Literature DB >> 34267729

Epigenetic Changes in Neonates Born to Mothers With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus May Be Associated With Neonatal Hypoglycaemia.

Yoshifumi Kasuga1,2, Tomoko Kawai2, Kei Miyakoshi1, Yoshifumi Saisho3, Masumi Tamagawa1, Keita Hasegawa1,2, Satoru Ikenoue1, Daigo Ochiai1, Mariko Hida4, Mamoru Tanaka1, Kenichiro Hata2.   

Abstract

The detection of epigenetic changes associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia may reveal the pathophysiology and predict the onset of future diseases in offspring. We hypothesized that neonatal hypoglycaemia reflects the in utero environment associated with maternal gestational diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to identify epigenetic changes associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia. The association between DNA methylation using Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadChip and neonatal plasma glucose (PG) level at 1 h after birth in 128 offspring born at term to mothers with well-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus was investigated by robust linear regression analysis. Cord blood DNA methylation at 12 CpG sites was significantly associated with PG at 1 h after birth after adding infant sex, delivery method, gestational day, and blood cell compositions as covariates to the regression model. DNA methylation at two CpG sites near an alternative transcription start site of ZNF696 was significantly associated with the PG level at 1 h following birth (false discovery rate-adjusted P < 0.05). Methylation levels at these sites increased as neonatal PG levels at 1 h after birth decreased. In conclusion, gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with DNA methylation changes at the alternative transcription start site of ZNF696 in cord blood cells. This is the first report of DNA methylation changes associated with neonatal PG at 1 h after birth.
Copyright © 2021 Kasuga, Kawai, Miyakoshi, Saisho, Tamagawa, Hasegawa, Ikenoue, Ochiai, Hida, Tanaka and Hata.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; epigenetics; gestational diabetes mellitus; neonatal hypoglycaemia; umbilical cord blood

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34267729      PMCID: PMC8276691          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.690648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an important perinatal problem because it can promote the development of intra-uterine foetal death, shoulder dystocia, macrosomia, and/or neonatal hypoglycaemia in offspring. A recent report indicated that epigenetic modifications associated with maternal hyperglycaemia during pregnancy can predispose offspring to develop metabolic disorders, and that the in utero environment during maternal GDM is associated with changes in foetal DNA methylation at CpG sites in genes related to metabolic function (1–7). Environmental interactions with the genome can cause epigenetic modifications, which have been investigated as mechanisms related to the development of type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes (8, 9). In mice, GDM alters DNA methylation in the pancreatic genome of offspring, suggesting an association with the development of abnormalities in glycolipid metabolism, type 2 diabetes susceptibility, and future obesity (10). However, no methods are available for directly measuring in utero hyperglycaemic conditions, and no associations between the degree of hyperglycaemia and methylation have been shown. Neonates born to mothers with GDM frequently present with hypoglycaemia. Because maternal glucose traverses the placenta, fetus born to mothers with GDM develop hyperinsulinemia to decrease plasma glucose (PG) levels. However, maternal glucose is shut down after birth, which often develop hypoglycaemia in neonates who were hyperinsulinemia in utero. The presence of hypoglycaemia in neonates immediately after birth is predictive of the future development of obesity or metabolic disorders (11). Furthermore, neonates that develop hypoglycaemia, which is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes (i.e., developmental delay at an older age), should be treated as soon as possible (12–14). Infants with hypoglycaemia can be born even to women with well-controlled GDM (15). It indicates that early-pregnancy high glucose (before GDM diagnosis) may be involved in neonatal hypoglycaemia and influence adverse foetal tissue development. Furthermore, higher maternal dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load during early pregnancy are associated with a larger foetal abdominal circumference in late-pregnancy or offspring fat mass, even at the age of 4–6 years (16, 17). Besides, fluctuating glucose and insulin concentrations during early pregnancy are associated with childhood glucose and insulin levels (18). Therefore, neonatal hypoglycaemia may be associated with epigenetic changes in cord blood cells. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that neonatal hypoglycaemia can reflect foetal hyperinsulinemia due to maternal early-pregnancy hyperglycaemia and that offspring cord blood epigenetics may be associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia. To this end, we examined the associations between the DNA methylation status in umbilical cord blood samples and neonatal PG at 1 h after birth.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by the Keio University School of Medicine Ethics Committee (20100154, 20110321, 20150103, and 20150168) and the Institutional Review Board of the National Research Institute for Child Health and Development (406) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and later amendments. All subjects provided written informed consent.

