Literature DB >> 34267803

Incidence of lung cancer and air pollution in boroughs of Chile: an ecological study.

Jorge Sapunar-Zenteno1,2, Pedro Ferrer-Rosende1, Christian Caglevic3.   

Abstract

Lung cancer frequency has been progressively increasing; this has been linked to the use of inhaled tobacco and air pollution. In Chile, air pollution has reached alarming levels due to motor vehicle traffic, firewood burning for heating and minerals in urban areas; for this reason, our objective was to evaluate the association between the incidence of lung cancer and the concentration of the main air pollutants monitored in the country. We carried out a cross-sectional ecological study that evaluated the association between the average incidence of lung cancer in a 5-year period (2015-2019) with the average annual concentration of six atmospheric pollutants in the 5 years prior in 14 Chilean boroughs, using the population of beneficiaries of the Fundación Arturo-López-Pérez Cancer Institute. The annualised incidence of lung cancer was 9.77 per 100,000 and it varied significantly within the boroughs studied. When evaluating the relationship between lung-cancer incidence and the average concentration of atmospheric pollutants, we only found a direct and significant correlation between the level of respirable particulates 2.5 and the incidence of adenocarcinomas (β: 0.16; p: 0.023). © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental air pollutants; epidemiology; lung cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 34267803      PMCID: PMC8241455          DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience        ISSN: 1754-6605


Introduction

Since 1950, there has been an increasing trend in the incidence of lung cancer worldwide, especially in high-income countries according to the World Bank classification. This increase has been related to different factors, but causality has been established in two of them: the consumption of inhaled tobacco and environmental pollution, mainly by inhalable particulate material. The association between lung cancer and air pollution is in addition to the well-known relationship between this factor and non-neoplastic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [1]. The evidence linking air pollution with the development of lung cancer has been obtained mainly in the last 40 years due to systematic monitoring of air quality and the development of ecological studies [2]. Pope’s reports have shown since the beginning of this millennium that for every 10 μg/m3 of air contaminated with fine particles, the risk of developing lung cancer increases by approximately 8% [3]. A more recent British study shows that living within 50 m of a London motorway increases the risk of developing lung cancer by almost 10% [4]. Chile is no exception to the global problem of environmental pollution in general and air pollution in particular. In the city of Santiago, the country’s capital with a population of around 7.5 million inhabitants, the problem of air pollution has been critical since the 1980s [5]. Due to the growth of other urban areas with poor natural ventilation conditions, the increase in vehicular traffic, industrial activity and the use of polluting fuels for heating, the problem of air pollution has progressively spread to other Chilean regions. In 2020, approximately 1,800,000 people are expected to die from lung cancer worldwide [6], it being by far the leading cause of cancer death in high-, low- and middle-income countries. Epidemiological data of lung cancer in Chile reflect a late diagnosis, which adds to the high mortality of this disease, unless it is diagnosed in very early stages. According to the projections of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, published on the Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) portal [7], 3,873 new cases and 3,581 deaths from lung cancer were estimated for Chile in 2018. The Antofagasta Region, in northern Chile, is one of the areas with the highest incidence of lung and airway cancers in the world. In this particular case, the incidence rate has been linked to arsenic contaminant in the water, although it is possible that other environmental pollutants may explain the incidence and mortality from lung cancer in this geographical area [8]. Death rates from lung cancer are higher in men than in women. In Chile, age-adjusted mortality rate in the period 1990–2015 was higher in the northernmost regions (Antofagasta, Tarapacá, Arica-Parinacota and Atacama in decreasing order), while it was lower in the Araucanía, Biobío and Maule regions in the south, both for men and women [9]. This study aims to evaluate whether there is a demonstrable association between the incidence of lung cancer and the concentration of the main air pollutants monitored in Chile through an ecological study based on epidemiological data from patients from the Fundación Arturo López Pérez Cancer Institute in Santiago, Chile residing in one of 14 boroughs selected for their good records of the presence of six atmospheric pollutants. Chile has a network of air-quality monitoring stations located in the main cities or in places where productive activities such as mining, heavy industry and thermoelectric power generation generate pollution. This information is centralised through the Ministry of the Environment and reported through the National Air-Quality Information Service, which gives us reliable sources for the analysis of our data and their correct interpretation.

