was TVM+F+ASC according to BIC scoring. Circles indicate support values above 95%. Note that Ca. T. taylori was found in eight host species but one host MAG was found to have low completion and high contamination and was therefore not included in this analysis (C. orbicularis, Florida). Shell images reprinted with permission from ref. 91. Lucinid shells are not to scale. (B) Spatial distribution of Ca. T. taylori in the gills of C. costata and (C) L. orbiculatus. Magenta, Ca. T. taylori; cyan, T. endolucinida; yellow, DAPI-labeled nuclei; green dashed lines, zone of ciliated epithelial cells.
Comparison of the predicted major metabolic functions annotated in the MAGs of Ca. T. taylori, Ca. T. weberae, Ca. T. lotti, Ca. T. sp. “RUGA,” and Ca. T. endolucinida
| Feature | |||||
| Carbon metabolism | |||||
| CBB cycle, form I (RuBisCO) | + | + | + | + | + |
| CBB cycle, form II (RuBisCO) | − | + | − | − | − |
| Methylotrophy pathway | + | + | − | − | + |
| Nitrogen metabolism | |||||
| Diazotrophy, nitrogenase | + | + | + | + | + |
| Respiratory nitrate reductase | − | + | − | − | − |
| Copper-containing nitrite reductase (NO-forming) | − | + | − | + | + |
| Nitric-oxide reductase | + | + | + | + | + |
| Nitrous-oxide reductase | + | + | + | + | + |
| Periplasmic nitrate reductase | + | + | + | + | + |
| Nitrite reductase NADPH subunit | + | + | + | + | + |
| Urease | + | − | + | − | − |
| Ammonia assimilation | + | + | + | + | + |
| Sulfur metabolism | |||||
| Sqr | + | + | + | + | + |
| Truncated SOX | + | + | + | + | + |
| DSR | + | + | + | + | + |
| DsrMKJOP complex | + | + | + | + | + |
| APR | + | + | + | + | + |
| FCC | + | + | + | + | + |
+, gene(s) within the pathway were present in all the high-quality MAGs; −, gene(s) within the pathway were absent from all the high-quality MAGs. Further details are available in and Dataset S3.
This cluster of genes is putatively annotated with the function of methylotrophy. Note that a recent study implicated similar genes in tetrathionate oxidation (92). Further studies are required to elucidate their true function.
These genes were only present in the high-quality MAGs of Ca. T. taylori associated with Stewartia floridana, from Florida.
Overall statistics from individual species and cooccurring pairs in ClonalFrameML
| Species | Length of genome alignment, bp | Recombination to mutation ratio (95% CI) |
| 1,751,700 | 0.814 (0.809–0.819) | |
| 3,149,280 | 0.043 (0.041–0.046) | |
| 3,149,280 | 0.085 (0.083–0.087) | |
| 3,420,600 | 0.082 (0.079–0.084) | |
| Cooccurring pairs | ||
| 1,664,616 | 0.0066 (0.0063–0.0069) | |
| 3,149,280 | 0.053 (0.052–0.054) |
The same core gene alignment was used for Ca. T. weberae and T. lotti together as well as each one individually.