Study Population

We collected samples of cord blood from 132 offspring born at term to mothers with GDM and under neonatal care at Keio University Hospital between 2012 and 2016. Neonatal PG was routinely measured at 1 h after birth by the nursing staff, and neonatal hypoglycaemia was diagnosed according to glucose concentrations <2.6 mmol/L (47 mg/dL). GDM was diagnosed using the oral glucose tolerance test with 75 g of glucose (75 g-OGTT) according to criteria established by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (19). This required achieving one or more of the following threshold values: fasting PG, 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL); 1 h PG levels during 75 g-OGTT (1 h-PG), 10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL); and 2 h PG levels during 75 g-OGTT (2 h-PG), 8.5 mmol/L (153 mg/dL). Each subject was evaluated based on the OGTT results. As described in our previous report, all mothers with GDM were on defined diets and self-monitored their blood glucose measurements at our hospital. Physicians analysed the blood glucose levels of all mothers every 2–3 weeks. Insulin was administered when dietary management did not result in the expected glucose levels (i.e., fasting PG level <5.6 mmol/L [100 mg/dL] or 2 h PG <6.7 mmol/L [120 mg/dL]) (20). The exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancy, preterm birth (gestational age at delivery <37 weeks), hypertensive disorder during pregnancy, neonatal asphyxia (umbilical artery pH <7.100 or Apgar score at 5 min <7), foetal growth restriction as defined by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and congenital foetal anomaly. We also excluded women with DM (i.e., type 1 or 2 diabetes) before pregnancy and overt diabetes during pregnancy. Based on standard Japanese sex- and parity-specific birth-weight percentile curves, a birth weight ≥90th or <10th percentile was defined as large or small for gestational age, respectively (21).

DNA Methylation in Umbilical Cord Blood

Umbilical cord blood was collected from each neonate immediately after birth. Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAsymphony DNA Midi kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), followed by bisulphite treatment using the Zymo EZ-96 DNA methylation kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). The genome-wide DNA methylation status for >850K CpG sites was analysed using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Methylation data were acquired using the iScan system (Illumina) as idat files and processed by the minfi and ChAMP packages (https://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R) in R (v.3.4.0; www.R-project.org). The background was corrected using the NOOB method in the minfi package (22). Corrected data were normalized by BMIQ in the ChAMP package (v.2.8.9) (23). The manifest file was annotated using “IlluminaHumanMethylationEPICanno.ilm10b2.hg19.” We removed 11,800 probes with detection P-values >0.01 in at least one sample, 3,125 probes with a bead count <3 in at least 5% of samples, and 2,894 non-CpG targeting probes. Additionally, we filtered 17,124 probes located on either the X or Y chromosome, 49 multi-hit probes (24), and 77,589 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-related probes (25) using ChAMP. This yielded 754,255 autosomal probes from 132 samples. We used the Beta-value (β), which represents the ratio of the methylated probe intensity and overall intensity (sum of methylated and unmethylated probe intensities). The cell composition of each cord blood sample (i.e., ‘Bcell’, ‘CD4T’, ‘CD8T’, ‘Gran’, ‘Mono’, ‘NK’, and ‘nRBC’) was analysed using “FlowSorted.CordBlood.450k” in the minfi package (26). We confirmed that the same sample had not been measured twice as clustering samples by using methylation levels of 1,297 probes with a minor allele frequency of the target CpG site >0.4 ( ).

Statistical Analysis

Perinatal information was retrospectively obtained from medical records at our hospital. The significance of associations between PG at 1 h after birth and each blood cell composition or each medical record estimated using the minfi package was examined by Pearson’s association test. Significant differences in PG at 1 h after birth according to the neonatal sex or effects of caesarean section (CS) were examined by Welch’s two-sample t test. Eventually, we included whole-cell types, except granulocytes, in addition to gestational age, CS, and neonatal sex as covariates. Additionally, we determined whether associations between DNA methylation and PG at 1 h after birth were influenced by genetic variants. We also evaluated significant 12 CpG sites according to a reference meQTL dataset described by Hannon et al. (27). We assessed raw and normalized β values from the 132 samples using principal component analysis to exclude the outliers ( ), resulting in exclusion of four samples. There were no differences in maternal characteristics between included and excluded cases ( ). First, we analysed associations between neonatal PG at 1 h after birth and blood cell composition or medical characteristics by linear regression analysis. Associations between neonatal PG at 1 h after birth and cord blood DNA methylation in the 128 samples were assessed by robust linear regression (rlm) using the R MASS package [rlm(model, method=“M”, psi = psi.hampel, init = “lts”)] with White’s estimator [coeftest(rlm, vcov=vcovHC(rlm, type=“HC”))] using the R ‘sandwich’ package. The variance inflation factor of PG at 1 h after birth or each estimated cell composition was as follows: PG at 1 h after birth (1.15), ‘Bcell’ (5.56), ‘CD4T’ (33.23), ‘CD8T’ (6.19), ‘Gran’ (55.35), ‘Mono’ (5.29), ‘NK’ (2.47), and ‘nRBC’ (4.70). Because the variance inflation factor of ‘Gran’ was the largest in this study, we removed the ‘Gran’ fractions from the covariates. After removing ‘Gran’, the covariates were PG at 1 h after birth (1.14), ‘Bcell’ (1.16), ‘CD4T’ (1.47), ‘CD8T’ (1.14), ‘Mono’ (1.25), ‘NK’ (1.23), and ‘nRBC’ (1.20). Other cell types were added to the rlm model as separate covariates. Additionally, we evaluated the rlm model by adding either cell type individually. The genomic inflation factor (λ) and quantile–quantile plots were used to compare the genome-wide distribution of P-values with the expected null distribution. The P-value was adjusted by λ and used to normalize the expected proportion of false-positives in the dataset (i.e., false discovery rate) and correct for multiple testing rounds using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. For maternal and neonatal characteristics, continuous data were compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney U, test and categorical variables were analysed using Fisher’s exact test using JMP software (v15.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A P < 0.05 was considered to indicate significant results.

