Literature DB >> 342620

Clinical trials of monovalent influenza A/New Jersey/76 virus vaccines in adults: reactogenicity, antibody response, and antibody persistence.

T R Cate, R B Couch, J A Kasel, H R Six.   

Abstract

Responses to monovalent influenza A/New Jersey/76 virus vaccines were evaluated in 22-43-year-old, antibody-negative males. Three doses of vaccine (200, 400, and 800 chick cell-agglutinating [CCA] units) from each of four manufacturers and a placebo were given intramuscularly. Mild systemic complaints occurred in 12% of vaccines and moderate reactions in 5%, mostly in recipients of 800 CCA units of the vaccines. Reactogenicities of subvirion vaccines were intermediate, while different preparations of whole-virus vaccine were the most and the least reactogenic. Local reactions to 200-CCA unit doses of vaccines resembled reactions to placebo. Serum antibody responses against influenza A/swine/37 virus and current swine-like strains were similar for recipients of vaccines from three manufacturers. Among recipients of 200 CCA units of the vaccines, 79% developed antibody titers of greater than or equal to 1:20. Increasing antibody response was not uniformly associated with increasing vaccine dose but did correlate with increasing reactogenicity. Antibody titers fell about twofold over six months, and they fell slightly more for recipients of subvirion than for recipients of whole-virus vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 342620     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  16 in total

Review 1.  Novel vaccines against influenza viruses.

Authors:  S M Kang; J M Song; R W Compans
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.303

2.  Technical guidelines for the application of seasonal influenza vaccine in China (2014-2015).

Authors:  Luzhao Feng; Peng Yang; Tao Zhang; Juan Yang; Chuanxi Fu; Ying Qin; Yi Zhang; Chunna Ma; Zhaoqiu Liu; Quanyi Wang; Genming Zhao; Hongjie Yu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The efficacy of inactivated split respiratory syncytial virus as a vaccine candidate and the effects of novel combination adjuvants.

Authors:  Youri Lee; Eun-Ju Ko; Ki-Hye Kim; Young-Tae Lee; Hye Suk Hwang; Yu-Jin Jung; Subbiah Jeeva; Young-Man Kwon; Baik Lin Seong; Sang Moo Kang
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  History of vaccination.

Authors:  Stanley Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Is there a role for a mucosal influenza vaccine in the elderly?

Authors:  E M Corrigan; R L Clancy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Mucosal vaccines for the prevention of influenza.

Authors:  R L Clancy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Intranasal immunization of ferrets with commercial trivalent influenza vaccines formulated in a nanoemulsion-based adjuvant.

Authors:  Tarek Hamouda; Joyce A Sutcliffe; Susan Ciotti; James R Baker
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-05-04

8.  Antibody response to monovalent A/New Jersey/8/76 influenza vaccine in pregnant women.

Authors:  D L Murray; D T Imagawa; D M Okada; J W St Geme
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Refining the approach to vaccines against influenza A viruses with pandemic potential.

Authors:  Rita Czako; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.831

Review 10.  The COVID-19 Vaccine Landscape.

Authors:  Till Koch; Anahita Fathi; Marylyn M Addo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.