| Literature DB >> 34271533 |
Su Yang1, Zaid Ulhassan2, Aamir Mehmood Shah3, Ali Raza Khan4, Wardah Azhar4, Yasir Hamid5, Sajad Hussain6, Mohamed Salah Sheteiwy7, Abdul Salam4, Weijun Zhou8.
Abstract
Chromium (Cr) phytotoxicity affirmed the need of mitigation strategies to remediate polluted soils and restricts its accumulation in the food chains. Salicylic acid (SA) and silicon (Si) play pivotal roles in stimulating the plant performance and stress resilience. So far, their interactive effects against Cr-phytotoxicities are less known. Thus, we evaluated the beneficial roles of alone or/and combine applications of SA and Si in mitigating the toxic effects of Cr in the leaves and roots of rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Results indicated that SA (10 μM) and/or Si (5 μM) markedly retrieved the Cr (100 μM) induced toxicities by minimizing the Cr-accretion in both leaves and roots, enhancing the performance of light harvesting pigments (total chlorophylls and carotenoids), water retention and accumulation of osmolytes (water-soluble protein and total soluble sugars) and ultimately improved the growth and biomass. Additionally, SA and/or Si maintained the ionic balance by enhancing the nutrients transport, upregulated the ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle enzymes, minimized the extra accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (H2O2 and O2•‒), malondialdehyde (MDA), recovered the membrane stability and damages in cellular ultrastructure in Cr-stressed rice plants. Overall findings suggested that SA underpins Si in mitigating the Cr-induced phytotoxicities on the above-reported parameters and combined applications of SA and Si were more effective than alone treatments. The uptake or cellular accumulation of Cr, osmoprotectants level and antioxidant defense system against oxidative stress can be considered as key toxicity biomarkers for the safe cultivation of rice in Cr-contaminated soils.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Chromium; Oryza sativa L; Oxidative stress; Salicylic acid; Silicon
Year: 2021 PMID: 34271533 DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.07.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Physiol Biochem ISSN: 0981-9428 Impact factor: 4.270