| Literature DB >> 34267532 |
Dong Zhang1, Ying Yuan1, Hao Zhang1, Xinzeyu Yi1, Weidong Xiao1, Aixi Yu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skin avulsion injuries caused by high-energy traffic and machinery accidents are important topics in the field of repair and reconstruction. The injury generates a skin flap with uncertain vascular basis resulting in ischemic necrosis of the distal portion of the flap. Yet there is lack of reliable way for estimating the extent of blood supply in damaged tissue, which has limited the possibility of prompt surgical intervention. Recent studies have confirmed that photoacoustic microscopy imaging has a wide range of applications in the biomedical field owing to its good performance in angiography.Entities:
Keywords: monitoring microcirculation; photoacoustic microscope; skin avulsion injuries
Year: 2021 PMID: 34267532 PMCID: PMC8275181 DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S316060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol ISSN: 1178-7015
Figure 1(A) The mechanism of photoacoustic microscopy, (B and C) the system used for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of mouse limb.
The score of tissue lesions
| Stage | Histological Findings |
|---|---|
| 0 | Normal skin |
| 1 | Visible inflammation but intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area |
| 2 | Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer |
| 3 | Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed |
| 4 | Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle |
Figure 2(A) Avulsed hindlimb flap following a proximal circumferential incision. (B–D) The digital and PAM imaging of region of interest in mouse limb.
Figure 3(A and B) H&E staining in avulsed hindlimb flap group and sham group. (C) The ulcer scars in two groups and the results show that the ulcer scars in avulsed hindlimb flap (necrosis) group were significantly higher than sham group. ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Clinical outcome at POD 7 and PAM imaging at several time points in region of interest between avulsed hindlimb flap group and sham group.
Figure 5Quantitative analysis of PA intensity in ROIs detected by PAM between two groups. ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 6Quantitative analysis of vascular density in ROIs detected by PAM between two groups. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.