Alex J Tanner1,2, Robin Kerr1,2, Helen H Fielding1, Geoff Thornton1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom. 2. London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, 17-19 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AH, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Two polymorphs of TiO2, anatase and rutile, are employed in photocatalytic applications. It is broadly accepted that anatase is the more catalytically active and subsequently finds wider commercial use. In this work, we focus on the Ti3+ polaronic states of anatase TiO2(101), which lie at ∼1.0 eV binding energy and are known to increase catalytic performance. Using UV-photoemission and two-photon photoemission spectroscopies, we demonstrate the capability to tune the excited state resonance of polarons by controlling the chemical environment. Anatase TiO2(101) contains subsurface polarons which undergo sub-band-gap photoexcitation to states ∼2.0 eV above the Fermi level. Formic acid adsorption dramatically influences the polaronic states, increasing the binding energy by ∼0.3 eV. Moreover, the photoexcitation oscillator strength changes significantly, resonating with states ∼3.0 eV above the Fermi level. We show that this behavior is likely due to the surface migration of subsurface oxygen vacancies.
Two polymorphs of TiO2, anatase and rutile, are employed in photocatalytic applications. It is broadly accepted that anatase is the more catalytically active and subsequently finds wider commercial use. In this work, we focus on the Ti3+ polaronic states of anatase TiO2(101), which lie at ∼1.0 eV binding energy and are known to increase catalytic performance. Using UV-photoemission and two-photon photoemission spectroscopies, we demonstrate the capability to tune the excited state resonance of polarons by controlling the chemical environment. Anatase TiO2(101) contains subsurface polarons which undergo sub-band-gap photoexcitation to states ∼2.0 eV above the Fermi level. Formic acid adsorption dramatically influences the polaronic states, increasing the binding energy by ∼0.3 eV. Moreover, the photoexcitation oscillator strength changes significantly, resonating with states ∼3.0 eV above the Fermi level. We show that this behavior is likely due to the surface migration of subsurface oxygen vacancies.
The polaronic Ti3+ states of TiO2 have long
been a source of technological interest. They arise from the reduction
of TiO2 and result in n-type semiconductor properties in
the material. Not only do these excess electrons give rise to the
conductivity that permits many surface studies, they also facilitate
a wide range of redox chemistries such as water splitting and hydrogen
generation.[1−3] In recent years, it has been shown that these polaronic
states, commonly referred to as the band gap states (BGS) of TiO2, can also undergo photoexcitation processes,[4−6] potentially contributing to the catalytic photoyield. Of the two
predominant TiO2 polymorphs, anatase demonstrates higher
catalytic performance.[7] Despite this, the
polaronic states of anatase remain poorly understood. In part, this
is because, unlike in rutile TiO2, anatase polarons rarely
exist at the surface in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions, resulting
in fewer microscopy studies and weaker spectroscopic signals.[8,9]The (101) facet has the lowest surface free energy of anatase
TiO2,[10,11] adopting a (1 × 1) sawtooth
structure
(see Figure ). This
surface is composed of five- and six-fold coordinated Ti atoms (Ti5c and Ti6c), bonded to three- and two-fold coordinated
O atoms (O3c and O2c), respectively. Preparation
of this surface in UHV reduces the sample and gives rise to oxygen
vacancies (Ovac), which are well-known to reside in the
subsurface (generally defined as 1 or 2 atomic layers below the surface).[9,12,13] It has been proposed that this
is due to greater atomic relaxations within this region, which results
in a lower vacancy formation energy.[8,14] Recently,
the influence of the crystal field has also been suggested as a contribution
toward subsurface Ovac formation, with a bulk-like octahedral
field favorable for the resulting polarons.[15]
Figure 1
Ball-and-stick
model of anatase TiO2(101). Turquoise
spheres denote Ti ions. Red spheres represent O ions, with two-fold
coordinated bridging O shaded gold. A subsurface oxygen vacancy (Ovac) is labeled, which represents a common defect and localization
point of polarons.
