| Literature DB >> 34266906 |
Kemal Alpay1, Tero Hinkka2, Antti E Lindgren3,4,5, Juha-Matti Isokangas6, Rahul Raj7, Riitta Parkkola8,9, Matias Sinisalo8, Jussi Numminen10, Juha-Pekka Pienimäki2, Petri Saari11, Janne Seppänen2, Kari Palosaari6, Riitta Rautio8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Flow diversion of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is controversial due to high treatment-related complication rates and a lack of supporting evidence. We present clinical and radiological results of the largest series to date.Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysm; Flow Diverter; Hemorrhage; Stroke; Subarachnoid
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34266906 PMCID: PMC9209683 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurointerv Surg ISSN: 1759-8478 Impact factor: 8.572
Patient and aneurysm/subarachnoid hemorrhage characteristics
| No. of patients | 110 |
| Proportion of women | 58% |
| Age (years) | 55.7 (12–82) |
| Aneurysm location | |
| Anterior circulation | 70 (64%) |
| Posterior circulation | 40 (36%) |
| Type of aneurysm | |
| Saccular | 30 (27%) |
| Fusiform | 15 (14%) |
| Blister | 47 (43%) |
| Dissecting | 18 (16%) |
| Mean maximal diameter (mm) | 4.8 (2–25) |
| Subarachnoid hemorrhage characteristics | |
| WFNS 1–3 | 80 (73%) |
| Fisher 4 | 64 (58%) |
| External ventricular drain | |
| Before intervention | 51 (46%) |
| After intervention | 9 (8%) |
WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.
Type of flow diverters and treatment characteristics
| No. of FDs used | 128 |
| No. of cases treated with multiple FDs | 18 (16%) |
| Type of FD | |
| Surpass Streamline | 7 |
| Surpass Evolve | 2 |
| Pipeline Embolization Device | 14 |
| PED with Shield Technology | 62 |
| FRED | 20 |
| FRED JR | 19 |
| SILK FD | 2 |
| Derivo FD | 2 |
| Additional coiling | 5 (4%) |
| Interval between ictus and treatment (day) | 3.8 (1–41) |
FD, flow diverter; FRED, flow re-direction endoluminal device; FRED JR, flow re-direction endoluminal device junior; PED, Pipeline embolization device.
Clinical and radiological outcomes
| Clinical follow-up | 102 (93%) |
| Mean follow-up time (months) | 8 (1–60) |
| mRS 0–2 | 74 (73%) |
| mRS 3–6 | 28 (27%) |
| Radiological follow-up | 88 (80%) |
| Mean follow-up time (month) | 11 (1–60) |
| Complete occlusion | 79 (90%) |
| Entry remnant | 3 (3%) |
| Sub-total filling | 5 (6%) |
| Total filling | 1 (1%) |
mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
Figure 1NECT image showing diffuse SAH (A). Three-dimensional rotational image and DSA showing a 1×2 mm ruptured blister-like aneurysm in right ICA (B, C). DSA captured during the deployment of FRED 4.0/18/12 mm (D). Dyna-CT showing good opposition of FD (E). DSA image showing complete occlusion of the aneurysm 4 months after the treatment (F). DSA, digital subtraction angiography; FD, flow diverter; FRED, flow re-direction endoluminal device; ICA, internal carotid artery; NECT, non-enhanced CT, SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage
Postoperative intracerebral hemorrhages and etiologies
| ICH due to placement of a new EVD postoperatively | 5 (5%) |
| ICH due to revision of an EVD postoperatively | 4 (4%) |
| ICH due to re-bleeding | 3 (3%) |
| ICH due to perforation of a non-parent artery | 1 (1%) |
| New idiopathic postoperative ICH | 3 (3%) |
| Expansion of preoperative ICH | 3 (3%) |
EVD, external ventricular drain; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage.
Types and frequencies of complication
| Rebleeding | 3 (3%) |
| In-stent thrombosis | 9 (8%) |
| Postoperative ICH | 19 (17%) |
| Postoperative IVH | 25 (23%) |
| Ischemic complications | 32 (29%) |
| Groin hemorrhage | 2 (2%) |
| Gastrointestinal bleeding | 1 (1%) |
| Epistaxis | 1 (1%) |
| Treatment-related mortality | 6 (5%) |
ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage.