Literature DB >> 34270037

Isolation of Staged and Viable Maize Microspores for DH Production.

Philippe Vergne1, Antoine Gaillard2.   

Abstract

Isolated microspore culture systems have been designed in maize by several groups, mainly from the late 1980s to early 2000s. However, even with optimized protocols, microspore embryogenesis induction has remained very dependent on the genotype in maize, with elite germplasm generally displaying no response or very low response. Yet, these last few years, significant progress has been accomplished in understanding and controlling microspore embryogenesis induction in model dicot and monocot species. This knowledge may be transferred to maize, and isolated microspore culture may gain new interest in this crop, at least for embryogenesis research. The methods we hereby present in detail permit the purification of 3-12 × 105 viable microspores per maize tassel, at the favorable stage for microspore embryogenesis. When cultured in appropriate liquid media, microspores from responsive genotypes give rise to androgenic embryos, which can then be regenerated into fertile doubled haploid plants.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgenesis; Isolated microspores; Maltose; Microspore culture; Microspore embryogenesis; Percoll; Sucrose; Zea mays L

Year:  2021        PMID: 34270037     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1315-3_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  21 in total

1.  Identification of candidate genes for in vitro androgenesis induction in maize.

Authors:  P Barret; M Brinkman; P Dufour; A Murigneux; M Beckert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  How microspores transform into haploid embryos: changes associated with embryogenesis induction and microspore-derived embryogenesis.

Authors:  José M Seguí-Simarro; Fernando Nuez
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.500

3.  Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Regeneration.

Authors:  Momoko Ikeuchi; David S Favero; Yuki Sakamoto; Akira Iwase; Duncan Coleman; Bart Rymen; Keiko Sugimoto
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 26.379

4.  Microspore embryogenesis: targeting the determinant factors of stress-induced cell reprogramming for crop improvement.

Authors:  Pilar S Testillano
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 5.  To regenerate or not to regenerate: factors that drive plant regeneration.

Authors:  Kaoru Sugimoto; Haruka Temman; Satoshi Kadokura; Sachihiro Matsunaga
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 6.  Puzzling out plant reproduction by haploid induction for innovations in plant breeding.

Authors:  Nathanaël M A Jacquier; Laurine M Gilles; Douglas E Pyott; Jean-Pierre Martinant; Peter M Rogowsky; Thomas Widiez
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 15.793

7.  Improved formation of regenerable callus in isolated microspore culture of maize: impact of carbohydrates, plating density and time of transfer.

Authors:  M Nägeli; J E Schmid; P Stamp; B Büter
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.570

8.  Complexity and Genetic Variability of Heat-Shock Protein Expression in Isolated Maize Microspores.

Authors:  J. L. Magnard; P. Vergne; C. Dumas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Optimization of maize microspore isolation and culture conditions for reliable plant regeneration.

Authors:  A Gaillard; P Vergne; M Beckert
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 10.  Current insights into hormonal regulation of microspore embryogenesis.

Authors:  Iwona Żur; Ewa Dubas; Monika Krzewska; Franciszek Janowiak
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.