Literature DB >> 34268468

Incidental detection of myocardial clefts in a patient with acute inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a very unusual and potentially ominous association-a case-report.

Giovanni Garau1, Yoann Bataille1, Eric Larose2, Etienne Hoffer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The crescent availability of high-resolution cardiac imaging allows detection of myocardial structural variations. Differentiate these entities from others with different clinical significance can be challenging. Clinicians should be familiar with myocardial clefts to avoid erroneous diagnosis. CASE
SUMMARY: A 63-year-old smoker man alerted the emergency medical system for sudden chest pain. The electrocardiogram showed Pardee wave in inferior leads. Coronary angiography evidenced a 100% occlusion of right coronary artery that was treated by angioplasty and drug-eluting stent implantation with optimal angiographic result. At ventriculography, two fissure-like protrusion were observed in the inferior wall. Urgent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) demonstrated two deep fissures on the mid-inferior wall, contained by a thin sub-epicardial layer, with sub-total obliteration during systole. A diagnosis of myocardial clefts was suspected and after Heart Team discussion, a conservative strategy was proposed. Early cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) confirmed two myocardial crypts on the mid-inferior wall. Stability of myocardial fissures and absence of left ventricular remodelling was confirmed by TTE, in a 2 years of follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Myocardial cleft should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of myocardial wall defects. In a patient presenting with an acute myocardial infarction, the main differential diagnosis is pseudoaneurysm. In this setting modified TTE views and meticulous analysis of CMR sequences are recommended to confirm the diagnosis and estimate the risk of myocardial rupture.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Case report; Echocardiography; Myocardial cleft; Pseudoaneurysm

Year:  2020        PMID: 34268468      PMCID: PMC8276608          DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep        ISSN: 2514-2119


Myocardial clefts should be considered in the differential diagnosis of myocardial wall defects and modified transthoracic echocardiogram views are often needed to their optimal delineation. When a myocardial wall defect is demonstrated in the context of acute myocardial infarction, the risk of ventricular rupture should always be estimated by meticulous analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance sequences.

Introduction

Myocardial clefts are asymptomatic unusual findings during diagnostic imaging techniques. Up to now, there is no definite evidence that their presence is associated with pathological causes/process. Clinicians should be aware of this rare entity in order to avoid erroneous diagnosis.

Timeline

Case presentation

A 63-year-old Caucasian smoker man alerted the emergency medical system for sudden chest pain. He neither had a relevant past medical history nor other cardiac risk factors. Physical examination at presentation was normal. The electrocardiogram showed Pardee wave in inferior leads. Immediate coronary angiography evidenced a 100% occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA), complete absence of visible retrograde collateral flow and intermediate disease of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. The culprit lesion was treated by angioplasty and drug-eluting stent implantation with optimal angiographic result. Symptom onset-to-balloon time was 120 minutes. At ventriculography, two finger-shaped images with contrast penetration were observed in the inferior wall ( and Supplementary material online, ). Urgent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed to assess myocardial and valve function and further characterize this finding. It showed a normal left ventricular (LV) cavity with mild concentric hypertrophy, an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50% with severe hypokinesia of inferior wall. Two fissure-like protrusions penetrating more than 50% of the wall thickness, contained by a thin sub epicardial layer and with sub-total obliteration during systole, were confirmed on the mid-inferior wall ( and Supplementary material online, and ). A diagnosis of incidental myocardial clefts was suspected. After Heart Team discussion, a conservative approach was applied. Three days later, the patient underwent repeated coronary angiography: functional assessment of the LAD lesion was negative with instantaneous fractional reserve of 0.95. Early after discharge, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed with demonstration of two deep myocardial crypts on the mid-inferior wall ( and Supplementary material online, ). Stability of myocardial fissures and absence of LV remodelling was confirmed by regular TTE follow-ups in a 2 years window. Ventriculography showing two finger-shaped images with contrast penetration in the inferior wall during different phases of cardiac cycle (A, proto-diastole; B, tele-diastole; C, proto-systole; and D, tele-systole). Echocardiographic features of myocardial crypts. (A) Transthoracic echocardiogram two-chamber view showing diastolic features of a myocardial crypt: penetration perpendicular to myocardial wall and contention by thin sub epicardial layer (white arrow); (B) systolic sub-total obliteration on transthoracic echocardiogram two-chamber view; and (C) modified two-chamber view demonstrates the presence of second, more apical crypt parallel of the previous one (white arrow). (A) Optimal delineation of the two crypts in cardiac magnetic resonance two-chamber view sequence (black arrows) and (B) obvious hyperenhancement in the inferior wall (white arrows) with adjacent myocardial crypt (open arrow) on the cardiac magnetic resonance-late gadolinium enhancement short-axis sequence.

