Yanping Jiang1, Samuele Zilioli, Raymond P Stowe, Rebecca Rubinstein, M Kristen Peek, Malcolm P Cutchin. 1. From the Departments of Psychology (Jiang, Zilioli) and Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences (Zilioli), Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; Microgen Laboratories (Stowe), La Marque, Texas; School of Medicine (Rubinstein), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Department of Preventative Medicine and Community Health (Peek), The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; and Department of Biomedical Sciences (Cutchin), Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, Washington.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Perceived social support is consistently associated with physical health outcomes, and one potential physiological mechanism underlying this association is immune function. In this study, we tested both the main and stress-buffering effects of perceived social support on cellular immunity measured via latent herpesvirus reactivation. METHODS: Data were collected from a community-based sample of 1443 ethnically diverse adults between the ages of 25 and 90 years. Participants self-reported measures of perceived social support, stressful life events, daily hassles, and perceived stress, and provided a blood sample to assess antibody titers to the herpes simplex virus type 1 and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). RESULTS: In accordance with the main effect hypothesis, results indicated that perceived social support was directly associated with EBV viral capsid antigen antibody titers (β = -0.06, 95% confidence interval = -0.12 to -0.01, p = .029). Perceived social support, however, did not interact with stressful life events, daily hassles, or perceived stress to influence latent herpesvirus reactivation (p values > .05). Neither race/ethnicity nor age moderated any of the interactions between perceived social support and the stress measures on latent herpesvirus reactivation (p values > .10). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the current study supports the main effect hypothesis, according to which higher levels of perceived social support were associated with lower levels of herpesvirus antibody titers.
OBJECTIVE: Perceived social support is consistently associated with physical health outcomes, and one potential physiological mechanism underlying this association is immune function. In this study, we tested both the main and stress-buffering effects of perceived social support on cellular immunity measured via latent herpesvirus reactivation. METHODS: Data were collected from a community-based sample of 1443 ethnically diverse adults between the ages of 25 and 90 years. Participants self-reported measures of perceived social support, stressful life events, daily hassles, and perceived stress, and provided a blood sample to assess antibody titers to the herpes simplex virus type 1 and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). RESULTS: In accordance with the main effect hypothesis, results indicated that perceived social support was directly associated with EBV viral capsid antigen antibody titers (β = -0.06, 95% confidence interval = -0.12 to -0.01, p = .029). Perceived social support, however, did not interact with stressful life events, daily hassles, or perceived stress to influence latent herpesvirus reactivation (p values > .05). Neither race/ethnicity nor age moderated any of the interactions between perceived social support and the stress measures on latent herpesvirus reactivation (p values > .10). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the current study supports the main effect hypothesis, according to which higher levels of perceived social support were associated with lower levels of herpesvirus antibody titers.
Authors: Bert N Uchino; Ryan Trettevik; Robert G Kent de Grey; Sierra Cronan; Jasara Hogan; Brian R W Baucom Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Keely A Muscatell; Naomi I Eisenberger; Janine M Dutcher; Steven W Cole; Julienne E Bower Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Henry H Balfour; Frangiscos Sifakis; Joseph A Sliman; Jennifer A Knight; David O Schmeling; William Thomas Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 5.226