Literature DB >> 34267401

On the Pitfalls of Estimating and Using Standardized Reliability Coefficients.

Tenko Raykov1, George A Marcoulides2.   

Abstract

The population discrepancy between unstandardized and standardized reliability of homogeneous multicomponent measuring instruments is examined. Within a latent variable modeling framework, it is shown that the standardized reliability coefficient for unidimensional scales can be markedly higher than the corresponding unstandardized reliability coefficient, or alternatively substantially lower than the latter. Based on these findings, it is recommended that scholars avoid estimating, reporting, interpreting, or using standardized scale reliability coefficients in empirical research, unless they have strong reasons to consider standardizing the original components of utilized scales.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congeneric test model; congeneric tests; measuring instrument; reliability; single-factor model; standardized reliability coefficient; unstandardized reliability coefficient

Year:  2020        PMID: 34267401      PMCID: PMC8243204          DOI: 10.1177/0013164420937345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   3.088


  3 in total

1.  Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-05-29

2.  Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You!

Authors:  Tenko Raykov; George A Marcoulides
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Testing model nesting and equivalence.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler; Albert Satorra
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.