Discussion

Clefts (also called ‘crypts’, or ‘fissures’) are defined as invaginations penetrating more than 50% of the adjoining compact myocardium thickness, perpendicular to the long axis of the LV, tending to narrow or occlude in systole and without local hypokinesia or dyskinesia., They are more commonly found in the interventricular septum and LV inferior wall. Congenital LV clefts are usually asymptomatic and nowadays more often incidentally discovered during cross-sectional diagnostic imaging procedures. Their aetiopathogenesis remains a source of debate but it is generally admitted that they represent a failure to resorb the trabeculated part of ventricular wall during normal embryological development. Myocardial clefts were initially described in early postmortem studies of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Donald Teare, with his historical publication in 1958, did the first pathological description. Their systolic narrowing or obliteration explains why these entities remained largely under-recognized by pathologists: postmortem heart specimens are always in a contracted state and features are closer to end-systolic cardiac images than end-diastolic ones. In addition, they may be easily overlooked by TTE due to their frequent location in non-standard views. These findings were later described in patients with genetic mutations related to HCM suggesting a potential role as preclinical marker of the disease. However, larger and more recent CMR series have found myocardial clefts in 6% of healthy individuals, toning down the initial enthusiasm; noteworthy, on follow-up, there was no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events or stroke incidence compared to the control group. Crypts need to be differentiated from other myocardial wall defects with different pathological profile and clinical significance. Especially in presence of multiples clefts, they can mimic trabeculations characteristic of non-compacted myocardium (NCM). There is considerable debate about the NCM diagnostic criteria. ‘Jenni criteria’ are the most used in the literature and include: a bilayered myocardium, a non-compacted to compacted ratio >2:1, communication with the intertrabecular space demonstrated by colour Doppler, absence of coexisting cardiac abnormalities, and presence of multiple prominent trabeculations in end-systole., It is also mandatory to differentiate them from LV diverticulum, aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm (). Diverticulum is an out-pouching that contains endocardium, myocardium and pericardium, and displays synchronous contractility. LV aneurysm represents a potential complication of a transmural acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and it is characterized by a thin, scarred or fibrotic wall, devoid of muscle or containing necrotic muscle; the involved wall segment is either akinetic (without movement) or dyskinetic (with paradoxical ballooning) during systole., Pseudoaneurysm forms when cardiac rupture is contained by adherent pericardium or scar tissue. The most common causes are AMI and surgery., In our case, in the setting of inferior AMI, the main differential diagnosis was with LV pseudoaneurysm. Analysing CMR sequences we observed an LVEF of 48% with basal and mid inferior wall akinesia, without septal, apical, or lateral extension (2 of 16 segments affected). These two segments were moderately but not severely thinned; all segments supplied by RCA were affected but interestingly, the only frankly transmural [late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) transmurality around 75%] was the mid-inferior one (). The more clarifying sequence to detect myocardial clefts was the two-chamber cine view, in which two deep myocardial crypts were evident on mid-inferior wall, surrounded by moderately thinned myocardium and with sub-total obliteration during systole (Supplementary material online, ). The differential diagnosis was challenging but several features argued for a fortuitous finding: relatively brief symptom onset-to-balloon time with low probability of acute mechanical complications; moderate but not severe thinned wall associated with myocardial invaginations; absence of dyskinesia; absence of scar discontinuity in LGE sequences. We empirically assess a low risk of myocardial rupture and a conservative approach was considered the best management in this setting. Stability of myocardial crypts was confirmed by regular TTE follow-ups in a 2 years window. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of clefts located in a myocardial region affected by AMI.
Table 1

Differential diagnosis of myocardial wall defects

Myocardial cleftDiverticulumPseudoaneurysmAneurysm
AetiologyEmbriogenesis defectEmbriogenesis defectAcquired (most related to AMI and cardiac surgery)

Congenital

Acquired (in the context of transmural AMI)

