Jumara Martins1, Ana Francisca Vaz1, Regina Celia Grion1, Lúcia Costa-Paiva2, Luiz Francisco Baccaro3. 1. Radiotherapy Section, Woman's Hospital - Caism/Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 2. Department of Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil. 3. Department of Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil. baccaro@unicamp.br.
Correction to: BMC Cancer 21, 682 (2021)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08274-wFollowing publication of the original article [1], it was noted that due to a figure processing error during typesetting, part of the text in Figs. 2 and 3 was presented in Portuguese. The correct Figs. 2 and 3 have been included in this Correction and the original article has been corrected.
Fig. 2
Vaginal stenosis (CTCAE v3.0 scale) in the different groups during follow-up (n = 142)
Fig. 3
Change in vaginal volume (%) in the different groups during follow-up (n = 142)
Vaginal stenosis (CTCAE v3.0 scale) in the different groups during follow-up (n = 142)Change in vaginal volume (%) in the different groups during follow-up (n = 142)The publisher apologises to the authors and readers for the inconvenience caused by the error.