Ball-and-stick
model of anatase TiO2(101). Turquoise
spheres denote Ti ions. Red spheres represent O ions, with two-fold
coordinated bridging O shaded gold. A subsurface oxygen vacancy (Ovac) is labeled, which represents a common defect and localization
point of polarons.Spectroscopically, the
BGS of TiO2(101) have been investigated
using photoemission techniques, where they are detectable at ∼1.0
eV binding energy (BE).[16−18] Formally, the BGS are Ti 3d in
character, resulting from the Jahn–Teller splitting of d-orbitals
in the pseudo-octahedral crystal field of anatase,
which gives rise to orbitals of t2- and e-like
symmetry.[16−18] Two-photon photoemission spectroscopy (2PPE) is a
pump-probe technique that offers additional information about the
BGS, such as photoexcitation properties. 2PPE spectra are most commonly
produced as a result of coherent (simultaneous two-photon excitation
of an occupied state) or incoherent (two sequential one-photon excitations
via an intermediate state) processes, providing information on both
the occupied and the excited states, respectively. Although there
have now been numerous 2PPE studies of rutile TiO2,[4−6,19−21] few have been
published on anatase.[22,23] In these earlier studies, a relatively
weak 2PPE resonance was observed for anatase TiO2(101),
which was ascribed to excitation of the BGS to an excited state ∼2.5
eV above the Fermi level (EF). This is
similar to the behavior observed for rutile TiO2(110).[22]Polarons form at Ovac in both
anatase and rutile TiO2, although their behavior differs
distinctly in the two polymorphs.
In rutile TiO2(110), polarons are known to have a low energy
barrier for “hopping” to adjacent Ti atoms.[24−27] Consequently, although the rutile UPS BGS intensity can fluctuate
significantly with the surface environment,[28−30] the BE of the
initial and excited states only shifts minimally.[4,31] In
anatase, however, density functional theory (DFT) and scanning tunneling
spectroscopy (STS) have shown that polarons associated with Ovac have higher energy barriers for hopping and hence are localized
at the defect.[8,32] This suggests that polarons in
anatase are able to be trapped at specific defect sites when the surface
is chemically altered, with the potential to modify the photoexcitation
behavior. In this work, we test this hypothesis by forming two distinctive
anatase TiO2(101) surface environments. As-prepared TiO2(101) with subsurface defects is denoted as C-A101, and TiO2(101) with a saturated coverage of dissociatively adsorbed
formic acid is denoted FA-A101.
Methods
UV photoemission spectroscopy (UPS, VG Microtech) and 2PPE experiments
were performed in a UHV system with a base pressure of ∼1.0
× 10–10 mbar, with the partial pressure of
residual water ∼3 × 10–11 mbar. UPS
and 2PPE spectra were recorded with a hemispherical electron energy
analyzer (VG Scienta R3000) with the entrance lens normal to the sample
surface, with the sample biased by −6.0 V. Photoemission from
the Ta sample holder was used to determine the position of EF. UPS and 2PPE were both used to measure workfunction
values. The incident angle of the laser was 68 ± 1° from
the surface normal, with the laser spot having a diameter of ∼0.5
mm at the sample. The system is also equipped with an X-ray (VG Microtech)
source, which enables core-level photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
measurements. All spectra were recorded at room temperature (RT) unless
otherwise indicated.Tunable femtosecond laser pulses (280–390
nm) were generated
by Light Conversion tunable optical parametric amplifiers (TOPAS-c),
pumped by a Coherent Legend regenerative amplifier operating at 1
kHz, seeded by a Ti-sapphire oscillator (Coherent Micra). The power
was reduced to ∼1 mW using neutral density filters to minimize
space-charge effects. UPS measurements were performed to check for
laser-induced defect states, with none being found. To ensure that
the results were not influenced by fluctuations in laser power, it
was monitored throughout experiments from a separate beam via a beam
splitter earlier in the optical sequence after the TOPAS-c. The polarization
of light relative to the crystal orientation is controlled by the
use of a periscope that is inserted at the end of the optical sequence.The natural anatase TiO2(101) crystal (MaTeck) and rutile
TiO2(110) sample were cleaned with multiple cycles of 20
min sputtering (1 kV, 1 μA cm–2) and 10 min
annealing at 950 and 1000 K, respectively. The sample temperature
was monitored via a K-type thermocouple in close proximity to the
sample, as well using a pyrometer (Minolta). Photoemission spectra
of anatase TiO2(101) were taken after approximately 1 h
to ensure full migration of surface Ovac to the subsurface.
