| Literature DB >> 34262065 |
Toshifumi Tada1, Takashi Kumada2, Atsushi Hiraoka3, Masanori Atsukawa4, Masashi Hirooka5, Kunihiko Tsuji6, Toru Ishikawa7, Koichi Takaguchi8, Kazuya Kariyama9, Ei Itobayashi10, Kazuto Tajiri11, Noritomo Shimada12, Hiroshi Shibata13, Hironori Ochi14, Satoshi Yasuda15, Hidenori Toyoda15, Shinya Fukunishi16, Hideko Ohama16, Kazuhito Kawata17, Joji Tani18, Shinichiro Nakamura19, Kazuhiro Nouso9, Akemi Tsutsui8, Takuya Nagano8, Tanaka Takaaki3, Norio Itokawa4, Tomomi Okubo4, Taeang Arai4, Michitaka Imai7, Kouji Joko14, Yohei Koizumi5, Yoichi Hiasa5.
Abstract
We investigated the impact on survival of modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade versus Child-Pugh classification in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received lenvatinib. A total of 524 patients with HCC who received lenvatinib were included. Univariate analysis showed that mALBI grade 2b/3 and Child-Pugh class B/C were significantly associated with survival [hazard ratio (HR), 2.471; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.944-3.141 and HR, 2.178; 95%CI, 1.591-2.982]. In patients with a Child-Pugh score of 5, multivariate analysis showed that mALBI grade 2b/3 was independently associated with survival (HR, 1.814; 95%CI, 1.083-3.037). Conversely, among patients with mALBI grade 1/2a, there was no difference in survival between those with a Child-Pugh class of 5 or 6 (p = 0.735). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the ALBI score predicted survival better than the Child-Pugh score. The optimal cut-off value of the ALBI score for predicting survival was nearly the same as the value separating mALBI grades 2a and 2b. In conclusion, the mALBI grade was a better predictor of survival than the Child-Pugh classification in patients with unresectable HCC who received lenvatinib therapy.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34262065 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93794-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379