Subjects and methods

An ecological cross-sectional study to evaluate the association between annualised incidence of lung cancer in the period 2015–2019 and the average annual concentration of six air pollutants in 14 Chilean boroughs during the 5 years prior to the estimate. The study population was selected among the captive subjects of a Chilean health centre dedicated to cancer management offering cancer-related insurance to potential patients, covering diagnostic and treatment costs of neoplastic events. The Arturo López Pérez Foundation (FALP) Cancer Institute meets these characteristics. After approval by the FALP Scientific Ethics Committee, we obtained the distribution by age, sex and borough of the beneficiaries of the cancer insurance, as well as the new cases of lung cancer treated at the Institute in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Only histologically confirmed lung cancer cases among insurance beneficiaries were considered to estimate its incidence. In order to correct the potential biases implicit in projecting the incidence of lung cancer to the entire Chilean population based on the population of FALP-insurance beneficiaries, this rate was adjusted for the age distribution of the 2012 census using the direct method. To control the effect of age distribution among beneficiaries from each borough on the association between lung cancer incidence and pollutant concentration, we adjusted the borough rate for the proportion of beneficiaries in the highest-risk age group. Total and by-sex incidence rates were estimated with their 95% confidence interval based on gamma distribution. The relative importance of the main histological types of lung cancer is described. The average annual concentration of air pollutants was obtained from the data recorded by air-quality monitoring stations throughout Chile. The pollutants studied were respirable particulates 2.5 and 10 (PM2.5, PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3). Techniques for determining the concentration of atmospheric pollutants are available on the website of the National Air Quality Information System [16]. We considered the average of the last 5 years prior to the incidence estimate due to the lack of validated data in oldest records. To evaluate the association between lung cancer incidence and the average concentration of air pollutants, we selected boroughs equipped with active monitoring stations and validated registries that have more than 5,000 FALP-insurance beneficiaries. Considering the relative importance of adenocarcinoma among lung cancers, we also analysed the correlation between this histological type and average pollution by PM2.5 and PM10; SO2; NO; NO2 and O3. Statistical analysis was performed with the R program version 3.6.0 (R Core Team, 2018. Vienna, Austria). Using multiple linear regression, we evaluated the effect of air pollution on the incidence rate of lung cancer and lung adenocarcinoma, all as continuous variables, considering age and Human Develop Index (HDI) by commune. We previously checked the linearity of the relationship between the lung cancer incidence rate and the average concentration of pollutants. Both variables were normally distributed in the communes. Covariates for the model were HDI, age, and mean pollutant concentrations.

Results

During the period 2015–2019, 275 new histologically-confirmed lung-cancer cases were treated in people with FALP cancer insurance. The annualised incidence of lung cancer was 9.77 per 100,000 people FALP insurance beneficiaries (95% CI: 8.7–11.0). Table 1 shows incidence by sex, adjusted according to projections from the 2012 census, highlighting a significantly higher rate in men (11.1 versus 8.68). Figure 1 shows age distribution by 5-year periods of lung cancer cases, which is more frequent between 55 and 79 years of age. The highest incidence in men was observed between 75 and 79 years, while in women it was between 70 and 74 years; in both cases, it was more than 10 times higher than the general rate. Table 2 shows distribution by histological type according to sex and mean age, adenocarcinoma being the most frequent type (68.4%), followed by squamous carcinoma (17.1%). Figure 2 shows age distribution by 5-year periods of the cases of lung adenocarcinoma, which did not differ from what was observed in lung cancer in general.
Table 1.

2015–2019 lung cancer cases in FALP cancer-insurance beneficiaries and incidence rates adjusted for age and sex according to 2012 census projections.

WomenMenTotal
Cases 2015–2019132143275
Crude rate 2015–2019 (per 100,000)8.68 (7.3–10.3)11.1 (9.3–13.0)9.77 (8.7–11.0)
Adjusted rate 2015–2019 (per 100,000)11.42 (9.2–14.0)12.6 (10.5–15.1)12.12 (10.5–13.9)
Figure 1.

Age distribution by sex expressed in 5-year periods for lung cancer cases occurring in beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance in the period 2015–2019.

Table 2.

Histological types of lung cancer occurring in beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance in the period 2015-2019, by sex and mean age.

