Rachel K Spooner1,2, Alex I Wiesman1,2, Tony W Wilson1,2. 1. Institute for Human Neuroscience, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. 2. College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Motor control requires a reciprocal volley between somatosensory and motor systems, with somatosensory feedback being essential for the online updating of motor commands to achieve behavioral outcomes. However, this dynamic interplay among sensorimotor brain systems serving motor control remains poorly understood. Methods: To address this, we designed a novel somatosensory entrainment-movement task, which 25 adults completed during magnetoencephalography (MEG). Specifically, participants completed a quasi-paced finger-tapping paradigm while subthreshold electrical stimulation was applied to the right median nerve at a sensorimotor-relevant frequency (15 Hz) and during a second condition where no electrical stimulation was applied. The MEG data were transformed into the time-frequency domain and imaged by using a beamformer to evaluate the effect of somatosensory feedback (i.e., entrainment) on movement-related oscillations and motor performance at the single trial level. Results: Our results indicated spectrally specific reductions in movement-related oscillatory power (i.e., theta, gamma) during 15 Hz stimulation in the contralateral motor cortex during motor execution. In addition, we observed robust cross-frequency coupling within the motor cortex and further, stronger theta-gamma coupling was predictive of faster reaction times, irrespective of condition (i.e., stim vs. no stim). Finally, in the presence of electrical stimulation, cross-frequency coupling of movement-related oscillations was reduced, and the stronger the entrained neuronal populations (i.e., increased oscillatory power) were before movement onset, the weaker the inherent theta-gamma coupling became in the motor cortex. Discussion: This novel exogenous manipulation paradigm provides key insights on how the somatosensory system modulates the motor cortical oscillations required for volitional movement in the normative sensorimotor system.
Introduction: Motor control requires a reciprocal volley between somatosensory and motor systems, with somatosensory feedback being essential for the online updating of motor commands to achieve behavioral outcomes. However, this dynamic interplay among sensorimotor brain systems serving motor control remains poorly understood. Methods: To address this, we designed a novel somatosensory entrainment-movement task, which 25 adults completed during magnetoencephalography (MEG). Specifically, participants completed a quasi-paced finger-tapping paradigm while subthreshold electrical stimulation was applied to the right median nerve at a sensorimotor-relevant frequency (15 Hz) and during a second condition where no electrical stimulation was applied. The MEG data were transformed into the time-frequency domain and imaged by using a beamformer to evaluate the effect of somatosensory feedback (i.e., entrainment) on movement-related oscillations and motor performance at the single trial level. Results: Our results indicated spectrally specific reductions in movement-related oscillatory power (i.e., theta, gamma) during 15 Hz stimulation in the contralateral motor cortex during motor execution. In addition, we observed robust cross-frequency coupling within the motor cortex and further, stronger theta-gamma coupling was predictive of faster reaction times, irrespective of condition (i.e., stim vs. no stim). Finally, in the presence of electrical stimulation, cross-frequency coupling of movement-related oscillations was reduced, and the stronger the entrained neuronal populations (i.e., increased oscillatory power) were before movement onset, the weaker the inherent theta-gamma coupling became in the motor cortex. Discussion: This novel exogenous manipulation paradigm provides key insights on how the somatosensory system modulates the motor cortical oscillations required for volitional movement in the normative sensorimotor system.
Authors: Constantin von Nicolai; Gerhard Engler; Andrew Sharott; Andreas K Engel; Christian K Moll; Markus Siegel Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Tony W Wilson; Erin Slason; Ryan Asherin; Eugene Kronberg; Peter D Teale; Martin L Reite; Donald C Rojas Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Bradley Voytek; Andrew S Kayser; David Badre; David Fegen; Edward F Chang; Nathan E Crone; Josef Parvizi; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Rachel K Spooner; Alex I Wiesman; Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 5.038