Literature DB >> 3426089

The broken nose: does familiarity breed neglect?

J A Crowther1, G M O'Donoghue.   

Abstract

A questionnaire method was used to assess the ability of early primary reduction to treat the fractured nose. Questionnaires were sent to one hundred and twenty eight such patients of whom eighty five (66%) replied. Seventy two (85%) of the patients expressed satisfaction with their nasal appearance with only thirteen (15%) requesting corrective surgery. Thirty one patients (36%) experienced nasal obstruction following reduction and of those, eighteen (21%) wished to undergo further surgery. In a separate study the cause of nasal deformity in fifty five patients undergoing septorhinoplasty was ascertained. In thirty six of these patients (65.5%) the deformity resulted from a neglected nasal injury. The value and limitations of early primary reduction of nasal fractures is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3426089      PMCID: PMC2498522     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  4 in total

1.  One thousand maxillo-facial and related fractures at the ENT-clinic in Gothenburg. A two-year prospective study.

Authors:  K Lundin; A Ridell; N Sandberg; A Ohman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Nasal fractures. Their occurrence, management and some late results.

Authors:  M F Mayell
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1973-01

3.  The treatment of nasal injuries by manipulation.

Authors:  J A Murray; A G Maran
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Open v closed reduction of the fractured nose.

Authors:  J A Murray; A G Maran; I J Mackenzie; G Raab
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1984-12
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Management of nasal injuries by UK accident and emergency consultants: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  C Coulson; R De
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Evaluation and reduction of nasal trauma.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Cara R Downey; Samuel Stal
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Nasal trauma: Primary reconstruction with open rhinoplasty.

Authors:  I Konstantinidis; H Malliari; S Metaxas
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

4.  Nasal Trauma: Who Nose what happens to the non-manipulated?

Authors:  N Hope; K Young; K Mclaughlin; C Smyth
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2021-02-26

5.  Patient aesthetic satisfaction with timing of nasal fracture manipulation.

Authors:  Sunil Dutt Sharma; Ivor Kwame; John Almeyda
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-02

6.  Comparison of Double Lateral Osteotomy and Asymmetric Dorsal Hump Reduction in Correction of Crooked Nose.

Authors:  Ali Goljanian Tabrizi; Matin Ghazizadeh; Behrouz Barati; Sara Nouri
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.