Hatice Bebiş1, Sue Moorhead2, Dercan Gençbaş3, Serpil Özdemir4, Memnun Seven5. 1. Department of Public Health Nursing, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus. 2. The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. Department of Nursing, Atılım University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. 4. Department of Public Health Nursing, Gülhane Faculty of Nursing Health Science University, Ankara, Turkey. 5. Department of Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to review interventional studies conducted by nurses about elderly people with urinary incontinence in nursing homes and to match the results to standardized nursing terminology using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcomes Classification Linkages to the NANDA-I diagnoses guidelines. METHOD: A systematic review of quantitative intervention studies was conducted using the PRISMA statement as a guide. The interventional research in English was scanned using the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases from January 2005 to May 2015. Fourteen studies that had at least one nurse researcher were conducted in nursing homes, excluding surgical and pharmacological interventions. The Nursing Outcome Classification and Nursing Intervention Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions Part II-U List were used as a guide to select North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International nursing diagnoses, Nursing Outcome Classification Scales, and Nursing Interventions from the data. RESULTS: We found the frequency of use of various NANDA-I diagnoses, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing Outcomes based on the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions List for incontinence. CONCLUSION: Using the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses guide may provide new nursing perspectives on non-standardized research. In future studies, this may allow a comparison of data worldwide, enabling nurses to use the results in evidence-based practices.
AIM: The aim of this study was to review interventional studies conducted by nurses about elderly people with urinary incontinence in nursing homes and to match the results to standardized nursing terminology using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcomes Classification Linkages to the NANDA-I diagnoses guidelines. METHOD: A systematic review of quantitative intervention studies was conducted using the PRISMA statement as a guide. The interventional research in English was scanned using the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases from January 2005 to May 2015. Fourteen studies that had at least one nurse researcher were conducted in nursing homes, excluding surgical and pharmacological interventions. The Nursing Outcome Classification and Nursing Intervention Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions Part II-U List were used as a guide to select North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International nursing diagnoses, Nursing Outcome Classification Scales, and Nursing Interventions from the data. RESULTS: We found the frequency of use of various NANDA-I diagnoses, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing Outcomes based on the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions List for incontinence. CONCLUSION: Using the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses guide may provide new nursing perspectives on non-standardized research. In future studies, this may allow a comparison of data worldwide, enabling nurses to use the results in evidence-based practices.
Authors: John F Schnelle; Kanika Kapur; Cathy Alessi; Dan Osterweil; John G Beck; Nahla R Al-Samarrai; Joseph G Ouslander Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joseph G Ouslander; Patricia C Griffiths; Eleanor McConnell; Lisa Riolo; Michael Kutner; John Schnelle Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Catherine M Sackley; Natalie A Rodriguez; Maayken van den Berg; Frances Badger; Christine Wright; Jelske Besemer; Katarina T V van Reeuwijk; Leontine van Wely Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.477