Literature DB >> 34269532

Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches).

Seo Young Park1, Ji Eun Park2, Hyungjin Kim3, Seong Ho Park4.   

Abstract

The recent introduction of various high-dimensional modeling methods, such as radiomics and deep learning, has created a much greater diversity in modeling approaches for survival prediction (or, more generally, time-to-event prediction). The newness of the recent modeling approaches and unfamiliarity with the model outputs may confuse some researchers and practitioners about the evaluation of the performance of such models. Methodological literacy to critically appraise the performance evaluation of the models and, ideally, the ability to conduct such an evaluation would be needed for those who want to develop models or apply them in practice. This article intends to provide intuitive, conceptual, and practical explanations of the statistical methods for evaluating the performance of survival prediction models with minimal usage of mathematical descriptions. It covers from conventional to deep learning methods, and emphasis has been placed on recent modeling approaches. This review article includes straightforward explanations of C indices (Harrell's C index, etc.), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration plot, other methods for evaluating the calibration performance, and Brier score.
Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Artificial intelligence; Calibration; Deep learning; Discrimination; Machine learning; Performance; Prediction model; Predictive model; Survival; Time-to-event

Year:  2021        PMID: 34269532     DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN: 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


  5 in total

1.  Restricted Mean Survival Time for Survival Analysis: A Quick Guide for Clinical Researchers.

Authors:  Kyunghwa Han; Inkyung Jung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 7.109

2.  Research Highlight: How to Use Technical and Oncologic Outcomes of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation According to Guidelines by Society of Interventional Oncology and DATECAN?

Authors:  Min Woo Lee; Hyunchul Rhim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Predictive models for clinical decision making: Deep dives in practical machine learning.

Authors:  Sandra Eloranta; Magnus Boman
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 13.068

4.  Systemic Inflammation Index and Tumor Glycolytic Heterogeneity Help Risk Stratify Patients with Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Kun-Han Lue; Chun-Hou Huang; Tsung-Cheng Hsieh; Shu-Hsin Liu; Yi-Feng Wu; Yu-Hung Chen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Prognostic Values of Inflammatory Indexes and Clinical Factors in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Bee-Song Chang; Tai-Chu Peng; Yi-Feng Wu; Tsung-Cheng Hsieh; Chun-Hou Huang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.