| Literature DB >> 34268384 |
Xiaopei Chao1,2, Yang Liu1,2, Qingbo Fan1,2, Honghui Shi1,2, Shu Wang1,2, Jinghe Lang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the specific vaginal microbiome in the differential diagnosis of endometriosis/adenomyosis (EM/AM)-associated chronic pelvic pain (CPP) from other types of CPP, and to explore the role of the vaginal microbiome in the mechanism of EM/AM-associated CPP.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Chronic pelvic pain (CPP); endometriosis/adenomyosis (EM/AM); function prediction; vaginal microbiome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34268384 PMCID: PMC8246188 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram of the study. Lower urinary tract or digestive tract disease refers to participants without relevant medical history or systematic clinical manifestations. Female with fever refers to participants whose body temperature exceeded 37.5 °C. Gynecologic benign diseases include deformity of the reproductive tract, uterine myoma, benign ovarian cyst, and mesangial cyst of the fallopian tube. Gynecologic malignant diseases refer to ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, or fallopian tube carcinoma. Pelvic organ benign/malignant diseases refer to those affecting the urinary or digestive system, or retroperitoneal tumor. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials; AM, adenomyosis; CPPS, chronic pelvic pain syndrome; EM, endometriosis; HPV, human papillomavirus.
Participant characteristics
| Characteristics | Group A (n=37) | Group B (n=25) | Group C (n=66) | Total (n=128) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (mean ± SD) | 39.89±6.24 | 37.56±5.48 | 38.23±7.80 | 38.58±6.97 | |
| Parity, n/N (%) | 0.076 | ||||
| Nulliparous | 8/37 (21.6) | 12/25 (48.0) | 25/66 (37.9) | 45/128 (35.2) | |
| Parous | 29/37 (78.4) | 13/ 25 (52.0) | 41/66 (62.1) | 83/128 (64.8) | |
| Situation of fertility | |||||
| Parity | 1.03±0.70 | 0.65±0.71 | 0.74±0.69 | 0.81±0.71 | 0.077 |
| Gravidity | 1.78±1.23 | 1.21±1.14 | 1.69±1.50 | 1.63±1.37 | 0.191 |
| Phase of menstrual cycle, n/N (%) | 0.270 | ||||
| Follicular | 12/37 (32.4) | 5/25 (20.0) | 22/66 (33.3) | 39/128 (30.5) | |
| Luteal | 15/37 (40.5) | 16/25 (64.0) | 35/66 (53.0) | 66/128 (51.6) | |
| NA | 10/37 (27.0) | 4/25 (16.0) | 9/66 (13.6) | 23/128 (18.0) | |
| Contraception, n/N (%) | 0.216 | ||||
| Nil | 26/37 (70.3) | 16/25 (64.0) | 33/66 (50.0) | ||
| Condoms | 10/37 (27.0) | 7/25 (28.0) | 25/66 (37.9) | ||
| IUD | 1/37 (2.7) | 2/25 (8.0) | 8/66 (12.1) | ||
IUD, Intrauterine device; SD, standard deviation. P-value is calculated by the Pearson Chi-Square and t-test.
Figure 2Bar chart showing vaginal microbiome composition in participants from the 3 groups. (A) The relative abundance of the top 10 phyla. (B) The relative abundance of the top 10 genera. (C) The relative abundance of the top 30 genera. (D) The relative abundance of the top 10 species.
Figure 3Alpha diversity analysis of vaginal microbiome composition in participants from the 3 groups. (A) Rarefaction curve of vaginal microbiome diversity in the 3 groups; error bars represent standard deviation. Total number of observed species: group A: 626 species; group B: 409 species; and group C: 465 species. (B) Bar chart showing microbiota diversity in the 3 groups.
Figure 4Vaginal microbiomes composition within the 3 groups. (A) Distance matrix heatmap. The number in the graph is the difference coefficient between the 2 samples. The difference coefficient is positively correlated with the difference in microbiome diversity. (B) Bar chart showing the intergroup difference analysis of vaginal microbiome by ANOSIM analysis. (C) Significant differences in the abundance of genera within groups by MetaStat analysis. (D) T test analysis of vaginal microbiome composition within the groups at the genera and species levels. (E) LEfSe analysis of vaginal microbiomes within groups. A significant effect size was considered when the clades had statistical significance (P<0.05) and an LDA score >±4. Prefixes represent abbreviations for the taxonomic rank of each taxa: phylum (p_), class (c_), order (o_), family (f_), genus (g_), and species (s_). ANOSIM, analysis of similarity; LDA, linear discriminant analysis.
Statistically different genera and species of the top 30 genera between the 3 groups
| Taxa | Relative abundance | Value | Method of analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | |||
|
| 0.005482 | 0.000078 | 0.0494129526387591* | MetaStat analysis | |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.005946 | 0.001649 | 0.0385635457112232# | ||
|
| 0.005495 | 0.000078 | 0.0313232534451& | LEfSe analysis | |
|
| 0.009102 | 0.015988 | 0.0466384014478& | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.003145 | 0.000857 | 0.0458592442122& | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.561734 | 0.716614 | 0.0295794229242957# | ||
|
| 0.005946 | 0.001314 | 0.020573151880915# | ||
|
| 0.000805 | 0.001369 | 0.0496299579455244# | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.006245 | 0.016048 | 0.0175645262151& | LEfSe analysis | |
|
| 0.009851 | 0.002642 | 0.0420310009006& | ||
|
| 0.008724 | 0.003283 | 0.0000568575884661& | ||
|
| 0.005495 | 0.000171 | 0.00547979034357& | ||
|
| 0.311857 | 0.441428 | 0.0190787524907& | ||
|
| 0.009102 | 0.034176 | 0.0000291877469495& | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.005893 | 0.00667 | 0.043367592503& | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.008356 | 0.001802 | 0.0381148044568& | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.005482 | 0.000171 | 0.00547979034357& | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0.009965 | 0.016048 | 0.0415655213735& | LEfSe analysis | |
|
| 0.000604 | 0.00221 | 0.0072300237267& | ||
*, Q value; #, P value; &, Kruskal-Wallis test P value.
Statistically different genera and species of the top 30 genera between the 3 groups
| Relative abundance | Kruskal-Wallis test P value | LEfSe analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | |||
| Taxa (genus) | |||||
| | 0.006245 | 0.009965 | 0.016048 | 0.0223508462253 | |
| | 0.008724 | 0.002758 | 0.003283 | 0.000312479146166 | |
| | 0.000621 | 0.000604 | 0.00221 | 0.0121196322448 | |
| Taxa (species) | |||||
| | 0.009102 | 0.015988 | 0.034176 | 0.000198940154373; LDA=4.1586381629 | |
| | |||||
| | 0.000564 | 0.000169 | 0.000167 | 0.0288725220546 | |
| | |||||
All of the significant different genera and species have relative abundance more than 0.001.