After cleaning, XPS evidenced a contamination level of ∼0.05
ML measured in the anatase sample, comprising naturally occurring
Nb, Ca, C, and Na. XPS of the rutile sample evidenced a contamination
of <0.05%. Both samples displayed a sharp (1 × 1) low energy
electron diffraction (LEED) pattern. LEED was used to determine that
the [010] azimuth lay in the horizontal direction of the anatase sample.
Formic acid exposure was via gas phase dosing under UHV conditions
from a liquid sample. Samples were cleaned via freeze/thaw pumping
to remove dissolved O2 and CO2, which could
affect accurate monitoring of the defect states. The purity of the
acid in the gas phase was monitored by a residual gas analyzer (Hiden
Analytical, HAL 101). The resulting interfaces were characterized
by XPS.
Results and Discussion
Sub-Band-Gap
Polaron Photoexcitation in C-A101
At the C-A101 surface,
we investigated photoexcitation of polarons
associated with subsurface vacancies.[33,34] 2PPE spectra
of as-prepared anatase TiO2(101) that contains subsurface
vacancies are shown in Figure a. The red circles represent the raw data points, and the
blue line represents the subsequent fit to two Gaussians and a background.
Two features become apparent at higher hν,
labeled feature 1 and feature 2, which have a different electron energy
dependence when varying the photon energy. The polarization dependence
of the 2PPE spectra at 3.87 eV, 320 nm (Figure b) shows that the oscillator strength is
higher with p-polarized light for all features, in
agreement with previous work.[22] Features
1 and 2 are visible as well as a third, smaller feature at 7.7 eV
(see inset). Its energy suggests that it is a coherent 2PPE feature
from the shallow donor state slightly below EF.[32,35]Figure c gives the quantitative representation of the final
state energy (E – EF) dependence on photon energy (eV). In these plots, data points produce
gradients of 1 or 2 for incoherent and coherent processes, respectively,
with a y-intercept equal to the intermediate or initial
state energy, respectively (see Figure caption for equations). We find a coherent and an
incoherent contribution, where the incoherent 2PPE process (feature
1) represents excitation into an intermediate state of t2-like character,[22] ∼2.0 eV above EF. Coherent
2PPE gives rise to feature 2, with a y-intercept
of around −0.9 eV, consistent with excitation of BGS polarons.
The resonant photon energy of the process is ∼2.81 eV, significantly
less than that of the optical band gap, 3.20 eV.[7,33,34,36,37] This is in line with previous studies that demonstrate
the extended photoresponse of Ti3+ doped TiO2.[38,39]
Figure 2
(a) 2PPE spectra (hν
= 3.44–4.00
eV, 360–310 nm) measured from C-A101 with p-polarized light. Spectra were fitted using the procedure described
in previous work (see refs (20) and (21)). The red circles represent the original data points, and the blue
line represents the fit. The gold peak represents the 2PPE background.
Two dominant peaks are observed, labeled feature 1 and feature 2 (green
and blue Gaussians, respectively). (b) 2PPE spectra (hν = 3.87 eV, 320 nm) measured with p- and s-polarized light. The spectra are normalized to the intensity
at the workfunction cut off. The difference spectrum (p – s) shows the presence of the two dominant
features identified in (a), as well as a third feature at ∼7.7
eV from the free carrier population, which is enlarged in the inset.
