Literature DB >> 34271565

Personalized dosimetry of177Lu-DOTATATE: a comparison of organ- and voxel-level approaches using open-access images.

L M Carter1, J C Ocampo Ramos1, A L Kesner1.   

Abstract

177Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®) enables targeted radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptor type 2. Though patient-specific dosimetry estimates may be clinically important for predicting absorbed dose-effect relationships, there are multiple relevant dosimetry paradigms which are distinct in terms of clinical effort, numerical output and added-value. This work compares three different approaches for177Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry, including 1) an organ-level approach based on reference phantom MIRD S-values scaled to patient-specific organ masses (MIRDcalc), 2) an organ-level approach based on Monte Carlo simulation in a patient-specific mesh phantoms (PARaDIM), and 3) a 3D approach based on Monte Carlo simulation in patient-specific voxel phantoms.Method. Serial quantitative SPECT/CT images for two patients receiving177Lu-DOTATATE therapy were obtained from archive in theDeep Bluedatabase. For each patient, the serial CT images were co-registered to the first time point CT using a deformable registration technique aided by virtual landmarks placed in the kidney pelves and the lesion foci. The co-registered SPECT images were integrated voxel-wise to generate time-integrated activity maps. Lesions, kidneys, liver, spleen, lungs, compact bone, spongiosa, and rest of body were segmented at the first imaging time point and overlaid on co-registered integrated activity maps. The resultant segmentation was used for three purposes: 1) to generate patient-specific phantoms, 2) to determine organ-level time-integrated activities, and 3) to generate dose volume histograms from 3D voxel-based calculations.Results. Mean absorbed doses were computed for lesions and 48 tissues with MIRDcalc software. Mean organ absorbed doses and dose volume histograms were obtained for lesions and 6 tissues with the voxel Monte Carlo approach. Lesion- and organ-level absorbed dose estimates agreed within ±26% for the lesions and ±13% for the critical organs, among the different methods tested. Overall good agreement was observed with the dosimetry estimates from the NETTER-1 trial.Conclusions. For personalized177Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry, a combined approach was determined to be valuable, which utilized two dose calculation methods supported by a single image processing workflow. In the absence of quantitative imaging limitations, the voxel Monte Carlo method likely provides valuable information to guide treatment by considering absorbed dose non-uniformity in lesions and organs at risk. The patient-scaled reference phantom method also provides valuable information, including absorbed dose estimates for non-segmented organs, and more accurate dose estimates for complex radiosensitive organs including the active marrow.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  177Lu-DOTATATE; MIRDcalc; PARaDIM; PHITS; Personalized dosimetry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34271565      PMCID: PMC9014836          DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac1550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express        ISSN: 2057-1976


  21 in total

1.  EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry.

Authors:  Cecilia Hindorf; Gerhard Glatting; Carlo Chiesa; Ola Lindén; Glenn Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  ICRP Publication 110. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. A report of adult reference computational phantoms.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Menzel; Christopher Clement; Paul DeLuca
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2009

4.  Personalised versus standard dosimetry approach of selective internal radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (DOSISPHERE-01): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Etienne Garin; Lambros Tselikas; Boris Guiu; Julia Chalaye; Julien Edeline; Thierry de Baere; Eric Assenat; Vania Tacher; Corentin Robert; Marie Terroir-Cassou-Mounat; Denis Mariano-Goulart; Giuliana Amaddeo; Xavier Palard; Antoine Hollebecque; Marilyne Kafrouni; Hélène Regnault; Karim Boudjema; Serena Grimaldi; Marjolaine Fourcade; Hicham Kobeiter; Eric Vibert; Samuel Le Sourd; Lauranne Piron; Danièle Sommacale; Sophie Laffont; Boris Campillo-Gimenez; Yan Rolland
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-06

5.  MIRD pamphlet No. 23: quantitative SPECT for patient-specific 3-dimensional dosimetry in internal radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Yuni K Dewaraja; Eric C Frey; George Sgouros; A Bertrand Brill; Peter Roberson; Pat B Zanzonico; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Individualized dosimetry of kidney and bone marrow in patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate treatment.

Authors:  Mattias Sandström; Ulrike Garske-Román; Dan Granberg; Silvia Johansson; Charles Widström; Barbro Eriksson; Anders Sundin; Hans Lundqvist; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  ICRP Publication 133: The ICRP computational framework for internal dose assessment for reference adults: specific absorbed fractions.

Authors:  W E Bolch; D Jokisch; M Zankl; K F Eckerman; T Fell; R Manger; A Endo; J Hunt; K P Kim; N Petoussi-Henss
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2016-11

8.  Clinical implementation of PLANET® Dose for dosimetric assessment after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: comparison with Dosimetry Toolkit® and OLINDA/EXM® V1.0.

Authors:  Lore Santoro; L Pitalot; D Trauchessec; E Mora-Ramirez; P O Kotzki; M Bardiès; E Deshayes
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  A head-to-head comparison between two commercial software packages for hybrid dosimetry after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Daphne M V Huizing; Steffie M B Peters; Michelle W J Versleijen; Esther Martens; Marcel Verheij; Michiel Sinaasappel; Marcel P M Stokkel; Berlinda J de Wit-van der Veen
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-06-01

10.  Personalized radiation dosimetry for PRRT-how many scans are really required?

Authors:  Nanette Freedman; Mattias Sandström; Jonathan Kuten; Natan Shtraus; Inna Ospovat; Albert Schlocker; Einat Even-Sapir
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.