| Literature DB >> 34262871 |
Pingping Wang1, Hai Li2, Yu Hu1, Xiaojing Peng1, Xinhua Ye1, Di Xu1, Ao Li1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between ultrasound (US) features and Ki-67 labeling index (LI) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS).Entities:
Keywords: Ki-67; immunohistochemistry; musculoskeletal; soft tissue sarcoma; ultrasonography
Year: 2021 PMID: 34262871 PMCID: PMC8273548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.687878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Flowchart of study population selection. (STS, soft tissue sarcoma; N, number).
Figure 2(A) A 42-year-old woman with 6cm lesion with vascular density grade 0 with histological diagnosis of synovial sarcoma with Ki-67 LI of 5%. (White arrow: The margin of the lesion) (B) A 50-year-old woman with 27cm lesion with vascular density grade I with histological diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma with Ki-67 LI of 10%. (C) A 33-year-old woman with 73cm lesion with vascular density grade II with histological diagnosis of fibrosarcoma with Ki-67 LI of 10%. (D) A 70-year-old man with 86cm lesion with vascular density grade III with histological diagnosis of synovial sarcoma with Ki-67 LI of 60%. (Images were obtained from four different lesions included in our study.
Figure 3Histogram of Ki-67 LI distribution of the lesions. Distribution was in accordance with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p = 0.20). Median was 40.00 and standard deviation was 20.20. LI, labeling index.
Detailed histological diagnoses in the low- and high-proliferation groups.
| High-proliferation group (N = 33) | Low-proliferation group (N = 14) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma = 7 | Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans =1 |
| Myxofibrosarcoma = 7 | Alveolar soft part sarcoma =1 | |
| Synovial sarcoma = 4 | Synovial sarcoma=3 | |
| Ewing’s sarcoma = 2 | Myxoid liposarcoma = 5 | |
| Clear cell sarcoma = 2 | Clear cell chondrosarcoma =1 | |
| Liposarcoma = 5 | Liposarcoma = 2 | |
| Leiomyosarcoma = 1 | Leiomyosarcoma = 1 | |
| Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma = 1 | ||
| Fibrosarcoma = 3 | ||
| Small round cell undifferentiated sarcoma = 1 |
N, number.
Characteristics of soft tissue sarcomas.
| Features | Number | High proliferation group (N = 33) | Low proliferation group (N = 14) | Coefficient ofcorrelation and P value | P value of diversity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 29 | 20 (69.0%) | 9 (31.0%) | -0.04 (P=0.82) | P=0.81 |
| Female | 18 | 13 (72.2%) | 5 (27.8%) | |||
| Age | / | 47 | 58.21±17.91 | 58.29±17.87 | -0.002 (P=0.99) | P=0.99 |
| Position | Extremities | 30 | 21 (70.0%) | 9 (30.0%) | -0.016 (P=0.91) | P=1.00 |
| trunk | 16 | 11 (68.8%) | 5 (31.2%) | |||
| Head and neck | 1 | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |||
| Tissue layer | Superficial fascia | 15 | 8 (53.3%) | 7 (46.7%) | -0.25 (P=0.09) | P=0.10 |
| Deep fascia | 32 | 25 (78.1%) | 7 (21.9%) | |||
| Diameter MAX | / | 47 | 67.21±42.02 | 44.00±22.91 | 0.28 (P=0.06) | P=0.06 |
| Shape | Regular | 20 | 14 (70.0%) | 7 (30.0%) | -0.004 (P=0.98) | P=0.98 |
| Irregular | 27 | 19 (70.4%) | 8 (29.6%) | |||
| Margin | Clear | 30 | 22 (73.3%) | 8 (26.7%) | -0.09 (P=0.55) | P=0.53 |
| Unclear | 17 | 11 (64.7%) | 6 (35.3%) | |||
| Internal echo | Hypoechoic | 44 | 30 (68.2%) | 14 (31.8%) | -0.17 (P=0.25) | P=1.00 |
| Isoechoic | 1 | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Hyperechoic | 2 | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Internal texture | Homogeneous | 5 | 2 (40%) | 3 (60%) | -0.23 (P=0.12) | P=0.15 |
| Inhomogeneous | 42 | 31 (73.8%) | 11 (26.2%) | |||
| Internal component | Mainly cystic | 1 | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | -0.10 (P=0.52) | P=1.00 |
| Mainly solid | 46 | 32 (69.6%) | 14 (30.4%) | |||
| Calcification | Positive | 6 | 4 (66.7%) | 2 (33.3%) | -0.03 (P=0.84) | P=1.00 |
| Negative | 41 | 29 (70.7%) | 12 (29.3%) | |||
| Grade of vascular density** | Grade 0 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0.409 (P=0.004) | P=0.005 |
| Grade I | 6 | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | |||
| Grade II | 16 | 10 (62.5%) | 6 (37.5%) | |||
| Grade III | 23 | 20 (87%) | 3 (13%) | |||
| Vascular distribution | None | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | -0.1 (P=0.51) | P=0.18 |
| Peripheral | 1 | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Internal | 5 | 4 (80%) | 1 (20%) | |||
| Mixed | 39 | 28 (71.8%) | 11 (28.2%) | |||
**P ≤ 0.005; N, number.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cut-off value of the vascular density grade with Adler criteria in discriminating between high and low proliferation groups.
Consistency of the observers with regard to US features of soft tissue sarcomas.
| Features | ICC/Kappa |
|---|---|
| DiameterMAX | 0.98 |
| Shape | 0.83 |
| Margin | 0.80 |
| Internal echo | 0.81 |
| Internal texture | 0.74 |
| Internal component | 0.84 |
| Calcification | 0.88 |
| Grade of vascular density | 0.86 |
| Vascular distribution | 0.91 |
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.