Results

We collected PG at 1 h after birth samples from 128 term neonates born to mothers with GDM ( ). The median gestational age at delivery and birth weight were 39 weeks (range: 37−41 weeks) and 3,022 g (range: 2,352−3,834 g), respectively. Among the 128 neonates, 63 were female (49%) and 45 exhibited hypoglycaemia (36%). The median PG at 1 h after birth was 2.8 mmol/L (range: 1.2−7.6 mmol/L). Among 45 neonates with hypoglycaemia, 12 were born to mothers with GDM who received insulin therapy during pregnancy, and 24 were born to mothers with GDM whose GDM was diagnosed before 24 gestational weeks. Maternal insulin therapy and GDM diagnosed before 24 gestational weeks were not associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia (P = 1.00 and 0.82, respectively).
Table 1

Characteristics of 128 neonates born to Japanese mothers with gestational diabetes and monitored 1 h after birth.

Inclusion Group
(n = 128)
Maternal age at delivery (years)37(26−47)
Maternal pregravid BMI (kg/m2)20.4(16.9–32.9)
Maternal insulin use during pregnancy33(26%)
Maternal gestational weight gain (kg)8.2(-5.2–18)
GDM diagnosis before 24 gestational weeks71(55%)
Gestational age at delivery (weeks)39(37–41)
Caesarean section45(35%)
Female neonates63(49%)
Birth weight (g)3,022(2,352−3,834)
PG at 1 h after birth (mmol/L)2.8(1.2−7.6)
Hypoglycaemia (PG <2.6 mmol/L)45(35%)
Umbilical artery pH7.31(7.13–7.44)
Apgar score
 1 min8(7–10)
 5 min9(7–10)
Placenta weight (g)560(310–910)

BMI, body mass index; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PG, plasma glucose level. Data are presented as median (range) or n (%).

Characteristics of 128 neonates born to Japanese mothers with gestational diabetes and monitored 1 h after birth. BMI, body mass index; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PG, plasma glucose level. Data are presented as median (range) or n (%). The association between PG at 1 h after birth and blood cell composition or medical characteristics is shown in . Although there was less collinearity between cell types and 1-h PG ( ), ‘CD4T’, ‘Gran’, and ‘NK’ were significantly correlated with PG at 1 h after birth. For medical characteristics, gestational age at birth was significantly associated with PG at 1 h after birth; however, the antepartum OGTT or metabolic features were not associated with PG at 1 h after birth. Although there was no difference in PG at 1 h after birth between female and male new-borns (2.8 mmol/L vs. 2.8 mmol/L, P = 0.63), the PG at 1 h after birth in those born via CS was lower than that in new-borns born via vaginal delivery (2.7 vs. 2.8 mmol/L, P = 0.024).
Table 2

Correlation between plasma glucose level at 1 h after birth and blood cell composition or medical records.

TrendP-value
Cell composition of blood sample
 B cell-0.1282550.15
 T cell, CD4-0.2793750.0014
 T cell, CD80.11795420.18
 Granulocyte0.1874390.034
 Monocyte0.02279670.80
 NK cell0.20669890.019
 Red blood cell0.04088770.65
Maternal age at delivery-0.0166840.85
Maternal antepartum OGTT
 Fasting PG-0.0166840.85
 1-h PG0.1193820.18
 2-h PG-0.0907440.31
 Fasting IRI-0.1116030.21
 1-h IRI0.01949410.83
 2-h IRI-0.0578490.52
HOMA-IR-0.0470580.60
ISOGTT -0.0072990.93
Insulinogenic index0.09950870.27
ISSI-2-0.0045840.96
Gestational age at birth0.27618610.0016
Birthweight-0.0307450.73
Neonatal PG10

OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PG, plasma glucose level; IRI, immunoreactive insulin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; ISOGTT: Insulin sensitivity index from OGTT; ISSI-2, Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2.

