| Literature DB >> 34260934 |
Hao Huang1, Alexander Gont2, Lynn Kee2, Ruben Dries1, Kathrin Pfeifer3, Bandana Sharma1, David N Debruyne1, Matthew Harlow1, Satyaki Sengupta1, Jikui Guan3, Caleb M Yeung1, Wenchao Wang1, Bengt Hallberg3, Ruth H Palmer3, Meredith S Irwin4, Rani E George5.
Abstract
Although activating mutations of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) membrane receptor occur in ∼10% of neuroblastoma (NB) tumors, the role of the wild-type (WT) receptor, which is aberrantly expressed in most non-mutated cases, is unclear. Both WT and mutant proteins undergo extracellular domain (ECD) cleavage. Here, we map the cleavage site to Asn654-Leu655 and demonstrate that cleavage inhibition of WT ALK significantly impedes NB cell migration with subsequent prolongation of survival in mouse models. Cleavage inhibition results in the downregulation of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) gene signature, with decreased nuclear localization and occupancy of β-catenin at EMT gene promoters. We further show that cleavage is mediated by matrix metalloproteinase 9, whose genetic and pharmacologic inactivation inhibits cleavage and decreases NB cell migration. Together, our results indicate a pivotal role for WT ALK ECD cleavage in NB pathogenesis, which may be harnessed for therapeutic benefit.Entities:
Keywords: ALK; MMP-9; cleavage; epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; extracellular domain; migration; neuroblastoma; receptor tyrosine kinase; wild-type ALK; β-catenin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34260934 PMCID: PMC8328392 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Impact factor: 9.423
Figure 1.ALK undergoes ECD cleavage at Asn654-Leu655
(A) Schematic illustration of the structure of ALK. TM, transmembrane; SP, signal peptide; LDL, low-density lipoprotein receptor domain; MAM, meprin, A-5 protein and receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase mu domain; G-rich, glycine-rich; PTK, protein tyrosine kinase domains. Numbers indicate amino acid positions. Dashed gray line indicates putative ligand-binding region.
(B) Western blot (WB) analysis of ALK expression using a C-terminal anti-ALK antibody (C26G7) in the indicated NB cell lysates. WT, wild-type; M, ALK-mutated; FL, full-length ALK; CTF, membrane-bound C-terminal ALK fragment here and throughout the figure.
(C) WB analysis of ALK expression in PDX NB models using C-terminal anti-ALK antibodies. Lanes T1 and T2 (tumor sample SJNBL046148_X1 in duplicate); lane T3 (SJNBL013761_1).
(D) WB analysis of ALK expression in brain tissue from P0 (S1) and P7 (S2) mice using an N-terminal anti-ALK antibody.
(E) WB analysis of ALK expression in conditioned media (CM) or cell lysates of NB cells with the N-terminal 8G7 anti-ALK antibody. SF, secreted extracellular fragment.
(F) Schematic illustration of the putative ECD cleavage site inferred from LC-MS/MS analysis. The red arrow indicates the cleavage position between amino acids 654 and 655.
(G) WB analysis of ALK in cell lysates from 293T cells engineered to express the shed fragment (ALK1–654) and CM from Kelly NB cells that express full-length, cleaved ALK using the 8G7 antibody. Negative controls, empty vector-expressing (MSCV) and untransfected cells (293T).
(H) WB analysis of ALK in 293T cells expressing wild-type (ALK WT) or engineered ALK variants. Negative controls, cells expressing the MSCV vector .
(I) Cell surface protein analysis of ALK in 293T cells engineered to express the indicated WT or mutant constructs. Cell surface proteins were labeled with sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin and isolated with streptavidin beads.
See also Figures S1, S2, and S3.
Figure 2.Insertion of the LF655del mutation inhibits ALK ECD cleavage in NB cells
(A) Electropherogram of the region in which the ALK LF655del mutation was introduced through biallelic CRISPR-cas9 editing.
(B) Representative phase contrast microscopy images of NGP NB cells in which the ECD cleavage site was genomically altered using CRISPR-cas9 editing (NGPALK(LF655del)). Controls, unedited NGP cells (NGP) and vector control (NGPCRISPR ctrl) cells. Scale bar, 25 µm.
(C) WB analysis of ALK expression in NGPALK(LF655del) or NGPCRISPR ctrl cells in which ALK WT (+ALK) or empty vector (+MSCV) was expressed. GAPDH was used as the loading control throughout.