(c) Plot of the photon energy dependence of the two fitted peaks in
(a). The gradient (x) and y-intercept
values determine the 2PPE process and intermediate/initial state energy,
respectively, according to equations for coherent (E – EF = hνprobe + hνpump + Einitial) and incoherent (E – EF = hνprobe + Eintermediate) excitations. A blue
diamond signifies feature 2 (coherent) and a green pentagon, feature
1 (incoherent). The resonant photon energy (circled) is identified
by the point at which the two lines intersect one another and is calculated
as ∼2.81 eV (440 nm).
(a) 2PPE spectra (hν
= 3.44–4.00
eV, 360–310 nm) measured from C-A101 with p-polarized light. Spectra were fitted using the procedure described
in previous work (see refs (20) and (21)). The red circles represent the original data points, and the blue
line represents the fit. The gold peak represents the 2PPE background.
Two dominant peaks are observed, labeled feature 1 and feature 2 (green
and blue Gaussians, respectively). (b) 2PPE spectra (hν = 3.87 eV, 320 nm) measured with p- and s-polarized light. The spectra are normalized to the intensity
at the workfunction cut off. The difference spectrum (p – s) shows the presence of the two dominant
features identified in (a), as well as a third feature at ∼7.7
eV from the free carrier population, which is enlarged in the inset.
(c) Plot of the photon energy dependence of the two fitted peaks in
(a). The gradient (x) and y-intercept
values determine the 2PPE process and intermediate/initial state energy,
respectively, according to equations for coherent (E – EF = hνprobe + hνpump + Einitial) and incoherent (E – EF = hνprobe + Eintermediate) excitations. A blue
diamond signifies feature 2 (coherent) and a green pentagon, feature
1 (incoherent). The resonant photon energy (circled) is identified
by the point at which the two lines intersect one another and is calculated
as ∼2.81 eV (440 nm).This interpretation differs from the assignment of spectra in earlier
work,[22] where it was concluded that the
2PPE spectra of C-A101 predominantly consists of an incoherent 2PPE
feature via an intermediate state centered at 2.5 eV above EF, with no contributing coherent peak. The differing
interpretation is likely a result of the available experimental photon
energies. It is now clear that the photon energies employed in the
previous work (hν = ∼2.9–3.1
eV (430–400 nm)) are close to the resonant photon energy for
BGS excitation in C-A101, resulting in significant overlap between
the coherent and incoherent 2PPE feature. In our work, tunable optical
parametric amplifiers (see Methods section)
give access to higher photon energies, allowing the separation of
features 1 and 2 in spectra. Figure a shows an example of this, which illustrates the overlap
of normalized 2PPE spectra recorded at photon energies of 3.18 and
4.00 eV (390 and 310 nm). The locations of features 1 and 2 in the
two spectra are labeled. The increase in spectral intensity at 5.3
eV in the 3.18 eV (390 nm) spectrum is due to greater overlap of the
coherent and incoherent features at near resonant conditions. Figure b further demonstrates
this by spectral fitting.
Figure 3
(a) 2PPE spectra of hν
= 3.18 eV (390 nm)
and 4.00 eV (310 nm), with the peak locations for features 1 and 2
at each photon energy labeled (recorded with p-polarized
light). The spectra are normalized at 4.89 eV (E – EF). (b) 2PPE spectrum (hν
= 3.18 eV, 390 nm) of C-A101 fitted with Gaussian peaks. The red circles
represent the original data points, and the blue line is the fit to
the background (Bkg), feature 1 (F1), and feature 2 (F2) contributions.