Correlation between plasma glucose level at 1 h after birth and blood cell composition or medical records. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PG, plasma glucose level; IRI, immunoreactive insulin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; ISOGTT: Insulin sensitivity index from OGTT; ISSI-2, Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2. We then performed rlm analysis of DNA methylation of cord blood cells and continuous neonatal 1-h PG of 128 samples by adding four covariates: sex, CS, gestational age, and blood cell components. This model resulted in a λ of 1.22 ( ). Therefore, we corrected the P-value by adjusting λ to 1.1, which we considered as an acceptable value (28). This revealed that the methylation level at 12 CpG sites was individually associated with PG at 1 h after birth (false discovery rate-adjusted P < 0.05) ( and ). Differences in the new-born DNA methylation beta value per 1 mmol/L increase in PG at 1 h after birth at these 12 CpG sites were -0.033–0.011. Of these 12 CpG sites, two (cg11388673 and cg08799779) were on the same CpG island (chr8:144371446-144372076) in ZNF696 and associated with GDM according to the EWAS Atlas database. We confirmed that cell heterogeneity was not a major confounder in the associations of these two CpG sites, by adding and comparing each cell type individually as a covariate and based on the results without cell type covariates ( ). However, neonatal gender was a major confounder of these two CpG sites. Regression analysis between only the DNA methylation status and neonatal PG at 1 h after birth did not reveal these two CpG sites as significant ( and ). Interestingly, previous reports have shown that these two CpG sites are associated with sex ( ) (29, 30); therefore, we examined the associations between each DNA methylation level in five array probes within the same CpG island and neonatal PG according to neonatal sex ( ). Of the five probes, four were associated with neonatal PG at 1 h after birth in both male and female infants (P < 0.05) ( ). Among the four probes, sites cg11388673 and cg08799779 were significantly associated with neonatal PG at 1 h after birth according to rlm after considering the covariates and confounders ( ).
Table 3

Methylation sites where neonatal plasma glucose level was associated with offspring new-born blood methylation.

Target IDCHRPositionCoefficient a SERaw p-valueFDR-corrected P value
cg0869457822418351470.0070797940.0012083944.66E-090.02163268
cg113886738144371779-0.0331615070.0059013541.92E-080.038674577
cg2242474611177533130.0048657950.0008885254.34E-080.042628046
cg14419205141035348830.0090460230.0016746796.60E-080.042628046
cg1412640810447053420.0092219150.001716997.83E-080.042628046
cg2615176112030258850.0049516420.0009222867.92E-080.042628046
cg098182651579173330.0095634490.0017871768.74E-080.042628046
cg122178318409589600.0089283460.0016759779.97E-080.042628046
cg087997798144371965-0.0321744810.0061166581.44E-070.048566746
cg093994761298382110.0066672270.0012726161.61E-070.048566746
cg2705215212550271760.0106870280.0020411431.64E-070.048566746
cg1815870922355985700.0019184370.0003678271.83E-070.049131149

CHR, chromosome; FDR, false discover rate; SE, standard error.

Differences in DNA methylation beta value per 1 mmol/L increase in PG at 1 h after birth.

Figure 1

(A) Manhattan plot of EWAS between PG at 1 h after birth and DNA methylation levels of 754,255 CpG sites. (B) QQ plot of EWAS p-values.

Table 4

Outputs from mQTL database and EWAS Atlas for identified 12 CpGs.

chrCpG siteposition (hg19)position (hg38)AnnotationGene NameLocationmeQTL SNPmeQTLmeQTLEWAS Atlas (We checked on August 24,2020)
(hg38)Beta valueP-value
1cg098182655791733357451661intron 3 of 16DAB1OpenSea
(NM_021080)
1cg22424746117753313117210691intron 1 of 4VTCN1OpenSeaMultiple sclerosis
(NM_001253850)
1cg26151761203025885203056757intron 18 of 29PPFIA4OpenSeaIL-13 treatment
(NM_001304331)
2cg18158709235598570234689926intron 1 of 2LINC01173OpenSea
(NR_132376)
2cg08694578241835147240895730exon 1 of 5C2orf54OpenSea
(NM_001085437)
8cg122178314095896041101441IntergenicOpenSea
8cg11388673144371779143289609Promoter-TSSZNF696Islandchr8.143289197-0.0538283858.96E-20Gender, GDM, Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome
(ENST 00000523891)
8cg08799779144371965143289795Promoter-TSSZNF696Islandchr8.143289818-0.0537825884.02E-22Gender
(ENST 00000523891)
10cg141264084470534244209894IntergenicS_ShelfCrohn’s disease, Pretem birth
12cg0939947698382119685615intron 2 of 5CLEC2DOpenSeachr12.92063990.010626812.18307E-10
(NM_001004419)
chr12.93616550.011490184.47186E-13
chr12.96638330.016001853.98094E-23
chr12.9673426-0.045248272.72462E-92
chr12.9764510-0.010510474.44425E-09
12cg270521525502717654633392intron 1 of 4LACRTOpenSeachr12.54615029-0.0283130871.34E-57Ancestry
(NM_033277)
14cg14419205103534883103068546Intergenic0OpenSea

