Raoul R F Stevens1, Erik D Gommer2, Marcel J H Aries3, Michael Ertl4, Werner H Mess2, Wouter Huberts5,6, Tammo Delhaas5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. 2. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands. 3. Department of Intensive Care, MHeNS School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reported cutoff values of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) for the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) are inconsistent. This hampers ONSD as a possible noninvasive bedside monitoring tool for ICP. Because the influence of methodological differences on variations in cutoff values is unknown, we performed a narrative review to identify discrepancies in ONSD assessment methodologies and to investigate their effect on reported ONSD values. METHODS: We used a structured and quantitative approach in which each ONSD methodology found in the reviewed articles was categorized based on the characteristic appearance of the ultrasound images and ultrasound marker placement. Subsequently, we investigated the influence of the different methodologies on ONSD values by organizing the ONSDs with respect to these categories. RESULTS: In a total of 63 eligible articles, we could determine the applied ONSD assessment methodology. Reported ultrasound images either showed the optic nerve and its sheath as a dark region with hyperechoic striped band at its edges or as a single dark region surrounded by lighter retrobulbar fat. Four different ultrasound marker positions were used to delineate the optic nerve sheath, which resulted in different ONSD values and more importantly, different sensitivities to changes in ICP. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observations, we recommend to place ultrasound markers at the outer edges of the hyperechoic striped bands or at the transitions from the single dark region to the hyperechoic retrobulbar fat because these locations yielded the highest sensitivity of ONSD measurements for increased ICP.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reported cutoff values of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) for the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) are inconsistent. This hampers ONSD as a possible noninvasive bedside monitoring tool for ICP. Because the influence of methodological differences on variations in cutoff values is unknown, we performed a narrative review to identify discrepancies in ONSD assessment methodologies and to investigate their effect on reported ONSD values. METHODS: We used a structured and quantitative approach in which each ONSD methodology found in the reviewed articles was categorized based on the characteristic appearance of the ultrasound images and ultrasound marker placement. Subsequently, we investigated the influence of the different methodologies on ONSD values by organizing the ONSDs with respect to these categories. RESULTS: In a total of 63 eligible articles, we could determine the applied ONSD assessment methodology. Reported ultrasound images either showed the optic nerve and its sheath as a dark region with hyperechoic striped band at its edges or as a single dark region surrounded by lighter retrobulbar fat. Four different ultrasound marker positions were used to delineate the optic nerve sheath, which resulted in different ONSD values and more importantly, different sensitivities to changes in ICP. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observations, we recommend to place ultrasound markers at the outer edges of the hyperechoic striped bands or at the transitions from the single dark region to the hyperechoic retrobulbar fat because these locations yielded the highest sensitivity of ONSD measurements for increased ICP.
Authors: Garrett G R J Johnson; Tomislav Jelic; Angela Derksen; Bertram Unger; Frederick A Zeiler; Markus T Ziesmann; Lawrence M Gillman Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-03-02