INTRODUCTION: Different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scanning protocols evaluate the macula. OBJECTIVE: To compare the determination coefficients (R2) between vessel and perfusion densities of two OCTA scanning protocols in order to determine if their metrics could be interchanged. METHOD: Cross-sectional, prospective, comparative, observational, study between two OCTA scanning protocols (Angioplex, Zeiss) in healthy subjects. The R2 between central, inner, and full densities (3 x 3 mm protocol) and between central, inner, outer and full densities (6 x 6 mm protocol) was identified, both for vessel and perfusion densities. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes were evaluated; subjects' median age was 23 years. There were high R2 between inner and full densities with the 3 x 3 mm protocol (0.96), between outer and full densities with the 6 x 6 mm protocol (0.96), and between central vessel and perfusion densities (≥ 0.96); R2 between central vessel and perfusion densities of different protocols was ≤ 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel and perfusion densities have high determination coefficients within a scanning protocol, but not between protocols, given that each one preferentially measures different macular areas. Metrics from different protocols should not be interchanged for follow up. Copyright:
INTRODUCTION: Different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scanning protocols evaluate the macula. OBJECTIVE: To compare the determination coefficients (R2) between vessel and perfusion densities of two OCTA scanning protocols in order to determine if their metrics could be interchanged. METHOD: Cross-sectional, prospective, comparative, observational, study between two OCTA scanning protocols (Angioplex, Zeiss) in healthy subjects. The R2 between central, inner, and full densities (3 x 3 mm protocol) and between central, inner, outer and full densities (6 x 6 mm protocol) was identified, both for vessel and perfusion densities. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes were evaluated; subjects' median age was 23 years. There were high R2 between inner and full densities with the 3 x 3 mm protocol (0.96), between outer and full densities with the 6 x 6 mm protocol (0.96), and between central vessel and perfusion densities (≥ 0.96); R2 between central vessel and perfusion densities of different protocols was ≤ 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel and perfusion densities have high determination coefficients within a scanning protocol, but not between protocols, given that each one preferentially measures different macular areas. Metrics from different protocols should not be interchanged for follow up. Copyright:
Keywords:
Angiografía por tomografía de coherencia óptica; Densidad de perfusión; Densidad de vasos; Macula; Mácula; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Perfusion density; Protocolo de rastrero; Scanning protocol; Vessel density