chr, chromosome; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Figure 2

Rlm analysis of DNA methylation and 1-h PG after birth in each of five CpG sites located in the same CpG island in the ZNF696 promoter. DNA methylation of the 5′ region of four CpG sites was associated with PG at 1 h after birth after birth. Only cg11388673 and cg08799779 were significant after considering covariates and confounders.

Table 5

The association with DNA methylation at 5 CpG sites within alternative TSS of ZNF696 and neonatal PG at 1h after birth by neonatal sex.

CGI [chr8:144371446-144372076]MaleFemale
CoefficientSEPr(>|z|)CoefficientSEPr(>|z|)
cg02530860 (8:144371537)-0.0250.0072.7.E-04-0.0270.0072.7.E-04
cg03151810* (8:144371745)-0.0290.0091.3.E-03-0.0290.0081.6.E-04
cg11388673* (8:144371779)-0.0280.0071.3.E-05-0.0430.0103.3.E-05
cg08799779 (8:144371965)-0.0310.0087.2.E-05-0.0360.0102.1.E-04
cg11750431 (8:144372051)-3.4.E-047.4.E-040.647.0.E-044.3.E-040.10

chr, chromosome; SE, standard error.

Rlm was performed adding 3 covariates; cesarean section delivery, gestational age, and cell components (-Gran).

*indicates the probes that reported to be hyper-methylated in infants cord blood born to GDM (31).

Methylation sites where neonatal plasma glucose level was associated with offspring new-born blood methylation. CHR, chromosome; FDR, false discover rate; SE, standard error. Differences in DNA methylation beta value per 1 mmol/L increase in PG at 1 h after birth. (A) Manhattan plot of EWAS between PG at 1 h after birth and DNA methylation levels of 754,255 CpG sites. (B) QQ plot of EWAS p-values. Outputs from mQTL database and EWAS Atlas for identified 12 CpGs. chr, chromosome; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism. The association with DNA methylation at 5 CpG sites within alternative TSS of ZNF696 and neonatal PG at 1h after birth by neonatal sex. chr, chromosome; SE, standard error. Rlm was performed adding 3 covariates; cesarean section delivery, gestational age, and cell components (-Gran). *indicates the probes that reported to be hyper-methylated in infants cord blood born to GDM (31). Rlm analysis of DNA methylation and 1-h PG after birth in each of five CpG sites located in the same CpG island in the ZNF696 promoter. DNA methylation of the 5′ region of four CpG sites was associated with PG at 1 h after birth after birth. Only cg11388673 and cg08799779 were significant after considering covariates and confounders. The sites cg11388673 and cg08799779 in ZNF696 were −67 and +119 proximal to the alternative transcription start site (TSS), respectively. The transcript starting from this location (i.e., ENST00000523891) encodes a protein isoform of ZNF696 (UniProt: E5RJV3_112 aa) with 96 amino acids of the C-terminus perfectly matching those of the N-terminus of another major isoform (UniProt: Q9H7X3_374 aa). DNA methylation in the proximity of the TSS of the major isoform (ENST00000330143) was not associated with PG at 1 h after birth ( ). We identified 46 transcription factors that bind the TSS of the major isoform, whereas only ELF1 and RUNX3 were confirmed to bind the alternative TSS in the human lymphoblastoid cell line GM12878 according to the ENCODE 3 TFBS Track (32), which is available in UCSC Genome Browser on Humans February 2009 (GRCh37/hg19) Assembly ( ). ELF1 and RUNX3 binding was not observed in any of the other 10 CpG sites. Methylation levels at the 12 CpG sites continuously changed in association with neonatal 1 h PG level after birth. However, these epigenetic changes may be related to genetic variations concentrated in neonates in whom methylation levels at any of the 12 CpG sites were either in the higher or lower range. Evaluation of this possibility using the DNA-methylated quantitative trait locus (meQTL) database (25) confirmed the presence of eight meQTL SNPs related to methylation levels at four CpG sites out of the 12 CpG sites ( ). None of eight SNPs have been reported to be associated with any traits in the GWAS Catalog. The minor allelic frequency (MAF) of the eight SNPs was 0.290–0.490 in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Next, to determine whether unexamined genetic variants associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia can alter methylation of the 12 CpG sites identified in our study, we referred to the GWAS Catalog. Among the six reported GDM-associated variants, none of the variants could be cis-meQTL within 1 Mb of the 12 CpG sites (30, 32). There were 549 significant genome-wide associations (P < 5 × 10-8) between 384 common SNPs within 1 Mb of 12 CpG sites and any trait. Of the 549 associations, SNPs associated with body mass index, fasting blood glucose, and T2DM were identified within 1 Mb of four (cg09818265, cg26151761, cg27052152, and cg14419205), one (cg12217831), and two (cg22424746 and cg14419205) of the 12 CpG sites, respectively. We cannot rule out the possibility that these meQTL- and GWAS-identified genetic variants are involved in methylation changes observed in the 12 CpG sites in a neonatal period-specific manner without evaluating the genetic variants in our subjects.

