Rationale: Animal studies of cardiac arrest suggest that shorter epinephrine dosing intervals than currently recommended (every 3-5 min) may be beneficial in select circumstances. Objectives: To evaluate the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and pediatric cardiac arrest outcomes. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of children (<18 years of age) who received ⩾1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ⩾2 doses of epinephrine for an index in-hospital cardiac arrest. Exposure was epinephrine dosing interval ⩽2 minutes (frequent epinephrine) versus >2 minutes. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with a favorable neurobehavioral outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score 1-2 or unchanged). Logistic regression evaluated the association between dosing interval and outcomes; additional analyses explored duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as a mediator. In a subgroup, the effect of dosing interval on diastolic blood pressure was investigated. Measurements and Main Results: Between January 2011 and December 2018, 125 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria; 33 (26%) received frequent epinephrine. Frequent epinephrine was associated with increased odds of survival with favorable neurobehavioral outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-6.14; P = 0.036), with 66% of the association mediated by CPR duration. Delta diastolic blood pressure was greater after the second dose of epinephrine among patients who received frequent epinephrine (median [interquartile range], 6.3 [4.1 to 16.9] vs. 0.13 [-2.3 to 1.9] mm Hg; P = 0.034). Conclusions: In patients who received at least two doses of epinephrine, dosing intervals ⩽2 minutes were associated with improved neurobehavioral outcomes compared with dosing intervals >2 minutes. Mediation analysis suggests that improved outcomes are largely due to frequent epinephrine shortening duration of CPR.
Rationale: Animal studies of cardiac arrest suggest that shorter epinephrine dosing intervals than currently recommended (every 3-5 min) may be beneficial in select circumstances. Objectives: To evaluate the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and pediatric cardiac arrest outcomes. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of children (<18 years of age) who received ⩾1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ⩾2 doses of epinephrine for an index in-hospital cardiac arrest. Exposure was epinephrine dosing interval ⩽2 minutes (frequent epinephrine) versus >2 minutes. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with a favorable neurobehavioral outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score 1-2 or unchanged). Logistic regression evaluated the association between dosing interval and outcomes; additional analyses explored duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as a mediator. In a subgroup, the effect of dosing interval on diastolic blood pressure was investigated. Measurements and Main Results: Between January 2011 and December 2018, 125 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria; 33 (26%) received frequent epinephrine. Frequent epinephrine was associated with increased odds of survival with favorable neurobehavioral outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-6.14; P = 0.036), with 66% of the association mediated by CPR duration. Delta diastolic blood pressure was greater after the second dose of epinephrine among patients who received frequent epinephrine (median [interquartile range], 6.3 [4.1 to 16.9] vs. 0.13 [-2.3 to 1.9] mm Hg; P = 0.034). Conclusions: In patients who received at least two doses of epinephrine, dosing intervals ⩽2 minutes were associated with improved neurobehavioral outcomes compared with dosing intervals >2 minutes. Mediation analysis suggests that improved outcomes are largely due to frequent epinephrine shortening duration of CPR.
Authors: Vinay M Nadkarni; Gregory Luke Larkin; Mary Ann Peberdy; Scott M Carey; William Kaye; Mary E Mancini; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Truitt; Jerry Potts; Joseph P Ornato; Robert A Berg Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Saket Girotra; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John A Spertus; Yan Li; Harlan M Krumholz; Paul S Chan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lars W Andersen; Katherine M Berg; Brian Z Saindon; Joseph M Massaro; Tia T Raymond; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Michael W Donnino Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gabriel Putzer; Judith Martini; Patrick Spraider; Rouven Hornung; Daniel Pinggera; Julia Abram; Niklas Altaner; Tobias Hell; Bernhard Glodny; Raimund Helbok; Peter Mair Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Alexis A Topjian; Tia T Raymond; Dianne Atkins; Melissa Chan; Jonathan P Duff; Benny L Joyner; Javier J Lasa; Eric J Lavonas; Arielle Levy; Melissa Mahgoub; Garth D Meckler; Kathryn E Roberts; Robert M Sutton; Stephen M Schexnayder Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 29.690