HistotypeFrequency (%)Mean age (±SD)
WomenMenTotalWomenMenTotal
Adenocarcinoma91 (68.9)97 (68.3)188 (68.6)64.2 ± 9.666.9 ± 8.165.6 ± 8.9
Squamous-cell Ca19 (14.4)28 (19.7)47 (17.2)69.9 ± 9.869.0 ± 6.669.4 ± 8.0
Small-cell lung cancer13 (9.8)6 (4.2)19 (6.9)65.2 ± 8.161.8 ± 6.364.1 ± 7.6
NET6 (4.5)2 (1.4)8 (2.9)66.0 ± 5.764.0 ± 7.165.5 ± 5.6
Other NSCLC2 (1.5)4 (2.8)6 (2.2)53.0 ± 1.458.5 ± 2.556.7 ± 3.5
Sarcomatoid Ca1 (0.8)2 (1.4)3 (1.1)7972.5 ± 4.974.7 ± 5.1
Large-cell lung cancer0 (0)3 (2.2)3 (1.1)-66.0 ± 8.966.0 ± 8.9
Total13214227465.1 ± 9.666.8 ± 7.866 ± 8.7

Ca, Carcinoma; NET, Tumour neuroendocrino; NSCLC, Non-small-cell lung cancer

Figure 2.

Age distribution by sex expressed in 5-year periods for lung cancer adenocarcinoma cases occurring in beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance in the period 2015–2019.

Table 3 shows the annualised incidence of lung cancer in 14 Chilean boroughs with more than 5,000 FALP cancer-insurance beneficiaries; data are presented both raw and adjusted for the proportion of people in the highest-risk age group. The boroughs with the highest adjusted incidence were Talca in the Maule Region (south), Las Condes in Greater Santiago (centre) and Los Angeles in the Bío-Bío Region (south). Table 4 shows the annualised incidence of lung adenocarcinoma in the same boroughs, with the highest adjusted rates registered for La Condes, Los Ángeles and Puente Alto (centre). It is noteworthy that in some boroughs, the incidence adjusted by age group at risk was extremely different between the sexes, with males predominating in some boroughs, such as Antofagasta (21.25 versus 2.01 cases per 100,000 in males and females, respectively), and the opposite occurring in others, such as Santiago (18.6 versus 5.55 cases per 100,000 in females and males, respectively).
Table 3.

Lung cancer annualised incidence by borough of residence in beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance between 2015 and 2019, direct and adjusted by risk group.

BoroughRegionCrude rate 2015–2019 (per 100,000)Adjusted rate 2015–2019 (per 100,000)
FemaleMaleTotalFemaleMaleTotal
AntofagastaAntofagasta1.62 (0.0–9.0)17.6 (8.4–32.4)9.29 (4.6–16.6)2.01 (0.1–11.2)21.25 (10.2–39.1)10.85 (5.4–19.5)
ChillánÑuble6.14 (0.7–22.2)7.47 (0.9–27.0)6.74 (1.8–17.3)5.97 (0.7–21.6)7.27 (0.9–26.3)6.57 (1.8–16.8)
ConcepciónBiobio9.74 (2.0–28.5)11.58 (2.4–33.8)10.58 (3.9–23.0)7.86 (1.6–23.0)9.82 (2.0–28.7)8.76 (3.2–19.1)
La FloridaGreater Stgo7.3 (1.5–21.3)23.23 (10.0–45.8)14.56 (7.3–26.1)5.5 (1.1–16.1)18 (7.7–35.8)11.24 (5.6–20.2)
La SerenaCoquimbo14.14 (3.9–36.2)0.007.65 (2.1–19.6)14.78 (4–37.9)0.007.99 (2.2–20.5)
Las CondesGreater Stgo15.39 (6.2–31.7)24.85 (11.4–47.2)19.58 (11.2–31.8)11.81 (4.4–25.5)18.68 (8.2–36.4)14.97 (8.3–24.9)
Los AngelesBiobio6.68 (0.8–24.1)19.65 (6.4–45.9)12.64 (5.1–26.1)7.66 (0.9–27.7)21.45 (7.0–50.1)14 (5.6–28.9)
Puente AltoGreater Stgo7.76 (1.6–22.7)11.65 (3.2–29.8)9.59 (3.9–19.8)9.29 (1.9–27.2)12.79 (3.5–32.7)10.9 (4.4–22.5)
Puerto MonttLos Lagos5.2 (0.6–18.8)2.99 (0.1–16.7)4.17 (0.9–12.2)5.84 (0.7–21.4)3.8 (0.1–21.2)4.9 (1.0–14.5)
Punta ArenasMagallanes3.78 (0.1–21.0)8.55 (1.0–30.9)6.02 (1.2–17.6)4.19 (0.1–23.4)8.64 (1.1–31.2)6.24 (1.3–18.3)
SantiagoGreater Stgo20.6 (9.4–39.1)5.86 (0.7–21.2)14.13 (7.1–25.3)18.6 (8.5–35.4)5.55 (0.7–20.1)12.6 (6.3–22.6)
TalcaMaule11.67 (3.2–29.9)20.69 (7.6–45.0)15.81 (7.6–29.1)11.46 (3.1–29.4)20.28 (7.4–44.1)15.51 (7.4–28.5)
TemucoLa Araucanía3.08 (0.1–17.2)7.25 (0.9–26.2)4.99 (1.0–14.6)3.07 (0.1–17.1)7.1 (0.9–25.7)4.92 (1.0–14.4)
Viña del MarValparaiso10.76 (2.2–31.5)0.005.87 (1.2–17.2)8.52 (1.8–24.9)0.004.6 (1.0–13.5)