(D) WB analysis of ALK and the indicated proteins in conditioned media (CM) or lysates from the same cells as in (B). The same cell lysates were used to perform the WB analysis shown in Figure 5F (in the same experiment); hence, ALK and GAPDH are the same for both blots.
(E) Representative immunofluorescence (IF) images of ALK expression in the same cells as in (B). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar,10 µm.
See also Figure S4.
Figure 3.Inhibition of ALK ECD cleavage suppresses migration and invasion of NB cells
(A) Representative crystal violet-stained images of transwell migration assays of the indicated cells (left). Scale bar, 100 µm. Quantification of cell migration determined by counting the number of migratory cells per field and calculating the relative numbers of modified to control cells (right). Values are reported as means ± SD; **p < 0.01, n = 3.
(B) Quantification of cell invasion in NGP cells in which cleavage was inhibited through genome editing (LF655del) versus control cells (NGP ctrl) and in cells in which ALK WT (LF655del + MSCV-ALK) or control vector (LF655del + MSCV) were expressed. Invasive capacity was quantified as means ± SD, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
(C) Representative phase-contrast microscopy images of wound healing in the indicated NGP cells at 0 and 48 h (left). Scale bar, 500 µm. Percentage of wound closure depicted as means ± SD, n = 12; **p < 0.01 (right).
(D and E) Crystal-violet-stained images of transwell migration of SK-N-AS (D) and CHP-212 (E) NB cells expressing the indicated ALK proteins (left). Empty vector, MSCV was used as a negative control. Scale bars, 100 µm. Quantification of cell migration (right). Values are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n = 3 for each panel.
See also Figures S5 and S6.
Figure 4.Inhibition of ALK ECD cleavage reduces NB cell migration in vivo
(A) Representative bioluminescence images (BLIs) of NOD/SCID mice 35 days after intracardiac injection of the indicated luciferase-labeled NGP NB cells (1 × 105 cells per animal).
(B) Comparison of bioluminescence in the animals described in (A) at day 20 and day 35 after injection. Bioluminescence was quantified as photon flux per second over time. The data are presented as means ± SEM, n = 7 mice per group; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
(C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival of mice in (A). Significance was calculated by the log-rank test (p = 0.006; n = 7 per group).
(D) Representative BLIs of NOD/SCID mice 42 days after tail-vein injection of the indicated luciferase-labeled NGP NB cells (5 × 105 per animal) (left). Comparison of bioluminescence quantified as in (B) at day 42 after injection (right). Data are presented as means ± SEM, *p < 0.05; n = 11 (NGPCRISPR ctrl), n = 9 (NGPALK(LF655del)).
(E) Representative BLIs of NOD/SCID mice 46 days after intracardiac injection of 1 × 105 luciferase-labeled SK-N-AS NB cells expressing ALK WT (n = 5) and the ALK LF655del CSM (n = 4) (left). Comparison of bioluminescence at day 46 (right). Data are presented as means ± SEM, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.Inhibition of ALK ECD cleavage leads to a downregulated EMT signature
(A) Volcano plot showing gene-expression changes between NGPCRISPR ctrl and NGPALK(LF655del) cells. Downregulated transcripts, 0.26%; upregulated transcripts, 0.21% (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05; fold change > 2). The x axis represents the fold change in gene expression (log2 ratio of NGPALK(LF655del) versus NGPCRISPR ctrl) and the y axis, the −log10 (adjusted p value). Dashed red lines denote the selected 2-fold change cutoff, whereas the green line denotes the selected p value cutoff.
(B) GSEA plot of an EMT signature in NGPALK(LF655del) versus NGPCRISPR ctrl cells. NES, normalized enrichment scores.
(C) Heatmap of the top 100 genes differentially expressed between NGPALK(LF655del) cells and NGPCRISPR ctrl cells. The highest ranked upregulated (yellow) and downregulated (blue) genes are listed.
(D) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of selected differentially expressed genes in NGPALK(LF655del) versus NGPCRISPR ctrl cells. Data were normalized to GAPDH. Quantification is shown as log2-normalized fold change. Error bars represent means ± SD (n = 3 replicates).
(E) GO analysis of significantly up- or downregulated genes in NGPALK(LF655del) versus NGPCRISPR ctrl cells. ‘‘Negative regulation of neuron migration’’ comprised the most-enriched category in NGPALK(LF655del) cells (> 40-fold; p = 3.93e−6).
(F) WB analysis of ALK and the indicated EMT markers in NGPALK(LF655del) versus NGPCRISPR ctrl cells. Unedited cells (NGP) were used as a reference. GAPDH was used as a loading control.