Implantation base on ventricleNarrow baseNarrow baseVariable (usually narrow base)Wide base
SizeSmallVariable (usually small/moderate size)VariableLarge
Common locationInterventricular septum and inferior wallMost on the apex of left ventricleVariable (particularly on inferior wall)Variable (commonly on the apex and rarely in posterolateral wall)
HistologyMyocardial disarray of adjacent myocardiumThe three layers are usually present (endocardium, myocardium, and pericardium)The wall contains only a pericardial layerThe three layers are present: myocardial layer is tinned and composed of scar/fibrotic tissue
KinesisNormalNormalAkinesia/dyskinesiaAkinesia/dyskinesia
ContractilitySynchrony with heart’s rhythm (tending to narrow/occlude in systole)Synchrony with heart’s rhythmAbsent contractilityAbsent or paradoxical contractility
ComplicationsUsually not occurringUsually not occurring

Rupture

Thromboembolism

Arrhythmia, thromboembolism, heart failure, rupture
PrognosisGoodDepending on the associated anomaliesBadBad
Differential diagnosis of myocardial wall defects Congenital Acquired (in the context of transmural AMI) Rupture Thromboembolism Schematic representation of myocardial cleft (A), ventricular aneurysm (B), ventricular diverticulum(C), and pseudoaneurysm (D) in diastole and systole

Conclusion

This case highlights the practical issues related to the differential diagnosis of myocardial wall defects, especially in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. Myocardial cleft should be considered in the diagnostic process to limit useless interventions; modified TTE views may help to its optimal delineation. In the setting of AMI, meticulous analysis of CMR sequences and high-resolution TTE images are imperative to estimate the risk of myocardial rupture.

Lead author biography

Dr Etienne Hoffer, corresponding author, is a cardiologist with tropism for echocardiography, including stress method. Since 2010, he’s head of the cardiology department at the CHR Citadelle in Liège. He has conducted several multicentres studies in the fields of heart failure, dyslipidaemia, and anticoagulant therapy. He has published more than 40 papers in peer-reviewed journal and is currently reviewer for a couple of them. He’s a collaborator of the Liège University and secretary of the local ethics committee.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal - Case Reports online. Slide sets: A fully edited slide set detailing this case and suitable for local presentation is available online as Supplementary data. Consent: The author/s confirm that written consent for submission and publication of this case report including image(s) and associated text has been obtained from the patient in line with COPE guidance. Conflict of interest: none declared. Funding: none declared. Click here for additional data file.
Table 2

Schematic representation of myocardial cleft (A), ventricular aneurysm (B), ventricular diverticulum(C), and pseudoaneurysm (D) in diastole and systole

  16 in total

1.  Congenital left ventricular diverticula.

Authors:  M S Tullu; P Vaideeswar; C T Deshmukh
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2000-05-31       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Myocardial disarray at junction of ventricular septum and left and right ventricular free walls in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  T Kuribayashi; W C Roberts
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Asymmetrical hypertrophy of the heart in young adults.

Authors:  D TEARE
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1958-01

Review 4.  Noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium.

Authors:  Brian C Weiford; Vijay D Subbarao; Kevin M Mulhern
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Clefts can be seen in the basal inferior wall of the left ventricle and the interventricular septum in healthy volunteers as well as patients by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bengt Johansson; Alicia M Maceira; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; James C Moon; Dudley J Pennell; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Structural abnormalities of the inferoseptal left ventricular wall detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in carriers of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations.

Authors:  Tjeerd Germans; Arthur A M Wilde; Pieter A Dijkmans; Wenxia Chai; Otto Kamp; Yigal M Pinto; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Prevalence of inferobasal myocardial crypts among patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Joanna Petryka; A John Baksi; Sanjay K Prasad; Dudley J Pennell; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 8.  Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

Authors:  C Frances; A Romero; D Grady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm versus aneurysm a diagnosis dilemma.

Authors:  Samarjit Bisoyi; Anjan K Dash; Debashish Nayak; Satyajit Sahoo; Raghunath Mohapatra
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Multimodality Imaging and Clinical Significance of Congenital Ventricular Outpouchings: Recesses, Diverticula, Aneurysms, Clefts, and Crypts.

Authors:  Alberto Cresti; Pierpaolo Cannarile; Elena Aldi; Marco Solari; Bruno Sposato; Luca Franci; Ugo Limbruno
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.