Literature DB >> 34271848

Examining Willingness-to-Pay and Zero Valuations for a Health Improvement with Logistic Regression.

Afentoula G Mavrodi1, Stavros A Chatzopoulos2, Vassilis H Aletras1.   

Abstract

Study aim was to elicit the Greek general population's willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a health improvement (recovery to perfect health), examine attitudinal differences between willing- and unwilling-to-pay individuals regarding healthcare services provision, and investigate -using a logistic regression model-demographic/socioeconomic factors impact on their intention to pay for a health improvement. A research tool was developed to conduct a cross-sectional stated-preference telephone-based survey (January-February 2019) and a representative sample (n = 1342) of the Greek general population was queried. The computer-assisted telephone-interview (CATI) method was used to ensure random sampling. WTP was elicited using the iterative bidding technique. Participants' attitudes toward healthcare services provision were assessed through pre-defined statements. Test-retest reliability of these statements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Logistic regression was employed to identify sociodemographic factors' effect on WTP intention. Differences among individuals' attitudes were assessed using the chi-square test. All analyses were conducted using the IBM SPSS Software v.25.0. Analysis showed acceptable reliability for WTP estimates (ICC = .67) and good reliability for healthcare services assessment statements (ICC = .83-.94). Mean WTP was estimated at €439.8. Respondents with higher educational level and higher household income were more likely to be willing to pay for a health improvement. On the contrary, older participants were less likely to be willing to pay. Most participants who considered public healthcare services to be of high quality were unwilling to pay. Logistic regression analysis led to the development of an effective predictive model regarding factors affecting individuals' WTP intention for a health improvement. Further classification of unwilling-to-pay individuals into protest responders and "true" zero valuators showed that protest responders are unlikely to be representative of the population. Hence, study results can be used for debiasing WTP responses, leading to a more accurate use of WTP estimates by policy makers, exploiting WTP values in medical interventions cost-benefit analysis within reimbursement decisions framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Greece; contingent valuation; health economics; logistic regression; protest responses; stated-preference study; zero valuations

Year:  2021        PMID: 34271848      PMCID: PMC8287344          DOI: 10.1177/00469580211028102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  31 in total

1.  Willingness to pay for a QALY.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review.

Authors:  Stephan Dreiseitl; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Testing the construct validity of willingness to pay valuations using objective information about risk and health benefit.

Authors:  Zoë Philips; David K Whynes; Mark Avis
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?

Authors:  Takeru Shiroiwa; Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Takashi Fukuda; Hui-Chu Lang; Sang-Cheol Bae; Kiichiro Tsutani
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Validity of the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument in a Greek general population.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Evelina Pappa; Dimitris Niakas; John Yfantopoulos; Christina Dimitrakaki; Yannis Tountas
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  The Willingness to Pay for a Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Review of the Empirical Literature.

Authors:  Linda Ryen; Mikael Svensson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year: is one threshold enough for decision-making?: results from a study in patients with chronic prostatitis.

Authors:  Fei-Li Zhao; Ming Yue; Hua Yang; Tian Wang; Jiu-Hong Wu; Shu-Chuen Li
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  A Contingent Valuation Study for Eliciting a Monetary Value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in the General Greek Population.

Authors:  Afentoula Mavrodi; Vassilis Aletras
Journal:  Value Health Reg Issues       Date:  2020-07-27

9.  Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the context of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Dimitris Niakas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Estimating a constant WTP for a QALY-a mission impossible?

Authors:  Björn Sund; Mikael Svensson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-09-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies.

Authors:  Caroline Steigenberger; Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni; Uwe Siebert; Andrea M Leiter
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-02-15

2.  Managing the delivery of venous leg ulcer services: A willingness to pay study.

Authors:  Nyantara Wickramasekera; Simon Palfreyman; Elizabeth Lumley; Arvind Dosanjh; Phil Shackley
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.