Stgo, Santiago

Table 4.

2015–2019 annualised incidence of lung adenocarcinoma by borough of residence in beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance; direct and adjusted by risk group.

BoroughRegionCrude rate 2015–2019 (per 100,000)Adjusted rate 2015–2019 (per 100,000)
FemaleMaleTotalFemaleMaleTotal
AntofagastaAntofagasta1.62 (0.0–9.0)7.04 (1.9–18.0)4.22 (1.4–9.9)2.01 (0.1–11.2)8.2 (2.2–21.1)4.86 (1.6–11.4)
ChillánÑuble3.07 (0.1–17.1)7.47 (0.9–27.0)5.06 (1.0–14.8)2.83 (0.1–15.8)7.27 (0.9–26.3)4.87 (1.0–14.3)
ConepciónBiobio6.49 (0.8–23.5)7.72 (0.9–27.9)7.05 (1.9–18.1)5.24 (0.6–18.9)6.54 (0.8–23.6)5.84 (1.6–15)
La FloridaGreater Stgo7.3 (1.5–21.3)14.52 (4.7–33.9)10.59 (4.6–20.9)5.5 (1.1–16.1)11.65 (3.7–27.6)8.33 (3.6–16.5)
La SerenaCoquimbo7.07 (0.9–25.5)0.003.82 (0.5–13.8)7.25 (0.9–26.2)0.003.92 (0.5–14.2)
Las CondesGreater Stgo13.19 (4.8–28.7)19.33 (7.8–39.8)15.91 (8.5–27.2)10.53 (3.5–24.1)15.18 (5.8–32.3)12.67 (6.5–22.3)
Los AngelesBiobio3.34 (0.1–18.6)15.72 (4.3–40.3)9.03 (2.9–21.1)3.83 (0.1–21.4)17.05 (4.6–43.7)9.91 (3.2–23.2)
Puente AltoGreater Stgo7.76 (1.6–22.7)8.74 (1.8–25.5)8.22 (3.0–17.9)9.29 (1.9–27.2)9.59 (2.0–28.0)9.43 (3.5–20.6)
Puerto MonttLos Lagos5.2 (0.6–18.8)2.99 (0.1–16.7)4.17 (0.9–12.2)5.84 (0.7–21.4)3.8 (0.1–21.2)4.9 (1.0–14.5)
Punta ArenasMagallanes0.004.28 (0.1–23.8)2.01 (0.1–11.2)0.004.32 (0.1–24.1)1.99 (0.1–11.1)
SantiagoGreater Stgo13.73 (5.0–29.9)5.86 (0.7–21.2)10.28 (4.4–20.3)12.26 (4.5–26.8)5.55 (0.7–20.1)9.18 (4.0–18.1)
TalcaMaule5.84 (0.7–21.1)13.8 (3.8–35.3)9.49 (3.5–20.7)5.54 (0.7–20.0)13.56 (3.7–34.7)9.22 (3.4–20.1)
TemucoLa Araucanía3.08 (0.1–17.2)7.25 (0.9–26.2)4.99 (1.0–14.6)3.07 (0.1–17.1)7.1 (0.9–25.7)4.92 (1.0–14.4)
Viña del MarValparaiso7.17 (0.9–25.9)0.003.91 (0.5–14.1)5.68 (0.7–20.5)0.003.07 (0.4–11.1)

