| Literature DB >> 34260922 |
Neha R Dhoke1, Hyunkee Kim1, Sridhar Selvaraj1, Karim Azzag1, Haowen Zhou2, Nelio A J Oliveira1, Sudheer Tungtur1, Carolina Ortiz-Cordero1, James Kiley1, Qi Long Lu3, Anne G Bang2, Rita C R Perlingeiro4.
Abstract
Mutations in the fukutin-related protein (FKRP) gene result in a broad spectrum of muscular dystrophy (MD) phenotypes, including the severe Walker-Warburg syndrome (WWS). Here, we develop a gene-editing approach that replaces the entire mutant open reading frame with the wild-type sequence to universally correct all FKRP mutations. We apply this approach to correct FKRP mutations in induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells derived from patients displaying broad clinical severity. Our findings show rescue of functional α-dystroglycan (α-DG) glycosylation in gene-edited WWS iPS cell-derived myotubes. Transplantation of gene-corrected myogenic progenitors in the FKRPP448L-NSG mouse model gives rise to myofiber and satellite cell engraftment and, importantly, restoration of α-DG functional glycosylation in vivo. These findings suggest the potential feasibility of using CRISPR-Cas9 technology in combination with patient-specific iPS cells for the future development of autologous cell transplantation for FKRP-associated MDs.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; FKRP mutations; WWS; gene editing; muscle engraftment; patient-specific iPS cells; phenotype rescue; satellite cell engraftment; universal correction; α-dystroglycan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34260922 PMCID: PMC8327854 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Impact factor: 9.423
Figure 1.Phenotype of FKRP mutant myotubes derived from patient-specific and isogenic iPS cells
(A) Representative western blot for IIH6 in myotubes from FKRP mutant patient-specific and control iPS cell lines. MHC and β-DG were used as differentiation and loading controls, respectively. The right panel shows wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) pull-down for these samples and representative laminin overlay assay (LOA) of WGA elutes.
(B) Scheme shows the gene-editing strategy used to insert a WWS-associated FKRP mutation in control iPS cell lines.
(C) Western blot for IIH6 in myotubes from WWS FKRP mutant isogenic iPS cell lines. Results from control 1 (WT, mutant bulk, and clones C7 and C12) and control 2 (WT, mutant bulk, and clones C8 and C10) iPS cell lines are shown in the left and right panels, respectively. MHC and β-DG were used as differentiation and loading controls, respectively. The center panel shows the IIH6 immunoblot in WGA pull-downs. Representative LOA of WGA elutes shows loss of laminin binding in WWS-associated FKRP mutant myotubes (lower panels).
Figure 2.Validation of WWS phenotype in vivo
Representative images show the engraftment of myogenic progenitors derived from WWS FKRP mutant isogenic (WT and mutant clones C7 and C12) and FP4 patient-specific iPS cell lines upon their transplantation into TA muscles of FKRPP448L-NSG mice.
(A) Immunostaining for human DYSTROPHIN (DYS, in red) and human LAMIN A/C (LMNA, in green). DAPI in blue stains nuclei. PBS and non-transplanted muscle served as negative controls. Scale bar, 200 μm.
(B) Immunostaining for IIH6 (in purple) in combination with LMNA (in green). DAPI stains nuclei (in blue). PBS and non-transplanted muscle served as negative controls. Scale bar, 200 μm.
(C) Graph shows the quantification of the total number of donor-derived IIH6+/LMNA+ myofibers in TA muscles that had been transplanted with myogenic progenitors differentiated from control 1 (n = 12), MUT C7 (n = 4), MUT C12 (n = 4), and FP4 (n = 18) iPS cells. Data are shown as means ± SEMs. ****p < 0.0001 by ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s test.
Figure 3.Gene correction of FP4 patient-specific iPS cells
(A) Schematic of the universal gene-editing strategy for correction of FKRP mutations through HDR-based gene knockin.
(B) Flow cytometry analysis for IIH6 in uncorrected and corrected (bulk and C40) FP4 iPS cells.
(C) Representative images show immunostaining for MHC (left) and IIH6 (right) in myotubes derived from gene-corrected FP4 (C40) iPS cells. Myotubes from uncorrected FP4 and control 1 iPS cells served as negative and positive controls, respectively. DAPI stains nuclei (in blue). Scale bar, 200 μm.
(D) Western blot and LOA show rescue of functional α-DG glycosylation in gene-corrected FP4 (C40) iPS cell-derived myotubes, as shown by IIH6 positivity and laminin binding (lower panel). MHC and β-DG were used as differentiation and loading controls, respectively.
Figure 4.Transplantation of gene-corrected FP4 iPS cell-derived myogenic progenitors into FKRP mutant mice rescues functional glycosylation of α-DG
(A) Representative images show the engraftment of gene-corrected FP4 (C40) iPS cell-derived myogenic progenitors following their transplantation into TA muscles of FKRPP448L-NSG mice. The left panel shows immunostaining for human DYS (in red) and human LMNA (in green), whereas the right panel shows immunostaining for IIH6 (in purple) in combination with LMNA (in green). PBS and non-transplanted muscle served as negative controls. DAPI stains nuclei (in blue). Scale bar, 200 μm.
(B) Graph shows the total number of donor-derived myofibers, IIH6+/LMNA+, in TA muscles that had been transplanted with myogenic progenitors differentiated from gene-corrected FP4 (C40) iPS cells. Data are shown as the mean of 3 independent transplantation experiments ± SEM (n = 18 mice).
(C and D) Immunofluorescence staining for satellite cells.
(C) Representative images show donor-derived satellite cell engraftment in TA muscles transplanted with gene-edited FP4 (C40) iPS cell-derived myogenic progenitors, as shown by the presence of human LMNA+ (in red)/PAX7+ (in green) cells localized beneath the basal lamina (upper panel).