Discussion

In this study, we measured genome-wide DNA methylation levels in umbilical cord blood and PG levels in neonates born to women with GDM. The results revealed an association between methylation at CpG sites proximal to an alternative TSS of ZNF696 and PG at 1 h after birth. We hypothesized that postnatal blood glucose levels reflect the degree of foetus-individual response to in utero hyperglycaemia, and that neonatal epigenetics and hypoglycaemia are associated. In this study, about half of the mothers were diagnosed with GDM after 24 gestational weeks. However, since we thought they might have had potential hyperglycaemia from the early stages of pregnancy according to previous reports (16–18), the DNA methylation status in cord blood cells was associated with neonatal PG at 1 h after birth. This is the first study investigating the possible association between the offspring epigenome with hypoglycaemia in neonates born to mothers with GDM. We identified two CpG sites associated with neonatal PG on the same CpG island (chr8:144371446–144372076) and in the vicinity of the alternative TSS of ZNF696. Moreover, another two CpG sites within the same CpG island were associated with DNA methylation and PG at 1 h after birth ( ). A previous report indicated that a CpG site in this region is associated with GDM according to genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of offspring born to mothers with GDM (31). Although the function of ZNF696 remains unknown, a previous study reported that this gene is involved in acquired paclitaxel resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells (33). In the present study, DNA methylation at two CpG sites within ZNF696 showed associations with neonatal 1-h PG. Although the method used to detect DNA methylation had a limited ability to detect all CpGs in the genome, the findings using array probes suggested strong epigenetic regulation. Yamamoto et al. reported that in-target intrapartum glucose control in mothers with GDM was not associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia after adjusting for neonatal factors and considering gestational age, preterm delivery, and infant sex as confounders of neonatal factors (34). This suggests that neonatal hypoglycaemia does not occur because of temporal maternal glycaemic dysregulation during intrapartum. Therefore, the association between changes in DNA methylation identified in the present study and neonatal hypoglycaemia suggests that both epigenetic regulation and hypoglycaemia are ascribed to effects related to maternal hyperglycaemia. Furthermore, epigenetic changes to the ZNF696 promoter may regulate blood cell function along with neonatal hypoglycaemia. We confirmed eight meQTL SNPs, which have been reported for four CpG sites among the 12 CpG sites ( ). Whether our results were affected by these reported genetic variants and if these reported genetic variants alone were associated with the changes in the methylation at four CpG sites remain unclear. Undefined SNPs may affect neonatal methylation at the identified 12 CpG sites in cis or trans manner to synergistically interact with maternal hyperglycaemia. Further studies are needed to clarify these possibilities. The TF ChIP-seq database revealed that ELF1 and RUNX3 bind the alternative TSS of ZNF696 based on information obtained using the human lymphoblastoid cell line GM12878 (32). These two transcription factors do not reportedly bind to other regions that are associated with the remained 10 CpG sites. This may be related to the results that showed that among the 12 significant CpG sites, methylation changes at the two CpG sites in the ZNF696 alternative TSS alone are negatively associated with postnatal 1-h PG. Targeting of alternative TSSs is related to developmental stage (35, 36) or cell differentiation (37). This suggests that the synergistic effects of the in utero environment and foetal glucose tolerance are driven by DNA methylation at the alternative TSS of ZNF696. Furthermore, Yamamoto et al. reported that male sex was significantly associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in children born to mothers with type 1 diabetes and GDM (34). In the present study, neonatal gender was unrelated to PG at 1 h after birth; however, we only observed an association between DNA methylation at ZNF696 and PG at 1 h after birth when neonatal sex was added as a covariate. Moreover, hypermethylation was observed in CpG sites in the alternative TSS of ZNF696 in males and in neonatal hypoglycaemia ( ), suggesting differential isoform transcription at this location between genders. Similar epigenetic regulation may occur in various tissues and affect the control of blood glucose depending on the neonatal sex. Hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome reportedly alter the blood cell composition (38). We identified a significant correlation between neonatal PG and the percentage of ‘CD4T’, ‘Gran’, and ‘NK’ components in cord blood cells, respectively. This indicates that in utero hyperinsulinemia affects cord blood cell differentiation. This study has several limitations. First, PG at 1 h after birth was determined only in neonates born to mothers with GDM at our hospital and not in those delivered from mothers without GDM. In addition, we did not determine the neonatal plasma insulin level. Furthermore, as neonatal hyperinsulinemia is the major reason for neonatal hypoglycaemia in offspring born to mothers with GDM, the neonatal plasma insulin level may better reflect the in utero environment compared to PG. However, we did