(a) 2PPE spectra of hν
= 3.18 eV (390 nm)
and 4.00 eV (310 nm), with the peak locations for features 1 and 2
at each photon energy labeled (recorded with p-polarized
light). The spectra are normalized at 4.89 eV (E – EF). (b) 2PPE spectrum (hν
= 3.18 eV, 390 nm) of C-A101 fitted with Gaussian peaks. The red circles
represent the original data points, and the blue line is the fit to
the background (Bkg), feature 1 (F1), and feature 2 (F2) contributions.
Defect Migration at the
Formate TiO2(101) Interface
The adsorption of
formic acid (HCOOH) on
the anatase TiO2(101) surface has been studied experimentally
and computationally in recent years.[40−44] It is now known that formic acid adsorbs dissociatively
on the anatase TiO2(110) surface at RT and saturates at
∼0.5 ML, as at the rutile TiO2(110) surface.[45] However, in contrast to rutile (110),[46,47] formate forms mixed monodentate/bidentate adsorption configurations
at saturated adsorption coverages. Although these structural aspects
are now clear, the effect of adsorption on the electronic structure
is not known. Figure a shows unnormalized He-I (21.2 eV) UPS spectra of C-A101 and FA-A101,
the latter being formed by in situ exposure to formic acid. Two additional
features are evident at 6.0 and 11.0 eV BE following adsorption, which
are also clear in the resulting difference spectrum (see Figure b). The peak at 11.0
eV is similar to a feature observed in spectra of rutile TiO2(110) surfaces after dissociative adsorption of water or carboxylic
acids.[29,48−52] This is assigned specifically to the 3σ OH
orbital based on UPS studies of hydroxylated and trimethyl acetic
acid TiO2 systems.[53,54] The residual peak at
11.0 eV BE in the C-A101 spectrum has previously been attributed to
small levels of water dissociation at step edges.[23] In the difference spectrum, the peak at ∼4 eV arises
predominantly due to an upward shift in the valence band maximum.
This is associated with band bending caused by increased negative
charge at the surface, which is expected to arise from Ovac and polaron migration to the surface (see below). The peak at ∼6.0
eV is best assigned to the formate highest occupied molecular orbital
(HOMO) due to its similar appearance in the UPS spectra of formate
on rutile (110).[55,56]
Figure 4
(a) He-I (21.2 eV) UPS spectra of C-A101
and FA-A101 following
in situ gas phase dosing of formic acid. (b) Difference spectra from
(a) showing peaks associated with the 3σ OH orbital and formate
HOMO. Negative peaks represent a decrease in signal due to attenuation
effects. (c) He-I (21.2 eV) UPS spectra of FA-A101 following flashing
to 396 K and subsequent cooling to RT. Dashed lines represent the
MOs of interest. (d) He-II (40.8 eV) spectra showing a comparison
of the VBM of C-A101, FA-A101, R-R110, and FA-R110. The inset shows
an expanded region near the VBM. Dashed lines represent the subsequent
shift of the VBM. The secondary electron contribution has been removed
with a Tougaard profile.
(a) He-I (21.2 eV) UPS spectra of C-A101
and FA-A101 following
in situ gas phase dosing of formic acid. (b) Difference spectra from
(a) showing peaks associated with the 3σ OH orbital and formate
HOMO. Negative peaks represent a decrease in signal due to attenuation
effects. (c) He-I (21.2 eV) UPS spectra of FA-A101 following flashing
to 396 K and subsequent cooling to RT. Dashed lines represent the
MOs of interest. (d) He-II (40.8 eV) spectra showing a comparison
of the VBM of C-A101, FA-A101, R-R110, and FA-R110. The inset shows
an expanded region near the VBM. Dashed lines represent the subsequent
shift of the VBM. The secondary electron contribution has been removed
with a Tougaard profile.Following flashing FA-A101
to 396 K, we find that both the 6.0
and the 11.0 eV peaks are removed, and the spectrum largely resembles
that of C-A101 (see Figure c). This clear desorption of formate is in agreement with
recent thermal programmed desorption (TPD) and vibrational spectroscopy
measurements, which evidenced the evolution of gas phase water at
∼400 K.[45]Figure d compares
the valence band maxima (VBM) of C-A101 and FA-A101 and the analogous
rutile TiO2(110) equivalents with He-II (40.8 eV) UPS.
