Literature DB >> 34267090

Treatment outcomes and trajectories of change in patients attributing their eating disorder onset to anti-obesity messaging.

Janell L Mensinger1, Shelbi A Cox, Jennifer R Henretty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Given increased prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) among individuals higher on the weight spectrum we aimed to: 1) report the prevalence of ED patients in higher levels of care (residential, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient) attributing the onset of their ED to anti-obesity messaging, 2) report the most commonly recollected sources of those messages, and 3) determine if those attributing the onset of their ED to anti-obesity messaging a) enter, b) exit, and c) respond to treatment differently than peers who did not.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from 2,901 patients receiving ED treatment in higher levels of care at a US-based center between 2015 and 2018. Multi-level models examined differences in ED symptoms and trajectories of change over time. NVivo was used to analyze the patients' comments about sources of messages.
RESULTS: 18% attributed their ED onset to anti-obesity messaging, 45% did not, 37% were unsure. Of those providing comments, the most common sources included: educational curriculum/school context (45.9%), media/internet (24.7%), healthcare (10.4%), family (9%), and peer bullying (3.7%). At admission, patients attributing their ED onset to anti-obesity messaging had more severe ED symptoms than those who did not (γ = 0.463, SE = 0.086, p < .001) and those who were unsure (γ = 0.288 SE = 0.089, p < .001); no differences were evident at discharge (p values > .483). During phase two of treatment, patients attributing their ED onset to anti-obesity messaging improved faster than those who did not (γ = 0.003, SE = 0.001, p = .008) and those who were unsure (γ = 0.003, SE = 0.001, p = .014).
CONCLUSION: Anti-obesity messaging may put vulnerable individuals at risk for EDs. We recommend increasing weight bias training for school personnel and healthcare professionals. To reduce health disparities, we also suggest the promotion of weight-neutral health-enhancing self-care practices in media and public health campaigns, legislative policies, and healthcare overall.
Copyright © 2021 by American Psychosomatic Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34267090     DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  5 in total

1.  Drivers of medicalization in the Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Andrea E Bombak; Louise Adams; Patricia Thille
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 2.  Atypical Anorexia in Youth: Cautiously Bridging the Treatment Gap.

Authors:  Melissa Freizinger; Michelle Recto; Grace Jhe; Jessica Lin
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-05

Review 3.  Influence and effects of weight stigmatisation in media: A systematic.

Authors:  James Kite; Bo-Huei Huang; Yvonne Laird; Anne Grunseit; Bronwyn McGill; Kathryn Williams; Bill Bellew; Margaret Thomas
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 4.  A mixed-studies systematic review of the experiences of body image, disordered eating, and eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jekaterina Schneider; Georgina Pegram; Benjamin Gibson; Deborah Talamonti; Aline Tinoco; Nadia Craddock; Emily Matheson; Mark Forshaw
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.791

Review 5.  Clinical Considerations of Ultra-processed Food Addiction Across Weight Classes: an Eating Disorder Treatment and Care Perspective.

Authors:  David Wiss
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2022-05-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.