Stgo, Santiago

The association between lung cancer incidence rate and the average concentration of six atmospheric pollutants, estimated by multiple lineal regression, is presented in Table 5. We only found an inverse association between the incidence of lung cancer and the concentration of SO2 in men, which loses its significance when adjusting for age and HDI. Table 6 shows the association between lung adenocarcinoma incidence rate and the average concentration of six atmospheric pollutants, estimated by multiple lineal regression. Again, we found an inverse association between the incidence of adenocarcinoma and the SO2 concentration, which in this case loses significance when we adjust for HDI. We found a direct association between the incidence of adenocarcinoma in the general population and the concentration of O3, which is lost when adjusting for age and HDI. Finally, we found a direct and significant association between the incidence of lung adenocarcinoma and the PM2.5 concentration, when adjusting for HDI.
Table 5.

Association between 2015 and 2019 annualised incidence of lung cancer and the average concentration of six atmospheric pollutants in Chilean boroughs during the 5 years prior to the estimate. Multiple lineal regression models adjusted by age and HDI.

Lung cancer
UnadjustedAdjusted by ageAdjusted by HDI
Pollutantβ (SE)p-valueβ (SE)p-valueβ (SE)p-value
SO2
General−1.97 (2.01)0.431−1.79 (2.16)0.560−2.14 (2.88)0.593
Woman4.65 (4.46)0.4065.04 (4.74)0.4804.23 (6.37)0.626
Male−10.1 (1.05)0.011−10.2 (1.02)0.063−10.0 (1.5)0.092
NO
General0.03 (0.20)0.8990.07 (0.06)0.3520.05 (0.05)0.407
Woman0.20 (0.26)0.5080.233 (0.26)0.4620.21 (0.27)0.508
Male−0.19 (0.40)0.657−0.14 (0.39)0.7540.16 (0.37)0.705
NO2
General0.24 (0.23)0.362−0.02 (0.25)0.9290.24 (0.35)0.540
Woman0.28 (0.34)0.4530.10 (0.47)0.8450.05 (0.69)0.949
Male0.19 (0.54)0.747−0.19 (0.73)0.813−0.63 (0.98)0.568
O3
General0.73 (0.46)0.1750.57 (0.50)0.3200.23 (0.68)0.756
Woman0.36 (0.56)0.5470.17 (0.61)0.789−0.15 (0.86)0.874
Male1.17 (1.04)0.3111.04 (1.23)0.4450.63 (1.67)0.724
PM10
General0.13 (0.11)0.2610.11 (0.10)0.2860.07 (0.09)0.473
Woman0.14 (0.13)0.3180.11 (0.10)0.3090.08 (0.12)0.541
Male0.12 (0.20)0.5700.11 (0.21)0.6150.06 (0.21)0.790
PM2.5
General0.08 (0.13)0.5390.07 (0.11)0.5330.11 (0.10)0.270
Woman0.02 (0.15)0.8930.01 (0.13)0.9710.05 (0.13)0.729
Male0.16 (0.24)0.5040.15 (0.24)0.5360.20 (0.22)0.390
Table 6.

Association between 2015 and 2019 annualised incidence of lung adenocarcinoma and the average concentration of six atmospheric pollutants in Chilean boroughs during the 5 years prior to the estimate. Multiple lineal regression model adjusted by age and HDI.