Here, R-R110 refers to the as-prepared reduced surface which contains
surface oxygen vacancies. FA-R110 denotes the formate saturated surface.
The spectra are shown after removal of the secondary electron background
with a Tougaard function.[57] As expected,
the VBM of C-A101 and R-R110 occurs at ∼3.2 and 3.05 eV BE,
respectively.[36] Following a saturation
adsorption of FA, the VBM of rutile TiO2(110) does not
change. However, in anatase TiO2(101), the VBM shifts 0.2
eV lower in BE, a result of band bending caused by the migration of
localized Ovac polarons to the surface.Formation
of FA-A101 causes the BGS peak to shift to ∼0.30
eV higher BE and to increase in intensity by 63% compared with C-A101
(see Figure a). UPS
is a surface sensitive technique, probing the top ∼1 nm of
the sample;[58] this rise in BGS intensity
is therefore evidence of an increased density of polarons in this
region. This is in line with results from FA-R110,[20] a key difference being that a BGSBE shift is not observed
for FA-R110, whereas it is for FA-A101. This indicates that the polaronic
states are in an altered chemical environment in FA-A101 compared
with C-A101. The difference spectrum (see Figure b) shows a decrease in intensity between
∼0 and 0.9 eV BE following formic acid adsorption, evidencing
a movement of the original C-A101 polaron population. An explanation
for these observations is that subsurface Ovac (and associated
polarons) are diffusing to the surface, as has been suggested by both
IRRAS and DFT calculations.[41,45] The shift of 0.3 eV
BE is also in agreement with measurements by Setvin et al., where
the BE's of subsurface and surface polarons were measured by
UPS and
STS, respectively, following tip-induced migration of Ovac (and polarons).[32] Furthermore, DFT calculations
of FA-R110 showed no density of states (DOS) in this region, excluding
the possibility of formate molecular orbitals contributing to this
signal.[20] This adsorbate-induced migration
likely occurs due to surface relaxations, which may reduce the energetic
gain required to accommodate Ovac at the TiO2(101) surface.[8,14] This may be related to the significant
relaxation at TiO2 surfaces caused by formic acid adsorption.[45,59]
Figure 5
(a)
BGS region of C-A101 and FA-A101 following exposure to formic
acid via in situ gas phase dosing. Peaks are isolated following subtraction
of the secondary electron background via a Tougaard function. Dashed
lines represent locations of peak maxima. Following adsorption, the
peak is 0.3 eV higher in BE and 63% larger by peak area. (b) Difference
spectrum between the raw UPS He-I spectrum of FA-A101 and C-A101.
The arrow represents the shift in electron density. The dashed line
represents the maximum point of He-I β contribution from the
valence band region. (c) 2PPE spectra of C-A101 and FA-A101 (hν = 3.87 eV (320 nm)) normalized at 5.2 eV (E – EF). The polarization
of light is shown in the panel legend. (d) 2PPE spectra of FA-A101
(p-polarized, hν = 3.94–3.40
eV (315–365 nm)) showing the formation of a resonance peak
in the 2PPE spectra. Spectra have been normalized at 5.2 eV (E – EF). The circle represents
the increased 2PPE signal from coherent 2PPE valence band contributions
at higher hν. (e) Stacked 2PPE spectra (s-polarized, hν = 4.00–3.44
eV (310–360 nm)). Dashed lines represent two features: one
lies at a constant E – EF regardless of hν, the other the movement
of feature B with hν. (f) The gradient (x) and y-intercept values determine the
2PPE process and intermediate/initial state energy, respectively,
according to equations for coherent (E – EF = hνprobe + hνpump + Einitial) and incoherent (E – EF = hνprobe + Eintermediate) excitations. A blue
square signifies feature B (coherent) and a yellow triangle, feature
A (incoherent). The circle represents the resonant photon energy for
the excitation process.
