| Literature DB >> 34268350 |
Nísio Teixeira1, Graziela Mello Vianna1, Ricardo Lima2, Carlos Jáuregui3, Lucianna Furtado4, Thiago Pereira Alberto5, Rafael Medeiros6.
Abstract
This article addresses the difficulties of musicians and measures taken by public and private authorities to mitigate the social impact of Covid-19 in the music sector of Belo Horizonte, capital city of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. These are preliminary results of a research developed by the research lab on Sound, Communication, Textualities and Sociability [ESCUTAS (in Portuguese)] at the Social Communication Department of the Federal University of Minas Gerais. This study has two perspectives. First, we surveyed public sources about Brazilian measures for the sector, as we are interested in verifying policies used by the private and public sectors, not only at the national level, but also at regional (state of Minas Gerais) and local (city of Belo Horizonte) levels. Second, we investigate the impact of the pandemic on the city's music sector, considering various categories of the profession such as composers, interpreters, arrangers, music teachers, DJs, among others. This work is part of a scenario of academic research and economic reports on the impacts of the pandemic in the music industry. More specifically, it aims to contribute to discussion on the effects of the social distance on livelihood of professionals of that area.Entities:
Keywords: Belo Horizonte; Brazil; Covid-19; Music; social impact
Year: 2021 PMID: 34268350 PMCID: PMC8276977 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.643344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Sociol ISSN: 2297-7775
FIGURE 1Distribution of participants by monthly income.
Effect caused by the pandemic on the monthly income of the respondents.
| Previous income range | Up to 1 MW | 1–2 MW | 2–4 MW | 4–6 MW | 6 MW + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintained the same income range | 10 (100%) | 6 (23.1%) | 15 (20.3%) | 7 (20%) | 12 (46.2%) |
| Reduction (↓ 1 income range) | 20 (76.9%) | 25 (33.8%) | 11 (31.4%) | 3 (11.5%) | |
| Reduction (↓ 2 income ranges) | 34 (45.9%) | 12 (34.3%) | 5 (19.2%) | ||
| Reduction (↓ 3 income ranges) | 5 (14.3%) | 0 | |||
| Reduction (↓ 4 income ranges) | 6 (23.1%) | ||||
| Total | 10 | 26 | 74 | 35 | 26 |
FIGURE 2Significance of intellectual property, copyright and similar rights in relation to total income.
FIGURE 3Significance of bars and restaurants in relation to total income.
FIGURE 4Ceremonies and-or religious events.
Monthly income by racial identification - before the pandemic.
| Income by racial identification | Up to 1 MW | 1–2 MW | 2–4 MW | 4–6 MW | 6 MW + | Total respondents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 5 (50%) | 10 (38.5%) | 39 (52.7%) | 23 (65.7%) | 23 (88.5%) | 100 (58.5%) |
| Black | 5 (50%) | 12 (46.1%) | 34 (46%) | 11 (31.4%) | 2 (7.7%) | 64 (37.4%) |
| Asian, indigenous or did not answer | 0 | 4 (15.4%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (2.9%) | 1 (3.8%) | 7 (4.1%) |
| Total by income range | 10 | 26 | 74 | 35 | 26 | 171 |
Monthly income by racial identification - in the context of the pandemic.
| Income by racial identification | Up to 1 MW | 1–2 MW | 2 a 4 SM | 4 to 6 SM | 6 SM + | Total respondents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 38 (50.7%) | 25 (58.2%) | 20 (64.5%) | 6 (60%) | 11 (91.7%) | 100 (58, 5%) |
| Black | 33 (44%) | 17 (39.5%) | 10 (32.3%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (8.3%) | 64 (37.4%) |
| Asian, indigenous or did not answer | 4 (5.3%) | 1 (2.3%) | 1 (3.2%) | 1 (10%) | 0 | 7 (4.1%) |
| Total by income range | 75 | 43 | 31 | 10 | 12 | 171 |
FIGURE 5Origin of aid policies accessed.
FIGURE 6Continuity of musical activities during the pandemic.
Categories of adaptations undertaken and number of respondents.
| Categories of adaptations undertaken | Number of respondents |
|---|---|
| Online environment - live performances and open events online (interpretation, production, audio treatment or studio rental for conducting live performances; without financial specification, with voluntary contributions, or without pay) | 52 |
| Online environment - online meetings (production, rehearsals, chorus conducting online) | 10 |
| Online environment - classes taught or received online (some reported loss of students, increased efforts to search for new students, reducing fees and/or increasing workload to compensate) | 40 |
| Face-to-face classes and other work in shared environments (with social distancing, mask use, sanitary protocols) | 4 |
| Presentations and private events (face-to-face private events, drive-in shows, creating playlists for private events, online or face-to-face serenades) | 9 |
| Recording of own initiative or on demand (remote, online, isolated, or in home studio) | 31 |
| Made new investments (in studies, in training, in new musical projects, and/or in equipment) | 11 |
| Releasing or selling musical work (selling records remotely, releasing previously recorded content, publishing or disseminating content, songs and/or videos on digital platforms) | 10 |
FIGURE 7Income comparison during and before the pandemic.