not determine plasma insulin levels in neonates. To overcome this limitation, we examined the methylation beta value of cord blood from 60 new-borns born to mothers with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) but whose neonatal PG at 1 h after birth was not evaluated. Neonatal hypoglycaemia may occur not only in new-borns born to mothers with GDM but also in those who are preterm or are small or large for their gestational age (38). Our 60 NGT subjects were all born after 37 gestational weeks. Four new-borns of our 60 subjects had -1.5 SD birth weight and four had +1.5 SD birth weight compared to subjects born at the same gestational age. We predicted that neonatal hypoglycaemia had not occurred in our 60 subjects with NGT based on the following results. The methylation levels in the 60 subjects with NGT should be higher than those in 128 subjects with GDM at the 10 CpG sites whose regression coefficients for neonatal PG levels showed positive values in our analysis, and vice versa for the remaining 2 CpG sites. As shown in , the median methylation levels of NGT were higher than those of GDM at cg08694578 and cg27052152 in both sexes. Student’s t-test revealed significant methylation differences between NGT and GDM at cg27052152 only in males (p = 0.035). The median methylation levels at cg11388673 and cg08799779, which are in the alternative TSS of ZNF696, were decreased in NGT compared to in GDM as predicted, although they were not significantly different. The differences were more obvious in males. These results regarding to at least four of the 12 identified CpG sites support our speculation that methylation changes at the identified CpG sites could be markers for in utero hyperglycaemia, even after including NGT subjects. Further experiments are warranted to confirm these results by recruiting subjects with NGT, whose neonatal PG is evaluated at 1 h after birth. Second, the sample size was small. When calculating multiple regression power with a medium effect size and at the false discovery rate-corrected significance level, the power of our sample size was 0.024. Without adjusting the 5% significance level using multiple test correction, the power was 0.86. However, we performed association analysis between DNA methylation and neonatal PG by adding four covariates, including sex, CS, gestational age, and blood cell components. Furthermore, aside from GDM and preterm birth, maternal obesity, poor or excessive nutrition, and adiposity are associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia (39). Given that a previous study reported that umbilical cord blood was associated with PG after birth in neonates (40), analysis of the relationship between neonatal PG and DNA methylation may be more effective than examining the relationship with GDM to identify epigenetic mechanisms related to the development of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Nevertheless, further investigation using a larger cohort is necessary to identify other epigenetic mechanisms related to neonatal hypoglycaemia. We attempted to verify our results using the Asian cohort study GUSTO (41). However, in this previous study, data on cord blood DNA methylation was obtained from only 65 of 211 mothers with GDM, limiting our ability to interpret the findings in this small sample. Third, since hyperinsulinemia in mothers with GDM might be often attributed to excessive insulin therapy, we cannot deny the possibility that insulin therapy during pregnancy influenced DNA methylation in cord blood samples. However, maternal insulin therapy was not significantly associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in our neonates. In addition, since we have introduced self-monitored blood glucose measurements for all GDM cases, we believe that extra insulin therapy did not occur in our subjects. Fourth, overt diabetes might be more strongly influenced by DNA methylation compared to GDM because maternal hyperglycaemia in overt diabetes mothers might be more prominent than that in mothers with GDM. However, in this study, only one mother developed overt DM, and we could not analyse the association between neonatal hypoglycaemia and DNA methylation in cord blood samples among neonates born to overt diabetes mothers. We have to consider further research using larger samples. In summary, we identified DNA methylation at two CpG sites near an alternative TSS of ZNF696 and found that they were significantly associated with PG at 1 h after birth. Methylation levels at these sites increased as neonatal PG levels at 1 h after birth decreased, suggesting that neonatal hypoglycaemia driven by the GDM status of mothers alters access to an alternative TSS of ZNF696 in cord blood cells, which may be related to abnormal blood cell differentiation. Furthermore, epigenetic variations in offspring related to exposure to maternal hyperglycaemia, especially during early pregnancy, may reflect neonatal PG levels at 1 h after birth.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the results of this article are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository (GSE122086, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE122086 and GSE122288, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE122288). Methylation data and analytical conditions are available upon request.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Keio University School of Medicine Ethics Committee The Institutional Review Board of the National Research Institute for Child Health and Development. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

