Literature DB >> 34262071

Silica nanoparticles as pesticide against insects of different feeding types and their non-target attraction of predators.

Ahmed F Thabet1,2,3,4, Hessien A Boraei5, Ola A Galal6, Magdy F M El-Samahy7, Kareem M Mousa5,8, Yao Z Zhang8, Midori Tuda9, Eman A Helmy8,10, Jian Wen8, Tsubasa Nozaki11,12.   

Abstract

The agricultural use of silica (SiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) has the potential to control insect pests while the safety and tritrophic effects on plants and beneficial natural enemies remains unknown. Here, we evaluate the effects of silica NPs on insect pests with different feeding niches, natural enemies, and a plant. Silica NPs were applied at different concentrations (75-425 mg/L) on field-cultivated faba bean and soybean for two growing seasons. The faba bean pests, the cowpea aphid Aphis craccivora and the American serpentine leafminer Liriomyza trifolii, and the soybean pest, the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis, were monitored along with their associated predators. Additional laboratory experiments were performed to test the effects of silica NPs on the growth of faba bean seedlings and to determine whether the rove beetle Paederus fuscipes is attracted to cotton leafworm-infested soybean treated with silica NPs. In the field experiments, silica NPs reduced the populations of all three insect pests and their associated predators, including rove beetles, as the concentration of silica NPs increased. In soybean fields, however, the total number of predators initially increased after applying the lowest concentration. An olfactometer-based choice test found that rove beetles were more likely to move towards an herbivore-infested plant treated with silica NPs than to a water-treated control, suggesting that silica NPs enhance the attraction of natural enemies via herbivore-induced plant volatiles. In the laboratory, while silica NPs inhibited the development of faba bean roots at 400 mg/L, they did not affect germination percentage, germination time, shoot length, or vigor index compared to the control.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34262071     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  23 in total

1.  Phylogenetic variation in the silicon composition of plants.

Authors:  M J Hodson; P J White; A Mead; M R Broadley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Does China really have the solution?

Authors:  I M Martinson
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.254

3.  Priming of jasmonate-mediated antiherbivore defense responses in rice by silicon.

Authors:  Mao Ye; Yuanyuan Song; Jun Long; Ruilong Wang; Scott R Baerson; Zhiqiang Pan; Keyan Zhu-Salzman; Jiefen Xie; Kunzheng Cai; Shiming Luo; Rensen Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Short-term exposure to silicon rapidly enhances plant resistance to herbivory.

Authors:  Jamie M Waterman; Ximena Cibils-Stewart; Christopher I Cazzonelli; Susan E Hartley; Scott N Johnson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Formation and enhanced biocidal activity of water-dispersable organic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Haifei Zhang; Dong Wang; Rachel Butler; Neil L Campbell; James Long; Bien Tan; David J Duncalf; Alison J Foster; Andrew Hopkinson; David Taylor; Doris Angus; Andrew I Cooper; Steven P Rannard
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 6.  Nanosilica-from medicine to pest control.

Authors:  T K Barik; B Sahu; V Swain
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Physical defences wear you down: progressive and irreversible impacts of silica on insect herbivores.

Authors:  Fergus P Massey; Sue E Hartley
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 8.  Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture.

Authors:  Anshu Rastogi; Durgesh Kumar Tripathi; Saurabh Yadav; Devendra Kumar Chauhan; Marek Živčák; Mansour Ghorbanpour; Nabil Ibrahim El-Sheery; Marian Brestic
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their activity against pathogenic fungi in combination with fluconazole.

Authors:  Monali Gajbhiye; Jayendra Kesharwani; Avinash Ingle; Aniket Gade; Mahendra Rai
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 10.  Silicon: Potential to Promote Direct and Indirect Effects on Plant Defense Against Arthropod Pests in Agriculture.

Authors:  Olivia L Reynolds; Matthew P Padula; Rensen Zeng; Geoff M Gurr
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Biogenic Amorphous Silicas Found in Common Horsetail and Oat Husk With Synthetic Amorphous Silicas.

Authors:  Gottlieb Georg Lindner; Claus-Peter Drexel; Katrin Sälzer; Tobias B Schuster; Nils Krueger
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  The Effect of Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles Combined with Entomopathogenic Bacteria or Fungus on the Survival of Colorado Potato Beetle and Cabbage Beetles.

Authors:  Elena I Shatalova; Ekaterina V Grizanova; Ivan M Dubovskiy
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 3.  Silica nanoparticles as novel sustainable approach for plant growth and crop protection.

Authors:  Pooja Goswami; Jyoti Mathur; Nidhi Srivastava
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 4.  Nanotechnological Interventions in Agriculture.

Authors:  Zishan Ahmad; Sabaha Tahseen; Adla Wasi; Irfan Bashir Ganie; Anwar Shahzad; Abolghassem Emamverdian; Muthusamy Ramakrishnan; Yulong Ding
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.719

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.