(a)
BGS region of C-A101 and FA-A101 following exposure to formic
acid via in situ gas phase dosing. Peaks are isolated following subtraction
of the secondary electron background via a Tougaard function. Dashed
lines represent locations of peak maxima. Following adsorption, the
peak is 0.3 eV higher in BE and 63% larger by peak area. (b) Difference
spectrum between the raw UPS He-I spectrum of FA-A101 and C-A101.
The arrow represents the shift in electron density. The dashed line
represents the maximum point of He-I β contribution from the
valence band region. (c) 2PPE spectra of C-A101 and FA-A101 (hν = 3.87 eV (320 nm)) normalized at 5.2 eV (E – EF). The polarization
of light is shown in the panel legend. (d) 2PPE spectra of FA-A101
(p-polarized, hν = 3.94–3.40
eV (315–365 nm)) showing the formation of a resonance peak
in the 2PPE spectra. Spectra have been normalized at 5.2 eV (E – EF). The circle represents
the increased 2PPE signal from coherent 2PPE valence band contributions
at higher hν. (e) Stacked 2PPE spectra (s-polarized, hν = 4.00–3.44
eV (310–360 nm)). Dashed lines represent two features: one
lies at a constant E – EF regardless of hν, the other the movement
of feature B with hν. (f) The gradient (x) and y-intercept values determine the
2PPE process and intermediate/initial state energy, respectively,
according to equations for coherent (E – EF = hνprobe + hνpump + Einitial) and incoherent (E – EF = hνprobe + Eintermediate) excitations. A blue
square signifies feature B (coherent) and a yellow triangle, feature
A (incoherent). The circle represents the resonant photon energy for
the excitation process.2PPE spectra of TiO2(101) also show substantial differences
following formic acid adsorption (see Figure c). In the p-polarized spectrum
specifically, FA-A101 displays a large peak at ∼6.9 eV (E – EF). On varying the
photon energy, this peak (labeled feature A) shifts in energy and
displays a strong intensity dependence (see Figure d). A smaller, broader feature, B, also becomes
clear at lower photon energies and appears to be merging with feature
A, indicative of a resonance process.[60] By comparing p- and s-polarized
spectra, it is evident that feature B is present in both. Figure e shows the s-polarized 2PPE spectra as a function of hν. Feature B clearly shifts in energy but displays little intensity
dependence. Another feature at lower energy shows no hν dependence, which is likely the result of an Auger process,
as has been observed in the 2PPE spectra of FA-R110.[20]Figure f shows the E – EF versus hν dependence of features A and B
taken from p- and s-polarized 2PPE
spectra, respectively. We find that feature A is produced by an incoherent
2PPE process from an intermediate state centered 3.04 eV above EF, whereas feature B is a coherent process from
the FA-A101BGS at ∼1.2 eV BE. The 2PPE features from FA-A101
are labeled in Figure a, which shows the p-polarized spectra (3.81 eV,
325 nm) following peak fitting. In previous work, DFT was used to
calculate the density of states (DOS) of Ti3+ electrons
at a variety of Ovac positions in TiO2(101);
the intermediate state energy reported here matches the position of
surface-localized DOS in the conduction band.[15] These DOS are t2-like
in character, suggesting a t2 → t2 transition,
as in C-A101. The orbital energy diagrams for BGS polarons and their
resonant excited state for C- and FA-A101 are shown in Figure b. The formation of a large
2PPE feature supports the interpretation from UPS that surface migration
of polaronic states occurs upon formic acid adsorption; the large
shift in resonance photon energy also demonstrates the changing chemical
environment. As a result of the new coordination environment, the t2-like orbitals of surface-localized
Ovac polarons have an increased energy separation. Polarons
in TiO2 exist in distinct configurations, dictated by the
electric field of the surface.[61] The clear
dependence of the photoexcitation on the electric field vector orientation
reveals that Ovac polarons at the FA-A101 surface largely
exist in a single configuration, with a transition dipole moment in
the [010] direction.