YK and KM collected the data; YK performed experiments; YK and TK performed statistical analyses, wrote the manuscript, contributed to the discussion, and reviewed/edited the manuscript; KM contributed to the discussion and wrote and reviewed/edited the manuscript; YS, SI, DO, MH, MTam, and KHas, MTan and KHat contributed to the discussion and reviewed/edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (18ek0109278h0002, 18ek0109290h0002, and 18mk0102093s0402), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (17K19535 and 19K09761), and NCCHD of Japan research grant (2020B-21).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  41 in total

1.  Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays.

Authors:  Martin J Aryee; Andrew E Jaffe; Hector Corrada-Bravo; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Andrew P Feinberg; Kasper D Hansen; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Maternal genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in gestational diabetes shows distinctive disease-associated changes relative to matched healthy pregnancies.

Authors:  Pensee Wu; William E Farrell; Kim E Haworth; Richard D Emes; Mark O Kitchen; John R Glossop; Fahmy W Hanna; Anthony A Fryer
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Glycemic and metabolic features in gestational diabetes: singleton versus twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Yohei Akiba; Kei Miyakoshi; Satoru Ikenoue; Yoshifumi Saisho; Yoshifumi Kasuga; Daigo Ochiai; Tadashi Matsumoto; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.349

Review 4.  Screening for gestational diabetes: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Seth C Brody; Russell Harris; Kathleen Lohr
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Maternal Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Newborn DNA Methylation: Findings From the Pregnancy and Childhood Epigenetics Consortium.

Authors:  Caitlin G Howe; Bianca Cox; Ruby Fore; James Jungius; Tuomas Kvist; Samantha Lent; Harriet E Miles; Lucas A Salas; Sheryl Rifas-Shiman; Anne P Starling; Paul Yousefi; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Andrea Baccarelli; Elisabeth B Binder; Vaia Lida Chatzi; Darina Czamara; Dana Dabelea; Dawn L DeMeo; Akram Ghantous; Zdenko Herceg; Eero Kajantie; Jari M T Lahti; Debbie A Lawlor; Augusto Litonjua; Tim S Nawrot; Ellen A Nohr; Emily Oken; Costanza Pizzi; Michelle Plusquin; Katri Räikkönen; Caroline L Relton; Gemma C Sharp; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jordi Sunyer; Martine Vrijheid; Weiming Zhang; Marie-France Hivert; Carrie V Breton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Impact on offspring methylation patterns of maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restraint suggest common genes and pathways linked to subsequent type 2 diabetes risk.

Authors:  Claire R Quilter; Wendy N Cooper; Kerry M Cliffe; Benjamin M Skinner; Philippa M Prentice; LaTasha Nelson; Julien Bauer; Ken K Ong; Miguel Constância; William L Lowe; Nabeel A Affara; David B Dunger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Leveraging DNA-Methylation Quantitative-Trait Loci to Characterize the Relationship between Methylomic Variation, Gene Expression, and Complex Traits.

Authors:  Eilis Hannon; Tyler J Gorrie-Stone; Melissa C Smart; Joe Burrage; Amanda Hughes; Yanchun Bao; Meena Kumari; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Jonathan Mill
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Developmentally regulated promoter-switch transcriptionally controls Runx1 function during embryonic hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Amir Pozner; Joseph Lotem; Cuiying Xiao; Dalia Goldenberg; Ori Brenner; Varda Negreanu; Ditsa Levanon; Yoram Groner
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Sex differences in DNA methylation assessed by 450 K BeadChip in newborns.

Authors:  Paul Yousefi; Karen Huen; Veronica Davé; Lisa Barcellos; Brenda Eskenazi; Nina Holland
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Severe neonatal hypoglycaemia and intrapartum glycaemic control in pregnancies complicated by type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes.

Authors:  J M Yamamoto; L E Donovan; K Mohammad; S L Wood
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The link between gestational diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: potential role of extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Valeska Ormazabal; Soumyalekshmi Nair; Flavio Carrión; H David Mcintyre; Carlos Salomon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 8.949

2.  DNA methylation analysis of cord blood samples in neonates born to gestational diabetes mothers diagnosed before 24 gestational weeks.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kasuga; Tomoko Kawai; Kei Miyakoshi; Asuka Hori; Masumi Tamagawa; Keita Hasegawa; Satoru Ikenoue; Daigo Ochiai; Yoshifumi Saisho; Mariko Hida; Mamoru Tanaka; Kenichiro Hata
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2022-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.