Laura P Cohen1, Demetria Hubbard2, Calvin L Colvin2, Byron C Jaeger3, Bharat Poudel2, Marwah Abdalla1, Aisha T Langford4, Shakia T Hardy2, Mario Sims5, Cora E Lewis2, Paul Muntner2, Daichi Shimbo1. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 4. Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure (BP) guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring to exclude white coat hypertension (WCH) among adults with office systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) of 130-159/80-99 mm Hg, and masked hypertension (MHT) among adults with office SBP/DBP of 120-129/75-79 mm Hg after a 3-month trial of lifestyle modification. We estimated the proportion of individuals with ideal lifestyle factors among those who meet these office BP criteria. METHODS: We analyzed data from participants not taking antihypertensive medication in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) and Jackson Heart Study (JHS) who met the office BP criteria for screening for WCH (CARDIA n = 490, JHS n = 873) and MHT (CARDIA n = 486, JHS n = 614). We estimated the prevalence of lifestyle factors including ideal body mass index (BMI), physical activity, diet, and alcohol use among participants who met office BP criteria for WCH or MHT screening. RESULTS: Among participants who met office BP criteria for WCH screening, 15.5% in CARDIA and 3.6% in JHS had 3 or more ideal lifestyle factors. Among participants who met office BP criteria for MHT screening, 22.6% in CARDIA and 4.7% in JHS had 3 or more ideal lifestyle factors. Ideal BMI, diet, and physical activity were present in less than half of participants in each sample. CONCLUSIONS: Few participants who met office BP criteria for the screening of WCH or MHT had ideal lifestyle factors.
BACKGROUND: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure (BP) guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring to exclude white coat hypertension (WCH) among adults with office systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) of 130-159/80-99 mm Hg, and masked hypertension (MHT) among adults with office SBP/DBP of 120-129/75-79 mm Hg after a 3-month trial of lifestyle modification. We estimated the proportion of individuals with ideal lifestyle factors among those who meet these office BP criteria. METHODS: We analyzed data from participants not taking antihypertensive medication in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) and Jackson Heart Study (JHS) who met the office BP criteria for screening for WCH (CARDIA n = 490, JHS n = 873) and MHT (CARDIA n = 486, JHS n = 614). We estimated the prevalence of lifestyle factors including ideal body mass index (BMI), physical activity, diet, and alcohol use among participants who met office BP criteria for WCH or MHT screening. RESULTS: Among participants who met office BP criteria for WCH screening, 15.5% in CARDIA and 3.6% in JHS had 3 or more ideal lifestyle factors. Among participants who met office BP criteria for MHT screening, 22.6% in CARDIA and 4.7% in JHS had 3 or more ideal lifestyle factors. Ideal BMI, diet, and physical activity were present in less than half of participants in each sample. CONCLUSIONS: Few participants who met office BP criteria for the screening of WCH or MHT had ideal lifestyle factors.
Keywords:
Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA); Jackson Heart Study (JHS); ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure; hypertension; ideal lifestyle factors; masked hypertension; white coat hypertension
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Yuling Hong; Darwin Labarthe; Dariush Mozaffarian; Lawrence J Appel; Linda Van Horn; Kurt Greenlund; Stephen Daniels; Graham Nichol; Gordon F Tomaselli; Donna K Arnett; Gregg C Fonarow; P Michael Ho; Michael S Lauer; Frederick A Masoudi; Rose Marie Robertson; Véronique Roger; Lee H Schwamm; Paul Sorlie; Clyde W Yancy; Wayne D Rosamond Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D Edmund Anstey; John N Booth; Marwah Abdalla; Tanya M Spruill; Yuan-I Min; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-07
Authors: Emily D Parker; Kathryn H Schmitz; David R Jacobs; Donald R Dengel; Pamela J Schreiner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Samantha R Seals; Lisandro D Colantonio; Jonathan V Tingle; Daichi Shimbo; Adolfo Correa; Michael E Griswold; Paul Muntner Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Daniel N Pugliese; John N Booth; Luqin Deng; D Edmund Anstey; Natalie A Bello; Byron C Jaeger; James M Shikany; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Cora E Lewis; Joseph E Schwartz; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: G D Friedman; G R Cutter; R P Donahue; G H Hughes; S B Hulley; D R Jacobs; K Liu; P J Savage Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.897