Figure 6
(a) 2PPE p-polarized spectrum (hν = 3.81 eV, 325 nm) of FA-A101 fitted with Gaussian
lineshapes.
The red line represents the original spectrum, and the blue line represents
the fit to the Gaussian distributions. The gold peak represents the
2PPE background. Three dominant features are labeled corresponding
to their 2PPE origin. (b) Orbital energy level diagram demonstrating
the orbital splitting and resonance levels of polarons in C-A101 (subsurface
Ovac) and FA-A101 (surface Ovac). Excited state
energies are obtained from 2PPE. The occupied state energies are obtained
from UPS.
(a) 2PPE p-polarized spectrum (hν = 3.81 eV, 325 nm) of FA-A101 fitted with Gaussian
lineshapes.
The red line represents the original spectrum, and the blue line represents
the fit to the Gaussian distributions. The gold peak represents the
2PPE background. Three dominant features are labeled corresponding
to their 2PPE origin. (b) Orbital energy level diagram demonstrating
the orbital splitting and resonance levels of polarons in C-A101 (subsurface
Ovac) and FA-A101 (surface Ovac). Excited state
energies are obtained from 2PPE. The occupied state energies are obtained
from UPS.Although we have focused on formate
adsorption in this work, the
adsorbate-induced modification of polaronic states in TiO2(101) is likely observable in other systems with high surface coverages
and significant surface relaxations. It may be possible to exert further
control over this effect based on the electrostatic properties of
the adsorbate.
Conclusions
In summary,
we have shown that it is possible to tune the energetics
of Ovac polarons in anatase TiO2(101) by chemically
altering the surface environment. It is likely that this control is
possible due to the decreased mobility of polarons at anatase Ovac sites, relative to those in rutile. On C-A101, subsurface
polarons undergo resonant photoexcitation at energies below that of
the band gap, potentially giving rise to an extended photoresponse.
UPS confirms that formic acid adsorbs dissociatively on TiO2(101). The effect on the BGS is profound, shifting the BE 0.3 eV
higher and causing the formation of a large, sharp resonance peak
in the 2PPE spectra. This peak is a result of strong coupling from
the BGS to an intermediate state 3.04 eV above EF, which also evidences an increased splitting of the t2-like energy levels. Our
UPS and 2PPE studies indicate that this modification is caused by
surface Ovac and polaron migration, as was also suggested
in vibrational spectroscopy measurements.[41]Manipulating polaronic states has mostly been limited to STM
tip
engineering. Here, we demonstrate the ability to do so on the macroscale
through a facile chemical process. This capacity to tune the energetic
environment of polarons has implications for the technological applications
of anatase TiO2 that look to exploit the role of polaronic
states.
Authors: David O Scanlon; Charles W Dunnill; John Buckeridge; Stephen A Shevlin; Andrew J Logsdail; Scott M Woodley; C Richard A Catlow; Michael J Powell; Robert G Palgrave; Ivan P Parkin; Graeme W Watson; Thomas W Keal; Paul Sherwood; Aron Walsh; Alexey A Sokol Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2013-07-07 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Yu Zhang; Daniel T Payne; Chi L Pang; Cephise Cacho; Richard T Chapman; Emma Springate; Helen H Fielding; Geoff Thornton Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Hua Gui Yang; Cheng Hua Sun; Shi Zhang Qiao; Jin Zou; Gang Liu; Sean Campbell Smith; Hui Ming Cheng; Gao Qing Lu Journal: Nature Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 49.962