Nicholas James Campion1, Rebecca Kohler1, Robin Ristl2, Sergio Villazala-Merino1, Julia Eckl-Dorna3, Verena Niederberger-Leppin1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: julia.eckl-dorna@meduniwien.ac.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is a common inflammatory condition with significant morbidity and financial cost, information regarding prevalence and disease burden of this condition is scarce. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we determined nasal polyp prevalence, polyp grade, concomitant disease, and symptom burden in more than 10,000 central European subjects. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 10,259 patients who had undergone routine examination of their nose by nasal endoscopy during a visit at a publicly accessible ear, nose, throat outpatient facility in Vienna were included. Patient details including presenting complaint, nasal symptoms, polyp score, age, gender, treatment, asthma, and allergic status were extracted retrospectively. A detailed questionnaire including history of nasal symptoms, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 German Adapted Version, and visual analog scale was available for 101 patients with nasal polyps. RESULTS: Nasal polyps were detected in 189 of the 10,259 (1.84%) patients. The calculated prevalence of polyps in Austria, adjusted for age and gender, was 1.95%. The average total polyp score (TPS) was 3.4, and 72.5% had a TPS of ≤4, with males and asthmatics having significantly larger polyps. Questionnaire analysis revealed that 67% suffered from a low symptom burden of ≤36. According to current European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) guidelines, 6% of patients with polyps met and another 8% potentially fulfilled the eligibility criteria for biological therapy. CONCLUSION: Nasal polyp prevalence was calculated to be 1.95% of the Austrian population. Large polyps (TPS >4) were found in 25%, 33% suffered from a high nasal symptom burden, and between 6% and 14% of patients with polyps would be eligible for biological therapy according to EPOS guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Although chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is a common inflammatory condition with significant morbidity and financial cost, information regarding prevalence and disease burden of this condition is scarce. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we determined nasal polyp prevalence, polyp grade, concomitant disease, and symptom burden in more than 10,000 central European subjects. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 10,259 patients who had undergone routine examination of their nose by nasal endoscopy during a visit at a publicly accessible ear, nose, throat outpatient facility in Vienna were included. Patient details including presenting complaint, nasal symptoms, polyp score, age, gender, treatment, asthma, and allergic status were extracted retrospectively. A detailed questionnaire including history of nasal symptoms, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 German Adapted Version, and visual analog scale was available for 101 patients with nasal polyps. RESULTS: Nasal polyps were detected in 189 of the 10,259 (1.84%) patients. The calculated prevalence of polyps in Austria, adjusted for age and gender, was 1.95%. The average total polyp score (TPS) was 3.4, and 72.5% had a TPS of ≤4, with males and asthmatics having significantly larger polyps. Questionnaire analysis revealed that 67% suffered from a low symptom burden of ≤36. According to current European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) guidelines, 6% of patients with polyps met and another 8% potentially fulfilled the eligibility criteria for biological therapy. CONCLUSION: Nasal polyp prevalence was calculated to be 1.95% of the Austrian population. Large polyps (TPS >4) were found in 25%, 33% suffered from a high nasal symptom burden, and between 6% and 14% of patients with polyps would be eligible for biological therapy according to EPOS guidelines.
Authors: Christine Bangert; Sergio Villazala-Merino; Martin Fahrenberger; Thomas Krausgruber; Wolfgang M Bauer; Victoria Stanek; Nicholas James Campion; Tina Bartosik; Tamara Quint; Guenther Regelsberger; Verena Niederberger-Leppin; Christoph Bock; Sven Schneider; Julia Eckl-Dorna Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 7.561