| Literature DB >> 34271953 |
Ewa Latour1, Jaroslaw Arlet2, Emilia E Latour2, Artur Juszkiewicz2, Karolina Łuczkowska3, Anita Marcinkiewicz2, Piotr Basta2, Jerzy Trzeciak2, Bogusław Machaliński3, Anna Skarpańska-Stejnborn2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper aimed to verify how a supplementation of rower's diet with Astragalus Membranaceus Root (AMR) modulated their immune system response to maximal physical exertion.Entities:
Keywords: Astragalus Membranaceus Root; Immunosuppression; Strenuous exercise; Supplementation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34271953 PMCID: PMC8285774 DOI: 10.1186/s12970-021-00425-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
Basic characteristics of the study groups
| Parameters | Supplemented subgroup | Placebo subgroup | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Age (years) | 21.4 | 0.91 | 20.4 | 1.02 |
| Body mass (kg) | 90.3 | 7.20 | 86.1 | 5.71 |
| Body height (cm) | 190.0 | 2.61 | 188.8 | 4.87 |
| Duration of training (years) | 7.6 | 1.50 | 6.5 | 1.91 |
Training schedule for the week preceding blood sampling during the first and second examination
| Days before the first examination | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Total training time, min/day | 190 | 100 | 205 | 105 | 195 | 110 | 90 |
| Time rowed, min/day | 105 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 85 | 100 | 80 |
| Distance rowed, km/day | 20 | 18 | 18 | 20 | 18 | 20 | 16 |
| Training for force development, min/day | – | – | 90 | – | 70 | – | – |
| Extensive endurance rowing training time, min/day | 85 | 90 | 74 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 80 |
| Highly intensive endurance rowing training time, min/day | 20 | – | 16 | 40 | 25 | – | – |
| Unspecific training (running, etc.), min/day | 75 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 10 | 10 |
| Days before the second examination | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Total training time, min/day | 170 | 90 | 190 | 180 | 180 | 100 | 100 |
| Time rowed, min/day | 90 | 80 | 100 | 160 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
| Distance rowed, km/day | 20 | 16 | 20 | 36 | 20 | 18 | 18 |
| Training for force development, min/day | – | – | 80 | – | 70 | – | – |
| Extensive endurance rowing training time, min/day | 84 | 80 | 100 | 52 | 67 | 90 | – |
| High intensity endurance rowing training time, min/day | 64 | 80 | 100 | 115 | 76 | 90 | 90 |
| Extremely intensive endurance rowing training time, min/day | 26 | – | – | 45 | 24 | – | – |
| Unspecific training (running, etc.), min/day | 80 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
Changes in 2000 m rowing ergometer performance before and after supplementation
| Parameters | Supplemented group | Placebo group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Power [Watt] | 437 | 26.3 | 440 | 24.70 | 428 | 19.73 | 435 | 11.08 |
| Power [W/kg] | 4.84 | 0.22 | 4.89 | 0.30 | 4.82 | 0.29 | 4.94 | 0.18 |
| LAmin [mmol/L]a | 1.3 | 0.23 | 1.6 | 0.72 | 1.6 | 0.17 | 1.7 | 0.38 |
| LAmax (mmol/L]a | 15.8 | 4.04 | 14.7 | 2.83 | 17.2 | 2.66 | 15.5 | 3.25 |
| Time [s] | 371.6 | 8.05 | 370.4 | 7.19 | 374.8 | 5. 08 | 371.4 | 3.42 |
aLA – lactate acid. No statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were found between the pre- and post-supplementation results
Fig. 1Relative changes in concentration of IL4, Treg, and Treg/Tδγ between initial states before and after training periods (I-I), between initial and after exertion states (I-E), and between initial and after restitution states (I-R). (I-I) levels of Treg were sustained with an intensive decrease of IL4 (I-I) in the supplemented subgroup, in contrast to an increase of Treg for the placebo subgroup. The post-camp Treg/Tδγ ratio (d = 0.86, p = 0.09) was relatively lower in the supplement subgroup as compared to placebo subgroup
Fig. 2Relative changes in concentration of CTL, NK, and Tδγ between initial states before and after training period (I-I), between initial and after exertion states (I-E), and between initial and after restitution states (I-R). The before and after camp-training baseline levels of NK were sustained in the supplemented subgroup, in contrast to a decrease of NK for the placebo subgroup. The intensification trend in the supplemental Tδγ increased
Fig. 3Relative changes in concentration of IL2, IL10, and IL2/IL10 between initial states before and after training period (I-I), between initial and after exertion states (I-E), and between initial and after restitution states (I-R). The directions of IL2 changes are mutually opposite in the subgroups and at both study points after exertion test (I-E – I-R). The changes in IL2 induced by exertion (I-E) are similar to the changes in IL10 induced by restitution (I-R); the mutual relations of these changes determine the changes in the IL2 / IL10 index. The post-exertion IL2 decrease (d = 1.22, p = 0.02) generates greater IL2/IL10 ratio (d = 1.61, p < 0.01) after recovery
Fig. 4Relative changes in concentration of IL2 between initial (I-I), exertion (E-E), and restitution (R-R) states before and after training period, with their 95% confidence intervals. In the supplemented subgroup, absolute post-exertion IL2 levels (E-E) remained similar to those before the training, but increased in the control subgroup
Relative changes in concentration of IL-2 in the initial (I-I), post-exertion (E-E), and restitution (R-R) states between before- and after training period
| I-I | E-E | R-R | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | RC [%] | d | p | RC[%] | d | p | RC[%] | d | p |
| Placebo | 15,33 [7,57 23,08] | −0,21 | 0,68 | 29,43 [21,68 37,19] | −1,51 | 0,01 | 1,11 [−6,64 8,86] | 1,37 | 0,02 |
| Supplemented | 10,49 [−0,74 21,73] | −3,00 [−13,24 7,24] | 22,07 [17,07 27, 08] | ||||||