Adenocarcinoma
UnadjustedAdjusted by ageAdjusted by HDI
Pollutantβ (EE)p-valueβ (EE)p-valueβ (EE)p-value
SO2
General−0.46 (0.89)0.656−0.34 (0.16)0.278−0.75 (0.76)0.502
Woman3.41 (1.99)0.2283.68 (0.42)0.0732.78 (1.74)0.357
Male−5.21 (0.50)0.009−5.28 (0.23)0.028−5.08 (0.54)0.067
NO
General0.01 (0.17)0.9880.04 (0.10)0.7360.02 (0.02)0.382
Woman0.11 (0.16)0.5470.14 (0.14)0.4220.12 (0.12)0.399
Male−0.14 (0.27)0.6450.09 (0.23)0.724−0.11 (0.19)0.619
NO2
General0.33 (0.15)0.0910.15 (0.14)0.378−0.04 (0.17)0.822
Woman0.40 (0.15)0.0570.30 (0.21)0.2360.25 (0.30)0.468
Male0.24 (0.34)0.5170.04 (0.44)0.928−0.40 (0.56)0.522
O3
General0.81 (0.29)0.0370.67 (0.28)0.0750.38 (0.37)0.365
Woman0.63 (0.30)0.0860.48 (0.28)0.1630.22 (0.40)0.612
Male1.03 (0.66)0.1770.90 (0.76)0.3020.55 (1.03)0.622
PM10
General0.13 (0.08)0.1210.11 (0.06)0.0850.08 (0.06)0.187
Woman0.14 (0.09)0.1490.12 (0.05)0.0550.08 (0.06)0.235
Male0.13 (0.13)0.3670.12 (0.14)0.4240.08 (0.14)0.561
PM2.5
General0.13 (0.10)0.2100.12 (0.07)0.1170.16 (0.06)0.023
Woman0.07 (0.11)0.5130.06 (0.08)0.4600.10 (0.08)0.202
Male0.21 (0.16)0.2110.19 (0.15)0.2110.23 (0.14)0.123

Discussion

According to GLOBOCAN estimates, lung cancer accounted for 11.6% of new cancer cases worldwide in 2018. The mean yearly incidence of this disease in countries with a high HDI was 40.4 cases per 100,000 males and 19.1 cases per 100,000 females. In countries with medium and low HDI, yearly rates were 11.8 cases per 100,000 males and 4.6 cases per 100,000 females. For South America, GLOBOCAN estimated 16.8 cases per 100,000 men per year and 10.2 cases per 100,000 women per year [11]. In Chile, crude airway- and lung-cancer incidence rates for the 5-year period 2003–2007, estimated from the registry of sentinel centres, were 17.1 cases per 100,000 men and 9.9 cases per 100,000 women [9]. Our study is the first one to directly obtain a lung cancer incidence rate for a Chilean population: it was 11.1 cases per 100,000 males per year and 8.68 cases per 100,000 females per year, a figure in the range observed for countries with medium to lower HDI in GLOBOCAN projections. The possible demographic differences between the population with FALP cancer insurance and the general Chilean population were partially corrected by adjusting the rate for the age distribution of the general population as registered in the 2012 census. On the other hand, FALP cancer insurance is mainly subscribed by companies for their workers, which would reduce the risk of selection bias given by individual affiliation. Regarding the distribution by histological type, this is similar to the results of large series from the United States and Latin America [12, 13], with adenocarcinoma followed by squamous carcinoma. In the 14 boroughs with a population of over 5,000 FALP insured selected for analysis, we observed a great variation in the mean annualised incidence of lung cancer ranging from 4.6 cases per 100,000 people per year in Viña del Mar, Valparaíso Region (centre) to 15.51 cases per 100,000 people per year in Talca, Maule Region (south). This finding is repeated in the analysis by sex. This variability in incidence by borough suggests that using sentinel centres to estimate incidence is debatable. Among the determinants of this variability, there would be socio-economic factors as shown by GLOBOCAN projections [11]. When assessing the association between the incidence of lung cancer in general and lung adenocarcinoma in particular and the average annual concentration of six air pollutants in the previous 5 years, we found an inverse association with the concentration of SO2, that is lost when fitting the linear regression model for age and HDI. We found a direct association between the incidence of adenocarcinoma and the O3 concentration that was also lost when the model was adjusted. This pollutant is not emitted directly into the atmosphere but is produced by chemical reactions between volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight. Its production is stimulated by luminosity and heat. It is a marker of emissions from vehicles and solvent-related industrial activities [14]. Because O3 is a powerful photochemical oxidant, it causes intense irritation to airway conjunctivas and mucosas, which could be classified as an acute effect. No association between the effect of long-term O3 exposure and outcomes such as mortality from various causes has been found upon analysis [15]. The borough of Las Condes exhibits the highest average annual O3 concentration and has one of the highest adjusted annual mean incidences of lung cancer (14.97 cases per 100,000). It is possible that O3 concentration is a marker of exposure to other pollutants with a carcinogenic effect as occurs in breast cancer [16]. The only contaminant that showed a significant direct association with the incidence of adenocarcinoma, when adjusting the model for HDI, was PM2.5. A systematic review reported that exposure to high concentrations of both PM2.5 and PM10 is associated with a slightly increased risk of lung cancer (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04–1.14 and OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00–1.17, respectively). This association is modified by smoking habits [17]. However, a study carried out in a cohort of non-smokers showed that for every 10 μg/m3 increase in the concentration of PM 2.5 the risk of adenocarcinoma increased by 31% [18]. Our study has some limitations due to the lack of validated records of all pollutants from air quality monitoring stations. There is also the possibility of selection bias in the beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance which may increase the incidence of cancer in relation to the general population. However, the lung cancer incidence rate found is similar to that reported in literature. Although we only selected boroughs with more than 5,000 beneficiaries of FALP cancer insurance, lung cancer projections for some of them were based on few cases, which distorts the subgroup analysis (e.g. by sex). Although literature reports an association between air pollution and risk of lung cancer, the effect is not very high and its confirmation required the accumulation of a large number of individuals in systematic reviews. It is also important to consider the effect of smoking as a recognised risk factor for lung cancer [19] which could act synergistically in the association between other air pollutants and risk of lung cancer [15]. Unfortunately, the magnitude of tobacco consumption by borough in Chile is unknown, so we could not control this variable in the population studied.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the incidence of lung cancer in the population studied is similar to that of countries with medium and low HDI, in accordance with GLOBOCAN 2018 projections; it is more frequent in males and between 55 and 79 years of age. We found a direct relationship between the frequency of lung adenocarcinoma and the concentration of PM2.5 in the air, when adjusting for HDI, considering that this indicator is strongly associated with the incidence of cancer. New studies are required to evaluate the role of smoking in the association between the pollutants studied and lung cancer. Finally, the lessons learned from our study could be applicable in low- and middle-income countries with a similar population.