Figure 6.ALK ECD cleavage affects EMT gene expression through changes in nuclear β-catenin localization
(A) WB analysis of co-immunoprecipitated (co-IP) ALK and β-catenin in 293T cells engineered to express WT or the indicated mutant ALK constructs and immunoprecipitated with an anti-ALK C-terminal antibody. IB, immunoblot.
(B) WB analysis of β-catenin in subcellular fractions and total cell lysates of the indicated NB cells. Lamin B1 expression was used as a control for the nuclear fraction.
(C) IF analysis of β-catenin expression in the indicated cells (left). Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Red, β-catenin. Scale bar,10 µm. Quantification of β-catenin signal in the nucleus (right); ****p < 0.0001, n = 84 cells per group; two independent replicates; Student t test.
(D) WB analysis of total and phospho-β-catenin in total cell lysates of the indicated cells. GAPDH used as a loading control.
(E) ChIP-qPCR analysis of β-catenin and TCF4 occupancy at putative TCF4/LEF/TCF-4E binding sites of the indicated gene promoters in NGPCRISPR ctrl and NGPALK(LF655del) cells. Numbers on the x axis indicate the genomic locations of the putative TCF4 sites with reference to the transcription start sites. Data represent means ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates (blue dots). *p < 0.05; one-tailed Welch’s t test.
Figure 7.ALK ECD cleavage is mediated by MMP-9 whose inhibition suppresses cell migration
(A) WB analysis of ALK expression in lysates and CM of NGP cells treated with the broad-spectrum protease inhibitor GM6001 and the MMP-9/13 inhibitor CAS 204140–01-2 at the indicated doses, for 12 h. Untreated (U) or DMSO-treated cells were used as controls. The 8G7 N-terminal anti-ALK antibody was used to detect the shed fragment in CM and a C-terminal anti-ALK antibody used for the cell lysates in this and subsequent panels. β-actin is used as a loading control throughout.
(B) WB analysis of ALK expression in NGP cells treated with the MMP-9 (CTK8G1150) and MMP-3/12/13 (MMP408) inhibitors (2 µM × 12 h).
(C) WB analysis of ALK expression in the indicated NB cell lines treated with or without CTK8G1150 (2 µM × 12 h).
(D) WB analysis of MMP-9 and ALK expression in NGP and BE (2)-C NB cells expressing either a control shRNA (shGFP) or two different shRNAs against MMP-9.
(E) Crystal-violet-stained images of NGP and IMR-5 NB cells treated with CTK8G1150 (2 µM) or DMSO for 16 h and then subjected to transwell migration assays for 48 h (left). Scale bar, 100 µm. Quantification of migration (right) reported as means ± SD; **p < 0.01, n = 4.
See also Figure S7.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#2118; RRID: AB_561053 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-ALK (4C5B8) | Life Technologies | Cat#354300; RRID: AB_2533203 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-ALK (C26G7) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#3333; RRID: AB_836862 |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-Phospho-ALK (Tyr1507) | Abcam | Cat#ab73996; RRID: AB_2226754 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-ALK (Tyr1604) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#3341; RRID: AB_331047 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-E-Cadherin (24E10) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#3195; RRID: AB_2291471 |
| Rabbit Polyclonal anti-β-Actin | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#4967; RRID: AB_330288 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-p44/42 MAPK | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#4695; RRID: AB_390779 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-p44/42 MAPK(Thr202/Tyr204) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#4377; RRID: AB_331775 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Stat3 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#4904; RRID: AB_331269 |
| Rabbit Polyclonal anti-Phospho-Stat3(Tyr705) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#9131; RRID: AB_331586 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Akt | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#4691; RRID: AB_915783 |
| Rabbit Polyclonal anti-Phospho-Akt (Ser473) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#9271; RRID: AB_329825 |
| Rabbit Polyclonal anti-Phospho-Akt (Thr308) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#9275; RRID: AB_329828 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-ALK (F-12) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-398791; RRID: AB_2889357 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Snail | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 3879; RRID: AB_2255011 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Slug | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 9585; RRID: AB_2239535 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-N-Cadherin | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#13116; RRID: AB_2687616 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-MMP-9 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#13667; RRID: AB_2798289 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-HA-Tag (C29F4) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 3724; RRID: AB_1549585 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-DYKDDDDK Tag(D6W5B) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#14793; RRID: AB_2572291 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-ADAM10 | Abcam | Cat#ab73402; RRID: AB_10562808 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-ADAM17 | Abcam | Cat#ab57484; RRID: AB_940131 |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-β-Catenin (D10A8) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 8480; RRID: AB_11127855 |
| Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, Biotin Conjugate | Thermo Fisher | Cat#65–6140; RRID: AB_2533969 |
| Alexa Fluor 568 Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG | Thermo Fisher | Cat#A10037; RRID: AB_2534013 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-ALK 8G7 | This paper | N/A |
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
| DH5α | Thermo Fisher | Cat# 18265017 |
| Stbl3 | Life Technologies | Cat# C7373–03 |
| Biological samples | ||
| Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) tumor tissue | St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (CRH) | SJNBL046148_X1 |
| Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) tumor tissue | St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital | SJNBL013761_1 |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| Full-length recombinant human MMP-9 | Biolegend | Cat# 551102 |
| CTK8G1150 | Millipore | Cat#444278; CAS 1177749–58-4 |
| CAS 204140–01-2 | Millipore | Cat# 444252 |
| GM6001 | Enzo Life Sciences | Cat# 89158–002 |
| MMP408 | Millipore | Cat#444291; CAS 1258003–93-8 |
| Streptavidin-TXRD | SouthernBiotech | Cat#7100–07; RRID: AB_2533969 |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay | Promega | Cat# G7573 |
| SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase | Thermo Fisher | Cat# 18080044 |
| QIAamp DNA mini Kit | QIAGEN | Cat# 51304 |
| QCM ECMatrix Cell Invasion Assay | MilliporeSigma | Cat# ECM554 |
| 24-Well Translucent Cell Culture Inserts | Falcon | Cat# 353097 |
| FLAG® M Purification Kit -For Mammalian expression systems | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# CELLMM2 |
| Lipofectamine 3000 | Life Technologies | Cat# L3000015 |
| QuikChange XL II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit | Agilent Technologies | Cat# 200522 |
| Pierce Cell surface protein isolation kit | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 89881 |
| mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit | Life Technologies | Cat# AM1561 |
| QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR kit | QIAGEN | Cat# 204057 |
| Universal Tyrosine Kinase Assay Kit | Takara | Cat# MK410 |
| DC protein assay kit | Bio-Rad | Cat# 500–0111 |
| Deposited data | ||
| Microarray data | This paper | GEO: GSE140025 |
| Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
| Human: HEK293T | ATCC | CRL-3216 |
| Human: NGP: | Children’s Oncology Group | N/A |
| Human: Kelly: | Children’s Oncology Group | N/A |
| Human: IMR-5: | Children’s Oncology Group | N/A |
| Human: BE(2)-C: | ATCC | CRL-2268 |
| Human: NBL-S | Children’s Oncology Group | N/A |
| Human: SH-SY5Y | Children’s Oncology Group | CRL-226 |
| Mouse: NIH 3T3 | ATCC | CRL-1658 |
| Human: SK-N-AS | Children’s Oncology Group | N/A |
| Human: CHP-212 | ATCC | CRL-2273 |
| Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains | ||
| Mouse: C57BL/6J | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 000664 |
| Mouse: NOD/SCID | UHN (University Health Network) | N/A |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| Primers and Oligonucleotides see | ||
| Recombinant DNA | ||
| pcDNA3.1-ALK-HA | This paper | N/A |
| pcDNA3.1-ALK LF655del –HA | This paper | N/A |
| pTT-FAM150A-HA | N/A | |
| pcDNA3-FAM150B-HA | N/A | |
| TGL reporter | N/A | |
| pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459) V2 | Addgene plasmid: Cat# 62988; RRID: Addgene_62988 | |
| PX459-ALK-gRNA | This paper | N/A |
| pLKO.1-puro eGFP shRNA Control Plasmid | Sigma | Cat# SHC005 |
| MSCV-ALK | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK LF655del | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK 655–1604 | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK Δ1–654 | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK p140 | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK D636–682 | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-FLAG-ALK | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-FLAG-ALK LF655del | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK F656D | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-LF655RD | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-LF655FY | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-NLF655KRD | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK KSRNLF651del | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK KSRNLFER651del | This paper | N/A |
| MSCV-ALK ECD del | This paper | N/A |
| pcDNA3.1-ALK | This paper | N/A |
| pcDNA3.1-ALK L655K | This paper | N/A |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| GraphPad Prism 7.0 and 8.0 | GraphPad | |
| PANTHER Classification System | PANTHER Classification System | |
| GSEA | Broad Institute | |
| Scaffold | Proteome Software, Inc | |
| ImageJ | ||
| PROSPER | Monash University;: | |
| FlowJo | FlowJo LLC | |