BACKGROUND: Technology to restore the ability to communicate in paralyzed persons who cannot speak has the potential to improve autonomy and quality of life. An approach that decodes words and sentences directly from the cerebral cortical activity of such patients may represent an advancement over existing methods for assisted communication. METHODS: We implanted a subdural, high-density, multielectrode array over the area of the sensorimotor cortex that controls speech in a person with anarthria (the loss of the ability to articulate speech) and spastic quadriparesis caused by a brain-stem stroke. Over the course of 48 sessions, we recorded 22 hours of cortical activity while the participant attempted to say individual words from a vocabulary set of 50 words. We used deep-learning algorithms to create computational models for the detection and classification of words from patterns in the recorded cortical activity. We applied these computational models, as well as a natural-language model that yielded next-word probabilities given the preceding words in a sequence, to decode full sentences as the participant attempted to say them. RESULTS: We decoded sentences from the participant's cortical activity in real time at a median rate of 15.2 words per minute, with a median word error rate of 25.6%. In post hoc analyses, we detected 98% of the attempts by the participant to produce individual words, and we classified words with 47.1% accuracy using cortical signals that were stable throughout the 81-week study period. CONCLUSIONS: In a person with anarthria and spastic quadriparesis caused by a brain-stem stroke, words and sentences were decoded directly from cortical activity during attempted speech with the use of deep-learning models and a natural-language model. (Funded by Facebook and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698149.).
BACKGROUND: Technology to restore the ability to communicate in paralyzed persons who cannot speak has the potential to improve autonomy and quality of life. An approach that decodes words and sentences directly from the cerebral cortical activity of such patients may represent an advancement over existing methods for assisted communication. METHODS: We implanted a subdural, high-density, multielectrode array over the area of the sensorimotor cortex that controls speech in a person with anarthria (the loss of the ability to articulate speech) and spastic quadriparesis caused by a brain-stem stroke. Over the course of 48 sessions, we recorded 22 hours of cortical activity while the participant attempted to say individual words from a vocabulary set of 50 words. We used deep-learning algorithms to create computational models for the detection and classification of words from patterns in the recorded cortical activity. We applied these computational models, as well as a natural-language model that yielded next-word probabilities given the preceding words in a sequence, to decode full sentences as the participant attempted to say them. RESULTS: We decoded sentences from the participant's cortical activity in real time at a median rate of 15.2 words per minute, with a median word error rate of 25.6%. In post hoc analyses, we detected 98% of the attempts by the participant to produce individual words, and we classified words with 47.1% accuracy using cortical signals that were stable throughout the 81-week study period. CONCLUSIONS: In a person with anarthria and spastic quadriparesis caused by a brain-stem stroke, words and sentences were decoded directly from cortical activity during attempted speech with the use of deep-learning models and a natural-language model. (Funded by Facebook and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698149.).
Authors: Leigh R Hochberg; Mijail D Serruya; Gerhard M Friehs; Jon A Mukand; Maryam Saleh; Abraham H Caplan; Almut Branner; David Chen; Richard D Penn; John P Donoghue Journal: Nature Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Vikram R Rao; Matthew K Leonard; Jonathan K Kleen; Ben A Lucas; Emily A Mirro; Edward F Chang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Emily M Mugler; Matthew C Tate; Karen Livescu; Jessica W Templer; Matthew A Goldrick; Marc W Slutzky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Frank H Guenther; Jonathan S Brumberg; E Joseph Wright; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Jason A Tourville; Mikhail Panko; Robert Law; Steven A Siebert; Jess L Bartels; Dinal S Andreasen; Princewill Ehirim; Hui Mao; Philip R Kennedy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mariska J Vansteensel; Elmar G M Pels; Erik J Aarnoutse; Martin G Bleichner; Mariana P Branco; Timothy Denison; Zachary V Freudenburg; Peter Gosselaar; Sacha Leinders; Thomas H Ottens; Max A Van Den Boom; Peter C Van Rijen; Nick F Ramsey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-11-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander A Aabedi; Benjamin Lipkin; Jasleen Kaur; Sofia Kakaizada; Claudia Valdivia; Sheantel Reihl; Jacob S Young; Anthony T Lee; Saritha Krishna; Mitchel S Berger; Edward F Chang; David Brang; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David A Handelman; Luke E Osborn; Tessy M Thomas; Andrew R Badger; Margaret Thompson; Robert W Nickl; Manuel A Anaya; Jared M Wormley; Gabriela L Cantarero; David McMullen; Nathan E Crone; Brock Wester; Pablo A Celnik; Matthew S Fifer; Francesco V Tenore Journal: Front Neurorobot Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.493
Authors: Sarah K Wandelt; Spencer Kellis; David A Bjånes; Kelsie Pejsa; Brian Lee; Charles Liu; Richard A Andersen Journal: Neuron Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 18.688
Authors: Blake S Wilson; Debara L Tucci; David A Moses; Edward F Chang; Nancy M Young; Fan-Gang Zeng; Nicholas A Lesica; Andrés M Bur; Hannah Kavookjian; Caroline Mussatto; Joseph Penn; Sara Goodwin; Shannon Kraft; Guanghui Wang; Jonathan M Cohen; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Geraldine Dawson; Howard W Francis Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2022-04-20
Authors: Timothée Proix; Jaime Delgado Saa; Andy Christen; Stephanie Martin; Brian N Pasley; Robert T Knight; Xing Tian; David Poeppel; Werner K Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Luc H Arnal; Pierre Mégevand; Anne-Lise Giraud Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 17.694