Conflicts of interest and funding statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding to declare.
  14 in total

1.  Air pollution and lung cancer: what more do we need to know?

Authors:  A J Cohen
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Exposure to multiple sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Patrick T Bradshaw; Amy H Herring; Susan L Teitelbaum; Jan Beyea; Steven D Stellman; Susan E Steck; Irina Mordukhovich; Sybil M Eng; Lawrence S Engel; Kathleen Conway; Maureen Hatch; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Clinical features of 5,628 primary lung cancer patients: experience at Mayo Clinic from 1997 to 2003.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Mark S Allen; Marie C Aubry; Jason A Wampfler; Randolph S Marks; Eric S Edell; Stephen Thibodeau; Alex A Adjei; James Jett; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Air pollution report shows health impact.

Authors:  Jacqui Wise
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; Kazuhiko Ito; George D Thurston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  [Lung cancer histological types and diagnostic methods in a tertiary care facility].

Authors:  Carmen Magdalena Gurrola-Díaz; Ana Elizabeth González-Santiago; Rogelio Troyo-Sanromán; Luz Audina Mendoza-Topete
Journal:  Gac Med Mex       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.302

Review 7.  Lung cancer and air pollution.

Authors:  A J Cohen; C A Pope
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Long-term exposure to ambient ozone and mortality: a quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from cohort studies.

Authors:  R W Atkinson; B K Butland; C Dimitroulopoulou; M R Heal; J R Stedman; N Carslaw; D Jarvis; C Heaviside; S Vardoulakis; H Walton; H R Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The association between ambient fine particulate matter and incident adenocarcinoma subtype of lung cancer.

Authors:  Lida Gharibvand; W Lawrence Beeson; David Shavlik; Raymond Knutsen; Mark Ghamsary; Samuel Soret; Synnove F Knutsen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 10.  Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; Neela Guha; Aaron Cohen; Francine Laden; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Jonathan M Samet; Paolo Vineis; Francesco Forastiere; Paulo Saldiva; Takashi Yorifuji; Dana Loomis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.