| Literature DB >> 34269532 |
Seo Young Park1, Ji Eun Park2, Hyungjin Kim3, Seong Ho Park4.
Abstract
The recent introduction of various high-dimensional modeling methods, such as radiomics and deep learning, has created a much greater diversity in modeling approaches for survival prediction (or, more generally, time-to-event prediction). The newness of the recent modeling approaches and unfamiliarity with the model outputs may confuse some researchers and practitioners about the evaluation of the performance of such models. Methodological literacy to critically appraise the performance evaluation of the models and, ideally, the ability to conduct such an evaluation would be needed for those who want to develop models or apply them in practice. This article intends to provide intuitive, conceptual, and practical explanations of the statistical methods for evaluating the performance of survival prediction models with minimal usage of mathematical descriptions. It covers from conventional to deep learning methods, and emphasis has been placed on recent modeling approaches. This review article includes straightforward explanations of C indices (Harrell's C index, etc.), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration plot, other methods for evaluating the calibration performance, and Brier score.Entities:
Keywords: Accuracy; Artificial intelligence; Calibration; Deep learning; Discrimination; Machine learning; Performance; Prediction model; Predictive model; Survival; Time-to-event
Year: 2021 PMID: 34269532 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500