| Literature DB >> 34262745 |
Guangfa Xie1, Huajun Zheng2, Zheling Qiu3, Zichen Lin2, Qi Peng2,4, Girma Dula Bealu2, Nabil Ibrahim Elsheery5, Yin Lu1, Chi Shen2, Jianwei Fu2, Huanyi Yang2, Jiongping Han6, Jian Lu7, Guanming Liu3.
Abstract
Huangjiu (Chinese rice wine) is brewed in an open environment, where bacteria play an important role during the fermentation process. In this study, bacterial community structure and composition changes in the fermented mash liquid of mechanized Huangjiu, well-fermented manual Huangjiu (wines of good qualities), and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (wines of poor qualities: spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol content) in different fermentation stages from Guyuelongshan Shaoxing Huangjiu company were analyzed via metagenomic sequencing. And bacterial metabolic difference was analyzed via gene prediction of metabolic pathway enzymes. The results showed that the bacterial diversity degree was abundant, and the number of bacterial species in every sample was approximately 200-400. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominated the bacterial community of Huangjiu fermentation, and lactobacillus was predominant species in well-fermented Huangjiu while Lactobacillus brevis had an absolute dominance in spoilage Huangjiu. Further, gene prediction revealed that transformation of malate to pyruvate and lactate anabolism was more active in mash liquid of well-fermented manual Huangjiu, while acetate accumulation was stronger in mash liquid of poorly fermented manual Huangjiu, which explained acidity excess reason in poorly fermented Huangjiu at gene level.Entities:
Keywords: Huangjiu; gene prediction; lactic acid bacteria; metagenomic sequencing; spoilage
Year: 2021 PMID: 34262745 PMCID: PMC8269602 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1The scheme of manual and mechanized Huangjiu fermentation. (raw wheat Qu contains naturally inoculated mildew and mature wheat Qu contains purely inoculated Aspergillus oryzae, which are employed to hydrolyze raw material)
The physiochemical indexes of fermented mash liquid of mechanized Huangjiu, well‐fermented manual Huangjiu, and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol) samples
| Sample | Sampling time (d) | Alcohol degree (%vol) | Acidity (g L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanized Huangjiua (machine) | |||
| Machine_2 | 2 days | 12.4 ± 0.9efg | 4.5 ± 0.6c |
| Machine_4 | 4 days | 13.5 ± 1.4cdefg | 4.7 ± 0.4c |
| Machine_7 | 7 days | 15.3 ± 1.4bcde | 4.8 ± 1.0c |
| Machine_14 | 14 days | 17.1 ± 1.9abc | 5.0 ± 0.8bc |
| Machine_16 | 16 days | 18.2 ± 1.9ab | 5.4 ± 1.0bc |
| Spoilage Huangjiub (poor manual) | |||
| Poor manual_2 | 2 days | 10.2 ± 1.0g | 5.8 ± 0.4abc |
| Poor manual_4 | 4 days | 11.5 ± 1.0fg | 6.5 ± 0.9abc |
| Poor manual_7 | 7 days | 12.7 ± 1.1defg | 6.4 ± 0.5abc |
| Poor manual_14 | 14 days | 14.2 ± 1.0cdef | 6.5 ± 0.6abc |
| Poor manual_30 | 30 days | 15.6 ± 0.8bcde | 7.2 ± 0.9ab |
| Poor manual_60 | 60 days | 18.1 ± 0.9ab | 8.0 ± 0.7a |
| Well‐fermented Huangjiub (good manual) | |||
| Good manual_2 | 2 days | 10.3 ± 1.0g | 5.8 ± 1.1abc |
| Good manual_4 | 4 days | 11.3 ± 0.9fg | 5.9 ± 0.9abc |
| Good manual_7 | 7 days | 13.5 ± 0.9cdefg | 5.8 ± 0.7abc |
| Good manual_14 | 14 days | 14.3 ± 0.7cdef | 6.0 ± 1.3abc |
| Good manual_30 | 30 days | 16.2 ± 1.7abcd | 6.2 ± 0.8abc |
| Good manual_60 | 60 days | 19.5 ± 1.1a | 6.1 ± 0.4abc |
a. The fermentation of mechanized Huangjiu lasts for about 20 days.
b. The fermentation of manual Huangjiu lasts for about 60 days.
c. Values are means of triplicates ± SD.
d. Values are significantly different (p < .05) labeled by different superscript letters within a column.
FIGURE 2Bacterial species number of fermented mash liquid of mechanized Huangjiu, well‐fermented manual Huangjiu and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol) samples during fermentation. (machine n: mechanized Huangjiu; good manual n: well‐fermented manual Huangjiu; poor manual n: spoilage manual Huangjiu. The word “n” represents the day of sampling)
FIGURE 3Bacterial diversity indexes (Shannon‐wiener index and Simpson index) of fermented mash liquid of mechanized Huangjiu, well‐fermented manual Huangjiu and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol) samples during fermentation
FIGURE 4Bacterial composition of fermented mash liquid of mechanized Huangjiu, well‐fermented manual Huangjiu and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol) samples during fermentation
Species number of LAB genera detected in Huangjiu samples
| LAB genera | Species number |
|---|---|
|
| 50 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 27 |
FIGURE 5PCA analysis of fermented mash liquid of mechanized Huangjiu, well‐fermented manual Huangjiu and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol) samples based on bacterial species contribution to the bacterial community structure
FIGURE 6Metabolic network of bacterial community in Huangjiu fermentation. The gray and black rectangle represent enzyme encoding by higher abundance of gene in fermented mash liquid of well‐fermented manual Huangjiu and poorly fermented manual Huangjiu (spoilage, high acidity, low alcohol), respectively (difference above 5 times)
EC number and its corresponding enzyme shown in metabolic network with above 5 times difference between well‐fermented and spoilage Huangjiu samples
| EC number | Enzyme |
|---|---|
| 1.2.1.22 | lactaldehyde reductase |
| 3.1.2.6 | Hydro acyl glutathione hydrolase |
| 4.1.1.3 | oxaloacetate decarboxylase subunit gamma |
| 1.1.5.4 | malate dehydrogenase |
| Eut D | phosphate acetyltransferase |
| 1.13.12.4 | lactate oxidase |
| 2.8.3.1 | acyl CoA: acetate CoA transferase |