(D) Representative images indicate a recipient PAX7+/LMNA− satellite cell. Scale bar, 10 μm.
(E) Percentage of PAX7+/LMNA+ (donor-derived) and PAX7+/LMNA− (recipient-derived) cells per muscle section in mice that had been transplanted with gene-edited FP4 (C40) iPS cell-derived myogenic progenitors. Data are shown as means ± SEMs (n = 8 mice).
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Anti-alpha dystroglycan (mouse monoclonal) | Millipore | Cat# 05–593; RRID: AB_309828 |
| Anti-alpha dystroglycan (mouse monoclonal) | DSHB | Cat# IIH6 C4; RRID: AB_261721 |
| Anti-MHC (mouse monoclonal) | DSHB | Cat# MF20; RRID: AB_21477 |
| Anti-laminin (rabbit polyclonal) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# L9393; RRID: AB_47716 |
| Anti-beta dystroglycan, concentrated (mouse monoclonal) | DSHB | Cat# MANDAG2 clone 7D11; RRID: AB_221177 |
| Anti-OCT3/4 (mouse monoclonal) | SCBT | Cat# C-10; RRID: AB_62805 |
| Anti-SOX2 (goat polyclonal) | SCBT | Cat# Y-17; RRID: AB_228668 |
| Anti-NANOG (mouse monoclonal) | SCBT | Cat# H-2; RRID: AB_1091825 |
| Anti-SSEA4 (mouse monoclonal) | SCBT | Cat# sc-21704; RRID: AB_62828 |
| Alexa fluor 555 goat anti-mouse IgG (goat polyclonal) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A-21424; RRID: AB_141780 |
| Alexa fluor 647 goat anti-mouse IgM (goat polyclonal) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A-21238; RRID: AB_2535807 |
| Goat Anti-Mouse IgG+IgM H&L (HRP) preadsorbed | Abcam | Cat# ab47827; RRID: AB_955398 |
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
| One shot Top 10 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# C404006 |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| CHIR99021 | Tocris | Cat# 4423 |
| LDN193189 | Cayman chemical | Cat# 19396 |
| SB431542 | Cayman chemical | Cat# 13031 |
| DAPT | Cayman chemical | Cat# 13197 |
| Dexamethasone | Cayman chemical | Cat# 11015 |
| Forskolin | Cayman chemical | Cat# 11018 |
| Doxycycline | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# D989 |
| Geneticin Selective Antibiotic (G418 Sulfate) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#10131035 |
| Ganciclovir (GCV) | InvivoGen | Sud-gcv |
| Recombinant human FGF-basic | Peprotech | Cat# 100–18 |
| Experimental models: cell lines | ||
| FP4 | This study. Available upon request: Anne Bang, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute | FP4 |
| FP3 | This study. Available upon request: Anne Bang, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute | FP3 |
| CDI73 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | CDI73 |
| Control 1 | PMID:22560081 available from the Rita Perlingeiro lab | PLZ |
| Control 2 | PMID:26411904 available from the RUCDR Infinite Biologics | TC1133 |
| Control 1 MUT C7 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | PLZ-C7 |
| Control 1 MUT C12 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | PLZ-C12 |
| Control 2 MUT C8 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | TC1133-C8 |
| Control 2 MUT C12 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | TC1133-C12 |
| FP4 C40 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | FP4-corrected |
| FP4 Scar-Free | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | FP4-SF-corrected |
| CDI73 C22 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | CDI73 HDR C22 |
| FP3 C6 | This study. Available upon request: Rita Perlingeiro, University of Minnesota | FP3 HDR C6 |
| Experimental models: organisms/strains | ||
| NSG | Jackson Laboratories | NSG™ (NOD. |
| FKRP-NSG | FKRPP448L-NSG | |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| 5′ gRNA CCGCATGGGGCCGAAGTCTG | Synthego | N/A |
| 3′gRNA ACCCCCGAAAAACAAAGGCG | Synthego | N/A |
| Full length FP: GAATGTGGAGGGGAGTGTCCTAAGGTT | This study | N/A |
| Full Length RP: CTGCTAAGTGGGTCTCCAAGCCCC | This study | N/A |
| Knock in-specific PCR FP: GAATGTGGAGGGGAGTGTCCTAAGGTT | This study | N/A |
| Knock in-specific PCR RP: TGGCGGCAAACCC GTTGCGAAAAAGA | This study | N/A |
| FKRP exon 4-Poly SV40 FP:TGCCCGAGCTGGTAGACTCC | This study | N/A |
| FKRP exon 4-Poly SV40 RP: CACACCTCCCCCTGAACCTG | This study | N/A |
| FKRP Exon 4 FP:TGCCCGAGCTGGTAGACTCC | This study | N/A |
| FKRP Exon 4 RP: CCCAGCTCACTAGGCGGATG | This study | N/A |
| ACTB FP:GCGACGAGGCCCAGAGCAAG | This study | N/A |
| ACTB RP: TGGCCGTCAGGCAGCTCGTA | This study | N/A |
| Recombinant DNA | ||
| HDR Donor Vector | This study | Intron 3 5′HA-Exon 4 FKRP Exon4 3′HA |
| HDR Mutant Donor Vector | This study | Intron 3 5′HA-Exon 4-FKRP SF Exon4 3′HA |
| HDR Scar Free Donor Vector | This study | Intron 3 5′HA-Exon 4-FKRP MUT Exon4 3′HA |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| ImageJ | ||
| Zen Lite | Zeiss Microscopy | |
| GraphPad Prism | GraphPad Software, LLC | RRID: SCR_002798 |
| TIDE: Tracking of Indels by DEcomposition |